EPT/in
TL Mafia XLIII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
/in | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 02 2011 04:27 Curu wrote: Excited to play in a Kurumi game, With a troll host it won't play out the same. So I've decided that I shall only post in rhyme, A monstrous feat that will surely eat my time. Role is received and I'm ready to roll, Taking tips from Kurumi the master troll. Let's kick some ass and make that scum squirm, Locked and ready, Curu is here to /confirm! Rofl. Sadly your not the first person to think of this idea. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
Was done far earlier than that (provided he did it there). | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 02 2011 04:41 Curu wrote: A great idea to reduce the inbox spam, Real time chat and no TL PM logjam, charles.suo on Skype is where I'll be at, Come add me so we can easily chat. I prefer rhymes. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 02 2011 05:24 Mig wrote: I will be in #loonybin on IRC and I will be pming most people. Everyone should hang out in the town's IRC whenever they are free. Townies should be pming people and talking on irc as much as possible. It is much easier for mafia to slip up and reveal themselves than it is for a townie to give away any vital information. So don't be afraid to be active and talk to people. Townies should only be doing what you are suggesting if they are comfortable talking outside of the thread. If they are not comfortable doing so, posting purely in thread is fine. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 02 2011 05:52 heist wrote: Loving the TF2 theme. I'd just like to say that it's highly recommended to post somewhat actively in the thread and not just disappear into solely IRC or PMs. We don't want an atmosphere where RED Team can just sit back, consort amongst themselves, and generally be inactive in the thread. I love the whole lot of nothing said here. Player list is filled with enough people who know the basics. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 02 2011 06:07 Varpulis wrote: A little warning. If you're lurking and not contributing, or avoiding taking a side on the issue of a lynch, I will be spamming your PM box to hell. Apparently the mods are notified when somebody sends or receives loads of PMs in a short period of time. I will treat lurkers as an opportunity to test that theory. Activity, people! Do you speak for all the people you are talking to? | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 02 2011 06:15 Varpulis wrote: nope. Just me. I don't represent the IRC channel in any ways, and I haven't sent out my first wave of pms yet. then that means you should be spammmmmming them toooooo  | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 02 2011 06:53 redFF wrote: I really dont think vig should shoot day 1. We can't all be redff. How about a real reason. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
I see the advantages of the plan, and if we could actually think of a target for day 1 to day vig it would be fine, however. This is a game with 4 mafia, 1 gf and 1 rber in the mix most likely. The next issue is a simple bit of knowledge of qatol and ver helped balance the game. Very few KP will be in this game. Counting on a day vig for all our hopes seems...shortsighted. If we have one, awesome, however we should have 2 kp at most given the setup. 1 med and 1 vet, or 2 vets, would be a likely blue setup for night survival and 1 dt if we are lucky. As this is speculation based on how to not make a game horribly OP for town I would guess no day kp as that would make town confirmable. However, if this plan can be made to work then thats fine and good. My issue now stems from DrH and redFF. DrH has been arguing against it in thread. He has been on the bad side of this sort of situation before, and I can see where he might have learned from that. I have no issues with him doing so primarily because he is doing it here, in thread. Redff however has been arguing this on irc. If he was so sure of his stance he should have taken it here in thread. Massive FoS by excluding info from thread. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 02 2011 09:37 chaos13 wrote: I don't much care for this attitude. You're brushing off the potential of a town hitting town by stating that it will give us info. How exactly would it do that? The only information it gives us is that our sniper is a shitty scumhunter. Mafia hits are the only kills we gain information from. more importantly, if he likes the idea of the pl an, why does he want us to wait till day 3 after the vig has shot twice -_- | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 02 2011 10:42 Incognito wrote: Hmm I happen to always avoid being killed off in day 1 posts now days. This is a good trend. Keep it up! note to self, kill incog every day post of a game, while making sure qatol is always blue. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 03 2011 08:08 Kenpachi wrote: -bows- hello my friends I am Kenpachi. can i claim Townie? DrH stop calling for me to appear when the thread was dead. I head to work to see 5 new pages and you constantly going "where is bc, where is bc, check bc" The more you do this the more likely you are to be scum. Also, lynch kenpachi, there are no green roles in the game, as he just claimed green, hes a liar. LAL works for day 1 right? | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 03 2011 09:45 DoctorHelvetica wrote: i said it like twice you were absent for much more than that lol you haven't weighed in on either of the two main lynch candidates and all the shit that has been flying around don't try to turn this around on me you said I was absent twice in a very short period of time in which up till that point the thread had been insanely dead. Don't call people out and expect immediate response, let alone doing it twice. Given the level of inactivity I'm for offing kenpachi for generally being useless or RL unless someone throws up compelling analysis on either target. I would be far more likely to jump at drazerk who has been mia since accusing someone and attempting to start a bandwagon. But as of now there is a selection of bad choices. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 03 2011 10:18 OriginalName wrote: Do you mind elaborating on how these these targets are bad ._. (Although I do agree on Drazerk) Its day 1, they are slightly more active than most people, and when a lot of analysis is based off irc arguments or logic pertaining to a plan anyone could have issues with then its meh. If they are red there is not enough information to solidly lynch them for. I would honestly prefer aiming for someone who tried to start a bandwagon then vanished. Offing active people (even if they end up red) isn't the best play day 1. Offing suspect people who aren't even attempting to help or at the very least defend their selves is a far better day 1 lynch choice. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
I would rather lynch someone appearing scummy / useless than someone who is being linked as scummy and is active. Their activity will help clear / damn them whereas inactivity doesn't give us dick all to work with. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On August 04 2011 01:26 OriginalName wrote: Im staying on Varpu right now, I dont like the prospect of a massive shift because BC had 2 posts saying so. In all honesty Varpu himself is lurking almost as bad Drazerk is. I dont see how people are saying we shouldnt lynch active players as hes quite clearly not being very active. As I have just mentioned on IRC. Varp was insanely easily bandwagon'd and lucidity had the looks of an easy bandwagon. I am usually wary of people voting for someone with very little information to go on. Factoring in that I know draz has been around TL but just not posting made him look like a safer inactive choice. However, what massive shift are you talking about? The 2 votes currently on draz? Varp still has the majority and no one has made a strong enough case to create a vote shift large enough to overtake that at the moment. Care to explain this "massive shift" you are talking about. | ||
| ||
