Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Mafia

On June 21 2010 07:44 Bill Murray wrote:
To clear up some things:

i'll make a thread for mayoral voting
you may nameclaim or roleclaim just don't claim masons or I will modkill you
keep it clean, please

On June 21 2010 15:00 stormtemplar wrote:
Well this is my first mafia so I am uber exited. So I guess this is the part where we kinda sit around and wait for the mafia/death eaters to kill someone.

I have no opinion on the name claim thing, as I'm kinda not sure.

On June 22 2010 08:03 Hesmyrr wrote:\
Btw, johnnyspazz, that could somewhat be interpreted as buddying, nor I wonder the wiseness of nominating currently afk player just because of his willingness to break the setup, especially when 25-player setup and 20-player setup is fundamentally different.

On June 22 2010 08:56 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Right now there are a lot of spells that can be used, and a bunch of spells mixed with roles that can really mess everything up. If I'm reading the rules right the mayor/pardoner positions are actually not as safe as one would hope. If the bus driver is in fact a DE role then that could cause trouble for us (If I am elected I could be swapped with another player and the DE could target the other player, thus killing me without going through any bodyguards.)

On June 22 2010 11:09 zeks wrote:
1. We'll see what kind of names the mafia claim.
2. They might mess up and overlap
3. Timing of the roleclaims

I wasn't hoping to answer your question, but I figured the mafia would figure that out eventually so no harm done by telling you.

On June 22 2010 11:44 Jugan wrote:
Isn't running for minister of magic risky? It says your character must be 18 or over, and so it could possibly narrow down on list of people you could be...

On June 22 2010 12:04 Jugan wrote:
Oh we should vote me for mayor then :D

On June 22 2010 17:26 lakrismamma wrote:
Where did you read that the busdriver cant comunicate with mafia? I could only find
"The bus driver can be mafia, town, or 3rd party."
I think you are right about the Minister is to well protected to attack though.

Also since it is getting closer to election and someones gotta be first im going to vote for Amber[LighT] he has the clearest (only?) plan so far and seems like a good leader.

On June 24 2010 11:01 Abenson wrote:
I would have to agree with johnny on that the 3rd party could be a serial killer.

After carefully reading through the whole first post in the game, I realized that there are absolutely no clues telling us how many DE there are. In a 21 people game, 4 DE might be a viable setup.
Therefore I think that we should not immediately assume how it amounted to 3 deaths in the few days.

Anyways, here are the possibilities I see:
1) Serial Killer killed someone
2) A random night Vig killed (unlikely, vig rarely kills on night 1 because of the risk of killing someone important on your side)
3) DE has 2 KP

On June 24 2010 13:19 Subversion wrote:
Also, couple of potentially noob questions (I'm new, forgive me):

1. Do we know if the person killed, Madame Pomfrey, was a Medic (i.e. has the spell Episky) or a Bodyguard? It would seem to me that her being the spellcaster would be more in line with book, but I'd just like to know if we're sure of this?

2. Could someone explain the concept of a "night vigilante"? I don't see them in the role list in the OP. Is this one, town-aligned person who is allowed to kill? Do they get 1 kill, or multiple? Are we certain this game has one?

On June 25 2010 08:47 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
On the other hand, when it was looking very close at the end of the voting, johnnyspazz did not change his vote from amber to YI -- this doesn't really add up in either the case he's mafia supporting the mafioso YI or if he's townie, so I'm rather confused by that. Care to explain, johnnyspazz?

On June 22 2010 21:13 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Even if radfield is going to be inactive I can communicate with him regularly. If and when we need to pardon we will use him. I'm going out on a limb here to stress that I will probably be the best person for the position. I am also asking the detective to IMMEDIATELY check me.

On June 23 2010 08:14 Amber[LighT] wrote:


no

On June 25 2010 08:47 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
I'm about 50/50 on him, no read either way as of yet.

On June 25 2010 10:59 Amber[LighT] wrote:
So the following players should have been blocked:
Myself
Radfield
Any other candidates

On June 26 2010 01:36 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
jspazz i don't think modkills are happening this game unless BM has changed his mind. He would instead be substituted with another player like subversion was replaced with thegilaboy. I agree the chance of him being mafia is slim though. who else do you think we should consider?

On June 27 2010 11:44 YellowInk wrote:
Well I guess that depends on the definition of the PGO role which our mod is choosing not to provide to us. Also, even assuming the rest of it, medic could be protecting DT, DT investigates Hes, medic covers DT, HWMNBN hits PGO, assuming PGO has infi shots we still have medic outing DT and medic for no gain.

For one example.

I am town aligned as has been vouched for by jspazz.

On June 29 2010 10:47 YellowInk wrote:
I'll keep this short.

The facts:
I am town aligned as has been vouched for by jspazz.
A hit on me was blocked.
I was covered by someone who believes I am town.
My action was not roleblocked.

Thus this implies:
Amber[Light] is either lying or perhaps some bus driving occurred.

Please read carefully the bus driver role - it switches the abilities between two targets - it is not based on the caster. So if someone did a bus drive on me with any other person, it would have swapped the hit, the role block, and the episky all to someone else.

Well obviously that didn't happen. Amber[Light] did not target me with a role block.

Amber[Light]'s voting has been suspect throughout - I'll let someone else elaborate on this as I'm a bit short on time at the moment to do the digging require to display. If no one gets to it, I'll put something together in four hours or so.

Time to lynch Amber[Light].

On June 29 2010 12:45 YellowInk wrote:
I would just like to say that there's something someone could say right now that is not a roleclaim in any way shape or form that would convince me you're a townie. I'm actually surprised it hasn't happened yet.

Are we going to let Amber[Light]'s lie stand or lynch?

On June 29 2010 09:18 Abenson wrote:
yay, this must be a new record.

YellowInk casts protego on himself

On June 29 2010 13:25 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
Don't forget, guys, that abenson could be full of shit with that PM. It's not exactly hard to fake that.

Amber, we are eagerly awaiting your explanation. Are you going to claim you got bussed?

On June 30 2010 03:55 JeeJee wrote:
also since when did bodyguards affect daykills?
but your game i suppose

On June 29 2010 21:21 Amber[LighT] wrote:
whoa whoa whoa...

First off sorry I sleep at night..

Second off YellowInk you can sit here and pull the wool over everyone's eyes, but this powerplay won't work, and I'm not about to let it.

3 people just got killed so the town is really going to suffer. You think that lynching ME is a good idea? I've been pro-town the whole game. I made my votes according to what was provided in the thread, nothing more. I told people how they should use their DT/Med/RB powers for each of the night phases, yah I kinda effed up on night one, but we picked up a better strategy come day 2.

I'm not going to post my PM's with BM because that's suicide, but like I said in a previous post I am a role blocker.

N1: Radfield
N2: Random (I didn't get to send in a block in time)
N2: YellowInk

The only reason BM hasn't come in to correct a possible mistake is that you were clearly protected by another DE last night. I know what I did.

You want an explanation about my role? Well you're not about to get that much info that easily, but I'll clue you in:

I am a pro-town role. I can cast Expelliarmus EVERY NIGHT, my choice or random if I forget to send one out.

Do you guys really think it would be logical for me to come forward and say that I role blocked someone who should have died when they casted a spell on themselves? I know what I did and aside from sending the PM to you guys to get killed by the mod I don't know what else you could want.

YellowInk this was a clever ploy to get the town to take down the MoM, and with this play the town will be doomed. OpZ, Elyas, Roffles, be logical in this decision. Would I really come forward to protect ABENSON, a person I have personally been gunning for since DAY 1, if I didn't have valuable information?

On June 30 2010 04:37 ~OpZ~ wrote:
STOP MOVING THE DISCUSSION ELSEWHERE

JohnnySpazz is? Ginny Weasely
AmberLight is? Harry Potter
Gila is Filius Flitwick
DOES ANYONE Else feel like claiming?

On June 30 2010 04:39 ~OpZ~ wrote to YellowInk:
So you are medic? Who are you?

On July 03 2010 05:41 JeeJee wrote:
what i don't get is why they would kill hermione of all people
surely they would have been killing DTs unless we're on completely the wrong track and they're enjoying it
clearly we must AK one of our confirmed townies right now
any volunteers?

On July 03 2010 03:31 JeeJee wrote:
opz and i run a jokeshop

anyway, i checked yink; i have no freaking clue what the clue means but i think it refers to neville's grandma upbringing (since his parents went cuckoo): babied over as a baby by an elderly lady.

so here are my assumptions
-this game has a harry potter who is on the town's side

-there is no evil character that wears tiny bowties and nervously awaits dates. opz and i decided it was flitwick, and we wanted to see if gila matched up to it -- short of gila going through every character's birthday and trying it on my crypt within 2/5 minutes (see timestamps), he seems to be flitwick. he couldn't have known what clue we saw, and could have guessed some other character. i mean, does flitwick have an evil twin? idk

-bill didn't lie to me about opz's alignment

then we have the following townies
amber (if this guy's de, there's no harry potter, then this game makes no sense)
opz (if this guy's de, bill lied to me about his alignment so this game makes no sense)
myself (if this guy's de, bill lied to me about his alignment so this game makes no sense)
yink (if this guy's de, then there's a DE babied over by an elderly lady? idk)
tga (if this guy's de, there's a DE that wears tiny bowties and is nervous of going on a date)

this leaves roffles, rad, jspazz

scrimmy checked yink but he could just be a de with investigative powers (another one? idk)
i dont know what ginny weasly did, jspazz could be de too
and aberforth is kind of a random claim but is he like a bus? or a stump? dunnooo

On July 04 2010 03:58 YellowInk wrote:
I can't find a way for Radfield's investigation to matter.

On July 04 2010 03:22 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I'm down with spazz for pretty much the same reason....And the fact that he claims he has no role, in a game where so far I think everyone has had a role?