|
On February 28 2011 06:36 kevconsim wrote:Jackal you haven't answered my question yet For realz???? From Wiki
The term "Madison Avenue" is often used metonymically for advertising, and Madison Avenue became identified with the advertising industry after the explosive growth in this area in the 1920s.
|
On February 28 2011 06:43 LSB wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2011 06:15 Jackal58 wrote:On February 28 2011 06:10 LSB wrote: Well, I think we should pick two people to set as who to lynch. We shouldn't split our votes between four people, that makes it easier for Mafia to hide behind a wall of votes.
I'm willing to lynch icemac/barundar We are aware of your willingness. What is your unwillingness to lynch gryffindor? He always plays like this, I'd rather have a DT check used on this. Case in point, Haunted Mafia. He tried to get people to claim to him, pretended a DT claimed to him when there was none, and then lied repeatedly, gotmodkilled and flipped town. If he always plays like this it's the other players fault for tolerating it. Lynch him.
|
Why have policy if it's ignored?
|
On February 28 2011 06:59 bumatlarge wrote: What did gryff lie about? I know he's an erratic player, but depending on the lie, that's a cause for concern I'd say. Mod PM's he didn't receive.
|
On February 28 2011 07:04 bumatlarge wrote: Page or link? Was it something RoL or meapak clarified because those are pretty damning.
I should know -_- Pages 32-35.
|
On February 28 2011 07:24 GMarshal wrote: ok, so can we agree to lynch neither LSB nor Barundar? I feel both of them are town and losing either of them would hurt town, I would much rather we hung an inactive or lurking player, as we really should not risk killing two players who are playing pro -town at the moment, if either is scum we can rely on the other to pick up on it as they suspect each other heavily, if both of them are scum then they are clearly on drugs of some sort. I'm trying. The only influence I have is when I fart in a small room and people leave.
|
I think you just matched his post count.
|
Well I suppose there is no such thing as a policy vote. Fair enough. ##unvote ##vote Icemac
He's been doing post and ghost similar to divinek in XXXVI.
And after a day of LSB and Barundar declaring No You! No You! I will take a dim view of people telling me I tunnel.
|
On February 28 2011 09:06 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2011 09:04 Jackal58 wrote:Well I suppose there is no such thing as a policy vote. Fair enough. ##unvote ##vote IcemacHe's been doing post and ghost similar to divinek in XXXVI. And after a day of LSB and Barundar declaring No You! No You! I will take a dim view of people telling me I tunnel. go and look for the game where Ace and L yell at each other for a few pages, they defined tunneling that game (anyone remember which one it was?) I'm guessing they'll continue it tonight or tomorrow. And no I'm not aware of what game it was.
|
You guys are making me feel like a ping pong ball.
|
On February 28 2011 10:45 Foolishness wrote: LunarDestiny has yet to contribute much of anything: Up until an hour ago neither had you.
|
On February 28 2011 10:55 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2011 10:52 Jackal58 wrote:On February 28 2011 10:45 Foolishness wrote: LunarDestiny has yet to contribute much of anything: Up until an hour ago neither had you. It's the foolishness way. Do nothing for a long time to avoid getting killed by scum and spring and attack when you least expect it I believe it's my first game with him. How does he play when he's scum? Do nothing for a long time to avoid getting lynched? Honest question. This looks like a diversion off of icemak. Except everybody is jumping on board. I'm confused. I don't like being confused.
|
##UNVOTE: icemac ##VOTE: Foolishness.
Dammit this day sucked.
|
##Unvote: Foolishness ##vote jbright
Just a poke.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On February 28 2011 12:01 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2011 11:39 seRapH wrote: Ok, all caught up.
LSB vs Barundar- LSB is the one who really pushed the annul lynch. That alone makes me doubt that he's mafia, regardless of how scummy the rest of his play so far might seem. Barundar, on the other hand, doesn't have the cleanest record right now. I'd be ok with lynching Barundar, since LSB has already caught one.
icemac- Getting scummier, really starting to suspect him now. It doesn't help that his lynch is meeting with a lot of resistance. Especially this late in the day. Feels like someone's deliberately diverting the lynch off of him, doesn't it? Personally, I say we go for it. When there's post that triggers a swing in votes this late in the game it feels super suspicious.
Also, it's the end of the day. The entire day cycle was spent with great bickering and squabbles between two parties. Everything was dandy, with two camps clearly lined up. No matter who we lynched, we'd have much more information to look at. But now people are jumping off and actively diverting the lynch. At the end of the day. For no reason other than because foolishness said so.
I hate that. I respect foolishness and all as a player, but that does not mean that we should just blindly do what he tells us. This isn't a battle between a few "priority 1" players, this is isn't even a battle between "priority 1+2" players, this is a game where YOU decide who YOU think is mafia. Is anyone actually voting for people they think are really mafia? Because at this rate, we're going to lose all the progress we made today. And that's bullshit. I'm voting for who I think is mafia, blame the followers. I learned a key thing from reading the thread before my accusation: nobody really wants to kill LSB, Barundar, or icemac. Want proof? I make an analysis on LD and everyone jumps ship. My analysis is not complete, but there are important points worth addressing. I think most people here will agree that LD is a better lynch than any of the above 3. That's what I sent out to fix. I didn't want to see the town killing a player out of policy or killing a player they were only half sure about. I thought I had more evidence against LD so I went with him instead of Seraph. Even if he's not mafia at least we got rid of a mostly inactive player who's usually active. Step in the positive direction. I'm also fine killing Jbright, right now I'm going to leave on LD so there's no last minute swing possible (hopefully, haven't checked the votes). Nice safe post that one is. Right after the vote is closed.
|
[QUOTE]On February 28 2011 20:13 deconduo wrote: First of all we have Jackal. He claimed posting PMs is scummy. When asked to explain the logic behind it he dodged the question twice then posted this gem:
[QUOTE]On February 25 2011 01:06 Jackal58 wrote: Decon- We'll simply have to agree to disagree on the posting of PM's. I think it's a bad idea. You don't. I'm over it. It's not an issue worth arguing.[/QUOTE]
I didn't dodge it. You just didn't like my answer. Ya the one you skipped. And now you're in a pissing contest over the content of a posted PM. Have fun. We got scum here folks.
|
Quote fail.
|
On March 01 2011 11:57 LSB wrote: I was role blocked last night. Really? Which Vig shot?
|
On March 01 2011 12:01 GMarshal wrote:This is interesting, it hints at mafia having 3 kp or else they cannot afford to rb anyone. Also do any vigi's claim to have shot last night? because if you did then we know that mafia spent a whole KP doing something else, if no-one claims the vigi hit then we have to work on the assumption that there wasn't one. Also gryff you seemed pretty convinced you were going to die... Either LSB is lying or a Vigi hit somebody. Vig claim soon. Cause I was roleblocked too.
|
On March 01 2011 12:07 GMarshal wrote: O.O then I believe CubEdIn was a vigi and shot last night as he told me in PM that he was particularly suspicious of ON, its possible it was someone else or that one of you is lying If we have no vigi hit one of us is most definitely lying. And the one lying ain't me.
|
|
|
|