|
United States4053 Posts
On November 08 2010 15:50 L wrote:
I suggest you look at 666's hatter role and the last Day post before assuming Decuondo wasn't hit.
Seems pretty clear that 666's bombs did not go off and that he killed himself.
we never said 666 blew deconduo with a bomb, in fact we clarified several times that his bombs never went off at all
ace said (untruthfully, it seems o_O) that deconduo probably died in 666's suicide bomb
|
United States4053 Posts
Ok then. I can't find a hole in your story, and kitaman's investigations are just too correct for me to fault him quite yet (plus, if he were mafia and really wanted to get rid of you, he would almost certainly have came out and said directly that you're scum instead of providing the correct description of what happened)
So who else is on your scumdar right now? (don't include kitaman, as I don't want this argument looping around anymore)
|
United States4053 Posts
also, i agree that it was for the better that you didn't say "i might know how deconduo died" or something to that effect
|
United States4053 Posts
On November 08 2010 16:04 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2010 15:58 infinitestory wrote:
Ok then. I can't find a hole in your story, and kitaman's investigations are just too correct for me to fault him quite yet (plus, if he were mafia and really wanted to get rid of you, he would almost certainly have came out and said directly that you're scum instead of providing the correct description of what happened)
So who else is on your scumdar right now? (don't include kitaman, as I don't want this argument looping around anymore) Wait... If kitaman is telling the truth doesn't that make Ace scum? I don't see how you can have it both ways.
kitaman tells the truth: infun did not leave house, amber did not leave house, ace carried out a hit
ace tells the truth: carried out the hit on deconduo
that's how you can have it both ways
|
United States4053 Posts
guys, quit arguing about this, the situation appears to have found a pleasing resolution and both of you look pro-town
no reason to keep going back and forth trying to prove the other one is redder or some shit like that
|
United States4053 Posts
On November 08 2010 16:42 Ace wrote:Easy for you to say when you don't have a bunch of votes next to your name 
this is true, brb
|
United States4053 Posts
|
United States4053 Posts
^i'll say that you look extremely blue judging from the investigations. i will admit that there is no way for an investigative role to truly 100% confirm, and that your role name question is still up in the air
|
United States4053 Posts
ok wtf guys, i told you hyperbola was not a very good lynch >_____> something VERY funny happened. I stated clearly that anyone who voted hyperbola should look at meapak because meapak was scummier, then people went ahead and KEPT VOTING HYPERBOLA WTF... let me check who voted hyperbola after my meapak analysis
also, if pandain is cleared by kthez, i'm heavily inclined to trust his check on nemesis as well
|
United States4053 Posts
|
United States4053 Posts
man, lol is really an unfortunate name for a video game
|
United States4053 Posts
OR the mafia vote can't be used two days in a row? i dunno, that was a theory that was raised when it went unused on day 2, and it's certainly been used-unused-used-unused
|
United States4053 Posts
On November 09 2010 11:03 Kenpachi wrote:
So i guess pandain is safe ;x.. your so misleading pandain D:
so who are the main suspects now? Ace? cant be me because that doesnt make any sense.. Why would it make sense if i were to vote lynch a mafia to my benefit when its not my benefit? I would have voted for Coag regardless of DrH and DC's plan to lynch pandain first no? now if you suspect that if my powers activated if i lynched a townie DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE TO YOU?
wait, who the fuck suspected you?
|
United States4053 Posts
On November 09 2010 16:31 flamewheel wrote:
Holy shit what the fuck 187 pages?
you can't possibly imagine the shitfests it took to get this far
|
United States4053 Posts
^First off, definitely agree with RoL, we've had a shitton of roleclaims and I'm having to look for inconsistencies to figure out which ones are fake. >_______>
Also, we have a LOT of investigative role information, and Node's oracling is giving us some good insights too. I think very soon (if not tomorrow), we'll be able to start catching mafia simply by process of elimination. We definitely need to keep that in mind as the blue:red ratio dwindles by the day.
|
United States4053 Posts
and I'm still wondering: how the fuck did Hyperbola get voted off the island with a ridiculously obvious bandwagon on an outdated, weak analysis? (not saying the analysis was wrong, but there wasn't a whole lot of evidence, and I even stated multiple times in bold font that anyone who was voting Hyperbola should look at my Meapak analysis which contained more content)
|
United States4053 Posts
On November 09 2010 18:07 infinitestory wrote:
^First off, definitely agree with RoL, we've had a shitton of roleclaims and I'm having to look for inconsistencies to figure out which ones are fake. >_______>
Also, we have a LOT of investigative role information, and Node's oracling is giving us some good insights too. I think very soon (if not tomorrow), we'll be able to start catching mafia simply by process of elimination. We definitely need to keep that in mind as the blue : red ratio dwindles by the day.
ebwop because smiley
|
United States4053 Posts
On November 09 2010 18:23 youngminii wrote:
wait wtf HOW DID PANDAIN NOT GET LYNCHED?
some weird shit happened and pandain made a bandwagon on the innocent DT who confirmed him while a completely unjustified bandwagon formed around hyperbola
|
United States4053 Posts
*ebwop: i mean completely unjustified in the sense that meapak was a legitly better lynch, and a lot of people decided to just ignore that fact >_______>
|
United States4053 Posts
ok new rule from now on
if you want to burn a lynch vote, put it on yourself
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
