|
On April 15 2011 23:03 Zorkmid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 20:52 sandroba wrote:On April 15 2011 11:27 Zorkmid wrote:On April 15 2011 11:12 Eternalmisfit wrote:
Btw I think we should lynch people who are inactive or lurking the boards as it is more likely that they are trying to stay under and radar and avoid suspicion on themselves by barely posting at all. I concur with this, there sure isn't any harm in losing inactive townies OR scum! GLHF! There is a lot of harm in losing any kind of townies. I'm suspicious that this means that sandroba is scum, and knows that that his scum buddy is going to be inactive. This points to Forumrite. Show nested quote +Unfortunately I´m going to post slowly during the first day-phace, lots of things happening this weekend, but it should pick up next week. It doesn't matter that he posted this before he was even PM'ed.....if my assumption about sandroba holds true, than he has already revealed he AND Forumrite. How do you plead?
This seemed retarded at first, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense....
It seems too convenient that forumite is afk at the start and that sandroba would make that statement.
Plus, my gut tells me that the first person who breaks and makes an outright accusation is suspicious, and that was Sandroba as well.
|
United States22154 Posts
Is the Mafia's KP 2 to start?
Mafia KP is always 1 this game
|
On April 15 2011 23:03 Zorkmid wrote:This points to Forumrite. Show nested quote +Unfortunately I´m going to post slowly during the first day-phace, lots of things happening this weekend, but it should pick up next week. It doesn't matter that he posted this before he was even PM'ed.....if my assumption about sandroba holds true, than he has already revealed he AND Forumrite. How do you plead?
I don´t understand your analysis at all. I´m in the game, posting, but unfortunately I can´t be online all the time. I will try to compensate by posting more when I can.
--------
I see 2 things people should take note off. Please call me out if I misinterpret the situation, I WANT to hear your defence against these accusations. That I accuse Zorkmind immediately after he´s suspicious of me is bad form, but please check his posts if you don´t believe me.
1. Ssandroba and Zorkmind are both suspicious of Shcoleosis, apparently because she (?) wants to be carefull about who to lynch.
2. Zorkmind has posted that he is suspicious of Forumite (me), Ssandroba (twice) and Shcoleosis, all three who try to encourage analysis and debate and doesn´t want to lynch innocents. I feel this is scummy behavior because analysis and carefull lynching is what Town wants.
|
Stop calling me Zorkmind!
|
|
|
FoS: Zorkmid
For the reasons mentioned above in my post, and because Zorkmid hasn´t made any effort at all to change my mind.
----
Is there a voting thread yet?
|
United States22154 Posts
On April 16 2011 03:51 Forumite wrote:
FoS: Zorkmid
For the reasons mentioned above in my post, and because Zorkmid hasn´t made any effort at all to change my mind.
----
Is there a voting thread yet?
No voting thread, vote in here please.
|
I'm all up for scumhunting, and will defend myself at any point that I think it's necessary. Let's hear from the lurkers!
VarpuliS
Senj
Vain
Penny for your thoughts?
|
On April 16 2011 03:59 Zorkmid wrote:
I'm all up for scumhunting, and will defend myself at any point that I think it's necessary. Let's hear from the lurkers!
Why do you accuse those who want debate and analysis? Isn´t that a good way to find Scums?
I want an answer from the lurkers too, especially if they are quiet tomorrow too, but the way you focused on them now, at the time that I want answers from you, feels more like you are trying to direct the heat to someone else.
|
Alright, just got back! Read through the thread, and from what I can gather, everybody either wants to
a) Lynch an inactive player because he might be lurking scum/ because he won't be helpful later on.
b) Wait to see how things play out.
I think we should pressure lurkers, but put the votes towards suspicious characters once we get the lurkers talking.
|
On April 16 2011 03:59 Zorkmid wrote:
I'm all up for scumhunting, and will defend myself at any point that I think it's necessary. Let's hear from the lurkers!
VarpuliS
Senj
Vain
Penny for your thoughts?
I'm interested in the little argument you and Forumite are having. I'm not sure if you're right and he's suspicious or if you're suspicious because of your accusation.
I don't like the idea of lynching active players without a good reason, though, and neither of those reasons are good enough for a lynch. Also, there's practically no way that you've found both the mafia within 24 hours of the beginning of the first day.
|
On April 16 2011 05:48 VarpuliS wrote:Show nested quote +On April 16 2011 03:59 Zorkmid wrote:
I'm all up for scumhunting, and will defend myself at any point that I think it's necessary. Let's hear from the lurkers!
VarpuliS
Senj
Vain
Penny for your thoughts? I don't like the idea of lynching active players without a good reason, though, and neither of those reasons are good enough for a lynch. Also, there's practically no way that you've found both the mafia within 24 hours of the beginning of the first day.
I also don't think there are good enough reasons yet to string someone up. I am suspicious about coming to the aid of someone that hadn't even come online yet.
Finding both in like 5 posts would have been damned epic though.
|
There has been some accusations of scummy behavior allready, actually everyone has except the lurkers (Varp, Senj, Vain) and Shcoleosis have pointed out someone that they think are scummy. There are 4 different people who have been pointed out as scummy by at least two people, at least if my data is correct.
|
On April 16 2011 05:52 Forumite wrote:
There has been some accusations of scummy behavior allready, actually everyone has except the lurkers (Varp, Senj, Vain) and Shcoleosis have pointed out someone that they think are scummy. There are 4 different people who have been pointed out as scummy by at least two people, at least if my data is correct.
would you care to share your data with the rest of us?
|
Well, right now, I'm still waiting on some kind of response by scholeosis. And the other lurkers should come out of the shadows and post their opnion, or is the situation too confortable that the scum can sit back and realx?
|
Zorkmid accuse Forumite (me) and Ssandroba on very shaky evidence, and Emlizzt agreed with him for questionable reasons.
On April 16 2011 02:34 elmizzt wrote:This seemed retarded at first, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense....
I and Eternalmisfit has accused Zorkmid, I think he´s trying to get reasonable people lynched and Eternal noted that he´s subtly derailing the talk.
I have Zorkmid and Sandroba against Shcoleosis. Zorkmid thinks Sholeosis doesn´t want to lynch lurkers because his buddy is a lurker, while Sandroba makes a case about how he´s not helping the debate but only stating the obvious.
Wants to Lynch Inactives:
emlizzt
Zorkmid
Eternalmisfit
Wants to Not Lynch Inactives:
Forumite (me)
Senj
Shcoleosis
Still not much to go on, but good to keep in mind for now.
|
I probably missed some information, this is just from going through the thread once.
|
On April 16 2011 06:04 VarpuliS wrote:Show nested quote +On April 16 2011 05:52 Forumite wrote:
There has been some accusations of scummy behavior allready, actually everyone has except the lurkers (Varp, Senj, Vain) and Shcoleosis have pointed out someone that they think are scummy. There are 4 different people who have been pointed out as scummy by at least two people, at least if my data is correct. would you care to share your data with the rest of us?
And because I like tripple-posting;
Yes, and you are welcome.
|
On April 15 2011 23:19 sandroba wrote:
That makes no kind of sense whatsoever. How is me saying losing townies is a bad thing makes me scum? I'm obviously town. The idea of lynching inactives is really just to make sure everyone post enough so we can get a read on them.
Also attacking the one doing analisys on you is not good town play. That's called OMGUS from what I've read. If you really are town then you should either defend yourself or make a case of someone you think is scum (a decent one, not the nonsencical one you've posted) so you can actually help town.
I also have no connection with forumite and I fail to see how you could possibly have drawn this conclusion. And to say it doesn't matter if he posted that before or after he got PM'ed is just LOL.
You are looking more and more like scum to me.
This is a scummy post. He gets defensive and says two scummy lines, which I bolded. Not sure if it's just defensive posting because Zorkmid called him scum or an actual scumtell, but it's suspicious.
I highly doubt that Forumite is scum though, so I might just be overanalysing.
Zorkmid's schtick about Forumite being scummy because he' busy over the weekend is bullshit though.
|
On April 16 2011 06:23 Forumite wrote:Show nested quote +On April 16 2011 06:04 VarpuliS wrote:On April 16 2011 05:52 Forumite wrote:
There has been some accusations of scummy behavior allready, actually everyone has except the lurkers (Varp, Senj, Vain) and Shcoleosis have pointed out someone that they think are scummy. There are 4 different people who have been pointed out as scummy by at least two people, at least if my data is correct. would you care to share your data with the rest of us? And because I like tripple-posting; Yes, and you are welcome.
Thank you very much. Am I still a lurker?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
