| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Kenpachi is that flaky every game, it was really easy to mislynch him day 1 in a similar scenario @ steamship mafia. You are better than that, and should be proud to live up to the higher standards you set for yourself. That said, I'm not in favour of lynching you, it's just an elaborate no. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
”Adam, I’m curious if you are still for cheese” I missed this line because of the whole “–town” debacle that occurred right after it. And the answer is… No, I've since put my vote on Protactinium. I don’t trust cheese since a large portion of his posts have been shitty. He can change my mind by doing some great analysis though. GGQ: You’ve had some experience playing with Palmar, should we hang him based on his meta of being obstructive and lazy as scum? Jackal58: In your last post, you agreed with Nisani201 that lynching Palmar based off of meta alone is a stupid idea. Do you feel that Palmar should warrant a ‘stay of execution’ until day 2 so we can better determine his alignment? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On January 14 2012 19:52 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Palmar, you know you're playing bad, I know you're playing bad, WBG knows you're playing bad. Right now I think you were trying to see who jumped on you for your play. Gambit's over, it's time for you to be useful. And the fact that you compare yourself to kenpachi should really indicate that you've taken this little game as far as it's gonna run. Tell us what you learned by doing what you did. Who cares, why am scummy for not posting and other people aren't. Explain it. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On January 14 2012 19:52 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Palmar, you know you're playing bad, I know you're playing bad, WBG knows you're playing bad. Right now I think you were trying to see who jumped on you for your play. Gambit's over, it's time for you to be useful. And the fact that you compare yourself to kenpachi should really indicate that you've taken this little game as far as it's gonna run. Tell us what you learned by doing what you did. this is definitely not a gambit, not after the way the previous games unfolded for Palmar. Steamship, XLVII, XLVIII, and another one that I will not name. Palmar KNOWS that the #1 priority for any and every townie day 1 is to establish his or her own innocence. He has failed to do anything to even come close to that. With less than 24 hours left in the day we don't have time to screw around anymore. We kill him today. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On January 14 2012 19:57 Palmar wrote: Wherebugsgo, can you summarize your case against me in one post so I can break it down and tell you why you're dumb and bad, possibly scum. I don't explain shit to scum | ||
|
Macpo
453 Posts
Mr Wiggles, a good town, but he just doesn't want to be on the stage too much, so I guess the mayor role doesn't suit him very well. BC: way too unclear and risky for me; he is trying too much stuff, going for a thousand contradictory stuff, taking back what he said and so on. Bill has shown a lot of presence, and has made reasonable analyses, plus he is not afraid. That's enough for me up to now, I think we won't have better than that. To those complaining about me being rational, it's getting obvious that they prefer random one line crap to argumentation. I'll answer back when they'll meet my standards. Also, I changed my mind on Cybercheese, as he opened my eyes on the the BC case. To bill: some people here have NOT posted yet at all!! I feel fine about lynching sandroba, as he acts quite scummy, but I suggest that if you are elected, you lynch someone who has not talked yet. statistics we'll be that it is mafia. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
Of course not, if you did it might actually come apparent that you don't have a case. | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
Explain it to me then. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
go read my filter in one word, meta. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
So, knowing each game is a different game, and that meta is not valid unless it's applied very precisely (you can't say something like x has posted less than usual, what's important is how, why and what he has posted), you still think that you have a valid enough case? Would you bet your abilities as a player on this case? | ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On January 14 2012 20:08 Palmar wrote: So, knowing each game is a different game, and that meta is not valid unless it's applied very precisely (you can't say something like x has posted less than usual, what's important is how, why and what he has posted), you still think that you have a valid enough case? Would you bet your abilities as a player on this case? Hey Palmar Why small posts instead of normal ones? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On January 14 2012 20:16 Palmar wrote: Cause I feel like it Kurumi. Why are we derping Day 1 instead of doing something useful? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On January 14 2012 20:18 Palmar wrote: Day 1 has two goals, getting someone I want in office, and killing someone I want to kill. Incog and Ciryandor fit the bill, my work is done here. Wait, You want Incog elected and Ciry killed or both of them killed? | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On January 14 2012 19:54 Adam4167 wrote: EchelonTee: ”Adam, I’m curious if you are still for cheese” I missed this line because of the whole “–town” debacle that occurred right after it. And the answer is… No, I've since put my vote on Protactinium. I don’t trust cheese since a large portion of his posts have been shitty. He can change my mind by doing some great analysis though. GGQ: You’ve had some experience playing with Palmar, should we hang him based on his meta of being obstructive and lazy as scum? Jackal58: In your last post, you agreed with Nisani201 that lynching Palmar based off of meta alone is a stupid idea. Do you feel that Palmar should warrant a ‘stay of execution’ until day 2 so we can better determine his alignment? Umm yeah, I'm not about to make an overly large and word for word perfect post. I'm going to get my thoughts out there so others can assess them, if they are good, someone else will agree with them. | ||
|
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
Just some analysis. Great analysis would be a plus. Keep getting your thoughts out there though, it'll help me make up my mind on your alignment. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On January 14 2012 20:08 Palmar wrote: So, knowing each game is a different game, and that meta is not valid unless it's applied very precisely (you can't say something like x has posted less than usual, what's important is how, why and what he has posted), you still think that you have a valid enough case? Would you bet your abilities as a player on this case? if I'm wrong about you being scum right now it reflects more on how bad your play is right now than mine. The fact that you are willing to try and guilt me into laying off you suggests you already know I'm town. Otherwise, you wouldn't ask whether I am willing to bet my abilities as a player on this case, since if I was scum I'd have no vested interest in something like that. So, that just strengthens my case even more. TL;DR, go die, scum. | ||
| ||
|
|
LAN Event
LAN Event
Replay Cast
WardiTV Korean Royale
LAN Event
OSC
The PondCast
LAN Event
Replay Cast
LAN Event
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
