EPTUs blues did not RB you afaik.
Insane Mafia 2 - Page 182
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
Us blues did not RB you afaik. | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
AWESOME PLAN OF AWESOMENESS STOPS HERE Well that was quick. Yeah, the fact of the matter was, we only had one DT check. And it was for Eiii. We didn't come forward with it because tnked claimed to have switched Eiii during the night. However, the role-check came back on Eiii, based on the check we just made, which means two things: 1. Eiii is confirmed town (unless he's GF/Miller) 2. Tnked did NOT switch Eiii last night Normally, I wouldn't have confirmed Eiii out loud, but I fear that we will die and I won't be able to pull him off the lynch afterwards. He seems to be pressured himself, so I think it's better off that you guys know he's town. Even so *Slaps Eiii on the back of the head for voting for Tackster*. Now, moving on! Let's analyze #2. Either Tnk lied, or there were other mechanics in the game that screwed things over. Both of these options are plausible, especially since LSB had a hard time putting the night actions together. However, Tnked seems to have slipped several times, one of the strongest tells being that he said we have two blues dead, before the second blue flipped. This can make sense if he had a DT/Kill role like the one Wiggles claimed on the previous page. I'm still not 100% positive he's scum though, it may all be just a series of bad calls, but he's definitely worth looking into. I suggest an analysis by a more competent player if possible. Either way, Lemon should be our lynch for the night. Do not deflect this. As for tnked, I am leaning 60-40 in favor of him being scum. It may be a good lynch for the next night, because even if he's telling the truth mafia can still use him for bussing, so he can hurt the town either way. Of course, if better targets come along, then he can be postponed. | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
But before I go to bed: On March 31 2011 11:37 LSB wrote: Well, your friendly neighborhood bus driver decided to have some fun. He pop some pills all excited, ready to bus around people. And then everything went to pieces. Someone tried to puppet him but the bus driver had already switched himself with another person. Since Puppeting and Busing are both modifying actions happening at the same time, one cannot be preferred over the other so they both failed. We already knew that tnk didn't switch me last night, so don't factor that into your scumminess calculations or anything. | ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
But now I see, only the second one failed. Ok, fair enough. Since we have mod confirmation that someone DID try to puppet him, I guess he can be postponed from analysis. Which leaves us with Insaneous and a few other mostly-lurking kind of people. | ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
If anything, the scum should work with town for lynching blacks at this point. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On April 01 2011 15:30 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: I know jackal quit Jackal just stfu like he was told to. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
RIP iGrok and Rean. Town: Follow Cube this time. It was edited in the day post | ||
|
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
On April 01 2011 19:23 Eiii wrote: ...wow, that was lucky as fuck. Still gonna be active though! But before I go to bed: We already knew that tnk didn't switch me last night, so don't factor that into your scumminess calculations or anything. Yep, I couldn't get a switch off. See, puppeting and switching are both manipulative actions, so I could't switch Eiii with anyone without risking puppeting. I had two switches though, so what I ended up doing was switching myself, which I figured I could do safely, and then switching again after that, where I would be safe from MC. I figured I could safely get Jackal out of the item game first, and then focus on getting Eiii into it. Worse case senario, from my perspective, was Wait a minute. I just won us the item game Give me a minute to PM LSB and make sure I'm allowed to do this. | ||
|
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
| ||
|
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
| ||
|
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
| ||
|
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
You seem to be around more recently ON, but your not contributing that much. If you are "around" why aren't you contributing? Do analysis on someone! Just sitting around doing nothing is really anti-town.[/QUOTE] If you guys hold off on a kevconism analysis i should be able to get one done, The problem will be I'm drving home today so ill be inactive from the start to however far I get (either hotel or home) so it may get posted halfway into the night. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
| ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
| ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On April 02 2011 02:00 Mr. Wiggles wrote: We should also consider that the arena can work like a lynch for us too if we can get two "confirmed" townies in there. Then, we all vote on who we'd like to enter the arena and the two townies can both submit the same name, and kill him the next day in the arena. The only problem is we'd have to be careful to only voting for people we have a strong scum read on, because once you get three townies in there, one of them HAS to die, or at least that's how I think the rules read. But yes, we can use that for a town directed second kill if we need to, and if we can trust that two of the people already in the arena are townies and will be willing to listen, so they don't submit other names. I kind of like that idea a lot. It could work well for us. | ||
|
Kavdragon
United States1251 Posts
On April 01 2011 18:59 CubEdIn wrote: EBWODP: the "it surely came from scum IMO." part was directed @ kav. Us blues did not RB you afaik. No, I'm not saying no one claimed roleblocker, I'm saying that no one claimed that they were roleblocked. I was RB'd. This confirms that there is a RB'er. So who did he RB the first night? | ||
| ||
