EPTNope, not anymore.
Senj and Vain seem like the lurkers now, but I´m not sure, counting their posts in this thread might be a good idea.
Surprisingly Normal Mini Mafia I - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
Nope, not anymore. Senj and Vain seem like the lurkers now, but I´m not sure, counting their posts in this thread might be a good idea. | ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On April 16 2011 06:17 sandroba wrote: Well, right now, I'm still waiting on some kind of response by scholeosis. And the other lurkers should come out of the shadows and post their opnion, or is the situation too confortable that the scum can sit back and realx? Well i'll come out of the shadows then and will mention there is not very much too say jet. You can only argue that some are more active then others but i don't think any obvious or major slips were made. Sure, Zorkmid has like 50% of the posts but doesn't really really fit the picture of scum(jet?). I think Shcoleosis has displayed an odd behaviour by at first saying I'm still learning :/ and switching from opinion that fast but an explanation for this could be that (s)he really isn't really into this game jet and is just afraid of being hanged the first day. Still until (s)he can give an explenation, my vote is still on him/her. And btw please tell if your a girl or not. i am sick of typing 2 genders all the time. ifnot i assume your sexless, lol | ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
On April 16 2011 06:36 Forumite wrote: Nope, not anymore. Senj and Vain seem like the lurkers now, but I´m not sure, counting their posts in this thread might be a good idea. Four if you count this one;) | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
I stand corrected. Senj has posted some, it´s not really a matter of non-posters anymore, but just some posting less, taking less part and taking less room in the debate. Information: Going offline early tonight. Will be back online tomorrow. Play nice while I´m gone. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
I just looked though the thread, and pretty much 100% of Eternalmisfit's posts have been pushing for an inactive lynch day 1. He'd like to get everybody talking, but has yet to contribute in a meaningful way. If we're gonna lynch a lurker, it should either be him or Senj, who has been lurking since the beginning of the game, save a few posts about inactives. | ||
|
Eternalmisfit
United States643 Posts
On April 16 2011 07:10 VarpuliS wrote: I just looked though the thread, and pretty much 100% of Eternalmisfit's posts have been pushing for an inactive lynch day 1. He'd like to get everybody talking, but has yet to contribute in a meaningful way. If we're gonna lynch a lurker, it should either be him or Senj, who has been lurking since the beginning of the game, save a few posts about inactives. I pushed for inactive lynch as I don't see in-actives contributing to discussion in any form or sense. As far as meaningful discussion is concerned, there has been very little analysis by anyone on this thread apart from arbitrary finger pointing. As far as my suspicions are concerned, I am quite suspicious of Shcoleosis being scum. + Show Spoiler + Most of the people in the town are in 2 camps: lynching lurkers or not lynching lurkers. And for the most, the people have strong opinions on the matter. Shcoleosis initially was quite against the idea at the start of the discussion. However, as my suggestion gained some support (as most of the people opposed to it posted later), she quickly jumped sides and was semi-pro for lynching inactives. I think she is changing her opinion and trying a bit too hard to fit in which seems like scummy behavior. She has also been inactive since those posts. FoS Shcoleosis | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On April 16 2011 07:10 VarpuliS wrote: As it stands it's unlikely we can identify mafia day one. I think we should lynch a lurker day 1 and see who the mafia kills night 1 before trying any hardcore analysis. I've got no problem with the analysis that's been going on atm though, so keep it up guys! I just looked though the thread, and pretty much 100% of Eternalmisfit's posts have been pushing for an inactive lynch day 1. He'd like to get everybody talking, but has yet to contribute in a meaningful way. If we're gonna lynch a lurker, it should either be him or Senj, who has been lurking since the beginning of the game, save a few posts about inactives. This is pretty contradictory. And you conviniently forgot about scholeosis who has 2 post of utter nothingness and scumtells. Senj really hasn't shown up much to give us his insight. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
On April 16 2011 07:28 Eternalmisfit wrote: I pushed for inactive lynch as I don't see in-actives contributing to discussion in any form or sense. As far as meaningful discussion is concerned, there has been very little analysis by anyone on this thread apart from arbitrary finger pointing. As far as my suspicions are concerned, I am quite suspicious of Shcoleosis being scum. + Show Spoiler + Most of the people in the town are in 2 camps: lynching lurkers or not lynching lurkers. And for the most, the people have strong opinions on the matter. Shcoleosis initially was quite against the idea at the start of the discussion. However, as my suggestion gained some support (as most of the people opposed to it posted later), she quickly jumped sides and was semi-pro for lynching inactives. I think she is changing her opinion and trying a bit too hard to fit in which seems like scummy behavior. She has also been inactive since those posts. FoS Shcoleosis Fair enough about the lurking. I'll look into the Shcoleosis matter. Expect a post about it in a couple of minutes. | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
First post is a response to Eternalmisfit's suggestion to pressure lurkers On April 15 2011 11:17 Shcoleosis wrote: Yeah, that seem logical. We don't want to kill innocent townies, though...It's the mafia we want gone! I highly doubt any mafia would be lurking or inactive when they have chances to kill. But who am I to say...I'm still learning :/ This bolded line is not scummy, it's just stupid. Mafia doesn't kill by talking, they kill by pm'ing GMarshal at night. Mafia needs to avoid drawing attention to itself to prevent themselves from getting lynched. This post in general is pretty worthless, ending with a line that is... strange. But who am I to say...I'm still learning :/ This is the first scumtell I can see. She basically says "don't listen to me, i'm new." Townies need to talk and be listened to, not ignored because this is their first game. Only mafia and blues benefit from being ignored, so unless he roleclaims, lets assume scum. Second post comes a little bit later. the post reads: On April 15 2011 11:41 Shcoleosis wrote: I'm sure getting rid of the inactive would make the lynching process easier, but I can't help but question the idea of getting rid of people unnecessarily. I'm thinking about it more, and I'm realizing that there's a chance the one we lynch is scum and there's also a chance that he or she might not be scum....no way to tell right now. Hopefully we'll get lucky. This is a post which blends in. It says practically nothing, but appears to be a contribution. Blending in is not something a townie needs to do. +1 scum level. Finally, we've got lucky number 3: On April 15 2011 13:01 Shcoleosis wrote: Not trying to protect the inactive. I guess I just didn't really understand your logic well. But, hey, if it takes lynching the inactive to get rid of the scum, LET'S DO THIS! Lol Here, Shcoleosis basically says: "you seem to disagree with me... fine, you're right!" Agreeing with everybody else is something that two kinds of players do: -unhelpful townies -because they're just being sheep -mafia -because they're trying to blend in I don't want either in my town come lategame. Based off of this analysis, I'd like to start putting some pressure on Shcoleosis. Until a better target surfaces or she comes up with some good posts later on, I'll put my vote on her. ## Vote Shcoleosis | ||
|
Eternalmisfit
United States643 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On April 16 2011 08:15 sandroba wrote: Also note that females are extremelly socially intelligent on average, while being the masters of appearing dumb while being manipulative. Let's leave stereotypes and mildly sexist comments out of the game please -_- | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
Vote: Scholeosis As a place holder. I'm going out right now and I'll probably be back around 4'o clock in the morning here in Brazil (GMT -3). | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
##Vote: Scholeosis | ||
|
Vain
Netherlands1115 Posts
##Vote: Scholeosis | ||
|
Shcoleosis
United States24 Posts
| ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
Shcoleosis, sheeping is not a great way to play town, if you are indeed town. Even if you're not scum, you're not helping us find them. Who do you think would be a better target for a lynch? there are no inactives left, and you are the most suspicious of the lurkers so far. I'd love to hear your opinion. If you can convince me that somebody else is more scummy than you, then I'll change my vote, until then, I'm fine with leaving you over the fire. | ||
| ||
