EPTPick Their Power Mafia - Page 45
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
If you think that Tackster was really scum would he have ended his post with "KISSES xx". And you say that his post is easily not noticable, I just really think that it is. It is a very long post from a dude you haven't seen around a lot. I think if he were scum he would really have made that post a bit shorter, it might be the longest post I remember reading in this post so far. That said, yes it is full of fluff but I don't think we should judge people by their not being useful right now. This game is beyond complex and I don't think anybody has proved to be conclusively useful yet. I also think that in the likely case that Tackster flips green then we will have gained nothing except a wasted lynch. So who do you think have conclusively contributed to this thread since you think that lack of contribution is a criteria for lyching? And why do you think that Tackster is the one who contributed the least? I mean at least he never spammed the thread like Kurumi or sandroba. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
@kita I agree that Rean needs to explain his posting, but a vote on him didn't seem to be doing much. Did you see my analysis? It said pretty much exactly what you just did. | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
On June 01 2011 07:38 GMarshal wrote: Instead answer these questions. 1.) If you were a vigilante who would you shoot tonight 2.) if you were a kingmaker who would you make king tomorrow 3.) what is your favorite colour 4.) Of all the players with more than ten posts in the game at the moment, which seem the scummiest? 1) Rean or Tackster maybe, hard to say at this point 2) Sandroba, what he did with it would tell me his alignment 100% 3) Green, but I enjoy many colours, it depends on the object 4) I thought Sandroba, but I'm re-evaluating, maybe tnkted Did you answer your own questions, GM? | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On June 01 2011 10:28 prplhz wrote: @Node If you think that Tackster was really scum would he have ended his post with "KISSES xx". And you say that his post is easily not noticable, I just really think that it is. It is a very long post from a dude you haven't seen around a lot. I think if he were scum he would really have made that post a bit shorter, it might be the longest post I remember reading in this post so far. That said, yes it is full of fluff but I don't think we should judge people by their not being useful right now. This game is beyond complex and I don't think anybody has proved to be conclusively useful yet. I also think that in the likely case that Tackster flips green then we will have gained nothing except a wasted lynch. So who do you think have conclusively contributed to this thread since you think that lack of contribution is a criteria for lyching? And why do you think that Tackster is the one who contributed the least? I mean at least he never spammed the thread like Kurumi or sandroba. I hope to god you're joking about the kisses. This entire argument is WifoM. Tackster isn't just being useless, he's adding worthless posts to the thread. This is a scummy defense, imo. | ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
On June 01 2011 10:17 chaos13 wrote: I think Tackster is definitely a good candidate for a lynch. He lurks, posts some brief thoughts that don't really give away much information, and then provides another excuse for leaving again. I'm also still unsure of redFF and tnkted, but they are not the scummiest players. Someone I really have my eye on is GMarshal. I don't feel that his contributions have been as good as they could be, and his response to my earlier accusation of him was rather weak. Overall I'm just getting a bad feel from him. This isn't enough to lynch him, but I'll be watching. As for what is going on right now - Sandroba and Jackal and everyone else in on this argument needs to stop. Neither of you are actually analyzing, you're just going back and forth with "you suck", "No you suck", "shut up scum", "you shut up". It's not providing anything helpful. kitaman27 and Node, what do you think of GMarshal? I feel he's been asking the right kind of questions, and though he hasn't been taking especially firm stances on particular people, on day 1 with the amount of madness happening in this particular thread it can be a difficult thing to do. I'm not getting a scum vibe currently, but I do hope to see more active scumhunting from him. I can understand him playing a bit more cautiously after being the mole in PYP Insane. I think he's been overall helpful, if a little more careful than I'm used to. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On June 01 2011 07:38 GMarshal wrote: 1.) If you were a vigilante who would you shoot tonight 2.) if you were a kingmaker who would you make king tomorrow 3.) what is your favorite colour 4.) Of all the players with more than ten posts in the game at the moment, which seem the scummiest? 1) I wouldn't shoot anybody if I were a vigilante. Not enough to base shooting on and you can't be sure of somebody's role, maybe they're immune to vigilantes and I'll have wasted my bullet. 2) I'd make you king because you really need to do something instead of asking questions all the time. I mean it's all good but you gotta make a move at some point. 3) prplhz 4) sandroba and Node seems scummy because he's protecting him but he probably just doesn't know any better. | ||
|
deskscaress
United States399 Posts
| ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On June 01 2011 10:28 Varpulis wrote: @chaos does saying "i'm voting for xxx" count, or are you asking for ##vote xxx? I would prefer the proper bolded format. It makes it much easier to see. As for Rean, I think the very thing that kita sees as a scumtell is a towntell for me. The fact that he said he has contributed when he really hasn't seems more like something a town would do than mafia. I know that as a townie I tend to overestimate my contributions. As scum I am far more careful about what and how much I post, and am therefore far more aware of how much I have actually contributed. | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On June 01 2011 07:38 GMarshal wrote: Instead answer these questions. 1.) If you were a vigilante who would you shoot tonight 2.) if you were a kingmaker who would you make king tomorrow 3.) what is your favorite colour 4.) Of all the players with more than ten posts in the game at the moment, which seem the scummiest? 1) tnkted. completely useless posting 2) Amber[light] because he might have a list of Mafia or something. His role might've been nerfed by dec: No overpowered roles The game wouldn't be much fun if someone got super dt+medic that had 3 nightkills and a daykill. Be sensible with your picking. If I feel the role you have picked is too powerful I will nerf it in someway. 3) red  4) 10. kitaman27 acting like he was in XXXIX, where he was Mafia 12. Tackster useless theorycrafting 14. tnkted like i said above, useless 25. Torte de Lini so many posts elsewhere on TL. a purposeful lurker | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On June 01 2011 08:17 Mataza wrote: Since its directed at me: 1) I wouldn´t shoot. If I was compulsive, I´d shoot cthsazsa. Few posts, even less content. 2) This is hard to say. Dropbear over Cobbler. 3) This is not a dating show 4) Right now, redff. Before that, Palmar. If I could include more(seem means plural) Varpulis, Chaos13 and Kitaman 27 too. Ahh, I meant to post before I went to school this morning, but the 24/28 hour deadline where I'm at is either 3:00pm or 4:00pm (GMT -6:00), which is right about where I get out of school (3 more days 'till school is out for summer heck yaa). Then I'll be able to stay up-to-date. That said, if you don't think I'm scummy or even suspicious, why the hell would you shoot me?? That makes no sense. Few posts, next to no content. Yes, I guess you could call it lurking, but it takes me almost a whole hour to read through all the spam and shit. How does it help town to kill someone you don't even find scummy. You might as well kill the 3 other people who are struggling to keep up right now. I need to get my vote in tonight because I know I'm not going to remember to do it in the morning. Back to rereading >_> | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
| ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
On June 01 2011 10:28 prplhz wrote: @Node If you think that Tackster was really scum would he have ended his post with "KISSES xx". And you say that his post is easily not noticable, I just really think that it is. It is a very long post from a dude you haven't seen around a lot. I think if he were scum he would really have made that post a bit shorter, it might be the longest post I remember reading in this post so far. That said, yes it is full of fluff but I don't think we should judge people by their not being useful right now. This game is beyond complex and I don't think anybody has proved to be conclusively useful yet. I also think that in the likely case that Tackster flips green then we will have gained nothing except a wasted lynch. So who do you think have conclusively contributed to this thread since you think that lack of contribution is a criteria for lyching? And why do you think that Tackster is the one who contributed the least? I mean at least he never spammed the thread like Kurumi or sandroba. Since this is your second time bringing up the "KISSES" thing, I have to assume you're serious. That is literally the most WIFOM-y argument you could make, and it gives absolutely no indication as to whether or not he's scum. If it were that easy to prove that you're not scum, then everybody would do it -- but then scum would do it too, etc etc. It tells us nothing. I think that his post failed to take a conclusive stance on any of the subjects mentioned. Reading back through it, I couldn't tell you where Tackster stands on the most. Post length has very little to do with it -- in fact, if anything, the length of that post makes him more scummy in my eyes, as a very clear and concise short post is infinitely more useful than a long, muddled one. I think BloodyCobbler has been useful. I think chaos13 and Mr. Wiggles have proven their worth. Palmar is also someone I'd like to have around as the game progresses. Contribution is a criteria for lynching, it is not the criteria for lynching. KISSES XOXO | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
Would you really not agree that if you don't want to draw too much attention to yourself and your post, you don't write something in it that will wholly differentiate you from everybody else in the game? Such as writing something as insane as "KISSES xx"? I am not saying that it is that easy, I am just saying that if he wanted to go unnoticed with his post then it would have been easy and he would probably not try to call unnecessary attention to it. Like you do by writing crazy stuff like that. I think your argument for voting for Tackster is pretty bad and I also think that if Tackster flips green, something I consider very likely, then we will have gained absolutely nothing except maybe a clear scum read on sandroba. But I know another way to get a clear scum read on sandroba that will even give us more information if sandroba flips green than if Tackster does. We flip sandroba! | ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
Your argument for Tackster being town is not very strong. Node's for him being scum is actually quite strong. I also think that sandroba will flip green, and an information lynch is never preferential to a scum lynch. Therefore, I think we should be putting pressure on Tackster instead of Sandroba. You are one of the few players I have a town read on. I think if you were on a mafia team your scumbuddies would be helping out your posting a bit more, rather than letting you bring attention to yourself with arguments like this one. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On June 01 2011 10:56 prplhz wrote: @Node Would you really not agree that if you don't want to draw too much attention to yourself and your post, you don't write something in it that will wholly differentiate you from everybody else in the game? Such as writing something as insane as "KISSES xx"? I am not saying that it is that easy, I am just saying that if he wanted to go unnoticed with his post then it would have been easy and he would probably not try to call unnecessary attention to it. Like you do by writing crazy stuff like that. I think your argument for voting for Tackster is pretty bad and I also think that if Tackster flips green, something I consider very likely, then we will have gained absolutely nothing except maybe a clear scum read on sandroba. But I know another way to get a clear scum read on sandroba that will even give us more information if sandroba flips green than if Tackster does. We flip sandroba! WifoM. Stop using it as an argument. Why is sandroba red if tackster isn't, specifically? He's only mentioned him once, and it wasn't a compelling argument that really rallied the town to lynch him, just pointing out how bad the post was. Tackster flipping green would prove nothing about sandroba's alignment at all. wrong != scum | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On June 01 2011 11:01 chaos13 wrote: @prplhz Your argument for Tackster being town is not very strong. Node's for him being scum is actually quite strong. I also think that sandroba will flip green, and an information lynch is never preferential to a scum lynch. Therefore, I think we should be putting pressure on Tackster instead of Sandroba. You are one of the few players I have a town read on. I think if you were on a mafia team your scumbuddies would be helping out your posting a bit more, rather than letting you bring attention to yourself with arguments like this one. Lol. You really shouldn't paraphrase me in a game I'm in. | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
chaos13
Canada885 Posts
On June 01 2011 11:04 Jackal58 wrote:Lol. You really shouldn't paraphrase me in a game I'm in. ??? | ||
| ||
