|
On March 29 2011 09:11 BrownBear wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 07:00 Coagulation wrote:On March 29 2011 06:23 BrownBear wrote: Coag, you too, if you happen to read this. If either of you plays in XXXVIII and pulls this shit, you'll be permabanned from any games I host. Play the damn game to completion.
im not quitting the game. im just not gonna argue about whos mafia in the item game anymore. You guys know who i have told you is mafia. do whatever the fuck you guys want. Okay, good. Your post sounded very ragequit-y, which got me worried. Glad to hear you're still with us data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" I wouldn't let him quit. He got me in this mess if he quit I'd kick his ass.
|
I'll be posting a clear verdict soon, I just need to argue with my circle some more so sit tight...
|
On March 29 2011 07:00 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 06:23 BrownBear wrote: Coag, you too, if you happen to read this. If either of you plays in XXXVIII and pulls this shit, you'll be permabanned from any games I host. Play the damn game to completion.
im not quitting the game. im just not gonna argue about whos mafia in the item game anymore. You guys know who i have told you is mafia. do whatever the fuck you guys want.
Theres a very strong case for the mafia to be either Lemon or Jackal. I think its Lemon. Would you at least not be as blind/stubborn as Jackal and think about it? The facts are there.
I don't know why the two of you are so narrow minded but it really isn't helping the slightest. You have no case against Tack whatsoever and you refuse to admit it. When Tack flips town it will be too late, and chances are you'll have cost us the entire game.
|
On March 29 2011 04:49 Tackster wrote:Now to point out something about Kavs posts: Kav said he can prove if I stole: Show nested quote +Kavdragon United States. March 28 2011 14:02. Posts 572 If I could provide proof that he stole the item, would the town decide that he is scum based off of that?
(I'm not saying that he has or hasn't, only that I can find out.) This implies kav either: - Is a Vet AND can check item steals (wtf?) - Is on a PM circle where someone can make the check (still unlikely) - Is lying again This isn't looking good Kav - please reply to this.
Firstly I retracted my statement about being able to figure out if you stole an item. It was never about an ability, or access to someone through PM, only logic. Hence my "Nevermind, I have fail logic" post.
The rest of your points are implications based off of assumptions that are not true.
I didn't lie about being hit.
|
On March 29 2011 09:08 Lanaia wrote: @LSB Are you prodding/notifying people who are inactive or at least threatening them for being inactive?
There are currently three 'inactives'
20. Amber[LighT] 21. BrownBear 28. Beneather
Knowing the three, probably none of them are going to be modkilled. I have two possible replacements lined up.
If you want, I can forcefully replace the two players who posted the least in day 2 at the end of day 2. Excessive spamming doesn't count.
Poll: Forcefully replace inactives?No (11) 85% Yes (2) 15% 13 total votes Your vote: Forcefully replace inactives? (Vote): Yes (Vote): No
|
Please note, if you want to be replaced out, just ask!
|
Aww, I was just about to start being active again :/
If you want to forcefully replace me though, I won't complain. I probably deserve it.
|
Nice tnk, that explains a lot. Let's see what I can do.
My DT: Checked Lemon, switched with me and came back as that. Makes perfect sense because that is my role. I believe that explains any FoS we could have had against him. He is no longer a suspect. I WAS NOT HIT LAST NIGHT
Scum KP: Red's hit annul. Simple as that, I could explain it but then I would have to kill you. Black/red hit GMarshal and Kav. Kav is alive, GMarshal is dead.
Coag KP: Used on tackster. Did not die. Bus already used, so he had to be protected. He clearly did not use his item, because coagulation says he did, which was the only item used, plus tackster should have claimed he used the item. IIRC, he never claimed a hit.
If you want to live tackster you need to answer this post. Lemon is no longer a bigger suspect then you.
|
On March 29 2011 09:21 deconduo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 07:00 Coagulation wrote:On March 29 2011 06:23 BrownBear wrote: Coag, you too, if you happen to read this. If either of you plays in XXXVIII and pulls this shit, you'll be permabanned from any games I host. Play the damn game to completion.
im not quitting the game. im just not gonna argue about whos mafia in the item game anymore. You guys know who i have told you is mafia. do whatever the fuck you guys want. Theres a very strong case for the mafia to be either Lemon or Jackal. I think its Lemon. Would you at least not be as blind/stubborn as Jackal and think about it? The facts are there. I don't know why the two of you are so narrow minded but it really isn't helping the slightest. You have no case against Tack whatsoever and you refuse to admit it. When Tack flips town it will be too late, and chances are you'll have cost us the entire game. You're still pissed at me because I cost you XXXVII.
I voted no on replacements. I'm willing to give them another day.
|
But then why does it say that Annul got hit twice? Was that a joke? Right now, if annul got hit twice, you're proposing there was 5 KP last night, or else the Day post was misguiding.
|
Beneather yes, BB and amber no.
|
On March 29 2011 09:21 deconduo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 07:00 Coagulation wrote:On March 29 2011 06:23 BrownBear wrote: Coag, you too, if you happen to read this. If either of you plays in XXXVIII and pulls this shit, you'll be permabanned from any games I host. Play the damn game to completion.
im not quitting the game. im just not gonna argue about whos mafia in the item game anymore. You guys know who i have told you is mafia. do whatever the fuck you guys want. Theres a very strong case for the mafia to be either Lemon or Jackal. I think its Lemon. Would you at least not be as blind/stubborn as Jackal and think about it? The facts are there. I don't know why the two of you are so narrow minded but it really isn't helping the slightest. You have no case against Tack whatsoever and you refuse to admit it. When Tack flips town it will be too late, and chances are you'll have cost us the entire game.
Stop with your hyperbola and fear mongering. Cost us the whole game? Unlikely. Losing us the IG, more likely but we still have the advantage. It seems mafia has a role block and a mind control. They can't cover medics/bus driver/vest all at once. To even get past the many combination of things we can do requires a shit load of luck from them. And even if they do get through, they'll kill 1 person max. Next day we can lynch the mafia and win IG.
|
On March 29 2011 09:32 Mr. Wiggles wrote: But then why does it say that Annul got hit twice? Was that a joke? Right now, if annul got hit twice, you're proposing there was 5 KP last night, or else the Day post was misguiding.
He was hit twice? That is interesting... but it still makes sense. Then Blacks hit annul as well. Kav and GM's hit might have come from somewhere else, or kav is lying. Perhaps coagulation's shot was aimed at Kav instead?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Welcome to Insane Mafia Mini-Game Number Two!
The following inactives are dangerously close to being incinerated. For each quality post, they will be moved further away from the incineration zone. However, spam too much and you will end up falling off the edge. Keep in mind there may be certain hidden abilities in play!
Good luck! ^_^
9. [Amber[LighT]] [ BrownBear ] 8. [ Beneather ] [___________] 7. [___________] [___________] 6. [___________] [___________] 5. [___________] [___________] 4. [___________] [___________] 3. [___________] [___________] 2. [___________] [___________] 1. [___________] [___________]
+ Show Spoiler +* Disclaimer: This may not be an actual mini-game
|
On March 29 2011 09:29 bumatlarge wrote: Nice tnk, that explains a lot. Let's see what I can do.
My DT: Checked Lemon, switched with me and came back as that. Makes perfect sense because that is my role. I believe that explains any FoS we could have had against him. He is no longer a suspect. I WAS NOT HIT LAST NIGHT
Scum KP: Red's hit annul. Simple as that, I could explain it but then I would have to kill you. Black/red hit GMarshal and Kav. Kav is alive, GMarshal is dead.
Coag KP: Used on tackster. Did not die. Bus already used, so he had to be protected. He clearly did not use his item, because coagulation says he did, which was the only item used, plus tackster should have claimed he used the item. IIRC, he never claimed a hit.
If you want to live tackster you need to answer this post. Lemon is no longer a bigger suspect then you.
Bullshit. I have my fucking dick stretched across half the globe to win the IG and ultimately the entire game for town and that's the best you can do??? Bullshit. And explain the Tack is 100% scum to 85 - 100% scum to now you're looking scummier than LW.
|
On March 29 2011 09:32 Mr. Wiggles wrote: But then why does it say that Annul got hit twice? Was that a joke? Right now, if annul got hit twice, you're proposing there was 5 KP last night, or else the Day post was misguiding.
The KP are explained as
2 on annul - 1 from red, 1 from a redirected hit from Coag who wanted to hit Tack 1 on Kav - black/red 1 on GM - black/red
That's 4
|
Because of his vest item. Accuse me all you want, I can't clarify any more then that.
|
On March 29 2011 09:37 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 09:29 bumatlarge wrote: Nice tnk, that explains a lot. Let's see what I can do.
My DT: Checked Lemon, switched with me and came back as that. Makes perfect sense because that is my role. I believe that explains any FoS we could have had against him. He is no longer a suspect. I WAS NOT HIT LAST NIGHT
Scum KP: Red's hit annul. Simple as that, I could explain it but then I would have to kill you. Black/red hit GMarshal and Kav. Kav is alive, GMarshal is dead.
Coag KP: Used on tackster. Did not die. Bus already used, so he had to be protected. He clearly did not use his item, because coagulation says he did, which was the only item used, plus tackster should have claimed he used the item. IIRC, he never claimed a hit.
If you want to live tackster you need to answer this post. Lemon is no longer a bigger suspect then you.
Bullshit. I have my fucking dick stretched across half the globe to win the IG and ultimately the entire game for town and that's the best you can do??? Bullshit. And explain the Tack is 100% scum to 85 - 100% scum to now you're looking scummier than LW.
Ok you need to calm down...pretty sure bum isn't scum by this point. The fact that you're suggesting it shows that you need to chill the fuck out. Blues not claiming at this point would be pretty fail and we would deserve to lose.
|
On March 29 2011 09:37 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2011 09:32 Mr. Wiggles wrote: But then why does it say that Annul got hit twice? Was that a joke? Right now, if annul got hit twice, you're proposing there was 5 KP last night, or else the Day post was misguiding. The KP are explained as 2 on annul - 1 from red, 1 from a redirected hit from Coag who wanted to hit Tack 1 on Kav - black/red 1 on GM - black/red That's 4
I must have misinterpreted... Coagulation did you tell darm that you had a gun?
|
On March 29 2011 09:38 bumatlarge wrote: Because of his vest item. Accuse me all you want, I can't clarify any more then that.
Wait, LW had the vest, not annul
|
|
|
|