Haunted Mafia - Page 4

On October 14 2010 13:41 Coagulation wrote:
HOLY FUCKING CAT Kpyolysis32

i dont wanna seem kind of harsh but if this isnt an obvious link to scum then i dont know what is.

On October 14 2010 19:42 KhrisKruel wrote:
I want to put my two cents in about blue roles.

Firstly, if you have a blue role, for the love of god don't claim unless you have a good reason. Don't even hint at them. You are giving the scum more information to easily make their nightkills.

Secondly, don't discuss what blue roles need to do. NB did this during day 1, and he was the mafia godfather. Blue roles will do what blue roles do, and they will give us information when they want us to.

Thirdly, don't claim to people in PM's. Don't listen to them when they say others have already claimed. You have no idea if they are townie or not, and knowing who you are you will die and the town will lose a blue role.

If that person tries to gain your trust by showing you a PM of them from DrH, they're cheating. They can tell you any role they have. All role PMs are public. Also, we were given two role pms, one of which has been changed. How do you know he isn't showing you the one given before?

As a rule, people discussing blue actions and asking people to PM them are never trustworthy. I hope the newbies to mafia don't fall into this. If you are a blue role, do what you think is best and don't listen to what anyone else tells you. Don't play WIFOM games of "well if we talk abou tit, then it won't happen." Just do what you believe is best. Don't worry about failing. Failing would be letting the mafia influence your night action for their benefit.

As a rule I'm highly suspicious of anyone discussing blue actions publicly.

On October 14 2010 22:55 KhrisKruel wrote:



Yes I suspect you. I Don't trust anyone trying to control blue actions. The town doesn't need structure until late in the game when roles are pretty much confirmed. At that point a mass claim is correct. Early in the game its better just to let blues do what they want.

Besides, who is going to control the structure? Why would anyone trust anyone? If you claim to a mafia, you'll just die the next night.

Any blue claiming to an unknown person has got to be completely retarded. Players that are new to the game might fall for these dumb tactics.

On October 15 2010 00:30 seRapH wrote:

The high accuracy rate surprises me too. Either I suck more at this game than I thought or something big is happening in PM land.

I doubt the mafia was looking to kill vamp brute, or vamps looked for GF, and both sides just got lucky. All in all its still really really surprising.

On October 15 2010 01:37 deconduo wrote:
Don't forget that the vamps might have more than one brute.

On October 15 2010 11:04 Node wrote:
Kpyolisis32 is pretty damn sketchy in my book. Forget the damn cat for a moment, and just look at the way he's been posting:



I mean, this statement is so weird no matter how you look at it. It's just, "Yep, the clue points to me. That's all." He doesn't defend himself. He doesn't deny that it was him, or provide other potential suspects. To me, it just looks like a ploy to gain some townie cred by implicating himself just a little bit, hoping that people will move on accepting that there's no way a red would provide evidence against himself. The only defense we get is:



I don't like it. I don't like it one bit.

On October 15 2010 12:46 Pandain wrote:
no one continue to vote vendril.

I need to check something...and we have a whole 'nother day.

On October 15 2010 21:38 CubEdIn wrote:


It's not just that. There are some people who have gained a lot of suspicion, but none nearly as much as Veldril, AND if we're right, it will reduce Vamp KP by 1. So it's a pretty high-priority target.

...unless we're wrong, which is what I'm most scared of right now.

On October 15 2010 22:15 KhrisKruel wrote:


You do realize this can be said about every player in the game.

This post reeks of "I don't care if Veldril dies"

On October 15 2010 22:40 KhrisKruel wrote:
Actually, now that I think about it, it does mean you care if Veldril dies.

You give completely illogical numbers. Anyone can see from the OP its not an equal chance of being each. Your numbers heavily skew towards advantageous numbers.

A townie lynch is not good. Ever. Sad that you would think that. I know scum would think that townie kills are good though.

With your illogical numbers, and no vote yourself, your post screams "I want Veldril dead but I don't want to get my hands dirty." Even if you do plan to vote for him, if this is really your reasoning, then that's scummy.

On October 15 2010 22:55 deconduo wrote:


1. Bad
2. Very Bad
3. Kinda Bad (Maf quite close to winning)
4. Good

75% chance of it going bad. I don't think the maths matter though, if veldril is scum, its 99% that he's a vamp rather than a maf. I don't think lynching him is a good idea.

Backs down. I had a pm with Dr. H that one of the major scum tells is someone accusing/making a point, then backing down. Now, obviously townies can do this all the time, but it points towards a scum.

On October 16 2010 12:25 orgolove wrote:



I post things that I notice, and show evidence that support those things, if any. If you are so offended by that, then perhaps you have something to hide - and would rather that someone does NOT place a careful eye over everyone's activities?



And I've been ridiculed through both PMs as well as this thread for what was an honest effort of many hours. I should have known better than to expect any more from an internet forum -.- Believe what you may, but it was meant as a tool, not as a weapon.