EPTOn November 02 2010 12:01 Coagulation wrote:
LETS LYNCH BENEATHER
LETS LYNCH BENEATHER
>_>
Insane Mafia - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
>_> | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 02 2010 12:01 Pandain wrote: Hi beneather. Part 1 of dr. h analysis coming up shortly make it your 2000th post | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 02 2010 11:47 Nemesis wrote: I do agree with L that we need to pick a lynch target who isn't part of the heavy arguing going on. If anyone can put together a case for an alternative, I'd be more than glad to hear it. Youngminii just revealed he had a misconception that ... certainly puts his actions in a different light. I'm nowhere near as sure of youngminii anymore, and I'm not very content with the argument against Aeres (note: this does not mean throw the same points at me again). | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 02 2010 12:10 L wrote: The +1 makes sense, but that means that mafia would have had to.. hmm. Node, when did you recieve the two PMs notifying you who's going to die? Like I said, he claims it's at the beginning of the day each day. He also claims that he received QuickStriker's name at the beginning of Day 1, but QuickStriker was modkilled at the end of Day 1, so he then received BrownBear's name. | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 02 2010 13:19 DoctorHelvetica wrote: The problem with talking about inactives, is you can't really talk about inactives. If players are truly inactive, not posting at all, then really they're all equally likely to be scum and no real conclusions can be drawn. However it is by no means a good thing that the town gets split 50/50 or that one argument/conflict is the spotlight of the entire day. Inactives need to start posting! I want to see Divinek post D: I want to see Divinek, Veldril, KtheZ, Hyperbola, and Infundibulum post. >_> iirc they've been posting the least. I would ask Kenpachi to post more too, but he's banned atm | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 02 2010 13:45 youngminii wrote: lol I think it's same to assume it was Fishball's PM group. Anyway, did L just single handedly take all the attention away from Aeres with one post that doesn't really defend his actions in any solid manner? Seriously? I can understand that, as long as we go back over everything before this day cycle ends. We need to avoid getting hung up over Aeres and whatnot, but we shouldn't forget about it. | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 02 2010 13:50 youngminii wrote: ok agreed I'm interested in the analysis of Misder. I could almost swear he played very similarly in a game of mafia when we were both scum. I'll just go away and look for it now. good luck  | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 02 2010 14:07 youngminii wrote: Okay based on TL Mafia XXX and TL Mafia XXXI, Misder is a lot more aggressive and willing to point fingers as scum. When he's town he tends to take a more neutral stance, and even when he's posting to voice his opinion of someone being scum (and voting for them) he would say something like "I feel as if x is more townlike than y and so I'm led to believe y is the most scummiest right now. That's why I'm putting my vote on him" whereas as scum he's more straightforward, "I'm voting for x because his posts are very scummy. Reasons x y z, he's scum". He also likes bussing. I remember in XXX when we were on the same team, basically his first post of value was one bussing me, then he went on trying to bus one or two more teammates throughout the game. wait http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=147475 says Misder was meek in XXX as scum but previously aggressive as town. I know in XXXI (because I was in it and I did one of the major analyses on Misder's contradictory posts >___>) Misder was aggressive but later apologetic as town. | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 03 2010 09:16 bumatlarge wrote: Here are some theories also. Rolebloker targetted Dr.H we assume, right? Dr.H is immune to M-rus. Mafia has a now dead PD. I think mafia is very conservative in their actions for fear of the virus. Which makes me think that town is likely to have a virus spreading role if they found some unprecedented infected. I suggest a medic considers dr. h as a target, since he is immune and becoming a clearer townie day by day. he's becoming a clearer townie? from what i can tell, there are now more people suspicious of drh than 1 day ago. also, the reason the reds have a plague doctor is probably because blues visiting reds or vice versa can (i'd assume) infect reds with murrayitis as well | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 03 2010 09:24 KtheZ wrote: I'll try to be more active now. Please do try. | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
every day, we get 1 blue lynch, 2 blue modkills, 1 red modkill, and a PM network is severely damaged due to modkill(s) | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
Where the fuck was Mr. Additional Mafia Vote yesterday? Did I miss it? | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 03 2010 09:55 Glasse wrote: 1. he forgot about it, could be one of the active day 1- inactive day 2 player. 2. can't be used every day 3. mysterious stuff happened that reminds me, I have a question for you. Do you have a guess as to why the Day post said we're in a sticky situation with DrH as mayor if you didn't write that? | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 03 2010 10:02 Glasse wrote: Idk, what do you want me to write?, i have a character restriction lmao mafia twitter | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
ebwop: i don't mean i think your role is red. i mean it's like twitter embedded in the game of mafia felt like i needed to be clear about that | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
ok wtf is going on here | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 03 2010 10:16 Coagulation wrote: scum constantly do what doesnt make sense for them to do JUST for the simple fact that they can say this. so what is this "glasse is red" conclusion being based off of, anyway? | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 03 2010 10:26 Coagulation wrote: im not saying hes scum. im saying hes not a confirmed townie because he says he can post in the day post. ok, i agree with that i have been seeing posts about Glasse being suspicious, though, and I would like to know where those are coming from. | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 03 2010 11:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Explanation to everyone regarding plague doctors, since one has died: (Plague) Doctors are not immune to Murrayitis, but will be notified of their infection. Every night, they may protect one person. If he does not have murrayitis, he will be immunized. If he does, he will just be cured. Plague Doctors may cure themselves, but can not become immune to Murrayitis. If (plague) doctors visit a patient with murrayitis AND that person has a hit on him, both the target and the doctor will die. So, how are plague doctors different from regular doctors? I thought the difference was that plague doctors were immune and could transfer immunization, while regular doctors could only cure. It also seems pretty unexpected that plague doctors can't immunize and cure at the same time. Lastly, I thought that plague doctors and regular doctors could both protect against hits and cure murrayitis at the same time. This post radically modifies every notion I had of doctors and plague doctors >_> | ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
where did i get the assumption that plague doctors are immune >____> | ||
| ||
