|
On February 12 2011 16:50 Coagulation wrote: hell his single post with his vote on himself alone has pretty much bumped his contribution level above 50% of players in this game. that's his only post? like i said, he hasn't been very scummy. I feel like you're just out for an easy mislynch, Node.
|
On February 12 2011 16:55 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 16:54 aidnai wrote:On February 12 2011 12:41 thefluffyone93 wrote: OK. Unvote; Vote: aidnai On February 12 2011 13:37 Misder wrote:Well, there really hasn't been much pressure in terms of voting. The inactives are still winning the vote count by a decent amount. I like pressure though. And as such, Unvote Ace Vote AidnaiYay for bandwagoning? How is PM land going for everyone btw? I'm lonely.  Now that Kitaman has proven his insanity, you two mind taking your votes off me? He asked nicely. That must mean he's town. I am fairly suspicious of him as well. I was leaning town on him before he started pming me.
|
@Node+ Show Spoiler +On February 12 2011 17:13 Node wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 16:51 gryffindor wrote:On February 12 2011 16:36 Node wrote: My vote is on Insanious. What more would you like from me? I'd like to hear your thoughts on possible scumteam pairings. Who do you feel Insanious is scum with? He doesn't feel that scummy to me. Why do you suspect him? He was inactive. I wanted to see him post. I placed a vote on him. I'm not really sure how else I could pressure someone who had yet to say anything in relation to the game. As for active posters, I'm more suspicious of bumatlarge than anyone else: Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 11:47 Node wrote: And for the record, FOS on bumatlarge. He seemed far too eager to egg on gryffindor's (fake) argument against me.
The post I was referring to: Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote: Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? I also disliked his "refutation" of Coagulation's post on how he was acting scummy: Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 19:02 bumatlarge wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On February 11 2011 17:38 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote: So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum? Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? really man? Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 13:50 Coagulation wrote: We should lynch zerroth because the last game completely inactive only posted/vote to avoid modkill etc
Lets get the inactives out now lets look at your contributions so far in this game Show nested quote +On January 23 2011 01:09 bumatlarge wrote:Once you are dead, you are free from any guidelines or constraints your role may have placed on you. Ohhh a penalty-esque game? I do have to redeem myself for the last one for Ace -_- /In! Awesome you joined the game! Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 15:29 bumatlarge wrote: Alright time to get started. Yep Hopefully I can make good use of this role, as I have to do the character justice. Filler Coagulation has already spouted off to his random tangents, so we might be better off without him. shows willingness to jump on the easy bandwagon. cause scum love easy bandwagons. that makes town sit around and not analyze people. I still want to see what everyone is posting like, because I am seeing a good number of sentence long posts with nothing in it. similar to this post. Too be expected. I'm not putting my vote anywhere yet until I see what I want to see. what is this? theres nothing of any value to your post so far for town. "im not gonna vote" awesome thanks for letting us know. Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote: So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum? Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? So wait.. i clearly showed you my indication of trying to help town. you disregarded that to blow out of proportion that i am anti town for your own purposes clearly. If you need an example of me trying to help town with info go ahead an read up top again. your last post you decided your not gonna vote...OK......And now im the EASY Choice? What changed your mind? What did you see? Sounds wishy washy to me. I dont think you seen anything but an easy lynch. And mafia love easy lynches. because it makes town not focus on scumhunting. is that what you seen? if your mafia im going to hand your ass to town on a silver platter. I will be watching you. You are right, I am mafia. That's a fair point, actually. I also don't like how he is telling him to change his meta. That just seems rude. Is this the extent of your case on bum?
|
On February 12 2011 23:14 GGQ wrote: If there's a gunsmith role or something, give me a gun, I wanna kill someone :D. you would be more likely the player I would shoot, not gun
|
Can someone tell me what the fuck just happened? I have to do some reading.
|
I was almost lynched? I'll admit, i'm way behind, but I have actually been a good poster in my opinion. I am astonished. It must have been a late-in-the-day mafia wagon. I wouldn't be surprised if I was killed tonight.
doc on me.
|
how am I making anything hard whatsoever? You voted on page 17 without and reasoning at all, and come on with a near-lynchworthy "placeholder" vote on me containing excuses within the EXACT SAME POST. You're joking, right?... right?
If you are not joking, I am very sad. You are way more scummy than I am, and much more likely to be mafia from my perspective. The fact you put me so close to lynch when I had addressed that I needed to be catching up on the game, and that you would vote someone with so little reasoning this far into a large themed game has me questioning your motivations.
|
On February 15 2011 08:27 deconduo wrote:Summary of all of GGQ's posts: + Show Spoiler +On February 11 2011 14:26 GGQ wrote: Wow looks like other people got really fun roles. Mine sucks. Could at least have given me a vigi shot or something to make up for it. Oh well.
Vote: Coagulation Jumps on the coagulation bandwagon without giving any reason.On February 11 2011 14:36 GGQ wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 14:30 Coagulation wrote: you come in here with complaining about your role Sounds like scum trying to force find things to say to sound like your contributing. no one gives a shit if your role is fun or not. and its not gonna help town secure a victory regardless.
and then vote for me give zero explanation deal with it, imo Yeah, great response.On February 12 2011 04:08 GGQ wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 19:12 Coagulation wrote:GGQ+ Show Spoiler +Likes to vote for people gives no reason and tells town to deal with it when they call him out on it. this definitely sets off some alarms FOS Yeah, because this is the only game I've ever played. You're free to look at some of my other games if you want. There doesn't seem to be any sort of plan or anything. Lots of people being pretty useless. I already know who I'd kill if I was maf... gonna be a boring night phase =/ unvote: Coagulation vote: Zerroth Calls people useless after not contributing anything himself. Switches his vote from coag because he's under pressure to explain said vote. Still doesn't say why he voted coag in the first place. Doesn't say why he's changing to zerroth. At this point zerroth was a 'safe' lynch for scum to switch to.On February 12 2011 09:39 GGQ wrote: There should be some red text in your role pm telling you how you are supposed to act.
Can we lynch a mafia already? Useless postOn February 12 2011 18:08 GGQ wrote: Let's not be too hasty. We have to be careful with our lynches, since that's our only killing power. Or at least, it's my only killing power QQ
And since apparently people get mad at me no matter whom I vote
unvote Zerroth vote GGQ Changes his vote AGAIN. Once again doesn't say why he voted for zerroth. Does another scummy thing in voting for himself. Is apathetic.On February 12 2011 23:14 GGQ wrote: If there's a gunsmith role or something, give me a gun, I wanna kill someone :D. Calls for a gun... Either a scummy post if serious or a useless one if not.On February 13 2011 08:27 GGQ wrote: It's GGQ, not GCQ. Not sure where that started. Corrected, sorry. However this doesn't contribute in any way/On February 14 2011 10:45 GGQ wrote: vote GGQ
sorry, busy today More uselessnessOn February 15 2011 01:55 GGQ wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2011 19:44 deconduo wrote: Vote:GCQ
Scummy voting, scummy play, inactivity.
I don't agree with the misder bandwagon and would encourage people to switch. It's GGQ. I'm not mafia. It'd be more fun if I was, but I'm not. Ok, I take your word for ittldr: As I said yesterday, not one helpful or non-scummy post. Scummy voting with no explanation or reasoning given for them. I would be very surprised if he is not mafia or his personality dictates he behaves as scummy as possible. I am suspicious of him. I voted him on D1 IIRC for it. What do you think about Believer? I have been having a scummy read of him since page 17. I feel his play recently has been more town, but he has been attacking me after I expressed my feeling he was likely mafia.
I don't know who the mafia are, but I don't really want to feel out of the loop of the game. People need to PM me more.
On February 15 2011 08:39 Coagulation wrote: GGQ would be a good lynch however i think you should wait till day to do post any analysis. you dont want to give mafia any more information to work with when picking targets. Why is that? If the night is open, we should use it. It can only give us an advantage to speak out. Doctors should protect me.
On February 15 2011 08:49 deconduo wrote:Summary of all of ilovejonn's posts: + Show Spoiler +On February 11 2011 14:33 ilovejonn wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 14:30 Coagulation wrote: you come in here with complaining about your role Sounds like scum trying to force find things to say to sound like your contributing. no one gives a shit if your role is fun or not. and its not gonna help town secure a victory regardless.
and then vote for me give zero explanation you funny role. SpamOn February 12 2011 06:29 ilovejonn wrote: Or maybe his role is to be inactive. But either way I'll be voting Zerroth for the time being until he posts.
##Vote: Zerroth Gives a reason at least.On February 12 2011 10:46 ilovejonn wrote: It ends 4 AM EST for me.. which I will be sleep. SpamOn February 13 2011 07:49 ilovejonn wrote: Wow, I kind of surprise only need 5 vote to lynch somebody. >__>
Also, is this the second day now? Or night time? I'm not sure about the phases, but I also don't want abstain from voteing. SpamOn February 13 2011 07:54 ilovejonn wrote: Okay, thanks you. SpamOn February 13 2011 12:48 ilovejonn wrote: I have feeling some of the active posters are going to be night kill. >< SpamOn February 13 2011 13:20 ilovejonn wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2011 13:09 pevergreen wrote:On February 13 2011 12:48 ilovejonn wrote: I have feeling some of the active posters are going to be night kill. >< You can still keep playing after death. Oh right.. forgot about that. Well at least that counters the inactiveness. SpamOn February 14 2011 17:04 ilovejonn wrote: I hope it wasn't a pro-town vig role who targetted kitaman27, what the heck. SpamOn February 14 2011 21:00 ilovejonn wrote: holy crap, 5 people modkilled. zzzzz Spam. Also while this is purely off my own experiences, posts like these are usually made by scum trying too hard to be town.tldr: Not even one substantial post. Nothing particularly scummy however, apart from the last post. Unless he steps it up he would certainly be on my lynch list. I haven't found him that scummy, but he hasn't really stuck out either. The fact he is just coasting by is enough for me to warrant voting him. I would rather have a Believer lynch tomorrow, or a GGQ lynch, but I would be willing to shift to ilovejonn if it became near deadline and we needed to cement a lynch on someone scummy as opposed to letting scum just creep in at the end and vote whoever they wanted. I don't want that to happen.
|
i actually like the above post. i feel bad saying i would lynch you now. sorry ilove
|
This town really needs to get its act together; I will be accepting PMs.
I am also for nameclaiming/roleclaiming openly. With all the modkills, this game just got unbalanced. We need to fix that.
|
Would grunts already have roles assigned to them, or would this happen before you assigned the town's roles?
|
I disagree that Ace is a good choice. Ace generally dies night 1, regardless of alignment. I would pick players like BrownBear who are good, actively lurk, and don't slip up.
|
but, the moderator actually implied that he may have changed it up before coming here out of courtesy, as he doesn't normally host here. That being said, it is pointless to try to break the game in this way, and is sort of disrespectful to be trying to get people cleared through this method, when it is, in fact, illogical.
|
On February 15 2011 18:03 LunarDestiny wrote:Show nested quote +On February 15 2011 17:47 gryffindor wrote: I disagree that Ace is a good choice. Ace generally dies night 1, regardless of alignment. I would pick players like BrownBear who are good, actively lurk, and don't slip up. People help me here. I didn't play many games with Ace. i don't remember him dying early or dying on night 1. (I'll check that out now...). I look at gryffindor... First game on TL. Man, he must have did some RESEARCH if he knew Ace dies early in games. This is not my first time around the block, LD. Lets just say that
|
On February 15 2011 18:32 LunarDestiny wrote: Dr.H smurfing again? I'm actually offended.
|
LD, top 3 suspects, with reasoning of at least an ~OpZ~-level-post. thanks.
|
Since you won't answer my question, LD, because you are unhelpful scum or not good as town, I will answer it for you.
Suspect #1 Believer:
On February 12 2011 15:43 gryffindor wrote: I really disliked Believer's vote a page ago, with absolutely no content with it whatsoever. I also didn't like seeing someone having a post edited earlier, and I was just informed that it was him in PM. I don't want to just go with the mold. I don't want to bandwagon. I want to lynch scum.
Vote: Believer
Ever since this post Believer has been pushing me His case on me is entirely OMGUS, and he is likely scum
I voted him because on page 17, he had voted without any reasoning whatsoever, which is very scummy in a large theme
He then voted me with very little time near the end of D2, as a "placeholder" putting me 1 level away from being lynched just with an unvote of the topwagon and a vote on mine. I'm just really glad his scum teammates weren't on, or I'd have been a goner.
Suspect #2: Aidnai
There are a couple of players that have altered my perception of Aidnai, Ace and Kitaman27. He is very good at rhetoric, which is why I'm not going to be pushing on him unless other people open their eyes. Why would I do this, you're wondering? Well, I'll tell you. Because you all aren't going to trust me enough to push him. Even me putting him up higher on my suspect list would probably get hated on, even if it is very possible he is scum.
He was asking me my opinion of Ace in PM, even defending him. It now reads as distancing after the situation revolving around Ace's death. Major scumpoints to Aidnai for what happened on 23. I would love to see someone counterclaim that name, or hear more about whether or not that claim is likely to be on our side or not.
Aidnai told me he had been in contact with Kitaman27, and Kitaman27 was asking me for the dialogues with Aidnai. I did not give them to him, but considering he died shortly thereafter, I have to be suspicious that it is Aidnai's fault that Kita died.
With his name being associated with two deaths for me, I can't not have him on my list of suspects. I would have him higher if I thought I could actually get him lynched, but I bet his mafia team won't throw him under the bus as easily as they would Believer, and I partly believe his claim. I'm just not sure if he's town.
Suspect #3: Siniquity
I am suspicious of Siniquity, but I am not going to make a huge case about this one, because there really isn't anything to comment on. He's had 1 good post, most of his posts came in the same time-frame, and he has been both unhelpful and actively lurking. He hasn't been adding anything to the discussion at all.
Suspect #3:
|
will need to talk to the moderator
|
It's for the good of the sanity of the town of this game, trust me.
|
On February 15 2011 19:54 deconduo wrote:I feel I missed something important  I'm going to look over your suspects and do an analysis on them too gryff. Not important from an in game standpoint, but from a personal one.
|
|
|
|