On October 22 2010 18:27 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2010 16:14 orgolove wrote:
One thing. How the heck will you know if we PM or not? Aren't even mods not allowed to see people's PM's?
mods can see pms btw
Info that doesn’t pertain to the actual game.
On October 29 2010 11:21 Coagulation wrote:
Hi guys.
im torn between voting for Bumatlarge or Pandain for mayor!
No info on why he thinks both are equal. And I think this was when there was only two major candidates anyways.
On October 29 2010 12:44 Coagulation wrote:
bumatlarge. as a campaigning candidate for mayor what is your political stance on bandwagoning
are you pro Bandwagon
or Anti bandwagon
plz explain
Question that I don’t think actually matters for a mayor. It’s not like the mayor can start a bandwagon. And he doesn’t explain why this is crucial to his decision. And he doesn’t even ask Pandain the question, his other candidate that he’s considering to vote.
On October 29 2010 18:52 Coagulation wrote:
maybe im missing something but if fishball is in a town circle like he claims he is and this town circle has no security from reds at the moment why would we want him elected mayor. doesnt his town circle just greatly increase the chances of scum influence on the town.
like we vote for Bum or pandain there is a 1 in 39 chance of mafia influenced mayor
we vote for fishball there is a 7 in 39 chance of mafia influenced mayor
This post may have some substance, as he now has a stance against fishball. However, as kingjames pointed out right after this post, his math is wrong (as in hes assuming that everything is random).
On October 29 2010 20:42 Coagulation wrote:
ok i understand what your saying but there is still a higher chance of mafia gaining influence through fishball being elected as mayor
isnt his "circle" about as relevant as the general town circle at this point? considering he has no idea what the alignment of his circle members are. also we have no idea if he even has a circle.
is there even a way we can verify this before the vote??
It just seems to me like an unnecessary security breach for mayor.
why risk voting up to 7 scum into power when we can play the odds and take a much safer route of voting 1.
Continuing the same thing as the post above. Again, he tries to make a point. Flawed, as jcarls points out the post after, but its something at least.
On October 29 2010 23:52 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2010 23:04 Fishball wrote:On October 29 2010 20:42 Coagulation wrote:
ok i understand what your saying but there is still a higher chance of mafia gaining influence through fishball being elected as mayor
isnt his "circle" about as relevant as the general town circle at this point? considering he has no idea what the alignment of his circle members are. also we have no idea if he even has a circle.
is there even a way we can verify this before the vote??
It just seems to me like an unnecessary security breach for mayor.
why risk voting up to 7 scum into power when we can play the odds and take a much safer route of voting 1.
I DO NOT HAVE A TOWN CIRCLE.Where the hell does this come from? Since after Ace starting using this term.
I repeat, we have a pre-made CIRCLE. People in this circle DOES NOT KNOW each other's role or alignment.
re-read my post. I referred to your circle ONLY as "circle" I am well aware that you dont have a town circle that was the whole basis of my post.
Defends himself. And he is correct that Fishball was overreacting.
On October 30 2010 00:07 Coagulation wrote:
How about instead of blowing up about imaginary references to your CIRCLE in my post you answer the question that you completely avoided.
why would we want to risk a chance of 7 people possibly being scum manipulating town with mayor when we can go with the much safer odds of only 1 person possibly being scum.
Same question as before. jcarls answered this as stated before.
On October 30 2010 00:12 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 00:06 annul wrote:
(dark background, wispy white smoke, dramatic thunderclaps and epic scary voiceovers)
pandain? (*bad picture of pandain roaring like a panda bear*) whaddanub! i hear lying as town is pro.
bumatlarge? (*bad picture of bumatlarge flashing fangs and raging against chains on a wall*) whaddanub! i hear dying night 1 as the suicide bomber is a pro move.
fishball? (*bad picture of a fish out of water*) whaddanub! who the hell names themself fishball?
is this who you want to lead your town?
(shift to a light background, with sunlight and sun rays, blue sky. dramatic music suddenly shifting to great happy tunes (think of the polyphonic spree) and the voiceover changes to that hot asian girl who did map voiceovers for MLG)
annul? (*good picture of annul flexing and the light shining off of his body, halo-style*) whaddapro! he knows how to lead towns! also, this time he is actually town and actually wants mayor for good reasons! annul wouldn't be so bold as to try the same strategy twice in a row, especially starting on day 1, unless he had a great plan, with bold leadership, to deliver the town to massive victory! annul's active, reading every post and playing the game as it should be played. a vote for annul is a vote for victory!
(imagery shifts one last time to a side-view shot of annul at his keyboard, head-turned and smiling, legs crossed, in full dress wizard robes (think: "business suit" of the wizarding world))
im annul v. and i support this message
i know i shouldnt base previous exploits from previous games on a fresh game but i honestly feel you have a snowballs chance in hell of being elected after Halloween mafia..
Starts basing things off of a previous mafia game. This was before the mod warning, but still…
On October 30 2010 00:26 Coagulation wrote:
We need someone who is good at mafia but terrible at manipulation.
pandain is probably the best candidate under these parameters. he is an extremely organized and tactical scum hunter his analyses skills are good and he has a good level head about what needs to be done.
i have also noticed that he is a terrible lier and his posting style makes his motives extremely transparent. this would make it much easier for us to spot a slip up if he is mafia. and greatly increases the chances that he would fail at getting away with scum moves if it turns out he is a red.
Makes a stance on his choice of mayor. Yay.
On October 30 2010 00:32 Coagulation wrote:
I think it would be in towns best interest to avoid placing an extremely skilled manipulator such as annul in the mayor seat when he could potentially be a red.
Consistent from what I’m assuming. I don’t know what happened in the previous mafia game, but I assume that annul did some crazy manipulation. Although annul is one of the newer players of mafia, he may be good at mafia in the eyes of Coagulation.
On October 30 2010 00:34 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 00:30 CubEdIn wrote:
Do we HAVE to vote for a mayor? I don't like all these arguments.
Can we worry about the more pressing issue? Meaning, who dies in the day1 lynching?
yeah i honestly feel like i dont trust ANYONE that wants to be mayor..
No reasoning behind this statement. Why not trust Pandain who you defended, or buma, who you also were considering?
On October 30 2010 00:40 Coagulation wrote:
doesn't the mayor choose day 1 lynch??
Question that was answered before. That’s ok once in a while.
On October 30 2010 01:35 Coagulation wrote:
wait whos jerkin off smurfs?
An irrelevant post.
On October 30 2010 01:55 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 01:44 Fishball wrote:On October 30 2010 00:07 Coagulation wrote:
How about instead of blowing up about imaginary references to your CIRCLE in my post you answer the question that you completely avoided.
why would we want to risk a chance of 7 people possibly being scum manipulating town with mayor when we can go with the much safer odds of only 1 person possibly being scum.
I'm at work. I answer what I can given the time that I have, but I have always come back and address the rest. This is not dodging. People who have played with me in previous games will know.
I think you meant 6 people, as I said there are only 6 people in this group. Now why would Mafia include 6 of their 9 buddies in this circle? Why 6? Not 3, not 4, but 6?
Assume what you say is true, all 6 of us are Mafia, how exactly would we "manipulate" town? What stops the other solo Mayor and his "non-circle" buddies to manipulate town? Different scenario, but the outcome can very well be the same.
Everyone can debate about the "truth", but no one can argue about that fact that I did offer information, and I want/need protection. With me being Mayor, doesn't make me a dictator. I still need the help of the town to provide valuable input.
im not saying there are 6 mafia in your circle as opposed to any other number im just saying there are 6 ''chances'' that mafia are in your circle as opposed to there only being 1 chance of a mafia getting voted in as mayor if we elect someone outside your circle.
there are alot of scenarios obviously that can play out but i just want everyone to understand that there is an added risk to you being mayor. as for whether your ability as mayor + your plan with your circle outweigh those risk's is up for debate.
my problem is this. If we elect you as mayor.. you will have communications with people outside of this thread(pm) that will influence the game and could be extremely vital to scum hunting.
I would rather have a mayor that has transparency.. any communications he makes will be public so we can keep an eye on him.
More on the circle. Surprisingly, I think it’s good input, and consistent.
On October 30 2010 02:44 Coagulation wrote:
may, may not, in fact, almost certainly
well you got the politician thing down perfectly.
Unimportant post.
On October 30 2010 06:15 Coagulation wrote:Doc you are all over the place with votes man
I will think about voting for you because i think you are very experienced however
Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 00:26 Coagulation wrote:
We need someone who is good at mafia but terrible at manipulation.
pandain is probably the best candidate under these parameters. he is an extremely organized and tactical scum hunter his analyses skills are good and he has a good level head about what needs to be done.
i have also noticed that he is a terrible lier and his posting style makes his motives extremely transparent. this would make it much easier for us to spot a slip up if he is mafia. and greatly increases the chances that he would fail at getting away with scum moves if it turns out he is a red.
I feel like if DocH Is a red we would never know.
Inconsistency here. DH is the one of the better manipulators in mafia… This basically contradicts his post. Neither does he say why being experience outweighs being manipulative, esp. since he totally put down Fishball, an even more experienced player.
On October 30 2010 07:08 Coagulation wrote:
How do we know the person who is "verifying" your confirmation of your role isnt just a Scumbuddy of yours?
Good question, assuming this is directed towards DH.
On October 30 2010 07:10 Coagulation wrote:
Maybe Godfather Will verify so no one can DT check him properly
thats possible right?
Again, good question.
On October 30 2010 07:27 Coagulation wrote:
DocH You basically said YOU WILL PROVE your town and then basically said "MAYBE DEPENDING ON WHAT HAPPENS I WILL PROVE IT IM NOT SURE"
I dont think pandain would be the greatest mayor
However
i would rather pandain then Annul and his manipulation if he is RED
and i would rather pandain then fishbowl and his "EXTREMELY SHY?? circle"
I would really really like for you to make me feel comfortable voting for you for mayor. but your doing a bad job so far.
Makes a good point on DH’s campaign. Completely didn’t compare Pandain with buma though (don’t know if this was before buma said hes going to retract his candidacy)
On October 30 2010 07:29 Coagulation wrote:
FISHBOWL =FISHBALL Sorry. Wheres This guys circle at?? wouldnt they claim by now??
Poses a question, and not a bad one.
On October 30 2010 08:07 Coagulation wrote:
Because hes not trying really really super hard to be mayor i figure hes just a good honest townie offering to take the spot and do his best.
you guys are gonna start tearing each other to shreds over the role makes me think you got something else going on.
On October 30 2010 08:09 Coagulation wrote:
actually to be honest i would rather we nominate ACE OR ANYONE that isnt TRYING to be mayor
Kinda consistent to what hes saying before. Although I feel that Ace would be as manipulative as annul…
On October 30 2010 09:42 Coagulation wrote:DocH
Anyone that doesn't fucking vote for you must be scum?
Are you fucking serious ?
i voted for Pandain because it was a choice between Him And Fishball at the time (bum withdrew his candidacy before i voted or I would have voted him for my placeholder instead of pandain)
I posted many reasons why i chose pandain over fishball MANY Logical reasons.
i will repost them for you ****This was before you had decided to run for mayor
Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 01:55 Coagulation wrote:On October 30 2010 01:44 Fishball wrote:On October 30 2010 00:07 Coagulation wrote:
How about instead of blowing up about imaginary references to your CIRCLE in my post you answer the question that you completely avoided.
why would we want to risk a chance of 7 people possibly being scum manipulating town with mayor when we can go with the much safer odds of only 1 person possibly being scum.
I'm at work. I answer what I can given the time that I have, but I have always come back and address the rest. This is not dodging. People who have played with me in previous games will know.
I think you meant 6 people, as I said there are only 6 people in this group. Now why would Mafia include 6 of their 9 buddies in this circle? Why 6? Not 3, not 4, but 6?
Assume what you say is true, all 6 of us are Mafia, how exactly would we "manipulate" town? What stops the other solo Mayor and his "non-circle" buddies to manipulate town? Different scenario, but the outcome can very well be the same.
Everyone can debate about the "truth", but no one can argue about that fact that I did offer information, and I want/need protection. With me being Mayor, doesn't make me a dictator. I still need the help of the town to provide valuable input.
I would rather have a mayor that has transparency.. any communications he makes will be public so we can keep an eye on him.
Is that not a reasonable reason considering the two choices?? maybe not the greatest reason but I FEEL CONFIDENT we are not getting FUCKED BEHIND OUR BACKS.
Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 00:26 Coagulation wrote:
We need someone who is good at mafia but terrible at manipulation.
pandain is probably the best candidate under these parameters. he is an extremely organized and tactical scum hunter his analyses skills are good and he has a good level head about what needs to be done.
i have also noticed that he is a terrible lier and his posting style makes his motives extremely transparent. this would make it much easier for us to spot a slip up if he is mafia. and greatly increases the chances that he would fail at getting away with scum moves if it turns out he is a red.
Is that not a reasonable reason?? YOU SAID THE SAME THING EARLIER.Now i am sticking with pandain because he is most likely not a red trying to gain control of town based on the fact that he is not campaigning relentlessly.
Pandain is more then capable of using what tools he has at his disposal to help coordinate a good town strategy and i doubt he would run for mayor if he thought his role wasnt capable of contributing greatly as mayor.. and I FEEL HE is the most TRUSTWORTHY candidate so far BASED ON HIS ACTIONS IN THIS GAME. I Dont get the same feeling from you when your Threatening "FOS" On anyone that doesnt vote you..
IM NOT VOTING on WHOS PROMISING SOME BULLSHIT IF THEY GET MAYOR (town circle?? where??)
IM VOTING ON WHO I TRUST THE MOST IN MY GUT
IS THAT REASON ENOUGH?
Gets a bit mad in this post. However, I don’t think this is a bad thing. He’s strong and on the offensive.
On October 30 2010 10:43 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 10:38 ghrur wrote:On October 30 2010 10:33 Pandain wrote:
*sigh*
Pandain:
1. I can prove I'm legit if elected.
2.I'm apparently very transparent
3.Relies on open discussion and debate.
Dr. H:
1.Can prove he's legit if elected
2.Is not transparent, is a master mafioso and a mayer Dr. H I would fear above all
3. Relies on secret pm circles which can easily be infiltrated. Same problem goes with Fishball, they would spend days trying to find mafia which might not even exist.
DTS should check mayoral canidates, most likely to find a mafia(at least one mafia must've run, else they're just handing us the game on a platter.)
Since so many people claimed valuable roles while running for election, those people must be at the top of the priority list for medic protection. And as of now, Fishball's "circle" hasn't said anything, so I'm beginning to become highly suscipcious of Fishball.
Again, if you are in Fishball's circle, say so now. You don't have to say your role or anything, just say if you are. If no one does, I am going to lynch Fishball day 1.
You can prove you're legit if you're elected?
How?
i think mayor can be dt checked.
dont quote me tho
Puts his input, but not sure about it. He could have just asked the question to the mod. But made an extra post saying basically nothing.
On October 30 2010 11:28 Coagulation wrote:
dr h and pandain it would be nice if you guys could talk about something relevent to the town and disregard this little pissing contest you guys have going on right now.
Wants to clean up the thread. Kinda funny since he has made some irrelevant posts himself.
On October 30 2010 11:40 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 11:18 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Also, it'd be great if we could get a few more people on the replacement list. If you're following the game and want to be on it, please PM me.
I dont know why anyone in their right fucking mind following this shit storm would want to join in.
Irrelevant to the game.
On October 30 2010 12:24 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 12:20 Glasse wrote:On October 30 2010 12:18 infinitestory wrote:On October 30 2010 12:16 Glasse wrote:On October 30 2010 12:13 NB wrote:
so we have 3 main candidates: Panda, dish, doctor... Who of you will promise to protect me from scums? :3
I will protect you as
i can't be killed during the game!. I will always be there for you! Vote for me!
wait, WHAT?
You heard it, even god would not be able to kill me!
this sounds legit.
Post that isn’t needed.
On October 30 2010 13:18 Coagulation wrote:
why are you responding to it?
just wondering.. obviously hes just fucking around.
Inconsistent again. He himself responded to Glasse.
On October 30 2010 14:20 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 14:05 kingjames01 wrote:On October 30 2010 13:56 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On October 30 2010 13:55 kingjames01 wrote:On October 30 2010 13:51 infinitestory wrote:Just thought of another way DrH might fake the role:
Suppose his claim about the poking is correct, including that the poked knows DrH did the poking. But say DrH were a mafia and the 1 person infected with Murrayitis. This "poke" could be the method by which he transfers Murrayitis... and the person poked would still confirm that DrH poked him, thus establishing credibility. The plague doctors would immunize the people DrH tells them to, possibly including any reds that end up infected.
This possibility has me extremely paranoid
if only because it gives the reds such a gigantic advantage. The only ways I can think of to beat this scenario are very WIFOM.
DAMN. That's so true. I was so excited to figure out the connection that I forgot to stay suspicious.
IF Bill Murry died while using Sticky, then it's VERY LIKELY that Sticky is infected with Murrayitis. If Sticky pokes someone that would pass it on... Then DrH pretends to be notified.
You're speculating on mod logic based on the storyline of a past game
pretty far out there if you ask me. this is getting way too meta.
I disagree. Your role is "Sticky". You admitted that yourself. It cannot be denied that the theme of the game revolves around Bill Murray. My logic isn't based on the storyline of a past game. It's based on finding connections around the theme:
- Bill Murray died in Haunted Mafia giving rise to Murrayitis
- Bill Murray died in Mafia XXXI holding a sticky named Sticky
- There is an actual role called "Sticky"
- Sticky's ability involves poking people
On October 29 2010 06:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Day 1
Rise and Shine! It is now Day 1! And no one is infected by Murrayitis... Yet.
If no one has Murrayitis yet, then no PERSON has Murrayitis yet. However, a Sticky might. That Sticky is you.
the plot thickens.
however i cant help but notice that he revealed his role honestly ( as far as we know it was pretty much confirmed by the fact that we found a logical link to it in another game that fits perfectly?)
then there is still the chance hes mafia sticky.
but I cant see a scum willingly giving up this kind of info like that.
I hate the way drH plays but his story is starting to come together. i still worry that he is too fucking good at this game to chance him possibly gaining such an advantage as a red.
Good. Tells his stance on DH after DH told the town his role. A little inconsistent to what he said earlier though, about manipulation.
On October 30 2010 14:30 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 14:22 Fishball wrote:
Even if I don't get the Mayor at the end, I still might reveal my role at that point, but this requires more consideration.
I think you are much better off not being mayor
If a red slips into power as mayor and you are truly pro town as you say you are we are gonna need someone who can organize as a backup plan.
I think you would be best suited as our ace up the sleeve in case mayor gets compromised.
Sure, makes a good point.
On October 30 2010 14:39 Coagulation wrote:
Hosting a game has nothing to do with playing in this game. all bitching about something like that is gonna do is create drama that town doesnt need to deal with.
Not useful post.
On October 30 2010 14:43 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 14:33 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
watch the mafia keep grasping at straws to try to make me look bad and red when I've done more to show i'm town than anyone in this game
and then they want to vote for pandain lololol
I told you why I voted for pandain.
and frankly from last game you pretty much showed me you have no problem being mafia and cramming town talk down my fucking throat without thinking twice. so im still skeptical.
He did say why he voted for Pandain, so, hes consistent here.
On October 30 2010 14:58 Coagulation wrote:
rofl
Irrelevant.
On October 31 2010 08:53 Coagulation wrote:
LOL THE BOOGER THROWER
Irrelevant.
On October 31 2010 13:39 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 31 2010 12:39 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
SUP ALL!
Going to start reading now O_O!
PUT YOUR FLAME RESISTANT PANTS ON.
Irrelevant.
On October 31 2010 14:10 Coagulation wrote:
Dodging a lynch sounds alot like a scum role.. anyone else think so?
Makes a point, and poses a question. Don’t think its bad.
On October 31 2010 19:08 Coagulation wrote:
OK i have caught up on reading
1. DOCH naturally I still cant trust you 100% until I can see some of your claims of verifying yourself come to light. I really hope your not a red otherwise we may as well just bend over and let you get to fucking.
2. you have a moron for a bodyguard
3. Node is asking for invites to the circle? i would think twice before letting people who request in. looks like 1 red was already in the circle. he dies and now Node starts asking to get in?(could be mafia trying to get a man back inside)
looks bad but not gonna dwell on it too much yet..
4. pandain I dunno what the hell you are talking about. Im not gonna keep my mouth shut if someone looks scummy just because they are not around to defend themselves.
Makes good points. Well, except for 2 as DXC technically didn’t say he was bodyguard.
On November 01 2010 06:02 Coagulation wrote:
concerning bodyguards
1. there are 2 bodyguards and mods lied to us (mods lie to us then thats bullshit)
2. there is 1 bodyguard and one of them lied. i dont think that would necessarily be scummy considering it can take heat off the real bodyguard and confuse mafia and keep the real bodyguard safe.
lets not do anymore roleclaims guys. we are handing so much info to the reds its not good at all.
if you got a role that needs to be revealed think on it for a day or two first.
Good point, and I agree.
On November 01 2010 06:32 Coagulation wrote:
dt needs to investigate pandain for sure considering he was running for mayor.
also the other people who wanted elected mayor
bumatlarge
fishball
annul
ghrur
glasse
node
also worth keeping an eye on node who is asking for people to invite him into circle.
Talks about how need to check mayor candidates. Not bad.
On November 01 2010 06:57 Coagulation wrote:
well regardless we need to get to the bottom of the youngminii thing somehow i think thats the point hes trying to make. i still feel like there is a good possibility that his ability is either a red ability or he was saved by a red allie. i dont want this to just blow under the radar
Sure, a valid point.
On November 01 2010 07:12 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2010 07:01 Lexpar wrote:
If I die tonight Doc H is almost definitely scum.
just the fact that you posted this comment nullifies itself
Technically not useful, but kinda makes a point.
On November 01 2010 07:15 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2010 07:14 Glasse wrote:
Hey guys if i die tonight Glasse is almost definitely blue.
why on earth did we not make you mayor.
Not helpful.
On November 01 2010 07:32 Coagulation wrote:
ya hes in a circle that is allowed to pm he however isnt give the role/alignment of the people with him.
Answers a question.
On November 01 2010 09:53 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2010 09:25 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On November 01 2010 09:24 jcarlsoniv wrote:On November 01 2010 09:22 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On November 01 2010 09:20 Misder wrote:
@DH
Earlier, you said you were going to poke the person you thought is most likely town. So why do you think that jcarls is town?
Agreeable posts, good analysis, cool headed and logical. He didn't make a big roleclaim or bring a lot of attention onto himself and seemed for that reason to be a good target for me.
Awwww that's the nicest thing anyone's ever said about me! ... on the internet...
I didn't realize I was actually an important player in this game.
On November 01 2010 08:15 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
I would like to announce that last night I poked jcarlsoniv. I did not receive a PM from Artanis or LSB meaning the poke was successful and jcarlsoniv does not have murrayitis.
I cannot confirm this Dr.H, I did not receive a PM from the mods saying I was poked.
Did you receive any other night actions?
Something stopped my poke from going through to jcarlsoniv. how fucking convenient.
Yay for being pissed off and not putting analysis. Although this is consistent to how he was acting before DH was elected.
On November 01 2010 10:17 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 07:11 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
you'll see very soon that the information I'm providing will be beneficial to the town and we'll see real results in numbers. I can back this up.
Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 07:12 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
there are other things to my power that will prove beyond any doubt that I am a pro-town player. they may not take affect immediately but everything will be quite clear when I am elected and roleclaim
Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 06:17 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
did you even read the thread? i am going to prove that I am my blue role as soon as I am elected.
Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 09:27 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
I can demonstrate my role is exactly what it is one I am able to use it. If this is not the case then feel free to lynch me.
Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 09:07 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Why does that make you nervous? I can prove to the entire town that I am town aligned. If I don't do that, simply lynch me.
Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 09:23 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
I am saying I am 100% able to prove I have a not scummy role and if I am found in any way to be lying, the town can lynch me. You don't have to take me at my word but this is a huge gambit I'm taking with a very small payoff if I am mafia.
Show nested quote +On October 30 2010 06:16 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
i'm the only candidate aside from node who is claiming to offer 100% proof that I am not mafia when I'm elected, just saying
Imo, makes a good point.
On November 01 2010 10:20 Coagulation wrote:
im not saying doch is red
im not saying that mafia wouldnt have anything to gain by discrediting him if he is a townie
im saying he had a campaign of bullshit.
Sure, agreed.
On November 01 2010 10:23 Coagulation wrote:
he claims he had thought about being roleblocked. yet he still claims 100% proof the whole time hes campaigning ITS CONVENIENT he happens to leave that out of his campaign
Same as above.
On November 01 2010 10:25 Coagulation wrote:
DOCH is not a shitty player there is no fucking way he got blindsided by something as simple as a ROLEBLOCK.
Same as above.
On November 01 2010 10:34 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2010 10:31 Glasse wrote:On November 01 2010 10:20 Coagulation wrote:
im not saying doch is red
im not saying that mafia wouldnt have anything to gain by discrediting him if he is a townie
im saying he had a campaign of bullshit.
i'd like to point out that there is always less than 10% truth in any elections.
so wait.. your not a god???
Unhelpful.
EPT
