|
lol wow Caller and BC are both just terrible scum. Caller's last post is full of nonsense like him flipping town means I'm obviously town and nai.protoss is town too when the guy has nothing to do with Caller.
BC keeps trying to bullshit the town into thinking I asked to Vigi 2 players when I said just one of you. BC even said it's ok to lynch him, when I said I'd have a Vigi shoot him but he throws a fit.
Scum logic go go go go go!
|
On April 21 2010 15:22 Ace wrote:
lol wow Caller and BC are both just terrible scum. Caller's last post is full of nonsense like him flipping town means I'm obviously town and nai.protoss is town too when the guy has nothing to do with Caller.
BC keeps trying to bullshit the town into thinking I asked to Vigi 2 players when I said just one of you. BC even said it's ok to lynch him, when I said I'd have a Vigi shoot him but he throws a fit.
Scum logic go go go go go!
oh ace you never make me tire of laughing
|
Oh and BC the difference between me and L is that my scumdar is really fucking good. It's going BEEP BEEP BEEP right now! Keep talking though, the more you misread posts and open your mouth the better RoLs Rolecheck looks to Vigilantes.
*Click Click*
|
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
Ace, calm down with the language (even in image macros, yes.)
|
On April 21 2010 15:24 Ace wrote:
Oh and BC the difference between me and L is that my scumdar is really fucking good. It's going BEEP BEEP BEEP right now! Keep talking though, the more you misread posts and open your mouth the better RoLs Rolecheck looks to Vigilantes.
*Click Click*
i agree
please hit BC tonight
today if possible
|
On April 21 2010 15:21 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2010 15:20 meeple wrote:On April 21 2010 14:55 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 21 2010 14:44 meeple wrote:Blanalysisnbtnbt5 - His very few posts in the thread have just to say he supports BM's assasin plan, and the plan to lynch an inactive. Moreover, the feel of his posts give me a hint of mafia with no idea how to act green. Still needs more posting and information to confirm. Voted for himself, then a fairly random vote on Falcynn... The self-vote gives me further suspicion that he's red and struggling with the role. Abenson - Lots of crap posting... saying alot and remaining active but not actually contributing very much at all - He might be implicated if Caller really does turn up red, by this post: On April 19 2010 07:05 Abenson wrote:
Hmm...
Caller is always interesting.
I propose we keep him for a bit.
He is a veteran, after all.
If he's not mafia he'll benefit us. And he prefaced this game by saying he's well known for being useless, which is somewhat of a cop-out so that he doesn't need to answer for what he says. And Elemenope I'm still waiting for your trademark few but lengthy posts... Hi meeple. You just confirmed yourself red. You have pointed the FoS at almost everyone, but hey, your trying to live. Thats not where the confirmation lies. If you had noticed oh say, days ago. Incognito replaced Elemenope as a player. You have spent most of this game not really contributing, and pointing your finger everywhere. Your initial play this game came as logical, and founded. Quickly it however turned for the worse. You dropped to one liners very quickly. Pointed the FoS at many players. You then make a random med list, where two of the people on said list are dead. (seems slightly odd that people in the spotlight would die. Also a few of the names on there make very little sense to be protected). You come back to jump on the kill caller wagon with the promise of more suspects to come. Those suspects include such small amounts of information its odd. With the amount of crapstorm posts we have, you could have easily narrowed down more than 2 people in an hour. Combine all this with the dead people who were suspicious of you. You have alooot to make up for. shape up. Yearghh... I'm so tired of being picked apart... but I have been playing sloppily so I suppose I deserve it. Alright..Time to go through my posts and do some retrospective: Rage - He posted very carefully... something that I would expect from a smart mafia. My suspicion of him has greatly lessened of late. TheLardyGooser - So... we need some sort of consensus on how to vote (obviously)... I don't mind lynching an inactive, but I would prefer someone like Lardygooser or the like... At any rate I would enjoy feedback on why we should shouldn't do it. And he was red... Where are all the other people that I pointed the finger at? Please show me my posts because I can't see to find them. The two listed in my latest post? I gave reasons for why I suspected them in the post. I never said that we should lynch them now... in fact if anything it was just a starting point for later analysis, and of course we couldn't learn anything from lynching them... that's why I voted to lynch Caller... He gives us valuable information. A FoS doesn't mean intent to lynch... I make it rather clear that the ideas are still being formulated. My medic list wasn't random... and I defended it to Incog already... if anything the fact that I was right about two of the people on there should exonerate me somewhat. If you think I have the balls to kill off two of the people on my list then I appreciate it, but yeah I'm much too safe a player for that. There are many more suspects of course but I focussed on ones that previously had perhaps been overlooked. I'm not just going to echo sentiments that other people have said. The amount that you've grossly exaggerated my failings here are outstanding... Where are the "many" people that I accused? Why is my medic list random, when I explained pretty thoroughly how I went about making it? My slip-up with forgetting that elemenope was replaced by incog is understandable in a game with 38 people in it. clearly mafia here. Why are we even doubting this?
I play safe, therefore I'm mafia... cmon Caller you can do better than that. What's stopping me from being a safe townie?
|
On April 21 2010 15:24 flamewheel91 wrote:
Ace, calm down with the language (even in image macros, yes.)
dang I can't say bs? Thats not against TL rules :/
|
On April 21 2010 15:25 meeple wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2010 15:21 Caller wrote:On April 21 2010 15:20 meeple wrote:On April 21 2010 14:55 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 21 2010 14:44 meeple wrote:Blanalysisnbtnbt5 - His very few posts in the thread have just to say he supports BM's assasin plan, and the plan to lynch an inactive. Moreover, the feel of his posts give me a hint of mafia with no idea how to act green. Still needs more posting and information to confirm. Voted for himself, then a fairly random vote on Falcynn... The self-vote gives me further suspicion that he's red and struggling with the role. Abenson - Lots of crap posting... saying alot and remaining active but not actually contributing very much at all - He might be implicated if Caller really does turn up red, by this post: On April 19 2010 07:05 Abenson wrote:
Hmm...
Caller is always interesting.
I propose we keep him for a bit.
He is a veteran, after all.
If he's not mafia he'll benefit us. And he prefaced this game by saying he's well known for being useless, which is somewhat of a cop-out so that he doesn't need to answer for what he says. And Elemenope I'm still waiting for your trademark few but lengthy posts... Hi meeple. You just confirmed yourself red. You have pointed the FoS at almost everyone, but hey, your trying to live. Thats not where the confirmation lies. If you had noticed oh say, days ago. Incognito replaced Elemenope as a player. You have spent most of this game not really contributing, and pointing your finger everywhere. Your initial play this game came as logical, and founded. Quickly it however turned for the worse. You dropped to one liners very quickly. Pointed the FoS at many players. You then make a random med list, where two of the people on said list are dead. (seems slightly odd that people in the spotlight would die. Also a few of the names on there make very little sense to be protected). You come back to jump on the kill caller wagon with the promise of more suspects to come. Those suspects include such small amounts of information its odd. With the amount of crapstorm posts we have, you could have easily narrowed down more than 2 people in an hour. Combine all this with the dead people who were suspicious of you. You have alooot to make up for. shape up. Yearghh... I'm so tired of being picked apart... but I have been playing sloppily so I suppose I deserve it. Alright..Time to go through my posts and do some retrospective: Rage - He posted very carefully... something that I would expect from a smart mafia. My suspicion of him has greatly lessened of late. TheLardyGooser - So... we need some sort of consensus on how to vote (obviously)... I don't mind lynching an inactive, but I would prefer someone like Lardygooser or the like... At any rate I would enjoy feedback on why we should shouldn't do it. And he was red... Where are all the other people that I pointed the finger at? Please show me my posts because I can't see to find them. The two listed in my latest post? I gave reasons for why I suspected them in the post. I never said that we should lynch them now... in fact if anything it was just a starting point for later analysis, and of course we couldn't learn anything from lynching them... that's why I voted to lynch Caller... He gives us valuable information. A FoS doesn't mean intent to lynch... I make it rather clear that the ideas are still being formulated. My medic list wasn't random... and I defended it to Incog already... if anything the fact that I was right about two of the people on there should exonerate me somewhat. If you think I have the balls to kill off two of the people on my list then I appreciate it, but yeah I'm much too safe a player for that. There are many more suspects of course but I focussed on ones that previously had perhaps been overlooked. I'm not just going to echo sentiments that other people have said. The amount that you've grossly exaggerated my failings here are outstanding... Where are the "many" people that I accused? Why is my medic list random, when I explained pretty thoroughly how I went about making it? My slip-up with forgetting that elemenope was replaced by incog is understandable in a game with 38 people in it. clearly mafia here. Why are we even doubting this? I play safe, therefore I'm mafia... cmon Caller you can do better than that. What's stopping me from being a safe townie?
Good sir, you're not only suspicious but you justify your lack of taking risky actions as making you a good player. That's an outright load of horseL. If you're really a townie that you claim you are just now, then you should be doing a lot more than making a Lload of mistakes or by defending yourself with whatever bullL you come up with.
Again:
LYNCH ITW, MEEPLE, MOTBOB, HIT BC TONIGHT
Now if you excuse me I have to take a L.
|
On April 21 2010 15:22 Ace wrote:
lol wow Caller and BC are both just terrible scum. Caller's last post is full of nonsense like him flipping town means I'm obviously town and nai.protoss is town too when the guy has nothing to do with Caller.
BC keeps trying to bullshit the town into thinking I asked to Vigi 2 players when I said just one of you. BC even said it's ok to lynch him, when I said I'd have a Vigi shoot him but he throws a fit.
Scum logic go go go go go!
No, i actually volunteered for a lynch? Wow. I'd willingly get lynched this day to clear a dt. Thing is, YOUR NO CLEARABLE. You are playing insanely scummy. Knock it off.
On April 21 2010 14:52 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2010 14:39 IntoTheWow wrote:
Can we use the double lynch right now? I mean, if you are so sure of him, it does make sense to read on other people based on that (who argued in favor of Caller, who against) to double lynch. nope dont even debate it. People will use that as an excuse to be confused and let Caller slide. Lynch him now, the BC/Rol situation will be resolved by Vigilantes tonight (because ALL of them should shoot either RoL or BC) and then we move on. The only 2 things that should be talked about now: voting for Caller or why you don't trust my rolecheck and who to rape between RoL/BC. No need to bring up suspicions on other people or talk about a double lynch.
Seriously duder. that bolded area just shows how naive you are. Both of us would lead to getting hit with night hits vigi's will take their chances and not listen to you because like meds, they act usually like tards. Had you been playing more pro town you would have mentioned something like "caller flips green you off me tonight, then off one of those two"
In fact you never even point out that if he flips anything but red you could be lying. You are pushing to kill off two of the game vets, kudo's to you. However the fact you have already been playing a style you've advocated against leaves it already open to your own death. Offer to step up to the hangmans board with me ace. Then maybe i'll take you seriously. TIll then your playing just as badly as caller.
|
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On April 21 2010 15:25 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2010 15:24 flamewheel91 wrote:
Ace, calm down with the language (even in image macros, yes.) dang I can't say bs? Thats not against TL rules :/
Well okay, I guess so 
I recall a case of you calling somebody stupid a few pages back...
And then I checked it, and it was RoL. Not quiiiiiiiite sure what to make of that, since that seems to be a constant in TL Mafia life.
Carry on, I guess ^_^
|
once again it should be painfully obvious that
BC is scum
Ace couldn't give a flying L what his role is
|
On April 21 2010 15:31 Caller wrote:
once again it should be painfully obvious that
BC is scum
Ace couldn't give a flying L what his role is
Care to stake money on your read of me caller?
|
On April 21 2010 15:31 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2010 15:31 Caller wrote:
once again it should be painfully obvious that
BC is scum
Ace couldn't give a flying L what his role is Care to stake money on your read of me caller?
how much are you willing to bet on your read of me
i like to hedge my bets
|
by the way Ace I'm suing you for breach of contract. I want my money back, I was under the impression that it was a second-price auction, not a first-price.
|
On April 21 2010 15:32 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2010 15:31 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 21 2010 15:31 Caller wrote:
once again it should be painfully obvious that
BC is scum
Ace couldn't give a flying L what his role is Care to stake money on your read of me caller? how much are you willing to bet on your read of me i like to hedge my bets
I would do 1:1 ratio on it. I'd give you a more favourable bet but well, with two of my major resources this game cut, im 1/3rd of a bc.
|
On April 21 2010 15:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2010 15:32 Caller wrote:On April 21 2010 15:31 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 21 2010 15:31 Caller wrote:
once again it should be painfully obvious that
BC is scum
Ace couldn't give a flying L what his role is Care to stake money on your read of me caller? how much are you willing to bet on your read of me i like to hedge my bets I would do 1:1 ratio on it. I'd give you a more favourable bet but well, with two of my major resources this game cut, im 1/3rd of a bc.
yeah well i'm terrible so i'll give you .8:1 odds because of simple probability.
|
*yawn*
BC you need to go get lessons from some good scum players on how to play scum. If Caller flipped green obviously I'd be killed. Dur? Do I even need to say it?
Then you try for the pity route - lol. Pathetic. I love watching you squirm. So now you realize that after I posted twice that only one of you has to be shot, you've moved away from your old argument of blatantly lying about what I said to a new one - that Vigilantes like Medics are tards and won't listen to me. So you admit that if they listened to me it would be the wise thing to do right?
Good. So we agree that you getting rocked by all the Vigilante shots tonight is the good move. If you flip town we get rid of RoL. Good idea sir, I knew you'd come around. Now go vote. Sucker.
|
On April 21 2010 15:34 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2010 15:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 21 2010 15:32 Caller wrote:On April 21 2010 15:31 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 21 2010 15:31 Caller wrote:
once again it should be painfully obvious that
BC is scum
Ace couldn't give a flying L what his role is Care to stake money on your read of me caller? how much are you willing to bet on your read of me i like to hedge my bets I would do 1:1 ratio on it. I'd give you a more favourable bet but well, with two of my major resources this game cut, im 1/3rd of a bc. yeah well i'm terrible so i'll give you .8:1 odds because of simple probability.
If your insanely terrible, I guess I am as well, our list of suspects mesh up somewhat lul
|
On April 21 2010 15:34 Ace wrote:
*yawn*
BC you need to go get lessons from some good scum players on how to play scum. If Caller flipped green obviously I'd be killed. Dur? Do I even need to say it?
Then you try for the pity route - lol. Pathetic. I love watching you squirm. So now you realize that after I posted twice that only one of you has to be shot, you've moved away from your old argument of blatantly lying about what I said to a new one - that Vigilantes like Medics are tards and won't listen to me. So you admit that if they listened to me it would be the wise thing to do right?
Good. So we agree that you getting rocked by all the Vigilante shots tonight is the good move. If you flip town we get rid of RoL. Good idea sir, I knew you'd come around. Now go vote. Sucker.
I already am voting for an obvious red. Sorry Ace. Should have given us the option of voting me or RoL and id have jumped on it. Or would you like me to swap my vote to the next most obvious scum player in you?
|
On April 21 2010 15:28 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2010 15:25 meeple wrote:On April 21 2010 15:21 Caller wrote:On April 21 2010 15:20 meeple wrote:On April 21 2010 14:55 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 21 2010 14:44 meeple wrote:Blanalysisnbtnbt5 - His very few posts in the thread have just to say he supports BM's assasin plan, and the plan to lynch an inactive. Moreover, the feel of his posts give me a hint of mafia with no idea how to act green. Still needs more posting and information to confirm. Voted for himself, then a fairly random vote on Falcynn... The self-vote gives me further suspicion that he's red and struggling with the role. Abenson - Lots of crap posting... saying alot and remaining active but not actually contributing very much at all - He might be implicated if Caller really does turn up red, by this post: On April 19 2010 07:05 Abenson wrote:
Hmm...
Caller is always interesting.
I propose we keep him for a bit.
He is a veteran, after all.
If he's not mafia he'll benefit us. And he prefaced this game by saying he's well known for being useless, which is somewhat of a cop-out so that he doesn't need to answer for what he says. And Elemenope I'm still waiting for your trademark few but lengthy posts... Hi meeple. You just confirmed yourself red. You have pointed the FoS at almost everyone, but hey, your trying to live. Thats not where the confirmation lies. If you had noticed oh say, days ago. Incognito replaced Elemenope as a player. You have spent most of this game not really contributing, and pointing your finger everywhere. Your initial play this game came as logical, and founded. Quickly it however turned for the worse. You dropped to one liners very quickly. Pointed the FoS at many players. You then make a random med list, where two of the people on said list are dead. (seems slightly odd that people in the spotlight would die. Also a few of the names on there make very little sense to be protected). You come back to jump on the kill caller wagon with the promise of more suspects to come. Those suspects include such small amounts of information its odd. With the amount of crapstorm posts we have, you could have easily narrowed down more than 2 people in an hour. Combine all this with the dead people who were suspicious of you. You have alooot to make up for. shape up. Yearghh... I'm so tired of being picked apart... but I have been playing sloppily so I suppose I deserve it. Alright..Time to go through my posts and do some retrospective: Rage - He posted very carefully... something that I would expect from a smart mafia. My suspicion of him has greatly lessened of late. TheLardyGooser - So... we need some sort of consensus on how to vote (obviously)... I don't mind lynching an inactive, but I would prefer someone like Lardygooser or the like... At any rate I would enjoy feedback on why we should shouldn't do it. And he was red... Where are all the other people that I pointed the finger at? Please show me my posts because I can't see to find them. The two listed in my latest post? I gave reasons for why I suspected them in the post. I never said that we should lynch them now... in fact if anything it was just a starting point for later analysis, and of course we couldn't learn anything from lynching them... that's why I voted to lynch Caller... He gives us valuable information. A FoS doesn't mean intent to lynch... I make it rather clear that the ideas are still being formulated. My medic list wasn't random... and I defended it to Incog already... if anything the fact that I was right about two of the people on there should exonerate me somewhat. If you think I have the balls to kill off two of the people on my list then I appreciate it, but yeah I'm much too safe a player for that. There are many more suspects of course but I focussed on ones that previously had perhaps been overlooked. I'm not just going to echo sentiments that other people have said. The amount that you've grossly exaggerated my failings here are outstanding... Where are the "many" people that I accused? Why is my medic list random, when I explained pretty thoroughly how I went about making it? My slip-up with forgetting that elemenope was replaced by incog is understandable in a game with 38 people in it. clearly mafia here. Why are we even doubting this? I play safe, therefore I'm mafia... cmon Caller you can do better than that. What's stopping me from being a safe townie? Good sir, you're not only suspicious but you justify your lack of taking risky actions as making you a good player. That's an outright load of horseL. If you're really a townie that you claim you are just now, then you should be doing a lot more than making a Lload of mistakes or by defending yourself with whatever bullL you come up with. Again: LYNCH ITW, MEEPLE, MOTBOB, HIT BC TONIGHTNow if you excuse me I have to take a L.
Alright... so now you're just making things up. Where did I say that I was a good player? I can't seem to find it. If you could kindly point it out to me. I said I was a safe player, as in not taking tons of risks like some of the hotshots around here. I've admitted I've been sloppy but more so simply because I didn't think that all my posts would be scrutinized to such an extent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
