|
On March 30 2011 11:04 Coagulation wrote: tack is scum stop flipping out
Eat your own words.
On March 30 2011 11:05 Jackal58 wrote: It doesn't matter if Tack is green or red. All that matters is that town wins the IG.
This is why town gets ass raped by scum all the time. You people are to goddamned afraid of being wrong to do anything.
From before you were 100% to it doesnt matter anymore? Well fuck.
|
On March 30 2011 11:13 Insanious wrote:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" I feel like such an asshole... /wrists for not knowing the mechanic, my fault you messed up. again. ;;
|
On March 30 2011 11:13 Kavdragon wrote: So, now do people believe my analysis of Insanious? You analyzed me calling me scum for defending Tack...
So now I'm scum for defending and killing him, i can't win, awesome.
|
|
Go on and join GMarshal, it's probably a better place anyways. Your lynch told us a ton, sorry I didn't act sooner.
|
Come on Insanious, you have to admit that is NOT a mistake you want to make in a Mafia game.
|
I have 95 pages of me screaming to defend Tack and save him.
No one listened...
Now I die because I lynched him like the town wanted... awesome.
|
On March 30 2011 11:13 Insanious wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2011 11:13 Kavdragon wrote: So, now do people believe my analysis of Insanious? You analyzed me calling me scum for defending Tack... So now I'm scum for defending and killing him, i can't win, awesome. You're right. Lol fail. Sorry bout that. I think i was mixing you and kenpachi together or something.
|
@Insanious: When I was mafia, I was defending townies left and right. It's easy when you know they're townies.
|
On March 30 2011 11:15 Kavdragon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2011 11:13 Insanious wrote:On March 30 2011 11:13 Kavdragon wrote: So, now do people believe my analysis of Insanious? You analyzed me calling me scum for defending Tack... So now I'm scum for defending and killing him, i can't win, awesome. You're right. Lol fail. Sorry bout that. I think i was mixing you and kenpachi together or something. but i didnt defend Tack
|
Criminal Activity: Moderate
|
I got you there Kavdragon
|
On March 30 2011 11:16 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2011 11:15 Kavdragon wrote:On March 30 2011 11:13 Insanious wrote:On March 30 2011 11:13 Kavdragon wrote: So, now do people believe my analysis of Insanious? You analyzed me calling me scum for defending Tack... So now I'm scum for defending and killing him, i can't win, awesome. You're right. Lol fail. Sorry bout that. I think i was mixing you and kenpachi together or something. but i didnt defend Tack That's the point... he called you scum.
|
|
deconduo & I (very softly) defended tack. That's why the lynch seemed very scum-heavy.
|
Day 2 Lynch Votes
1. RebirthOfLeGenD - Tackster 2. Jackal58 - Tackster 3. OriginalName - Tackster > Lemonwalrus 4. Kenpachi - Tackster > Lemonwalrus 5. deconduo - Lemonwalrus 6. Kavdragon - Tackster > Kenpachi > Lemonwalrus 7. darmousseh - dead 8. bumatlarge - Tackster > Lemonwalrus 9. GMarshal 10. Coagulation - Tackster 11. orgolove - Tackster 12. chaoser - Tackster > Lemonwalrus 13. Meapak_Ziphh - Tackster 14. annul - dead 15. kevconsim - Tackster 16. Mr. Wiggles - Tackster 17. CubEdIn - Tackster > Lemonwalrus 18. GGQ - Tackster 19. ilovejonn - Tackster > Lemonwalrus 20. Amber[LighT] - Tackster 21. BrownBear - Tackster 22. Lemonwalrus - Tackster 23. Rean - Tackster > Lemonwalrus 24. tnkted - Tackster 25. Tackster - Jackal > Lemonwalrus 26. Lanaia - Tackster > Lemonwalrus 27. iGrok - Lemonwalrus > Tackster > Lemonwalrus 28. Beneather - Tackster 29. Insanious - Tackster > Lemonwalrus > Tackster 30. Eiii - Tackster
|
On March 30 2011 11:16 LSB wrote: Criminal Activity: Moderate Um... I think this means that the +vote was one from a scum.
Black or Red = important.
If its from Red, it means jackal is scum... just saying.
|
On March 30 2011 11:16 Kenpachi wrote: I got you there Kavdragon i think you're black actually. you are going to die tomorrow. Unless LW didnt die overnight
|
Ok, so before anyone starts spouting that night time is a no-talking time, you're dead wrong.
"It helps Mafia pick targets" uh...Or it lets the people who need to live hide. "It's the mafia's hour" Nope. We still outnumber them last I checked.
Talking at night is like giving us 72 hour days. It's a good thing.
On that note, I still suspect Insanious, but he's nowhere near as high on my scumdar as Kenpachi.
If you haven't read my analysis, please do so. Let's get this scum lynch rolling.
|
On March 30 2011 11:10 CubEdIn wrote: @Jackal: Not by your friends, the boys in blue, pal! See that's the thing. It really doesn't matter who I pissed off. It doesn't really matter who gets lynched. I know Coag is town Lynching Lemon or Tack doesn't matter. Kill me tonight protect Coag. How that happens I don't really give a shit. If Tack flips green it doesn't matter. Kill me protect Coag. Town wins items. I don't give two shits if I live or not. I refuse to allow scum to have DT items. They get them they will win. Scum will not win any game I'm in if I can do anything to prevent it. Sorry Tack. But the sad truth is I don't care what your alignment is. I know Coag is town. Either you or Lemon need to die. Coag believes Lemon is town. I can't get his support if I threw Lemons name against the wall to see what sticks so I threw yours. It's not personal. Hell it probably doesn't even seem logical. But it is. I need one of you to die. I didn't really care which of you it was. I didn't really care how that person would flip. What I do care about is town winning. I'm town. I refuse to lose as town. I've done pretty fucking good making town win over my last 3 games. I've also pissed off alot of townies and scum doing it. I don't care. The mantra is "Play to win" The mantra isn't "Play not to lose" The difference is balls. After tomorrows day post kill whoever isn't coag if Tack flips green
|
|
|
|