Werewolves Invade TeamLiquid

On August 15 2011 05:52 DropBear wrote:


CLAIMING

Traits are not alignment based so anyone with the following traits should openly claim immediately:

- Rivals should claim once Day 1 has started. Rivals are much more likely to be townies than Mafia. Mafia already have their rivals: the town. Not only this, it puts into perspective your motivations in getting specific people killed. If you prove yourself useful and don't fuck things up you will be assisted where possible in achieving your goals.

- Short Fuse should claim and never use their power of modkill. If you fail or succeed, deliberately goading people will shit up the thread to no end. Also it makes us seriously consider the lynching of a Short Fuse, the potential of having a VisceraEyes/BC event needs to be known beforehand.

- Rabid Fanboy #1. You are essentially a mayor. Do not use this power without first putting it out in the open. We get a replacement if you die anyway so you are not as important as other roles, no need to hide.

- Thief. The rapidly increasing chances of being instalynched as roles are stolen means that scum theives would be unlikely to risk stealing a role a second time, 1for1 trades are not good for Mafia. Claim outright so we can work out when and if you use your role.

Additionally, all players should claim their roles, traits and alignments to me via PM asap :D

VOTING

Multiple lynches should be avoided on the first few days. We can save them until later when we have more information. Especially with the Night 0 start where people will probably die before we can get a lynch off, we can't just start offing large numbers of people straight away if we mislynch we get fucked much quicker.

CELLS

Are stupid. From what I have read in past games everyone ignores them and chooses to PM whoever they please. I am in favour of communicating with who you want and whoever wants to talk to you, forcing people into an arbitrarily formed cell doesn't make sense when the formation of such groups can easily be biased.

Discuss!

On August 15 2011 06:25 DropBear wrote:

If the rivals claim asap, then this defence is not available. We get rivals, if they exist, to claim now. Then we ignore them until later in the game and decide who we want to win amongst them. Townies are not going to team up with mafia to get their rival killed because they still lose if town loses. They will have to play a town game anyeay and the more they do the more likely we will help them with their individual win condition.

On August 15 2011 06:43 DropBear wrote:

It is less likely for Mafiosos to be paired with Townies as rivals. Mafia and Townies are already opposed. Mafia are not going to be paired with themselves either, its hard enough being a mafioso as it is without completely disrupting the team. I would be very confident that any rivals are Town/Town.

If we do get a Townie/Mafioso rival pairing, the townie should claim now. If the Mafioso denies the pairing, they will be killed for lying as soon as the townie flips. If he ignores the claim, he will be offed as well. He has to confirm the claim or he is dead. The mafioso in the pair can't win unless that person dies, so he can't just bring them to endgame. He's under pressure to stay hidden but he absolutely has to take out his rival as well. Pressure on scum is a good thing

How do you feel about the other claims I suggested?

On August 15 2011 08:03 Jackal58 wrote:

It's ok man. I poke everybody now and then.

On August 15 2011 09:56 Sknowman wrote:


I would imagine he can only use that once then, considering he'd have to take on that person's role from who he steals.

On August 17 2011 11:05 Navillus wrote:
Oh look who's back, did you realize that greymist actually said that there was reason to think what nasini did but greymist didnt think that nasini went through that thought process. What are your opinions on other people Sevryn?

On August 17 2011 14:58 Nisani201 wrote:
The only problem is that I cannot check if someone is a medic or protector. They will only return Townie.

On August 18 2011 08:29 Jackal58 wrote:
Sevryn is scum too. He was fishing for what kind of answer I wanted from Nisani.

To: Sevryn [ Profile | Buddy | Report ]
Subject: Re: your question of nisan
Date: 8/18/11 07:45
We'll see how he answers.

Original Message From Sevryn:
if he doesn't respond regular forumer hes scum.

On August 19 2011 10:39 Trotske wrote:


Who do you think is a better lynch.

On August 21 2011 14:10 hiro protagonist wrote:
Anyone against this will be up for the next lynch, I promise you that.

On August 21 2011 23:41 Da-Muffinman wrote:
Gonna go with the mass,
#vote Nisani201

On August 22 2011 01:59 Curu wrote:
Sigh. Well good job Mafia, you're going to get 3 mislynches out of your hit.

I told Nisani over and over how stupid it was for me to hit DB but his refusal to listen struck me as a scum trait desperate to push an agenda.

Forumite is scum, I'll explain as I write it up.

On August 23 2011 00:31 Curu wrote:
Alright boys and girls, Forumite:



First off, already saying he won't even think about being in IRC, setting up a thing he can point at later if people accuse him for being scummy for it. As he says in his own post, he has done nothing but discuss mechanics and tactics, he's afraid to lay down a vote of his own so he won't be suspicious if he leads a mislynch.

His style is not FoS:


But here's a FoS



This post came right when the GreyMisT wagon was picking up heat:



He went from Nisani to Slam because Slam was the only one with a chance of getting lynched that wasn't GreyMisT.



Scum excuse for not giving an opinion and scum excuse for posting useless stuff while appearing to be contributing.

I didn't think he was scum because I was sure Jackal was and Forumite voted for Jackal very easily, but he's scum.

##Vote Forumite

On August 23 2011 03:21 Forumite wrote:
Really Curu? Tell us to expect something good, then wait 23 hours during which we are waiting for the bomb and don´t discuss anyone else? At least it´s an effective technique to get someone lynched, and enough are buying it.

On August 23 2011 07:24 Forumite wrote:
Missed it earlier, Sevryn has been very successfull with bandwagoning winning lynches too.

On August 23 2011 12:01 snotboogie wrote:
Okay, I see an opportunity to get rid of both Forumite and Slam500 today, so I'll keep my vote on Slam. While I previously suggested that this could be construed as a scum tactic, I think getting rid of Slam shouldn't even count as a lynch since he'd be modkilled in any other game.

On August 26 2011 13:07 sinani206 wrote:
My list right now. I'm going to trust Sevryn's roleclaim because it makes things a hecka lot easier and because his play hasn't been very scummy.

1. Kurumi -- as I said before very spammy and his play in this game just seems more scummy in general.
8. snotboogie -- I have never played with either one of these guys before so I'm going to go with the only lead I have on Kurumi, metagame.
9. Da-Muffinman -- included in above
12. Sevryn
13. sinani206

Since it's 4-1 we have one mislynch, assuming that the only kill during the night is a scumkill.

So there's no reason why voting for Kurumi is a bad idea.

On August 26 2011 13:08 snotboogie wrote:
I'm bad at lategame and WHO THE HELL IS DA-MUFFINMAN? #Vote Da-Muffinman