|
On August 02 2010 06:50 Misder wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2010 03:59 BrownBear wrote:Holy shit Protact. I am very impress. I want to raise the topic of Misder's inactivity - namely, it's nothing new. TL Mafia XXVI: Day 1: Shows up late, votes for me for Mayor right after I withdraw my candidacy, then doesnt post. Throughout the rest of the game, posted the bare minimum to stay alive, only stayed on bandwagons, occasionally popped up with some kinda-alright analysis... you get the picture. Only thing he had going for him this game was, he ended up being green. It's possible he is doing the exact same thing again. I went further back, and couldn't find any other games, so this is all we got to go on. this is the way i play >.< this is my second mafia game, so that is the only one in the past. i guess you really cant judge from only one mafia game. Luckily, this mafia game will also support the fact even when I'm inactive, I will end up green. Actually, a lot in that mafia game thought a was mafia member...
im pushing for you for night one kills in every game from now on
|
i still find it very interesting how sub died
cause the only people that knew about him were pandain, and proct (i still hate you for telling people you didnt confirm sub). Though i suppose pandain probably slipped up enough info to make it obvious who the dt was, aya.
and pandain flipped town and proct was never actually checked. Though it took subversion what a whole extra night after he was discovered to die?
surprisingly this doesnt make me that much more suspicious of proct really, it just makes me want to pray sub doesnt get dt again
quiiiite interesting.
|
What is this abstaining shit?
##vote: Misder##
|
I think an interesting thing for people to go back an analyze with their own sets of logic
is at the point where BB suggests for the vets to claim, with the idea in mind that the GF himself was using a vet cover.
i think this should clear BB, or im hoping the mob didnt read into it deeply enough to try a move like that, but more so the people that opposed the idea of vets claiming who are still alive. You can obviously see BC opposing this idea (even though it is a reasonable idea to oppose, it is extra pertinent for the mob as this is their GF's cover)
and i couldnt see a mob member so strongly pushing for this idea if he knew his own GF had this role, or at least i hope not
i dont think there is much to be had out from this early idea than taking a clearer look at bb's alignment but it is always helpful to narrow down that list
it's around page 36 for you lazy dudes
also a fun person to put under the spotlight will be pyrr!
never been in danger of dying yet...for good reason or not?
|
On August 02 2010 06:58 Divinek wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2010 06:50 Misder wrote:On August 02 2010 03:59 BrownBear wrote:Holy shit Protact. I am very impress. I want to raise the topic of Misder's inactivity - namely, it's nothing new. TL Mafia XXVI: Day 1: Shows up late, votes for me for Mayor right after I withdraw my candidacy, then doesnt post. Throughout the rest of the game, posted the bare minimum to stay alive, only stayed on bandwagons, occasionally popped up with some kinda-alright analysis... you get the picture. Only thing he had going for him this game was, he ended up being green. It's possible he is doing the exact same thing again. I went further back, and couldn't find any other games, so this is all we got to go on. this is the way i play >.< this is my second mafia game, so that is the only one in the past. i guess you really cant judge from only one mafia game. Luckily, this mafia game will also support the fact even when I'm inactive, I will end up green. Actually, a lot in that mafia game thought a was mafia member... im pushing for you for night one kills in every game from now on
Why? Just because I've been inactive sometimes. I still think I contributed more to the game than say, Jayme or tricode.
My current list is:
rastaban
chaoser
pyrrholuxia
but I need to do more reseaerch on this least. I will try to do this when I have to the time, probably tonight.
|
atleast tricode being a confirmed townie is useful in itself rofl you have 24 posts in this entire game
please do the research and then ill consider moving my vote!
|
WHO DO I GOTTA KILL? oh, wait, nm! 24 hours to go!
|
2]Misder (Pyrrhuloxia, Divinek)
2]Rastaban (tricode, Misder)
Abstaining: Protactinium, ~OpZ~, BrownBear
not voting: chaoser, d3_crescentia, rastaban
|
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
d3_crescentia is voting for Misder, Bill :>
|
On August 02 2010 11:10 flamewheel wrote:
d3_crescentia is voting for Misder, Bill :>
bunny d3_crescentia votes for WHOEVER Bill murray wants D3_crescentia to vote for.
XDXDXD
|
dont post you're fucking dead
god damn it
|
wherrrrree are all the towns people
|
On August 02 2010 12:22 Divinek wrote:
dont post you're fucking dead
god damn it
They say ghosts often return to the places of their deaths.... especially when they've been wronged....
|
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Seriously, if you're dead please stop posting.
|
On August 02 2010 07:44 Divinek wrote:
i still find it very interesting how sub died
cause the only people that knew about him were pandain, and proct (i still hate you for telling people you didnt confirm sub). Though i suppose pandain probably slipped up enough info to make it obvious who the dt was, aya.
and pandain flipped town and proct was never actually checked. Though it took subversion what a whole extra night after he was discovered to die?
surprisingly this doesnt make me that much more suspicious of proct really, it just makes me want to pray sub doesnt get dt again
quiiiite interesting.
Sub claimed blue in thread to avoid lynch so I'm sure mafia would go after him unless they thought he might be veteran.
|
On August 02 2010 08:19 Divinek wrote:
I think an interesting thing for people to go back an analyze with their own sets of logic
is at the point where BB suggests for the vets to claim, with the idea in mind that the GF himself was using a vet cover.
i think this should clear BB, or im hoping the mob didnt read into it deeply enough to try a move like that, but more so the people that opposed the idea of vets claiming who are still alive. You can obviously see BC opposing this idea (even though it is a reasonable idea to oppose, it is extra pertinent for the mob as this is their GF's cover)
and i couldnt see a mob member so strongly pushing for this idea if he knew his own GF had this role, or at least i hope not
i dont think there is much to be had out from this early idea than taking a clearer look at bb's alignment but it is always helpful to narrow down that list
it's around page 36 for you lazy dudes
also a fun person to put under the spotlight will be pyrr!
never been in danger of dying yet...for good reason or not?
I think this does make BB look innocent - no reason for mafia to have a public debate over this. When I criticized BB over his plan I was thinking from the perspective of the end game where we want mafia to waste hits on veterans. I suppose even then the plan could have been part of a ploy to out the veterans and avoid hitting them but if this was the mafia's plan they would have used their most persuasive player to do it (BC) rather than putting him against it.
|
On August 02 2010 08:19 Divinek wrote:
I think an interesting thing for people to go back an analyze with their own sets of logic
is at the point where BB suggests for the vets to claim, with the idea in mind that the GF himself was using a vet cover.
i think this should clear BB, or im hoping the mob didnt read into it deeply enough to try a move like that, but more so the people that opposed the idea of vets claiming who are still alive. You can obviously see BC opposing this idea (even though it is a reasonable idea to oppose, it is extra pertinent for the mob as this is their GF's cover)
and i couldnt see a mob member so strongly pushing for this idea if he knew his own GF had this role, or at least i hope not
i dont think there is much to be had out from this early idea than taking a clearer look at bb's alignment but it is always helpful to narrow down that list
it's around page 36 for you lazy dudes
also a fun person to put under the spotlight will be pyrr!
never been in danger of dying yet...for good reason or not?
No....BC would of PUSHED for Vets to claim. Because he would of been DT checked as Vet...And he would be the one more likely to be DT checked...Lol
|
On August 02 2010 08:54 Misder wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2010 06:58 Divinek wrote:On August 02 2010 06:50 Misder wrote:On August 02 2010 03:59 BrownBear wrote:Holy shit Protact. I am very impress. I want to raise the topic of Misder's inactivity - namely, it's nothing new. TL Mafia XXVI: Day 1: Shows up late, votes for me for Mayor right after I withdraw my candidacy, then doesnt post. Throughout the rest of the game, posted the bare minimum to stay alive, only stayed on bandwagons, occasionally popped up with some kinda-alright analysis... you get the picture. Only thing he had going for him this game was, he ended up being green. It's possible he is doing the exact same thing again. I went further back, and couldn't find any other games, so this is all we got to go on. this is the way i play >.< this is my second mafia game, so that is the only one in the past. i guess you really cant judge from only one mafia game. Luckily, this mafia game will also support the fact even when I'm inactive, I will end up green. Actually, a lot in that mafia game thought a was mafia member... im pushing for you for night one kills in every game from now on Why? Just because I've been inactive sometimes. I still think I contributed more to the game than say, Jayme or tricode. My current list is: rastaban chaoser pyrrholuxia but I need to do more reseaerch on this least. I will try to do this when I have to the time, probably tonight.
TriCode ALMOST killed the GF....If Roffles hadn't fucked it all up >_<
|
On August 02 2010 13:00 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2010 08:19 Divinek wrote:
I think an interesting thing for people to go back an analyze with their own sets of logic
is at the point where BB suggests for the vets to claim, with the idea in mind that the GF himself was using a vet cover.
i think this should clear BB, or im hoping the mob didnt read into it deeply enough to try a move like that, but more so the people that opposed the idea of vets claiming who are still alive. You can obviously see BC opposing this idea (even though it is a reasonable idea to oppose, it is extra pertinent for the mob as this is their GF's cover)
and i couldnt see a mob member so strongly pushing for this idea if he knew his own GF had this role, or at least i hope not
i dont think there is much to be had out from this early idea than taking a clearer look at bb's alignment but it is always helpful to narrow down that list
it's around page 36 for you lazy dudes
also a fun person to put under the spotlight will be pyrr!
never been in danger of dying yet...for good reason or not?
I think this does make BB look innocent - no reason for mafia to have a public debate over this. When I criticized BB over his plan I was thinking from the perspective of the end game where we want mafia to waste hits on veterans. I suppose even then the plan could have been part of a ploy to out the veterans and avoid hitting them but if this was the mafia's plan they would have used their most persuasive player to do it (BC) rather than putting him against it.
No....BrownBear can be pretty influential.
Your idea here is crappy. And probably going to get me to vote for you.
Here is the issue. BC would not pursue this plan because he had himself appearing to be a veteran. So him making that plan would be kind of fail. BrownBear is actually a regular at this game and is a lot better of a player than he has been this game....
I don't trust you, and you are making someone who sat near death look innocent. I'm finding the votes now, I finally got Firefox running on the desktop.
|
On August 02 2010 13:04 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2010 08:19 Divinek wrote:
I think an interesting thing for people to go back an analyze with their own sets of logic
is at the point where BB suggests for the vets to claim, with the idea in mind that the GF himself was using a vet cover.
i think this should clear BB, or im hoping the mob didnt read into it deeply enough to try a move like that, but more so the people that opposed the idea of vets claiming who are still alive. You can obviously see BC opposing this idea (even though it is a reasonable idea to oppose, it is extra pertinent for the mob as this is their GF's cover)
and i couldnt see a mob member so strongly pushing for this idea if he knew his own GF had this role, or at least i hope not
i dont think there is much to be had out from this early idea than taking a clearer look at bb's alignment but it is always helpful to narrow down that list
it's around page 36 for you lazy dudes
also a fun person to put under the spotlight will be pyrr!
never been in danger of dying yet...for good reason or not?
No....BC would of PUSHED for Vets to claim. Because he would of been DT checked as Vet...And he would be the one more likely to be DT checked...Lol
Well BC would have had to try to fight against the plan and have his plan fail, otherwise the suspicion that he was GF would be too high Wifom, so just my opinion. If BC had done that, I'd be suspicious because I know BC but that's how I would assume BC would handle that plan / situtation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
