Team Mini Mafia III BCE - Page 19

On January 10 2011 04:59 aidnai wrote:
If mafia are confident enough that we have setup 2 to fake roleclaim, there's no need to roleblock anyone. That's frighteningly obvious I thought....

On January 10 2011 05:12 Nemesis wrote:

If mafia does indeed have a roleblocker, they wouldn't have known it was setup 2 until after their supposed blue snipe on deconduo.

A HUGE issue for town right now is subversion being afk. If he doesn't show up and he is town, then the only way we get a town lynch done today is if we get our votes on a scum before they get their votes on us. Therefore, Gmarshal/Mango, I'm urging you to vote nemesis immediately, even if you aren't 100% convinced by what I say at the moment. If subversion really is scum, then town will be able to get a majority vote whether or not he shows up. If subversion is innocent, then it is imperative that we get our lynch votes ASAP.

think Nemesis' vote was fishy to say the least, and even though I don't trust LSB or Ace per se, I don't think they are scum either.

On January 07 2011 08:13 Nemesis wrote:

I don't really see how that will be helpful to town.

Right now I am suspicious of subversion and aidnai. I will make an analysis on them later and decide my vote.

As for subversion's claim of being roleblocked, there is a possibility that he is lying, but he could also be telling the truth so it is a bit WIFOM.

My senior chaoser is rather inactive, and only pms me once in a while.

On January 10 2011 05:48 TheMango wrote:
I see, because if it's tied, it's whoever got their vote in first?

On January 10 2011 05:49 Ace wrote:
See the problem here is that not only is subversion pretty much inactive but no one else has reported being role blocked. While Nemesis may be a fake DT claim I don't think so. For one I still think aidnai isn't Town oriented. Here aidnai, here's a post of yours I was just looking at here:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=7488394

Specifically this:



I mean really. You don't even have a solid stance + the fact you appeared on both innocent wagons. I mean seriously how many times do I have to look back at your posts and see "I have a really bad feeling". You haven't exactly been committed to anything this game.But for now we'll ignore you. I think we have to roll with Nemesis here.

1.) No one else has been reportedly role blocked
2.) If Nemesis is faking a DT claim that's a sick play because of this:



Nemesis did say he was suspicious of Subversion. If he's a real Detective then his Night Check would make sense since it follows up with him claiming he's suspect of Subversion right here. So with this in mind and no other role block claims I think it's best we lynch Subversion.

On January 10 2011 05:55 Ace wrote:
Mango take your vote off of Nemesis. It's majority lynch and you could end up costing us the game. If you think you may switch later take your vote off now. If you aren't sure DONT VOTE.

On January 10 2011 05:55 Ace wrote:
Mango take your vote off of Nemesis. It's majority lynch and you could end up costing us the game. If you think you may switch later take your vote off now. If you aren't sure DONT VOTE.

On January 10 2011 06:04 Ace wrote:
I can't vote remember?

So if you are claiming you were responsible for Orgo's lynch, and appeared on another innocent lynch wagon then why should I believe you? I just quoted a post of yours where you said you don't really think myself or LSB are scum but don't exactly trust us. You say Nemesis is fishy but you didn't vote for him. That's wishy washy.

If you believe you are the most outstanding figure in this game and we haven't caught any mafia then yea, I think it's safe to say I don't mind lynching you. If you can present a scenario where Subversion is telling the truth about being role blocked and Nemesis must be a fake DT then show it.

@Mango: If your vote is there and someone else comes in and quickvotes then it's an instant lynch.