|
On April 15 2011 11:12 Eternalmisfit wrote:
Btw I think we should lynch people who are inactive or lurking the boards as it is more likely that they are trying to stay under and radar and avoid suspicion on themselves by barely posting at all.
Yeah, that seem logical. We don't want to kill innocent townies, though...It's the mafia we want gone! I highly doubt any mafia would be lurking or inactive when they have chances to kill. But who am I to say...I'm still learning :/
|
GL HF broskis. Not sure I agree Eternalmisfit, seeing as we're all relatively new to the mafia game.
|
I agree that we are all new but if we have people only posting the minimum count and not partaking in discussion, it becomes harder to analyze who the mafia are. If we can make Mafia post more, it is likely that they will slip up and drop hints.
In any case, it will be a tough call for the first day lynch 
|
Hi everyone, GL HF! I would like to highly incentive everyone to post a lot of good a analisys and be very active so we can effectively make the mafia post a lot aswell if they don't want to be lynched by inactivity. This should help town a lot by giving us a lot of material to analise. Please, avoid spamming the thread with useless post and be sure to always post your opnion and analisys.
|
On April 15 2011 11:12 Eternalmisfit wrote:
Btw I think we should lynch people who are inactive or lurking the boards as it is more likely that they are trying to stay under and radar and avoid suspicion on themselves by barely posting at all.
I concur with this, there sure isn't any harm in losing inactive townies OR scum!
GLHF!
|
I'm sure getting rid of the inactive would make the lynching process easier, but I can't help but question the idea of getting rid of people unnecessarily. I'm thinking about it more, and I'm realizing that there's a chance the one we lynch is scum and there's also a chance that he or she might not be scum....no way to tell right now. Hopefully we'll get lucky.
|
On April 15 2011 11:41 Shcoleosis wrote:
I'm sure getting rid of the inactive would make the lynching process easier, but I can't help but question the idea of getting rid of people unnecessarily. I'm thinking about it more, and I'm realizing that there's a chance the one we lynch is scum and there's also a chance that he or she might not be scum....no way to tell right now. Hopefully we'll get lucky.
Why are you trying to protect inactives? Either they're not helping to scumhunt, or they are mafia. Let's hang em all !
|
Yeah, basically. I guess that's kind of the idea of keeping the thread active though, more posts mean more chances to slip up and divulge too much information.
Somewhat unrelated, but I just broke a 9 game lose streak. :D huuuuuge relief there.
|
I for one am going to vote that we lynch the quiet most innocent seeming player  I might even do a character count!
|
On April 15 2011 12:49 Zorkmid wrote:I for one am going to vote that we lynch the quiet most innocent seeming player I might even do a character count!
hmmm...how long until we can start eye-ing some of the inactive players and leaning on em a little?
|
On April 15 2011 12:52 elmizzt wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 12:49 Zorkmid wrote:I for one am going to vote that we lynch the quiet most innocent seeming player I might even do a character count! hmmm...how long until we can start eye-ing some of the inactive players and leaning on em a little?
I'm already taking note that we have yet to see Forumite, Vain and Varpulis, however; I feel it's a little early yet. By the halfway mark on the first day I'll be suspicious if we haven't heard from them yet.
|
We will have to see. So far three folks are missing in action. But, I guess the day just started at near sleep time on EST side. Hopefully the thread will be active tomorrow and we can start figuring out folks.
|
On April 15 2011 12:40 Zorkmid wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 11:41 Shcoleosis wrote:
I'm sure getting rid of the inactive would make the lynching process easier, but I can't help but question the idea of getting rid of people unnecessarily. I'm thinking about it more, and I'm realizing that there's a chance the one we lynch is scum and there's also a chance that he or she might not be scum....no way to tell right now. Hopefully we'll get lucky. Why are you trying to protect inactives? Either they're not helping to scumhunt, or they are mafia. Let's hang em all !
Not trying to protect the inactive. I guess I just didn't really understand your logic well. But, hey, if it takes lynching the inactive to get rid of the scum, LET'S DO THIS! Lol
|
Well I just checked and it's actually 6 AM in sweeden/netherlands so Vain and Forumite are probably actually sleeping. However, judging from this thread varpulis is normally active around this time. Hmmm...
|
Im getting the feelings that playing this game is going to be about 1/10000 as fun as watching XVIII
|
United States22154 Posts
On April 15 2011 14:02 Zorkmid wrote:
Im getting the feelings that playing this game is going to be about 1/10000 as fun as watching XVIII
mafia games are as fun as you choose to make them.
|
1/10000 less drama too. Be sure to vote in the thread with a
##Vote Chaoser btw
|
we vets should take over this thread, flame the shit out of everyone and cause utter destruction.
where is coagulation? RELEASE THE KRAKEN.
nah gl hf newbies
|
On April 15 2011 15:22 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
we vets should take over this thread, flame the shit out of everyone and cause utter destruction.
>.<
I hope we don´t get too many non-player posts, they are basically flooding the debate, making it harder to see what´s going on.
On April 15 2011 11:41 Shcoleosis wrote:
I'm sure getting rid of the inactive would make the lynching process easier, but I can't help but question the idea of getting rid of people unnecessarily. I'm thinking about it more, and I'm realizing that there's a chance the one we lynch is scum and there's also a chance that he or she might not be scum....no way to tell right now. Hopefully we'll get lucky.
Lynching inactives is a decent tactic, because scum usually try to stay under the radar and not help so much, then again any mafia with 5 minutes on the internet would know that and try to post more to avoid the first blasts.
Been reading through these first posts and these are my first notes, not complete of course, just the first summary. While I partly agree with those who want to lynch people who post little, we should still think about how and why we lynch. It doesn´t take many lynches of slow-posting townies before we loose.
Want to lynch inactives
emlizzt
Zorkmid
Eternalmisfit
Tries to not lynch inactives, at least yet
Senj
Scholeosis
|
On April 15 2011 13:08 sandroba wrote:
Well I just checked and it's actually 6 AM in sweeden/netherlands so Vain and Forumite are probably actually sleeping. However, judging from this thread varpulis is normally active around this time. Hmmm...
Yup, just got out of bed. its 12:40 now here
ehm, can't we like check if these other person's are posting elsewhere so they are knowingly avoiding posting here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
