|
annul you ask for the post and then you say you dont want it....
@tnkted - I didn't have the weakest reputation in the IG. You're getting your chronology messed up
It goes:
I was active and thoughtful. People thought I was town. I received no fosses. The other 2 in question that arent in the 'confirmed' circle both got fossed . . . i went to bed . . . Jackal outs that I'm scum and MUST be lynched. He says he has cleared towns (3 of them). He offers no proof that i am mafia but insists i am 100% mafia. . . . The other 2 'confirmed' fos me in a sheepish way . . . Before I even returned people started defending me . . . I returned and defended myself as any good towny would . . . Jackal admits he doesn't know i'm mafia but apparently i'm the most lynchable (Not true) Coag admits the 3 clears arent clear at all the vote from the IG is 3 for me and 3 for jackal.
NONE of this scumminess was evn mentioned before jackal decided i was scum I was never an fos or a lynch target before that. In fact the 2 others jackal fosses were...
|
Basically for me...
Track has given town over 100 posts to analyze for later
Jackal/Coag have given few posts. The posts they have given... half of them contradict the other half
"Tack is 100% scum" vs "I'm not 100% sure he is scum" "Jackal, Coag, Lemon are confirmed" vs "We will be confirming Jackal, Coag, and lemon by day 2" "Tack isn't responding to PMs" vs "No one sent Tack PMs" "Tack was inactive" vs "Tack being active the whole time with over 100 posts"
Everything Coag and Jackal have said is a lie... so how can I support anything you do? You lie, and then contradict your selves later in your posts... I don't understand how you can do that and still think we will follow what you are doing.
|
After lemon picked up on the BC the two 1/2 clues I laid had been pretty much revealed. Coag got a clue from the other mod, and insanious picked up on it. After lemon the other three players are a toss up, because they could easily have figured out what the clues were and grabbed one of the other posts where I used them.
So Tack Jack and Darm are all unconfirmed breadcrumbwise.
|
On March 27 2011 07:17 tnkted wrote: After lemon picked up on the BC the two 1/2 clues I laid had been pretty much revealed. Coag got a clue from the other mod, and insanious picked up on it. After lemon the other three players are a toss up, because they could easily have figured out what the clues were and grabbed one of the other posts where I used them.
So Tack Jack and Darm are all unconfirmed breadcrumbwise.
Don't forget that Jackal got one totally wrong as well. He then claimed it was because he was looking for one relating to his role PM, but HOW COULD YOU BREADCRUMB A ROLE PM!
|
@bum
you should only focus on these two targets for the kill tonight regardless of what people say by now. we have 3-4 hours left til night 1? And by the two targets I mean Tackster and Jackal.
I don't care who you lynch it is up to you and your blue circle to decide, but one of these two MUST be lynched due to gaining tremendous information. If you were to lynch other IG players we won't know shit until a day or 2 later where we have to read a shit ton more pages by the pace people are arguing.
|
|
Tack, if all the item game members were immediately willing to FOS you, you did have the weakest reputation among the item game members. Its nothing personal, its just that they all didn't trust you enough to support you when it mattered. That statement was made with no personal judgement at all.
|
"annul you ask for the post and then you say you dont want it...."
i did no such thing
if you can show me that you responded to the ALIGNMENT PM breadcrumb, the one sent at the start of night 0, not the start of day 1, then that is what i want. otherwise, no.
|
On March 27 2011 07:17 Insanious wrote: Basically for me...
Track has given town over 100 posts to analyze for later
Jackal/Coag have given few posts. The posts they have given... half of them contradict the other half
"Tack is 100% scum" vs "I'm not 100% sure he is scum" "Jackal, Coag, Lemon are confirmed" vs "We will be confirming Jackal, Coag, and lemon by day 2" "Tack isn't responding to PMs" vs "No one sent Tack PMs" "Tack was inactive" vs "Tack being active the whole time with over 100 posts"
Everything Coag and Jackal have said is a lie... so how can I support anything you do? You lie, and then contradict your selves later in your posts... I don't understand how you can do that and still think we will follow what you are doing. Nobody has lied. You keep alluding to that. You take posts out of timeline and represent them as accurate. Then say we lie. You sir are scum. I'm becoming more convinced with every post you make defending Trackster that he is your scumbuddy. Keep 'em coming.
|
@ ilovejohn which all makes sense and i'd like to add something.
I think we can all agree that Jackal is behaving extremely wildly. He also claims he has a KP.
When I pop up green to we really want to see jackal shoot another confirmed 'mafia'?
|
On March 27 2011 07:22 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 07:17 Insanious wrote: Basically for me...
Track has given town over 100 posts to analyze for later
Jackal/Coag have given few posts. The posts they have given... half of them contradict the other half
"Tack is 100% scum" vs "I'm not 100% sure he is scum" "Jackal, Coag, Lemon are confirmed" vs "We will be confirming Jackal, Coag, and lemon by day 2" "Tack isn't responding to PMs" vs "No one sent Tack PMs" "Tack was inactive" vs "Tack being active the whole time with over 100 posts"
Everything Coag and Jackal have said is a lie... so how can I support anything you do? You lie, and then contradict your selves later in your posts... I don't understand how you can do that and still think we will follow what you are doing. Nobody has lied. You keep alluding to that. You take posts out of timeline and represent them as accurate. Then say we lie. You sir are scum. I'm becoming more convinced with every post you make defending Trackster that he is your scumbuddy. Keep 'em coming. Dude, don't even try this with me, you want me to go through every post of yours and line them up?
If you say 12 hours ago "Tack is 100% scum" Then a hour ago "not confirmed scum, just most likely scum" Still a lie. Doesn't matter if it was 12 hours ago, or 24 hours ago. You said it was confirmed and it wasn't.
Just like you said, when you first posted that Jackal, Coag, and Lemon were 100% confirmed. Yet just now, Coag posted about a Plan to confirm you guys. This means you lied.
You said Tack didn't respond to PMs, yet then Tack said you guys didn't PM him. And you said you left him out of the PM circle. Another lie.
Then you were just caught in a lie saying Tack was inactive, when he never was.
You have LIED, stop LYING TO THE TOWN.
jesus, if you are town, you are the worst town in the history of mafia.
|
"annul you ask for the post and then you say you dont want it...."
I was typing the post as you replied. didn't see you admit to the mistake till i hit send.
|
On March 27 2011 07:19 deconduo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 07:17 tnkted wrote: After lemon picked up on the BC the two 1/2 clues I laid had been pretty much revealed. Coag got a clue from the other mod, and insanious picked up on it. After lemon the other three players are a toss up, because they could easily have figured out what the clues were and grabbed one of the other posts where I used them.
So Tack Jack and Darm are all unconfirmed breadcrumbwise. Don't forget that Jackal got one totally wrong as well. He then claimed it was because he was looking for one relating to his role PM, but HOW COULD YOU BREADCRUMB A ROLE PM! http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=8452176
Already covered that.
|
On March 27 2011 07:30 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 07:19 deconduo wrote:On March 27 2011 07:17 tnkted wrote: After lemon picked up on the BC the two 1/2 clues I laid had been pretty much revealed. Coag got a clue from the other mod, and insanious picked up on it. After lemon the other three players are a toss up, because they could easily have figured out what the clues were and grabbed one of the other posts where I used them.
So Tack Jack and Darm are all unconfirmed breadcrumbwise. Don't forget that Jackal got one totally wrong as well. He then claimed it was because he was looking for one relating to his role PM, but HOW COULD YOU BREADCRUMB A ROLE PM! http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=8452176Already covered that.
Well, i can see why you were confused, but I said role alignment pm. I mistyped.
Regardless, three people had already posted the clues by the time you got back on, so my chance to confirm you was wasted. :/
In return, however, we got coag and annul and lemon confirmed, and it appears from allayall's internal discussions that you guys concur on that front, so I guess thats one good thing that happened from this plan.
|
On March 27 2011 07:25 Insanious wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 07:22 Jackal58 wrote:On March 27 2011 07:17 Insanious wrote: Basically for me...
Track has given town over 100 posts to analyze for later
Jackal/Coag have given few posts. The posts they have given... half of them contradict the other half
"Tack is 100% scum" vs "I'm not 100% sure he is scum" "Jackal, Coag, Lemon are confirmed" vs "We will be confirming Jackal, Coag, and lemon by day 2" "Tack isn't responding to PMs" vs "No one sent Tack PMs" "Tack was inactive" vs "Tack being active the whole time with over 100 posts"
Everything Coag and Jackal have said is a lie... so how can I support anything you do? You lie, and then contradict your selves later in your posts... I don't understand how you can do that and still think we will follow what you are doing. Nobody has lied. You keep alluding to that. You take posts out of timeline and represent them as accurate. Then say we lie. You sir are scum. I'm becoming more convinced with every post you make defending Trackster that he is your scumbuddy. Keep 'em coming. Dude, don't even try this with me, you want me to go through every post of yours and line them up? If you say 12 hours ago "Tack is 100% scum" Then a hour ago "not confirmed scum, just most likely scum" Still a lie. Doesn't matter if it was 12 hours ago, or 24 hours ago. You said it was confirmed and it wasn't. Just like you said, when you first posted that Jackal, Coag, and Lemon were 100% confirmed. Yet just now, Coag posted about a Plan to confirm you guys. This means you lied. You said Tack didn't respond to PMs, yet then Tack said you guys didn't PM him. And you said you left him out of the PM circle. Another lie. Then you were just caught in a lie saying Tack was inactive, when he never was. You have LIED, stop LYING TO THE TOWN. jesus, if you are town, you are the worst town in the history of mafia. Go ahead scummy. Everyone of them. Link them all with time stamps. I'll start you off. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=8445339 My two scenarios as outlined allude to the fact that I might be wrong on Trackster. However with your stalwart defense of him and your uncanny ability to see lies in every thing I say I am now 100% positive he is scum. So are you.
|
On March 27 2011 07:34 tnkted wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 07:30 Jackal58 wrote:On March 27 2011 07:19 deconduo wrote:On March 27 2011 07:17 tnkted wrote: After lemon picked up on the BC the two 1/2 clues I laid had been pretty much revealed. Coag got a clue from the other mod, and insanious picked up on it. After lemon the other three players are a toss up, because they could easily have figured out what the clues were and grabbed one of the other posts where I used them.
So Tack Jack and Darm are all unconfirmed breadcrumbwise. Don't forget that Jackal got one totally wrong as well. He then claimed it was because he was looking for one relating to his role PM, but HOW COULD YOU BREADCRUMB A ROLE PM! http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=8452176Already covered that. Well, i can see why you were confused, but I said role alignment pm. I mistyped. Regardless, three people had already posted the clues by the time you got back on, so my chance to confirm you was wasted. :/ In return, however, we got coag and annul and lemon confirmed, and it appears from allayall's internal discussions that you guys concur on that front, so I guess thats one good thing that happened from this plan. I was also half in the bag. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" So my list of confirmed townies matches yours from the IG game. And now we include annul.
And I'm still scum.
|
I'm saying you and tack are tied for me scumsensewise. If it makes you feel better, I do not think that your inability to understand what I was doing confirms you as scum, but it really doesn't help and you wasted an opportunity to prove yourself.
Appealing to me is stupid though, because I'm just a townie and Bum already said he doesn't want anything to do with my plan. :/
|
Fine, lets start here...
On March 26 2011 11:23 Jackal58 wrote: Hola fellow townies. A fond fuck you to scum. I'm gonna do the same shit i did in XXXVII. I'm gonna start a shit storm of the absolute highest magnitude. I'm going to exceedingly piss off 3 IG players and I'm going to tell you guys to lay off three of them. But I'm not telling which 3 until tomorrow. And now I'm going to give town victory on day 1 #1 Bum lynch Tackster. Dunno if he's red or black but he is scum. #2 I want medic protection over night. #3 If Tackster flips black I will shoot the other scum. If I miss and hit green the remaining one will be tomorrows lynch. #4 Item game players can stop me from shooting them but they will be lynched. #5 Did I say I need medic protection for this to work? If we don't have a medic I'm hosed but town is still going to win. #6 I will not announce scum #2 until tomorrow. #7 Worse case scenario is we have 4 confirmed townies plus bums circle of 3 #8 Best case scenario is we have 5 confirmed townies plus bums circle #9 That's 8 vs the world #10 Bum's circle is cops. They should be able to add more townies faster than scum can kill us. #11 Scum of either black or red persuasion will immediately try to kill all of us in the IM game. If I do manage to survive night 1 town has a kp at their disposal on night 2 and I will shoot whoever you vote for. Caveat - There are a few who shall remain nameless at this point that I will not shoot. #12 I was going to wait until tomorrow to post this but I want bum and his team to have time to hash it all out. I am town. I can deliver at worst 2 out of 3 kills as scum or hopefully best case is 2 for 2. #13 Town wins. #14 Scum sucks. #15 Stuff it noobs. I know what I'm doing. #16. This is "Insane" Mafia remember!!!
This DOES NOT allude to Tackster being anything but SCUM.
#2 says he is scum black or red #3 says you will shoot the other scum when tackster flips red/black
You do not say anywhere that you might be wrong. There is 0% interpretation where you allude to not being 100% sure Tack is scum here. If you can show me exactly what lines allude to that....
On March 26 2011 11:54 Jackal58 wrote: Don't care how he looks. He's either red or black. What color you reppin?
Here's you saying he is 100% black or red
On March 26 2011 22:12 Jackal58 wrote: I'm not asking anybody to sheep. I'm offering 2 scum at the possibility of 1 townie getting hit. Best case is 2 for 2 and then 4 confirmed townies worst case is 3 confirmed townies.
Again saying he is 100% red or black
On March 27 2011 05:24 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 05:13 bumatlarge wrote:On March 27 2011 05:07 annul wrote: the majority (if not all other five?) of us agree that tackster is a fine kill for tonight. Alright, I just want confirmation on this from all. Even if two are scum, three of you who are town have a strong feeling that tackster is scum, even with what he has posted in the thread? I'll be honest and fair. Out of Tackster Annul and Darm 2 are scum. I picked Tack simply because I saw him as the easiest lynch. If you want to lynch darm I'm cool with that as well. The longer this has gone on the more I think annul is the town out of those 3. It is a numbers game.
First time you said Tack wasn't 100% Scum... so now you are trying to weasel your self out of what your previously said. For 17 pages before this post, you said Tackster was 100% scum, 0% chance of not being scum. Now, since we are attacking you. You are saying "oh wait... he is just 2/3 chance, not 100% chance"
Very scummy. Scum like to leave backdoors, you are making yours very late, then trying to weasel out of it later.
On March 26 2011 22:42 Jackal58 wrote: Cubed. That was my plan. Except I picked a name. I said at the beginning of my post outlining my plan I was about to piss off 3 IG players. I know what 3 of the IG items are. Of the 3 none are particularly beneficial to the black team but they would allow reds to rape us. The other 3 may have attributes that would equally make black damn near invincible but that is merely speculation on my part. I know who 3 of the 4 townies are. Of the 3 of us we are confident in our choice of Tackster. Of the other 3 1 says a scum is definitely among the two noobs in the IG. Annul says it's the other noob. Of those 3 players 2 are scum. Plain and simple. 66% chance that Tack is red or black. 50% of the IG players agree he is scum. 1 other allows for it to be likely. 2 disagree. 1 being Tackster the other annul.
Yes we may be wrong but it will pretty much nail the other two to the wall if we are. Worse case scenario 1 townie - 1 red - 1 black. Items to town. I can't make it any more win than that.
Again this is more for bum than anybody else but feel free to call me names some more. I am nothing but pro town.
Now, as people start to question your plan. Tack goes from 100% scum (AS seen in point #2 and #3 of your plan) To only being 66% scum... you think.
On March 27 2011 05:41 Jackal58 wrote: If you sheep could read you'd already have seen where 3 or 4 times including my original post regarding my plan I have always admitted I might be wrong.
Wait, now your saying you could be wrong... look at the first post here, you linked it. You NEVER SAID YOU COULD BE WRONG.
You said Tack could be red or black. You NEVER ONCE said he could be green. LIER!
On March 27 2011 05:57 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 05:49 Lanaia wrote:On March 27 2011 05:45 Insanious wrote: If you want to change my mind you have to prove it... give me PMs. Give me something to change my mind.
Because you NEVER will sway ANYONE simply going "guys... believe me, I'm town I swear!" QFT. But seriously, Jackal, why isn't it necessary to give us proof? Same to annul. Because none of us have any "proof". I can tell you what items LW and coag have. But I'm not going to. I can't prove coag and LW are town any more than I could prove LSB and coag were town in XXXVII. Bum if you want to lynch me go for it. But then lynch darm tack and annul in the next 3 days. Probably be too late but hey. What the hell. I'll be dead.
HELL, now you are saying that you don't even have proof to say that track is scum or not... you are just guessing.
Before you confirmed he was scum, now you are saying he might not be? That its just a hunch...
- - - -
So your plan was built on a LIE (Tack being confirmed scum), because you LIED saying he was scum (see posts above)... then you LIED saying you didn't LIE.
:/ Time to look into your other LIES.
|
On March 27 2011 08:01 Insanious wrote:Fine, lets start here... Show nested quote +On March 26 2011 11:23 Jackal58 wrote: Hola fellow townies. A fond fuck you to scum. I'm gonna do the same shit i did in XXXVII. I'm gonna start a shit storm of the absolute highest magnitude. I'm going to exceedingly piss off 3 IG players and I'm going to tell you guys to lay off three of them. But I'm not telling which 3 until tomorrow. And now I'm going to give town victory on day 1 #1 Bum lynch Tackster. Dunno if he's red or black but he is scum. #2 I want medic protection over night. #3 If Tackster flips black I will shoot the other scum. If I miss and hit green the remaining one will be tomorrows lynch. #4 Item game players can stop me from shooting them but they will be lynched. #5 Did I say I need medic protection for this to work? If we don't have a medic I'm hosed but town is still going to win. #6 I will not announce scum #2 until tomorrow. #7 Worse case scenario is we have 4 confirmed townies plus bums circle of 3 #8 Best case scenario is we have 5 confirmed townies plus bums circle #9 That's 8 vs the world #10 Bum's circle is cops. They should be able to add more townies faster than scum can kill us. #11 Scum of either black or red persuasion will immediately try to kill all of us in the IM game. If I do manage to survive night 1 town has a kp at their disposal on night 2 and I will shoot whoever you vote for. Caveat - There are a few who shall remain nameless at this point that I will not shoot. #12 I was going to wait until tomorrow to post this but I want bum and his team to have time to hash it all out. I am town. I can deliver at worst 2 out of 3 kills as scum or hopefully best case is 2 for 2. #13 Town wins. #14 Scum sucks. #15 Stuff it noobs. I know what I'm doing. #16. This is "Insane" Mafia remember!!!
This DOES NOT allude to Tackster being anything but SCUM. #2 says he is scum black or red #3 says you will shoot the other scum when tackster flips red/black You do not say anywhere that you might be wrong. There is 0% interpretation where you allude to not being 100% sure Tack is scum here. If you can show me exactly what lines allude to that.... Show nested quote +On March 26 2011 11:54 Jackal58 wrote: Don't care how he looks. He's either red or black. What color you reppin? Here's you saying he is 100% black or red Show nested quote +On March 26 2011 22:12 Jackal58 wrote: I'm not asking anybody to sheep. I'm offering 2 scum at the possibility of 1 townie getting hit. Best case is 2 for 2 and then 4 confirmed townies worst case is 3 confirmed townies.
Again saying he is 100% red or black Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 05:24 Jackal58 wrote:On March 27 2011 05:13 bumatlarge wrote:On March 27 2011 05:07 annul wrote: the majority (if not all other five?) of us agree that tackster is a fine kill for tonight. Alright, I just want confirmation on this from all. Even if two are scum, three of you who are town have a strong feeling that tackster is scum, even with what he has posted in the thread? I'll be honest and fair. Out of Tackster Annul and Darm 2 are scum. I picked Tack simply because I saw him as the easiest lynch. If you want to lynch darm I'm cool with that as well. The longer this has gone on the more I think annul is the town out of those 3. It is a numbers game. First time you said Tack wasn't 100% Scum... so now you are trying to weasel your self out of what your previously said. For 17 pages before this post, you said Tackster was 100% scum, 0% chance of not being scum. Now, since we are attacking you. You are saying "oh wait... he is just 2/3 chance, not 100% chance" Very scummy. Scum like to leave backdoors, you are making yours very late, then trying to weasel out of it later. Show nested quote +On March 26 2011 22:42 Jackal58 wrote: Cubed. That was my plan. Except I picked a name. I said at the beginning of my post outlining my plan I was about to piss off 3 IG players. I know what 3 of the IG items are. Of the 3 none are particularly beneficial to the black team but they would allow reds to rape us. The other 3 may have attributes that would equally make black damn near invincible but that is merely speculation on my part. I know who 3 of the 4 townies are. Of the 3 of us we are confident in our choice of Tackster. Of the other 3 1 says a scum is definitely among the two noobs in the IG. Annul says it's the other noob. Of those 3 players 2 are scum. Plain and simple. 66% chance that Tack is red or black. 50% of the IG players agree he is scum. 1 other allows for it to be likely. 2 disagree. 1 being Tackster the other annul.
Yes we may be wrong but it will pretty much nail the other two to the wall if we are. Worse case scenario 1 townie - 1 red - 1 black. Items to town. I can't make it any more win than that.
Again this is more for bum than anybody else but feel free to call me names some more. I am nothing but pro town. Now, as people start to question your plan. Tack goes from 100% scum (AS seen in point #2 and #3 of your plan) To only being 66% scum... you think. Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 05:41 Jackal58 wrote: If you sheep could read you'd already have seen where 3 or 4 times including my original post regarding my plan I have always admitted I might be wrong. Wait, now your saying you could be wrong... look at the first post here, you linked it. You NEVER SAID YOU COULD BE WRONG. You said Tack could be red or black. You NEVER ONCE said he could be green. LIER! Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 05:57 Jackal58 wrote:On March 27 2011 05:49 Lanaia wrote:On March 27 2011 05:45 Insanious wrote: If you want to change my mind you have to prove it... give me PMs. Give me something to change my mind.
Because you NEVER will sway ANYONE simply going "guys... believe me, I'm town I swear!" QFT. But seriously, Jackal, why isn't it necessary to give us proof? Same to annul. Because none of us have any "proof". I can tell you what items LW and coag have. But I'm not going to. I can't prove coag and LW are town any more than I could prove LSB and coag were town in XXXVII. Bum if you want to lynch me go for it. But then lynch darm tack and annul in the next 3 days. Probably be too late but hey. What the hell. I'll be dead. HELL, now you are saying that you don't even have proof to say that track is scum or not... you are just guessing. Before you confirmed he was scum, now you are saying he might not be? That its just a hunch... - - - - So your plan was built on a LIE (Tack being confirmed scum), because you LIED saying he was scum (see posts above)... then you LIED saying you didn't LIE. :/ Time to look into your other LIES. I'm not weaseling anything. You are.
|
Let's start with a short lie, that deconduo caught you with
On March 27 2011 06:53 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 06:40 Tackster wrote: Coagulation even if I were to agree that the posts were scummy - which of course they werent
and i were to agree you did analysis on them - which you didnt, you just said 'look scum' and left it there
you still are referencing PMs that occured AFTER you FOSsed me.
You haven't mentioned any material from before you made your mind up. Nobody could say anything about you until I posted my plan. You were inactive. Now you're the towns darling. If I had put forth darm or annul you'd still be lurking.
On March 27 2011 06:59 deconduo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 06:53 Jackal58 wrote:On March 27 2011 06:40 Tackster wrote: Coagulation even if I were to agree that the posts were scummy - which of course they werent
and i were to agree you did analysis on them - which you didnt, you just said 'look scum' and left it there
you still are referencing PMs that occured AFTER you FOSsed me.
You haven't mentioned any material from before you made your mind up. Nobody could say anything about you until I posted my plan. You were inactive. Now you're the towns darling. If I had put forth darm or annul you'd still be lurking. At what point was he inactive? He's been posting since the game started. He has 100 posts, all of them in this thread. You are making shit up once again.
Lie caught 6 minutes later...
Now into another lie, that ties into this one...
On March 26 2011 12:22 Jackal58 wrote: Tackster hasn't responded to PMs.
On March 26 2011 14:02 Tackster wrote: Next I had only PMd ONE person before going to be last night. I told that person that we have an opportunity to work together because they gave me green vibes in the thread. I made a CLEAR condition however - I would only work together once I had somehow cleared them AND they had cleared me. That is to say I don't work with people that I haven't cleared but I also don't work with people that im not sure have cleared me. For the obvious reason that it doesn't make sense to work with me if im not clear to you.
Seeing as I only spoke with 1 person this item game team has decided i'm scum WITHOUT EVEN TALKING TO ME. Jackal, coag, etc. have PMd only today while i've been catching up on the thread to find this unbelievably wild accusation
Wait WHAT? You said he never responded to PMs... that you never sent. NO SHIT. Doesn't make him scum,
YOU LIED TO MAKE HIM LOOK SCUMMY.
You left him out of the PM circle, you didn't even PM him, and then you oust him for not PM'ing you, wow... LIER LIER LIER.
|
|
|
|