[T][M]Experimental Haunted Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 04 2011 11:39 redFF wrote: I'm thinking this could get And then were none style, cool! So I've been playing on mafiascum and at mafiascum they ask questions at the start of the game, so i put this one forward to all the other players. What are your intentions this game? play to win what else would you say to that? | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 05 2011 01:09 Curu wrote: The amount of lunatics increased. Enraged at the perceived insult, Syllogism ripped off the zombie Amber[LighT]'s arm and stuffed it in Amber's mouth, ensuring Amber's continued silence as the zombie munched happily on his own undead flesh. Trotske, the insecure hermaphrodite, nervously stammered its input before retreating back into its own corner, afraid to be ridiculed by its peers. Coagulation smoothly reassured his companions of his good intentions, wearing an oily smile that never touched his eyes. Despite his reassurances, the wickedly curved sickle with I AM DEATH splotched across it in the blood of fifty virgins subtly proclaimed that his intentions were anything but good. Meapak_Ziphh, the stinky uneducated hobo, introduced himself much to the chagrin of all assembled. bumatlarge, more commonly known as Bruce Wayne, say quietly in his seat carefully observing the gathered people. And finally Palmar, the snakery snake snake, drew himself up as he hissed at the crowd, "Sssssssss join my cultsssssssssssssssssssss," he proclaimed, pulling out a piece of wrinkled parchment with terms on it. "Firsssssssssssssssssssssssst to kill the detecctivessssssssssssss getssssssssssss one week paid leave." What horrors are in store for the brave and faithful Curu? Will he be eaten by the zombie Amber, beaten to death by the lunatic kitaman, seduced by the disturbingly attractive hermaphrodite Trotske? Or, much more likely, will he meet his end at the hands of the oily incarnation of pure evil, Coagulation? Only time will tell........ I have no idea what to make if this. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 05 2011 22:35 Mig wrote: I was not speculating on the role set-up from nothing. This combined with there being a n0 where no townies have claimed to have had to do anything to do makes it seem to me that recruiter is the most likely setup. The part about meapak being the one selected is speculation but he makes the most logical sense to me. Regardless there is nothing wrong with speculating on the setup at the beginning of day 1. While I like the thinking about the recruiter If I were one I would probably try to get to you mig considering your meta is if we haven't found scum by d2 mig is scum. so I really don't think a lynch at one of our vet players is a good idea until we have something more than a educated guess. I would much rather vote for curu or palmer for both of their annoying posts but that doesn't mean they are scum. I'm thinking that if there is a recruiter they just got picked last night or they can't recruit every night or town would be at a huge disadvantage. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 06 2011 02:50 Coagulation wrote: ##vote Trotske reasons? | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 06 2011 03:45 Varpulis wrote: Meta argument: bad. You can play really well one game and really terribly the next, but if your behavior is the same, and your arguments follow the same logic, i'll call you town as easily in the second as in the first. Lynch based on behavior in the game, and actions with scum motivations, not because he hasn't filled his quota. Trotske who do you think is scummy? I really haven't gotten a scum read but a person of interest is mig because I don't agree with his reasons to try to get an experienced person lynched. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
Scum wise right now I'm looking at redFF because the other small game I played with him SNMMV he was a lot less talkative as town. Thing is though this game is a lot more interesting with puzzles and such so the one game meta is kind of useless but is a good reason to keep an eye on him. if we had to lynch one person right now I would go for curu he has a few posts in the thread but they are all useless he hasn't said anything useful for the town the whole game. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
##vote Curu | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
please | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 06 2011 10:45 Amber[LighT] wrote: You're voting coag bc you fear he won't post at all or because you legit think his play is scummy? Either scenario is trumped by the idea that his meta involves him doing nothing until about day 3 regardless of his alignment. Unless you think he's a threat to the "town" I don't think he's the best lynch target. I always find it fascinating to see how the pregame chat changes as soon as day starts. With that said I really think palmar is the best lynch candidate as of right now. His pregame cult thing kinda got me nervous. It's a good cover up to hang backon later in the game. #vote: Palmar could you explain the palmer thing a little bit more ? | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 06 2011 11:21 Coagulation wrote: if you say so. I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also. sorry for not thinking back to my PM before I posted. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 06 2011 12:08 Mig wrote: So why didn't you post that reason at the time of your vote? And trotske has done plenty of suspicious things since then. Last page he said red was the scummiest person yet voted curu. Every time someone asks troske his opinion he lists a different person he is suspicious of. But instead of bringing any of these points up you lurk not posting then only show up once someone votes for you. If you actually thought trotske was still the scummiest you could have made a case to actual push him for a lynch but you chose not to. yes I did say I thought the scummiest person was red based off of a one game meta..... | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 06 2011 13:03 redFF wrote: and then you immediately voted someone else. What gives? know what I'm tired of this shit lets lynch redFF. for all I know he really is scum and is trying to make it look like i'm his scum buddy. He falls under the vet category, I think his meta is wrong based off one game, and he won't tell us what his item is. I feel like if there is a recruiter type role then they will come after people with items, RedFF has an item. we need to watch syllogism for changes considering he is a beast at solving puzzles. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
##vote RedFF | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 07 2011 00:16 redFF wrote: K my thoughts. Amber is actually making posts and fos'ing people and doing analysis, which is more then i've seen him do as scum. Trotske just isn't very good. I don't like the last part of his post. He's basically saying "let's lynch into these 3 people because I said so. Honestly all it loos like is mafia Trying to control town/divert lynches. Bum, why not keep it between coag, amber and Palmar instead? isn't calling someone bad and dismissing their argument because of it a classic scum tell? | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 07 2011 05:33 Varpulis wrote: sorry guys for the low activity, will evaluate the situation and probably vote either coagulation or palmar when I'm back at my computer. Trotske is pretty bad, going to be rolling under the assumption that his accusations and crappy logic are because of that, not that he's scum. coagulation, why so inactive? I don't care if it's your meta, a little more effort would be nice. please point out my crappy logic so I can be better don't just say i'm bad but hes a townie.... unless your just trying to discredit me. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
##vote Amber[LighT] out of the few people who might actually get lynched he is the most scummy in my eyes. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
##unvote ##vote Amber[LighT] | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:43 bumatlarge wrote: Amber is getting lynched as of right now with three, but I think mafia is too scared to change their votes, unless trotske has balls of steel. I think amber dying will bring a lot to the table, especially with votes this tight. But I'd rather have one of the three I listed get lynched. So I'll vote curu as well, amber is a good player and can be useful. ##Unvote ##Vote Curu its funny because the first person I Wanted lynched was Curu because he has been pushing a lynch on a afk person the whole game even during n0. so I don't mind lynching him but at the same time I feel like this could be some giant switch by you and kita to save Amber by baiting me with a jib becasue you know I'm active. If amber is scum I think we need to look at you two a lot closer. I'm not going to change my vote. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 07 2011 08:57 syllogism wrote: If your puzzle is related to your item, I'm guessing you've to match the tarot cards with the names The Magician, The High Priestess, The Empress, The Emperor, The Hierophant, The Lovers, The Chariot, Strength, The Hermit, Wheel of Fortune, Justice, The Hanged Man, Death, Temperance, The Devil, The Tower, The Star, The Moon, The Sun, Judgement, The World, and The Fool. THE MAN BORN I Uh, The Fool? THE FALLEN KING OF BABYLON II The Devil? The Emperor? THE LIGHT III The Sun THE END IV Death or Judgement THE MORNING STAR V The Devil? Apparently it can also refer to Virgin Mary, in which case this could be The High Priestess THE STAGE VI The World do you like solve riddles in your spare time? | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 08 2011 05:27 Coagulation wrote: Im getting sick and tired of repeating myself because you guys have reading comprehension issues. I explained TWICE why i voted him. You guys are just making up shit and sensationalizing NOTHINGNESS For the sake of Pushing Something ANYTHING to look pro town. I voted trotske cause of the stupid breadcrumbs he was oblivious about. I dont see anyone scummier. I noticed alot of people ignored the question tho and Its probably a good idea to keep an eye on them also. i dont have a case on him worth wasting towns time. Its a placeholder vote Its a fucking vote on the 1 person that gave me red flags with the crumb and shit. ITS A PRESSURE VOTE TO SEE HOW HE AND HIS SCUM BROS RESPOND. ITS AN ACTION TO GET INFORMATION TO BUILD A CASE. Im sorry but im not gonna make up fucking shit and try to get trotske lynched just because its "DAY1" OMG I NEED A CASE TO PUSH. Im not here to buy town cred. This is EXACTLY WHY I DO NOT PUSH CASES ON PEOPLE UNLESS SOLID EVIDENCE IS THERE On day 1. I posted that I didn't think back to my original post but just so you will start playing the game instead of chasing me due to the smallest shit. the last line of my PM where the good intentions shit was made of three sentences the first was 6 words the next was 6 words and the last was 4 words happy? | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 07 2011 06:43 bumatlarge wrote: Amber is getting lynched as of right now with three, but I think mafia is too scared to change their votes, unless trotske has balls of steel. I think amber dying will bring a lot to the table, especially with votes this tight. But I'd rather have one of the three I listed get lynched. So I'll vote curu as well, amber is a good player and can be useful. ##Unvote ##Vote Curu What is this to me it looks like you were trying to get me to switch my vote to curu because you knew that I had thought him a little scummy earlier. explain it. Oh and after I Said I wasn't going to change my vote you posted this On August 07 2011 06:55 bumatlarge wrote: YEAH KITA LETS SAVE OUR BUDDY AMBER BY VOTING SOMEONE WITH NO VOTES ON HIM... What I don't understand is even if you were town and you really thought that amber was a townie why wouldn't you derail the lynch on someone with votes up by lynching the scummiest person you saw with a chance at getting lynched instead of throwing your votes away unless you put it all on me switching my vote. and the you could back out by saying how dumb it was if you were scum. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 06 2011 18:10 bumatlarge wrote: Yeah the votes are really spread out. Perhaps we should narrow down candidates, so that we can actually have something to go on for later. In a recruiting set-up, it is generally accepted that vets get picked up nearly 90% of the time. The recruiter forces town to lose a valuable asset, while bolstering his team more effectively then normal. Aside from that, we don't have any evidence supporting that this so it shouldn't have any impact on who we lynch. Mig, Curu, or redff are all viable picks, and we should probably keep it between these three unless someone feels otherwise. this post is one of the reason's I think Bum is scum. he posts this saying that we need to consoladate our votes but at the same time saying that curu is a viable pick who at this point had only my vote on him which I switched soon after. While I will agree that when he said curu was viable there was my vote on him when he later switched his vote to Curu there was no votes on Curu. and also he tried to get me to switch my vote back to Curu after I had shown that I would vote for him earlier. I think Bum tried to get Curu lynched becasue he thought I would take my vote off of amber and onto Curu becasue. | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
##Vote bumatlarge | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
On August 09 2011 03:57 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: I haven't submitted a solution and I suck at puzzles so instead I'll let the town decide what I send in. (let's not kid ourselves, it'll be syllo who finds the answer lol). Oh and I'll save us some time: ##Shoot: Bumatlarge wat | ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
| ||