|
On October 29 2010 10:40 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Sorry guys, I botched up the definition of Murrayitis completely. This is the 100% correct definition.
Murrayitis Mechanics. The amount of people infected with Murrayitis is posted at the start of the day. Murrayitis is transferred if a carrier is visited, or visits someone during the night. Doctors can cure someone from Murrayitis. While Plague Doctors can cure and transfer immunity to someone with Murrayitis. If over half of the Game has Murrayitis, every carrier of Murrayitis dies.
Damn, with so many roles, this is gonna hurt. But it does hit mafia too Im sure. Sounds like Plague doctor is pro-town, so if they pick out solid townies as his visits, they can put it in our favor if this event happens. I'm assuming half also does not include dead people also, so this has a high chance of happening.
But assuming mafia is the source, it will be harder for it to infect them if they pick and choose the initial infected. Very interesting.
|
Now that I think about it, I'm more unsure about the mass roleclaiming thing I suggested. My main concern is that there isn't a concrete way to confirm anyone. And, as Fishball stated, nothing is preventing the mafia from making roles up that have passive abilities, or claim vigi.
|
What I am interested in is how forgetforeverine is going to factor into the game. Is it simply a role playing element and can a specific role can utilize it? Or is it just a way of having people "forget" about other mafia games... in which case we can't make arguments based on past actions.
|
My inclination is to vote for Pandain, especially since we know pretty well how he plays pro-town, and thus can scrutinize his posts for suspicious activity.
The day 1 lynch is going to be huge. We need to watch the mayor veeeeeeery closely when he makes it.
|
If forgetforeveritis isn't just a flavor thing, I would guess that it means people can be misinformed about their roles. I'm not sure how that would work, but in this game, who knows?
|
On October 29 2010 11:02 Misder wrote:
Now that I think about it, I'm more unsure about the mass roleclaiming thing I suggested. My main concern is that there isn't a concrete way to confirm anyone. And, as Fishball stated, nothing is preventing the mafia from making roles up that have passive abilities, or claim vigi.
Yeah, don't mass roleclaim, unless you're me, and you roleclaim and don't afraid of anything. I think I've claimed in the past 5 game I've played by day 2. But I'm insane so it's appropriate. We also have to lynch someone  hopefully no one falls prey to OMGUS. I've already seen blatant WIFOM against Dr.H and myself I guess. Remember to avoid WineInFrontOfMe, think "Hm, am I eliminating any option with this thought process." Listing that we can both be mafia, both town, 1mafia/1 town does not really take out any options. That is WIFOM!
It's also been discussed to death in previous games that voting someone based on what role they have been in the past is ILLOGICAL and SILLY. If you can prove "He's acting like he did when he was mafia" well then that's all good in the hood. I want reasons.
And usually you can fin something you dont mean in the wiki, or right here!
Terms that people use
|
Vatican City State1650 Posts
How does murrayitis start?
Is there a mafia with the ability to give murrayitis? Do some people start infected with murrayitis?
will the murrayitis extend to the mayor even with bodyguards present?
If the mayor was visited, and was infected, will he die even if the bodyguards are alive when more than half the participants have murrayitis?
[b] Are there other viruses (standard poisons) present?[b]
There has been instances of people being "poisoned" and dying on the second night. Will this be a separate mechanic from murrayitis?
|
Hi guys.
im torn between voting for Bumatlarge or Pandain for mayor!
|
On October 29 2010 11:19 orgolove wrote:
How does murrayitis start?
Day 1 post:
It quickly became clear that the Mafia had somehow harnessed the power of Murrayitis and planned to use it against the town.
will the murrayitis extend to the mayor even with bodyguards present?
The Mayor can be infected by Murrayitis.
If the mayor was visited, and was infected, will he die even if the bodyguards are alive when more than half the participants have murrayitis?
Yes. Possible bodyguards are unfortunately piss poor medics.
Are there other viruses (standard poisons) present?
There has been instances of people being "poisoned" and dying on the second night. Will this be a separate mechanic from murrayitis?
No information regarding possible poisonings is available, but the known effects of Murrayitis do not include death by poisoning on the second night.
|
do people know if they are infected with murraynitis?
|
On October 29 2010 11:31 Pandain wrote:
do people know if they are infected with murraynitis?
On October 29 2010 10:15 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2010 10:07 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Does the person with murrayitis know they have murrayitis? With the exception of any doctor role, players will not be informed if they have murrayitis.
|
On October 29 2010 10:56 Fishball wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2010 10:43 Misder wrote:
So I only heard from DH about the mass roleclaiming idea. To me, I feel that its more advantagious to the town than it is disadvantagious, but I want to hear from more of you guys about it. I think I've missed his post, but do NOT mass role claim. There is no role list in this game, so there are plenty of room for fake roles. In case of mass role claim, the real beneficiary here is the Mafia. If what you say is true, we have to look at DH more, as he definitely knows better.
i said it's a bad idea
|
I want to say I won't be as active during Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. This does not mean I will stop playing. I will read every comments posted and will offer my opinion. I will have about 5 posts per day during those three days.
|
United States4053 Posts
On October 29 2010 11:35 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2010 10:56 Fishball wrote:On October 29 2010 10:43 Misder wrote:
So I only heard from DH about the mass roleclaiming idea. To me, I feel that its more advantagious to the town than it is disadvantagious, but I want to hear from more of you guys about it. I think I've missed his post, but do NOT mass role claim. There is no role list in this game, so there are plenty of room for fake roles. In case of mass role claim, the real beneficiary here is the Mafia. If what you say is true, we have to look at DH more, as he definitely knows better. i said it's a bad idea
He agreed, and so do I. The only possible pro of mass roleclaim is that the reds would have to make up roles, and we might be able to discern them from that, but I don't put any faith in that. I don't want to give the reds a hit list on a silver platter under any circumstances (and please no WIFOM)
|
Comparing Pandain's and Bum's Mayor running post, Pandain's post is more solid, though both doesn't necessarily offer anything to the table. But given the current game settings, that's only fair.
I'm still debating whether I should run for Mayor or not, as I DO have something to offer. If I do, this will be the first time I've run for Mayor since I started playing.
|
Hi guys checking in, I think I'll be voting for pandain or bum.
|
On October 29 2010 11:58 Fishball wrote:
I'm still debating whether I should run for Mayor or not, as I DO have something to offer.
Such a tease.
|
Maybe I should run for Mayor? 
|
On October 29 2010 12:14 Ace wrote:Maybe I should run for Mayor?
LALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU.
We also need to decide the first person to kill, which is often hard with little information. I say we kill a mayor candidate, as it might increase our chances, based on when and how they claimed to run. Of course they might not run at all, but with such ambiguity in what roles are present, you could really fake some nasty stuff. I wouldn't pass up that opportunity.
|
On October 29 2010 12:17 bumatlarge wrote:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/postmessage.php# LALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU. We also need to decide the first person to kill, which is often hard with little information. I say we kill a mayor candidate, as it might increase our chances, based on when and how they claimed to run. Of course they might not run at all, but with such ambiguity in what roles are present, you could really fake some nasty stuff. I wouldn't pass up that opportunity.
Mayor determines first day kill.
On October 29 2010 09:58 bumatlarge wrote:Show nested quote +On October 29 2010 09:45 Hyperbola wrote:On October 29 2010 08:29 bumatlarge wrote:On October 29 2010 07:47 Hyperbola wrote:
Citizens of Insania,
I would like to announce my candidacy for mayor. In light of recent events, most importantly the town's development of many new powers, a new system of government must emerge to quell the chaos that is this town. It has come to our attention that the local mafia has begun to exploit their new abilities and are now aiming for total control of this fine community. In order to successfully repel them, a properly organized inner circle of supertownies must be established. This new circle needs leadership and commitment, and I believe I am the man for the job.
Vote for Order! Vote Hyperbola! On October 29 2010 07:49 CubEdIn wrote:
*heads to the voting thread to vote for Hyperbola*
*giggles* See, this is bad, we can't have this. Look how much nonsense he spouted. No of that means anything. IT MEANS NOTHING. Then this dude just votes for him? Sorry charlie not having it. You need to be voting for me. If I am not voed in, I will be Then I will become a Pandain/BM (without the getting modkilled part) and just bug everyone. But if I am! I will be :D Everything will go under my scrutinizer eye and no one will get any biased treatment. Except for maybe Ace, who I owe some respect for that penalty mafia game. He's allowed to do his own thing and not vote for me. An interesting strategy. You call me out on my magnificent speech and then proceed to say almost nothing yourself. Then you direct attention away from yourself and give the illusion of trying to help town by saying random things about the game. I don't think Cube was being serious when he posted that, but I however, was. I am very adept at organization and strategic play. Although I may have not been in as many mafia games and tend to stay quiet, I can still manage a team and have done so in games I was mafia in. The same skills can apply to town if we are able to sort out who's who and create a legitimate town circle. Furthermore, I am very adept at sorting out what's what's legitimate and what's bullshit. Unless there are some specific roles which may overcome my keen eye, I can guarantee you that there will be NO leaks in the town circle if I am voted mayor. As for the issue of whether I am mafia or not... you can be damn well sure that the first person to announce their candidacy for mayor as I did had better be really fucking good at defending themselves from clues if they're mafia. Other than that fact, I cannot guarantee anything. But that is what most elections are: a leap of faith. I'm curious how you would go about forming a town circle. Considering the PM rules. And there are no clues in this game, unless you mean something else like slip-ups. It seems for someone claiming they have such a keen-eye, you don't read the OP very well. I don't think this makes you scummy, you just don't stand out as an experienced player if we put aside how smart you will be as mayor.
oh the irony 
+ Show Spoiler +
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
