TL Mafia XXXV

On December 23 2010 11:57 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

On December 23 2010 13:48 Brocket wrote:
/in

I just went /out of the pyp3.

Also noticing a lot of pokemafia players. I'll try be more cuddly this time.

On December 24 2010 08:59 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Is there PM's in this game? From what I read in the OP it doesn't list PM's as cheating and judging by the framer role I would imagine there is PMs.

On December 27 2010 10:25 TheMango wrote:
where are my mafia team mates? lets start getting rid of some people.

On December 27 2010 11:43 LSB wrote:
TheMango, just a question, why is it that when I try stalking you some of you posts don't show up in your post history?

On December 27 2010 12:00 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
guys please dont fucking roleclaim to me day 1 or make this game about what i'm doing/not doing i hate being the center of attention

note role pms are not yet sent and i am VERY busy recently so if i don't post a ton then don't get all weirded out

On December 27 2010 13:37 LSB wrote:

+ Show Spoiler +

How about Zero meaningful posts? If all they have is spam and one vote with an explination of "I agree". That would be an inactive

Or if we seriously have no idea what to do, we could lynch someone about to be modkilled, a way to essentially abstain

On December 27 2010 13:43 LSB wrote:

Hmm... I wonder if the mafia would try to modkill one of their own members in hopes of getting the person replaced by DoctorH

Ace did that back in insane. Well, we forced the mafia to find their own repacements, and Ace choose L.

On December 27 2010 14:35 LunarDestiny wrote:
Vigs can only hit on or AFTER night 2

On December 28 2010 11:52 why wrote:
Hi everyone, just got off from work and caught up with the thread.

It seems to me that the annul vs. LSB debate is distracting from the issue at hand, hunting inactives. This is clearly the way to avoid an apathetic town.

The list that LunarDestiny suggested isn’t the best idea. If there are 10 people on the list, then no one will feel pressured to respond unless everyone else on the list is responding. They will just be lurking amongst the people on the list who aren’t responding on the list.

The best way to pressure inactives is to vote for them and actually intend to lynch them unless they contribute something useful.

As such, I'm going to pick someone that hasn't posted yet and put my vote on them. If they come to the thread and contribute then I'll move my vote off them. My pick is GeorgeClooney.

On December 28 2010 16:42 Node wrote:
I think between annul and LSB it's actually quite likely that one of them is scum. In Haunted Mafia, DocH and Pandain continually re-iterated the same arguments against each other, making huge walls of text that consumed many pages, and diverted town discussion from important things for like two whole game days. In the end, Pandain was scum. The difference there was that there were no PMs that game, so it was more important to be able to follow the thread well. All the same, I'm sensing echoes of that here, especially since annul seems to want to continue to force the issue.

I'll also say that I find annul's posting to be much scummier than LSB's. The way he's posting reminds me a lot of the way he played Experimental Mini Mafia (which was an interesting experience, as I knew he was scum from the beginning ), whereas LSB's defense and contribution seems a lot more like his posting in Pokemafia, where he was green.

For now, I'm putting my vote on annul.

I'm also going to be analyzing LunarDestiny, as I think his posting has been... strange, to say the least. Gonna work on that now.