|
On July 27 2011 06:13 Lanaia wrote:
I wish I'd been here in time to unvote.
I'm wondering, is it typical to say what you've done before the night ends or do people only do that if they've already roleclaimed?
Mostly if you're planning to role-claim, I guess.
Say, if you're a vig and are going to claim, 1 minute before the day post, you'd say: "I'm shooting X tonight", so then town knows, and if you die at the same time, then we know where your hit went.
Don't think people claim what they're doing unless they're planning on claiming or already claimed, though.
|
|
|
United States22154 Posts
On July 27 2011 06:13 sandroba wrote:
How was his role shitty? It was fucking excelent for town and terrible for scum you fuckers.
do we really need to call people "fuckers" to get the point across?
|
On July 27 2011 06:25 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2011 06:13 sandroba wrote:
How was his role shitty? It was fucking excelent for town and terrible for scum you fuckers. do we really need to call people "fuckers" to get the point across?
This.
This this and this again
Now I'm going to do some thinking.
|
Vigilante kill me I am mole.
|
On July 27 2011 06:25 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2011 06:13 sandroba wrote:
How was his role shitty? It was fucking excelent for town and terrible for scum you fuckers. do we really need to call people "fuckers" to get the point across?
-_-
I mean fuckers in a good way =)
|
On July 27 2011 06:36 sandroba wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2011 06:25 GMarshal wrote:On July 27 2011 06:13 sandroba wrote:
How was his role shitty? It was fucking excelent for town and terrible for scum you fuckers. do we really need to call people "fuckers" to get the point across? -_- I mean fuckers in a good way =)
you say it because you're feigning disappointment.
I think you're one of the more scummy players in this game.
|
If you think that you are scum.
|
|
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
lol miller? Bad luck, but at least getting a scum on day one counts for something.
What confuses me most is the people who decided to switch off BC after the alignment check came up red. You can spew all the garbage about how you don't lynch a miller, but in reality it was the correct move. The only people who had a right to think he was town after that check was the scum team.
Is it too late to use jackal/sandroba's wand as a night kill? There is a fair list of lurkers that would be worth killing off, but if its not possible, I won't bring them up until after the night kills.
|
Finland5948 Posts
BC the scum doesn't spend day 1 antagonizing most of the town for no reason and he had role that is nigh useless for mafia, keeping him alive would have been the correct move
|
Well, everytime people sugested a jackal check he conviniently dissapeared, so I'm gonna hang on to the wand.
|
Btw, whoever made BC's role is scum for not defending him.
|
kita, there's no reason to think people switching off BC were scum. Do they suddenly believe he's their scum teammate? They know he's Town, if anything that's even more incentive to stay on the BC wagon.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
When its 14-4 a vote change 5 minutes from the lynch isn't going to change things. There is no incentive to stay on BC really. If anything, it just allows their name to be removed from the list. If they thought he was innocent they wouldn't have voted for him and then switched off when his check came red.
On July 27 2011 07:04 syllogism wrote:
BC the scum doesn't spend day 1 antagonizing most of the town for no reason and he had role that is nigh useless for mafia, keeping him alive would have been the correct move
Right, because antagonizing most the town for no reason is clearly so pro-town.
|
Okay vigs, shoot jackal so we can properly analyse day1 and not have this whole mess day2 all over again.
|
Kita do you think I'm scum? Who is the person that switched that you actually think is scum?
|
Finland5948 Posts
On July 27 2011 07:16 kitaman27 wrote:When its 14-4 a vote change 5 minutes from the lynch isn't going to change things. There is no incentive to stay on BC really. If anything, it just allows their name to be removed from the list. If they thought he was innocent they wouldn't have voted for him and then switched off when his check came red. Show nested quote +On July 27 2011 07:04 syllogism wrote:
BC the scum doesn't spend day 1 antagonizing most of the town for no reason and he had role that is nigh useless for mafia, keeping him alive would have been the correct move Right, because antagonizing most the town for no reason is clearly so pro-town.
It makes more sense as town as he was simply arguing for something he believes in. It's very townie behaviour. Further, none of the people who switched from BC had actually voted for him until the check came back red; the natural reaction was to switch to BC after the check, but after thinking about it just didn't make sense for this to be his scum play.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On July 27 2011 07:20 sandroba wrote:
Kita do you think I'm scum? Who is the person that switched that you actually think is scum?
Like I said before, the role pm incident is what is saving you in my eyes, but I'm displeased otherwise. heist or syllogism could be scum. I'm not ready to say one way or the other. heist made a post earlier on in the thread about jackal that I didn't like, but its hard to put much weight into that without knowing jackals alignment. syllogism said earlier in the thread he either thought BC had a post restriction or was scum. The fact that he chose post restriction shows some signs of guilt if he knew he was a townie.
|
Finland5948 Posts
You are either scum, or haven't actually been reading the thread; time to catch up
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
