EPTTL Mafia L - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 14 2012 02:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Eh? in smaller games with a core group of players where they are decent enough to dodge a solid read until d3 is why at least I typically am not active till then. However. In larger games right from the getgo you have to be active. More new people, more people to hide in (as such people tend to slip up more as there is a level of security). As such by being active now and analyzing and calling people out you can snag them early or catch someone before they start getting coached by their team if red. This is something I like doing if at all possible. I do appreciate your concern so I would levy you this question. Provided I do everything I said I will in my campaign post, as well as continue being active all through day 1 (as thats all we have to vote on) would you be willing to vote for me? Absolutely - I've made my concerns for you known and if you prove them to be unfounded then I'll absolutely support your bid. What's it going to take to get your support for mine?  | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
 | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
All right - consider lynching Palmar as part of my platform. If you elect me to office, I promise to lynch scumPalmar as my first act. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 13 2012 13:45 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Something seems wrong... I didn't autoscum :O Speaking of auto-scum ##Vote MrWiggles This is the post BM is pushing as Cyber_Cheese trying to "force a mislynch" This post is very obviously a joke based on site-meta...Mr. Wiggles rolls scum A LOT and I for one giggled when CC posted this. Anyone who says BM's case on CC trying to "force a mislynch" of Mr. Wiggles is assuming 2 things: 1) CC was serious about that vote, and 2) Mr. Wiggles is automatically town. Both of these things are ridiculous to assume at this point in the game. I'm inclined to believe Mr. Wiggles is town based on his posts myself, but when CC had posted this, and subsequently when BM called him scum for it, Wiggles hadn't posted ANYTHING. If anything, I'd say it makes BM suspicious for knowing that Wiggles is town and CC was pushing a "mislynch". Think, guys. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 14 2012 03:33 kitaman27 wrote: VE, you mention that you're voting BM because he is scumhunting. Does this mean you agree with his case on cyber_cheese? Absolutely not. It's the action I like, not the content. You ninja'd me, but I've spelled out my concerns with his target in a post above this one. I do NOT agree with his case on CC. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Why? You're clearly not interested in participating in the game. Can you give me a good reason NOT to lynch you if I'm elected? Your play looks VERY like your disinterested, aloof scum play. "HERP it's so I don't get NK'd HERP" Don't give me that. townPalmar gets protected by doctors solely based on thread presence. What the fuck man? Of course I'm going to lynch you. You know me bro, I GOTTA kill Palmar if I think he's scum. Y U SO SCUM BRO? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
What's your plan on confirming your role? Are you going to out who you've masoned with? Are you going to let them do it at their own pace? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Personally, I'm torn on the mass-mason claim. It makes sense in that Mafia will be put to the decision to either kill them or let them mason away...but with their own masons, it seems to me like they'll probably avoid killing them as to not draw any attention to THEIR masons (by them surviving). | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 14 2012 05:31 kitaman27 wrote: I disagree with a mass mason claim. A mason is a town favored role. Denying the mafia mason is not the priority. I'd be more than happy if a scum mason tried to contact me, considering they are now pressured into openly sharing their reads. People tend to have loose lips when regarding pms, but if you always consider their motives and agenda then there is no problem. With a mass claim, the scum team is free to pick off or roleblock blues. Suppose there are 4 mason claims and two get shot night one and flip town. Does that tell us anything about the remaining two masons? Not really. It's not about denying the mafia masons, it's about finding scum. It forces the mafia masons to claim with the other masons if they want to use them, that's true, so if scum masons opted to not use their masons then yes, we'd be denying the scum masons...but I'm more interested in the pressure it puts on the remaining claimed masons to "turn on the town"...because they're now in the spotlight. Roleblocking masons? Go for it! I'd rather the masons get roleblocked than our docs or cops. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 14 2012 05:35 Cyber_Cheese wrote: It's discussing the set-up, we don't really need that when we could be scum hunting. There is enough information generated by elections already. CC this is an important conversation. If you have nothing to add, that's fine...but read it all because a LOT of your scumhunting is going to come from THIS conversation. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 14 2012 07:25 Kenpachi wrote: id like a gist of what is going on right now Mayoral discussion has been shelved temporarily to discuss the Mason mechanic in this game, because BC claimed mason and is seeking election. I suggest reading the Candidacy posts and then skipping ahead to the Mason stuff so you can weigh in the mason matter before it's closed and we start discussing exclusively the election. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 14 2012 07:30 Liquid`Sheth wrote: People are saying stuff. Its day1. There are lots of pages to read. Ignorance will not be treated well. Come on Sheth, lighten up. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 14 2012 07:51 Foolishness wrote: If anyone is voting for someone partly with the reason of "he's a good player" then they are doing the same thing. Don't know why you choose to call me out instead of any of the other lackluster votes. At least I have a plan and reasoning. I found Foolish's campaign to be both hilarious and appropriate and will support either BM or BC today. I still think people should vote for me, but the general consensus seems to be that I'm not experienced enough, which is totally fair. I don't think I'm totally out of the running though, so I'm not going to withdraw quite yet...but expect me to withdraw if I don't get any more support by 12 hours to deadline. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
| ||
