EPTwould be my first game so I don't obviously qualify for preferential treatment due to previous activity, but worth a shot. Also, is editing posts before the game starts fine?
TL Mafia XLII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
would be my first game so I don't obviously qualify for preferential treatment due to previous activity, but worth a shot. Also, is editing posts before the game starts fine? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On June 14 2011 13:37 ilovejonn wrote: I'd also like to suggest that people on this list, if you're on towns side of course, to start posting, because you know, getting killed Night 0 sucks. This post would make more sense if he had just encouraged everyone on the list to start posting, though perhaps that town qualifier was just there to pressure mafia. In addition, logically it doesn't make much sense as getting killed on night 0 sucks whether you happened to make a few posts or not and posting would only make it more likely. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
This is a bit early, but if you are about to get lynched or you've a strong reason to believe you'll be night killed, do reveal who you've masoned before you die. Regarding Sandroba, I also find it unlikely mafia would have signed off on him proposing that plan on n0. Opz: not sure if it matters, but you misspelled ilovejonn's name in the voting thread | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
His contributions so far + Show Spoiler + On June 15 2011 05:59 Kenpachi wrote: hi im Kenpachi i slept all day yesterday so thats the reason why i was mia (surprise!) btw, im a townie On June 16 2011 10:13 Kenpachi wrote: There is nothing to talk about for me really.. I cant say much except that Sinani has been a total hypocrite. Other than that, i just cant put a finger on w/e is going on right now On June 16 2011 22:49 Kenpachi wrote: kk. Time to get my shit on. /game face ... ill get my shit on later. ##Vote:Sinani206 Seems to be the only one suspicious You can do better than this Meanwhile, we've about 9 hours until lynch and 11 people haven't voted yet aidnai, demorcerf, GGQ, hiro protagonist, Imprevious, Jacinto, LandenC, Lazorbear, Node, sandroba, sinari206 In addition, 5 people haven't even posted today. GGQ has been around today at least, but hasn't graced this thread with his presence. GGQ, Jacinto, LandenC, Lazorbear, Node (Jacinto and LandenC didn't post on N0 either) At the pace things are going, we won't have much material to work on tomorrow unless we somehow hit the jackpot with the lynch or night actions. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On June 17 2011 07:47 Scamp wrote: I need to go and I won't be back before the deadline. As stated earlier, I don't think either ILJ or GG are scum so I won't be voting for them. However, I do like aidnai's case against him [ILJ?] as outlined a few posts before this one. Also my read on GG is null but I'm suspicious of a few people that are voting for him. You can treat my vote as an abstain vote but it's going on someone who I will be looking at more closely on the next day. You like a case against them, but don't think they are scum ??? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Let's look at GGQ: On June 17 2011 10:47 GGQ wrote: No I didnt? Impervious is lurking, contributing almost nothing, just making empty "I'm here" posts. I already looked at his posts earlier in the thread, which also answers Mataza's accusation of me bringing up Impervious way too late. No, I brought him up hours ago but no one responded to my post. I disagree with the hiro lynch, btw. I've already made a post looking at both hiro and Impervious, I didn't find hiro suspicious at all, though that was before the 'scumslip' about voting for someone that he thought was town. I'd disagree with the logic of that post, but I'd disagree that it was scummy. He just doesn't feel like a scum to me like Impervious does. Now, obviously Impervious isn't going to get lynched, but I dont like the ILJ lynch either, so I'm keeping my vote on him in protest. On June 17 2011 10:59 GGQ wrote: Imp voted now, but if I had to instantly kill one of those three, probably GG. And then he kept his vote on Impervious? Once again, I do think impervious would have been a decent lynch, but since that wasn't obviously going to happen, what good does abstaining do? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
You are right, you shouldn't vote to save yourself if it's likely you will be on the chopping block on the next day regardless or if your contributions are worthless and the other viable alternative is likely town. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
##Vote: RebirthOfLeGenD | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On June 18 2011 18:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote: It's 5:30 in the morning and your bitching I haven't made analysis? I have been more active than you this entire game so don't go there. As for analysis I shall do it when I get home from work if I have the time. Analysis on people takes a huge amount of time which I may not have until tommorrow. Oh I'm perfectly conscious of my hypocrisy, and I didn't mean today, but overall you haven't done any analysis of your own either and just wanted to lurker lynch instead. At least I've an excuse since this is my first game, but you specifically made a list of players, including you, who should step up and bizarrely recommended that those players shouldn't be DT checked or medi protected. I suppose the natural explanation is that you aren't playing for town victory. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=9798242 In addition, I'm looking into Sinani again, mostly because his only vote on day1, Kenpachi, was very poorly reasoned, lacking commitment and an extremely safe vote when at the time of his vote there were two other wagons and it was quite clear Kenpachi wasn't going to get lynched at that point. He found both GG and ILJ suspicious/scummy On June 17 2011 05:20 sinani206 wrote: I got lucky, lol. You were fast too. GrassGiraffe Supposedly really active according to his friend. The scummiest if only because I know almost nothing about the others. On June 17 2011 02:38 sinani206 wrote: Yeah. He defended himself early and isn't now. Instead, he voted for Kenpachi, apparently based on this "contradiction" On June 17 2011 05:24 sinani206 wrote: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/fHG0u.png) On June 17 2011 05:26 sinani206 wrote: Oh yeah: ##Vote: Kenpachi Not only is your posting worse than in any of your previous games, it is also contradictory. I mean you always lurk but this contradictory and repetitive bullshit is really scummy. Perhaps he hasn't played with Kenpachi much, but he should know this is a null tell at best He was around at the time of the deadline, but didn't feel like committing into voting on any of the three wagons at the time (Hiro, GG, ILJ), but still said we would be getting "valuable information" from the ILJ lynch, which is, of course, always a bad reason to justify a lynch and could even indicate he knew ILJ would flip green On June 17 2011 10:51 sinani206 wrote: It's too late for a counter-wagon to form, but at least we get some valuable information from the ilovejonn lynch. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + [QUOTE]On June 17 2011 13:34 sinani206 wrote: [QUOTE]On June 14 2011 13:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Zodiac list time. Rebirthoflegend BloodyC0bbler Node Mr.Wiggles Kitaman Opz Youngminii Scamp Everyone should be watching players very closely on this list. We as a group will draw insane scrutiny from town and as such dt checks should be used on anyone not us. The group of us should be forced to prove our worth to town. It also provides us with a list that if there are any reds in shooting into becomes dangerous as it lowers the possible hiding spots for them. This should effectively keep veteran townies alive and kicking longer while letting medics work elsewhere. Dts should be firing into people who are likely to be inactive, or have posted something insanely suspicious. Medics should protect anyone who is not listed above. Note: This is for night 0 and potentially night 1 only. Past that time frame enough information should be garnered in thread for blues to act properly and the vets to properly distinguish sides. [/QUOTE] | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On June 20 2011 02:03 sandroba wrote: Yo syllogism, so you are saying that even if you thought ILJ started to look town before the lynch, you kept your vote on him to avoid suspicion? Fuck killing scum, the point is not looking scummy? If you had followed the thread, I went to bed before ILJ showed up from work and specifically said if he doesn't show up to defend, we should go ahead with the lynch | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
 | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Also, it's a pretty silly meta how you've to pretend you are sure that the person you vote to lynch is scum when in reality these flimsy scum "tells" only slightly increase the probability of them not being town. Uncertainty is a pretty weak scum tell anyway and scum tells aren't scum tells once they are known. | ||
| ||
