TL Mafia XLIV - Page 44

On August 23 2011 04:29 wherebugsgo wrote:


Where in that post did I suggest you were mafia?

On August 21 2011 03:49 xtfftc wrote:

I expected supersoft to be superhappy about this but noone else. Sevryn is basically dead, one way or another. No mafia will be dumb enough to protect him anymore and the townies are aware that going after anyone else now would look suspicious. But in case Sevryn gets modkilled, we need to use the opportunity for two town kills.

On August 23 2011 04:40 VisceraEyes wrote:


Scum-slip bolded! Scum-slip bolded! Self-admitted scum everyone!

RayzorFlash just made a nice ninja vote on Hiro.

I will answer to QuickSilver in a separate post because this one is long enough anyway.

If I don't answer QuickSilver, people will claim that I have nothing to say in my defense.
If I don't analyse Sevyrn, I will be accused of not contributing.

I will try to do both as there is enough time before the deadline but this is exactly what Mafia want us to do - discuss a number of targets instead of a single one.

On August 21 2011 03:49 xtfftc wrote:

I expected supersoft to be superhappy about this but noone else. Sevryn is basically dead, one way or another. No mafia will be dumb enough to protect him anymore and the townies are aware that going after anyone else now would look suspicious. But in case Sevryn gets modkilled, we need to use the opportunity for two town kills.

On August 23 2011 04:30 xtfftc wrote:

And while he is working on it, how about you sharing your thoughts on my persona? The first time you ever mentioned me was when you voted for my lynching.

On August 20 2011 05:09 xtfftc wrote:
##Vote: Palmar

He obviously had something in mind and there's no way he wasn't aware of how his accusations would be perceived by the rest of us.

However, his strategy hasn't benefited town by now. He has until the deadline to convince me to vote DropBear or BrownBear. If nothing meaningful comes out of the discussion initiated by him, I'd rather have one less player who throws arbitrary accusations around.

I'd also like to point out that it shouldn't be that difficult to convince me to switch to DropBear, considering DropBear's behaviour.

On August 22 2011 17:51 Mig wrote:
Chaoser you are technically correct but really you are twisting my words around to try and make me appear scummy. Not all meta arguments are the same, you didn't see me disagreeing with other meta arguments foolish had made in the thread. But his meta argument about how my "attitude" was different and therefore mafia was incorrect. He provided no examples of me acting that way as mafia and that attitude hadn't done anything to hurt the town. My meta argument against you was completely different. As town I have seen you dominate and put a ton of effort into scum hunting. This game I see you writing complete fluff posts and providing no analysis while making an excuse for being busy. Anyone can look at your play in mafia 39 and see how different it is compared to this game. Foolishness' meta argument didn't show one way or the other whether I was town and it didn't show how I was harming the town with my play however your play style is a complete 180 from your normal town play and is considerably worse than normal for you.

So instead of providing any real analysis this game you started off with A) writing fluff posts B) voted for me basically just saying yea I agree with foolish then disappeared before the lynch and now C) you are twisting my words around to make me appear scummy when it should be obvious how different my argument was from the one foolish made.

#Vote: chaoser

On August 23 2011 04:33 xtfftc wrote:

You didn't, I was responding to the whole page. The hostility in some of the posts is clearly visible, I believe.

On August 23 2011 04:22 hiro protagonist wrote:


I have no idea what your trying to say Vain...

On August 23 2011 04:53 Vain wrote:


He asked me if i meant what xtffc said. To me it was pretty clear but i guess not to everyone. So to be clear: Yes, if we agree on a single target and direct vigilante's to them you have a big chance mafia just protects them. but i think we wasted too much posts on that subject already.

On August 23 2011 04:40 VisceraEyes wrote:


Scum-slip bolded! Scum-slip bolded! Self-admitted scum everyone!

On August 23 2011 04:43 wherebugsgo wrote:


God damn it you posted this before my analysis I WANTED TO BE FIRST

On August 23 2011 04:52 VisceraEyes wrote:
hiro, he actually backpedaled on Palmar. Why are you defending Palmar against someone who didn't really find him all that suspicious?

On August 23 2011 04:56 Jackal58 wrote:

Where did Hiro defend Palmar?

On August 23 2011 04:50 hiro protagonist wrote:

well, there's this:



yeah, If I was scum, I wouldn't want someone around that randomly accusing people ether. I mean, why would you want anyone to do something that puts pressure on scum, right?

On August 23 2011 04:57 VisceraEyes wrote:
hiro - I say we take a hard look at VAIN and lynch XTC. I'll even put my vote on it if you'll agree. Vain is the very picture of inactive and is more worth a random bullet some random night than a lynch. We should use our lynch for people we're relatively certain is scum...and your post reads more like you're more certain that XT is scum. So why not lynch scum instead of an inactive that 'makes your scumdar go crazy'...he hasn't posted enough for us to ACTUALLY divine his alignment, let's give him that opportunity...or make him eat a bullet.

On August 23 2011 04:55 xtfftc wrote:




Mod kill = a kill made by a mod.
Mafia kill = a kill made by the mafia.
Town kill = a kill made by the town.