• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:58
CEST 11:58
KST 18:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview8[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21
Community News
[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation05.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)30ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo23Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested0RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 202611
StarCraft 2
General
Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) SC2 Planner - The StarCraft II Build Planner [TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK #4 20-21th June Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery Mutation # 530 One For All Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed
Brood War
General
Fact based Zerg Upgrade Tier List BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ STARCRAFT MOVIE - Last Night at the Command center BW General Discussion Battle cruiser feet vs Carrier fleet
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSLAN 4 is Coming! Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Relatively freeroll strategies Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread [H]Internet/Gaming Cafe Tips and Tricks The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How To Predict Tilt in Espor…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10810 users

TL Mafia Ban List - Page 73

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 71 72 73 74 75 180 Next
bumatlarge
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States4567 Posts
May 01 2011 03:08 GMT
#1441
As someone who felt BM didn't deserve a perma-ban, I feel zorkmid deserves it. He was intentionally malicious for reasons I won't specify til after current games are finished.
Together but separate, like oatmeal
aidnai
Profile Joined January 2010
United States1159 Posts
May 01 2011 03:28 GMT
#1442
absolutely ok with flamewheel. I also like your other suggestions - 1 game for coag, hosts only for ban discussions, etc.
Varpulis
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States2517 Posts
May 01 2011 04:18 GMT
#1443
Flamewheel's cool, I'm set with him being Qatol's lieutennent.

I'm also fine with only the hosts having votes in the ban thread, because you guys have proved yourselves to be knowledgeable and level-headed(mostly).
For he is the Oystermeister, lord of all the oysters.
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
May 01 2011 04:55 GMT
#1444
FW is fine with me.
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
Barundar
Profile Joined May 2010
Denmark1582 Posts
May 01 2011 09:47 GMT
#1445
flamewheel v(^_^)v
Bartundar
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
May 01 2011 12:14 GMT
#1446
I would not be comfortable with Flamewheel in that position, not after he invited two others to use his smurf-account to play in the same game.

About Zorkmid, I want to know what really happened, that it should be discussed openly, after the game he played in is over of course. I would also like that whole TL-ban thing cleared up, and removed, so he can, if he wants to, come here and defend himself. Getting him banned and then accusing and badmouthing is not a fair tactic.
:3
Jackal58
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4264 Posts
May 01 2011 14:06 GMT
#1447
I have no problems with Flamewheel. If others do and it appears to become an issue I would recommend GMarshall or bumatlarge.
I would suggest a poll on Flamewheel. If he gets over 75% yea vote I'd say go with him if he's interested in helping you.
Life can only kill you once.
Barundar
Profile Joined May 2010
Denmark1582 Posts
May 01 2011 14:17 GMT
#1448
flamewheel is a staff on the site and interested in mafia, he is already a nice connection between the mafia administration (qatol) and the mods. He has apologized for mafia xxxviii which, in my humble opinion, got blown out of proportion. If he wants to help out more I'd welcome it.

As for Zorkmid, it was the decision of the hosts to contact the men in red. 2 weeks ban might be a bit harsh, but if he isn't interested in returning anyways I'm not sure it's worth the hassle to contact mods for an unban.
Bartundar
DropBear
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Australia4405 Posts
May 01 2011 14:26 GMT
#1449
My opinions in this subforum have been slightly incendiary so far and being new my voice should count for little here but Flamewheel is a sensible choice.

He does excellent work in administrative positions on this site already with his MSL writeups and Power Rank. He is an experienced Mafia player and host.

He has come completely clean and apologised about the xxxviii situation so I don't hold it against him anymore.

The only possible issue I can think of is time due to his other TL commitments. If he can fit regular Mafia admin into his schedule with his other duties it's a no-brainer really.
Sucker for nostalgia
chaoser
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States5541 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-01 15:20:11
May 01 2011 14:51 GMT
#1450
On May 01 2011 21:14 Forumite wrote:
I would not be comfortable with Flamewheel in that position, not after he invited two others to use his smurf-account to play in the same game.

About Zorkmid, I want to know what really happened, that it should be discussed openly, after the game he played in is over of course. I would also like that whole TL-ban thing cleared up, and removed, so he can, if he wants to, come here and defend himself. Getting him banned and then accusing and badmouthing is not a fair tactic.


We always discuss bans after games and the details will be made clear.

In regards to the ban, I stand by it due to him intentionally trying to ruin the game, both in thread and out, as well as many other actions that I touched upon on a post already. I didn't want him causing any more trouble and potentially just outright ruining the game so I asked for the TL ban. The accusations are justified in evidence and I find it kind of insulting that I'm being accused of badmouthing someone for unfounded reasons and the incendiary/accusatory tone that's in that post, to both me and this subforum as a whole. We run a smooth ship here and while some problems do pop up from time to time, we handle things things well. Like I said previously, all details will be made clear after the game ends so let's not talk about it anymore.
Haven't you heard? I'm not an ex-progamer. I'm not a poker player. I'm not an admin of the site. I'm mother fucking Rekrul.
Vain
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Netherlands1115 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-01 21:30:04
May 01 2011 20:36 GMT
#1451
If its okay with Qatol i will sit out XXXIX.

Edit: If you are reading this Qatol XXXIX will probably start after sleeper cell
Battle.net 2.0 is a waiter and he's a dick
GMarshal
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States22154 Posts
May 01 2011 20:40 GMT
#1452
On May 02 2011 05:36 Vain wrote:
If its okay with Qatol i will sit out XXXIX.

Edit: If you are reading this Quatol XXXIX will probably start after sleeper cell


There is n U in Qatol! Remove it quickly before he consumes your soul!
Moderator
Ace
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States16096 Posts
May 01 2011 20:49 GMT
#1453
Chezinu
Math me up, scumboi. - Acrofales
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
May 01 2011 21:19 GMT
#1454
On May 01 2011 23:51 chaoser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2011 21:14 Forumite wrote:
I would not be comfortable with Flamewheel in that position, not after he invited two others to use his smurf-account to play in the same game.

About Zorkmid, I want to know what really happened, that it should be discussed openly, after the game he played in is over of course. I would also like that whole TL-ban thing cleared up, and removed, so he can, if he wants to, come here and defend himself. Getting him banned and then accusing and badmouthing is not a fair tactic.


We always discuss bans after games and the details will be made clear.

In regards to the ban, I stand by it due to him intentionally trying to ruin the game, both in thread and out, as well as many other actions that I touched upon on a post already. I didn't want him causing any more trouble and potentially just outright ruining the game so I asked for the TL ban. The accusations are justified in evidence and I find it kind of insulting that I'm being accused of badmouthing someone for unfounded reasons and the incendiary/accusatory tone that's in that post, to both me and this subforum as a whole. We run a smooth ship here and while some problems do pop up from time to time, we handle things things well. Like I said previously, all details will be made clear after the game ends so let's not talk about it anymore.

It wasn´t an attack against you Chaoser, actually I was not aware of who got Zorkmid banned. I suspected taht it might have been a host, but I didn´t find posts of anyone claiming to have requested the ban, so I assumed it was an anonymous tip that got him banned. My apologies.

I still object to talking about Zorkmid without him getting a chance to talk back, but that´s a general complaint to many on this forum. Did he state in that final post in the game thread that he wanted to stop playing Mafia? Even if he did, I think he should get the chance to come back here to defend himself once we start discussing the ban. If he doesn´t want to come, then that´s the end of it, give him a semi-permanent ban and move, but if he´s cooled down and want another chance to play mafia then he should be allowed a chance to defend himself.
:3
Vain
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Netherlands1115 Posts
May 01 2011 21:30 GMT
#1455
On May 02 2011 05:40 GMarshal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2011 05:36 Vain wrote:
If its okay with Qatol i will sit out XXXIX.

Edit: If you are reading this Quatol XXXIX will probably start after sleeper cell


There is n U in Qatol! Remove it quickly before he consumes your soul!


What U?

:D
Battle.net 2.0 is a waiter and he's a dick
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
May 01 2011 21:40 GMT
#1456
On May 02 2011 06:19 Forumite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2011 23:51 chaoser wrote:
On May 01 2011 21:14 Forumite wrote:
I would not be comfortable with Flamewheel in that position, not after he invited two others to use his smurf-account to play in the same game.

About Zorkmid, I want to know what really happened, that it should be discussed openly, after the game he played in is over of course. I would also like that whole TL-ban thing cleared up, and removed, so he can, if he wants to, come here and defend himself. Getting him banned and then accusing and badmouthing is not a fair tactic.


We always discuss bans after games and the details will be made clear.

In regards to the ban, I stand by it due to him intentionally trying to ruin the game, both in thread and out, as well as many other actions that I touched upon on a post already. I didn't want him causing any more trouble and potentially just outright ruining the game so I asked for the TL ban. The accusations are justified in evidence and I find it kind of insulting that I'm being accused of badmouthing someone for unfounded reasons and the incendiary/accusatory tone that's in that post, to both me and this subforum as a whole. We run a smooth ship here and while some problems do pop up from time to time, we handle things things well. Like I said previously, all details will be made clear after the game ends so let's not talk about it anymore.

It wasn´t an attack against you Chaoser, actually I was not aware of who got Zorkmid banned. I suspected taht it might have been a host, but I didn´t find posts of anyone claiming to have requested the ban, so I assumed it was an anonymous tip that got him banned. My apologies.

I still object to talking about Zorkmid without him getting a chance to talk back, but that´s a general complaint to many on this forum. Did he state in that final post in the game thread that he wanted to stop playing Mafia? Even if he did, I think he should get the chance to come back here to defend himself once we start discussing the ban. If he doesn´t want to come, then that´s the end of it, give him a semi-permanent ban and move, but if he´s cooled down and want another chance to play mafia then he should be allowed a chance to defend himself.

He will be given his opportunity to speak. In the heat of the moment and the confusion over the banlist they requested that he get ousted to a mod. The ban won't be discussed until the game is over. He has an account (green2) that can access this forum and respond to us if he wishes. In any case he can respond on his Zorkmid account in around a week anyway. So he will be heard and we don't generally try to railroad people. At the same time we don't know the entire story because the game is still going on. When it is over we will consider all evidence and make a decision.
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
May 02 2011 05:47 GMT
#1457
On May 02 2011 06:40 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2011 06:19 Forumite wrote:
On May 01 2011 23:51 chaoser wrote:
On May 01 2011 21:14 Forumite wrote:
I would not be comfortable with Flamewheel in that position, not after he invited two others to use his smurf-account to play in the same game.

About Zorkmid, I want to know what really happened, that it should be discussed openly, after the game he played in is over of course. I would also like that whole TL-ban thing cleared up, and removed, so he can, if he wants to, come here and defend himself. Getting him banned and then accusing and badmouthing is not a fair tactic.


We always discuss bans after games and the details will be made clear.

In regards to the ban, I stand by it due to him intentionally trying to ruin the game, both in thread and out, as well as many other actions that I touched upon on a post already. I didn't want him causing any more trouble and potentially just outright ruining the game so I asked for the TL ban. The accusations are justified in evidence and I find it kind of insulting that I'm being accused of badmouthing someone for unfounded reasons and the incendiary/accusatory tone that's in that post, to both me and this subforum as a whole. We run a smooth ship here and while some problems do pop up from time to time, we handle things things well. Like I said previously, all details will be made clear after the game ends so let's not talk about it anymore.

It wasn´t an attack against you Chaoser, actually I was not aware of who got Zorkmid banned. I suspected taht it might have been a host, but I didn´t find posts of anyone claiming to have requested the ban, so I assumed it was an anonymous tip that got him banned. My apologies.

I still object to talking about Zorkmid without him getting a chance to talk back, but that´s a general complaint to many on this forum. Did he state in that final post in the game thread that he wanted to stop playing Mafia? Even if he did, I think he should get the chance to come back here to defend himself once we start discussing the ban. If he doesn´t want to come, then that´s the end of it, give him a semi-permanent ban and move, but if he´s cooled down and want another chance to play mafia then he should be allowed a chance to defend himself.

He will be given his opportunity to speak. In the heat of the moment and the confusion over the banlist they requested that he get ousted to a mod. The ban won't be discussed until the game is over. He has an account (green2) that can access this forum and respond to us if he wishes. In any case he can respond on his Zorkmid account in around a week anyway. So he will be heard and we don't generally try to railroad people. At the same time we don't know the entire story because the game is still going on. When it is over we will consider all evidence and make a decision.

Also, what I proposed right now is just that we create a writeup of exactly what happened. If he should choose to come back, he will be on the ban list so we remember exactly what happened, but we can discuss punishments at that time. This keeps us from making up a punishment which is never used, and more importantly, gives him a chance to argue his side of the story.
Uff Da
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
May 02 2011 14:29 GMT
#1458
On May 02 2011 06:40 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2011 06:19 Forumite wrote:
On May 01 2011 23:51 chaoser wrote:
On May 01 2011 21:14 Forumite wrote:
I would not be comfortable with Flamewheel in that position, not after he invited two others to use his smurf-account to play in the same game.

About Zorkmid, I want to know what really happened, that it should be discussed openly, after the game he played in is over of course. I would also like that whole TL-ban thing cleared up, and removed, so he can, if he wants to, come here and defend himself. Getting him banned and then accusing and badmouthing is not a fair tactic.


We always discuss bans after games and the details will be made clear.

In regards to the ban, I stand by it due to him intentionally trying to ruin the game, both in thread and out, as well as many other actions that I touched upon on a post already. I didn't want him causing any more trouble and potentially just outright ruining the game so I asked for the TL ban. The accusations are justified in evidence and I find it kind of insulting that I'm being accused of badmouthing someone for unfounded reasons and the incendiary/accusatory tone that's in that post, to both me and this subforum as a whole. We run a smooth ship here and while some problems do pop up from time to time, we handle things things well. Like I said previously, all details will be made clear after the game ends so let's not talk about it anymore.

It wasn´t an attack against you Chaoser, actually I was not aware of who got Zorkmid banned. I suspected taht it might have been a host, but I didn´t find posts of anyone claiming to have requested the ban, so I assumed it was an anonymous tip that got him banned. My apologies.

I still object to talking about Zorkmid without him getting a chance to talk back, but that´s a general complaint to many on this forum. Did he state in that final post in the game thread that he wanted to stop playing Mafia? Even if he did, I think he should get the chance to come back here to defend himself once we start discussing the ban. If he doesn´t want to come, then that´s the end of it, give him a semi-permanent ban and move, but if he´s cooled down and want another chance to play mafia then he should be allowed a chance to defend himself.

He will be given his opportunity to speak. In the heat of the moment and the confusion over the banlist they requested that he get ousted to a mod. The ban won't be discussed until the game is over. He has an account (green2) that can access this forum and respond to us if he wishes. In any case he can respond on his Zorkmid account in around a week anyway. So he will be heard and we don't generally try to railroad people. At the same time we don't know the entire story because the game is still going on. When it is over we will consider all evidence and make a decision.

He´s an old TL-user, so he will probably come back to TL, but him getting banned from TL is probably a large part of why he doesn´t want to join Mafia here anymore, which is why I disagree with getting him banned in the first place. I can see why it happened, but it doesn´t solve any problems, if Zorkmid wanted to post again, then he could have posted with green2. Banning the Zorkmid account only means the problem in Mafia spilled over into TL.

IMO his TL-ban should be lifted, even if his Mafia-access is removed. The damage is done, he´s out of TL-Mafia, but there´s no point in keeping him out of TL anymore.
:3
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
May 02 2011 14:30 GMT
#1459
On May 02 2011 14:47 Qatol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2011 06:40 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
On May 02 2011 06:19 Forumite wrote:
On May 01 2011 23:51 chaoser wrote:
On May 01 2011 21:14 Forumite wrote:
I would not be comfortable with Flamewheel in that position, not after he invited two others to use his smurf-account to play in the same game.

About Zorkmid, I want to know what really happened, that it should be discussed openly, after the game he played in is over of course. I would also like that whole TL-ban thing cleared up, and removed, so he can, if he wants to, come here and defend himself. Getting him banned and then accusing and badmouthing is not a fair tactic.


We always discuss bans after games and the details will be made clear.

In regards to the ban, I stand by it due to him intentionally trying to ruin the game, both in thread and out, as well as many other actions that I touched upon on a post already. I didn't want him causing any more trouble and potentially just outright ruining the game so I asked for the TL ban. The accusations are justified in evidence and I find it kind of insulting that I'm being accused of badmouthing someone for unfounded reasons and the incendiary/accusatory tone that's in that post, to both me and this subforum as a whole. We run a smooth ship here and while some problems do pop up from time to time, we handle things things well. Like I said previously, all details will be made clear after the game ends so let's not talk about it anymore.

It wasn´t an attack against you Chaoser, actually I was not aware of who got Zorkmid banned. I suspected taht it might have been a host, but I didn´t find posts of anyone claiming to have requested the ban, so I assumed it was an anonymous tip that got him banned. My apologies.

I still object to talking about Zorkmid without him getting a chance to talk back, but that´s a general complaint to many on this forum. Did he state in that final post in the game thread that he wanted to stop playing Mafia? Even if he did, I think he should get the chance to come back here to defend himself once we start discussing the ban. If he doesn´t want to come, then that´s the end of it, give him a semi-permanent ban and move, but if he´s cooled down and want another chance to play mafia then he should be allowed a chance to defend himself.

He will be given his opportunity to speak. In the heat of the moment and the confusion over the banlist they requested that he get ousted to a mod. The ban won't be discussed until the game is over. He has an account (green2) that can access this forum and respond to us if he wishes. In any case he can respond on his Zorkmid account in around a week anyway. So he will be heard and we don't generally try to railroad people. At the same time we don't know the entire story because the game is still going on. When it is over we will consider all evidence and make a decision.

Also, what I proposed right now is just that we create a writeup of exactly what happened. If he should choose to come back, he will be on the ban list so we remember exactly what happened, but we can discuss punishments at that time. This keeps us from making up a punishment which is never used, and more importantly, gives him a chance to argue his side of the story.

Sounds good, as long as someone cares to do it.
:3
RebirthOfLeGenD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
USA5860 Posts
May 02 2011 15:55 GMT
#1460
On May 02 2011 23:29 Forumite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2011 06:40 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
On May 02 2011 06:19 Forumite wrote:
On May 01 2011 23:51 chaoser wrote:
On May 01 2011 21:14 Forumite wrote:
I would not be comfortable with Flamewheel in that position, not after he invited two others to use his smurf-account to play in the same game.

About Zorkmid, I want to know what really happened, that it should be discussed openly, after the game he played in is over of course. I would also like that whole TL-ban thing cleared up, and removed, so he can, if he wants to, come here and defend himself. Getting him banned and then accusing and badmouthing is not a fair tactic.


We always discuss bans after games and the details will be made clear.

In regards to the ban, I stand by it due to him intentionally trying to ruin the game, both in thread and out, as well as many other actions that I touched upon on a post already. I didn't want him causing any more trouble and potentially just outright ruining the game so I asked for the TL ban. The accusations are justified in evidence and I find it kind of insulting that I'm being accused of badmouthing someone for unfounded reasons and the incendiary/accusatory tone that's in that post, to both me and this subforum as a whole. We run a smooth ship here and while some problems do pop up from time to time, we handle things things well. Like I said previously, all details will be made clear after the game ends so let's not talk about it anymore.

It wasn´t an attack against you Chaoser, actually I was not aware of who got Zorkmid banned. I suspected taht it might have been a host, but I didn´t find posts of anyone claiming to have requested the ban, so I assumed it was an anonymous tip that got him banned. My apologies.

I still object to talking about Zorkmid without him getting a chance to talk back, but that´s a general complaint to many on this forum. Did he state in that final post in the game thread that he wanted to stop playing Mafia? Even if he did, I think he should get the chance to come back here to defend himself once we start discussing the ban. If he doesn´t want to come, then that´s the end of it, give him a semi-permanent ban and move, but if he´s cooled down and want another chance to play mafia then he should be allowed a chance to defend himself.

He will be given his opportunity to speak. In the heat of the moment and the confusion over the banlist they requested that he get ousted to a mod. The ban won't be discussed until the game is over. He has an account (green2) that can access this forum and respond to us if he wishes. In any case he can respond on his Zorkmid account in around a week anyway. So he will be heard and we don't generally try to railroad people. At the same time we don't know the entire story because the game is still going on. When it is over we will consider all evidence and make a decision.

He´s an old TL-user, so he will probably come back to TL, but him getting banned from TL is probably a large part of why he doesn´t want to join Mafia here anymore, which is why I disagree with getting him banned in the first place. I can see why it happened, but it doesn´t solve any problems, if Zorkmid wanted to post again, then he could have posted with green2. Banning the Zorkmid account only means the problem in Mafia spilled over into TL.

IMO his TL-ban should be lifted, even if his Mafia-access is removed. The damage is done, he´s out of TL-Mafia, but there´s no point in keeping him out of TL anymore.

We don't have the power to do that. On top of which, if I remember right. He raged and saidhe was done with TL Mafia before he was banned. It wasn't in reverse. If he was banned before he said that he wouldn't of been able to say it. But we should resume this discussion after sleeper cell is over, there is no farther we can move at the moment.
Be a man, Become a Legend. TL Mafia Forum Ask for access!!
Prev 1 71 72 73 74 75 180 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
StateSC2 240
ProTech149
LamboSC2 89
SHIN 64
ByuN 0
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 33004
BeSt 1195
Hyuk 682
Jaedong 567
firebathero 490
Mini 357
Pusan 167
EffOrt 99
Soma 83
Zeus 58
[ Show more ]
PianO 54
Hyun 52
NaDa 47
Hm[arnc] 43
Liquid`Ret 36
ggaemo 34
hero 31
Sharp 28
Rush 25
Free 25
sorry 18
Movie 14
Noble 13
Sacsri 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 7
Dota 2
Gorgc5622
Fuzer 132
XcaliburYe59
syndereN19
League of Legends
JimRising 458
Reynor84
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss1277
olofmeister1081
x6flipin166
kennyS163
markeloff23
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi960
Hui .207
Trikslyr26
RuFF_SC221
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream10986
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream2328
Other Games
gamesdonequick531
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 122
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH248
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2390
• Stunt757
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2m
CranKy Ducklings14
CranKy Ducklings SOOP5
The PondCast
1d
Douyu Cup 2020
1d 19h
Oliveira vs Trap
Jieshi vs XY
soO vs FanTaSy
TY vs Coffee
OSC
2 days
Douyu Cup 2020
2 days
Neeb vs Impact
MacSed vs Cyan
Scarlett vs Kelazhur
INnoVation vs Dear
Douyu Cup 2020
3 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
herO vs Classic
Maru vs Serral
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
4 days
Douyu Cup 2020
4 days
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-06-19
WardiTV Spring 2026
Heroes Pulsing #2

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 1
SCTL 2026 Spring
Maestros of the Game 2
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026

Upcoming

CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
BCC 2026
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E1
Heroes Pulsing #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.