Mini Mafia 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 05 2010 19:27 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Okay well I am too lazy to read tonight too much. Just for the record. Can we wait to see who the fuck is actually inactive before deciding who we are going to kill for inactivity? On January 05 2010 19:47 Scamp wrote: Word. I actually plan to play this game through. I'm really surprised it was Vivi who first said to kill me and not L, considering how often I seem to get L killed. Also isn't NemY the one that's supposed to claim medic on day one? Last time this happened the town got in a major BS argument day 1 and then won when our mafia leader ragequit because Vivi logged in 2 minutes late. Oh wait he claimed detective. Maybe this will turn out better. I guess the evidence points to killing Vivi. -I really dont see the point in RoLs post and i dont like the fact that scamp came up just 10 minutes later to support his own defence. How did RoL knew scamp wasnt inactive? Why is RoL too lazy to read tonight but has his time to half defend scamp? Maybe this is just a coincidence but since we are lynching almost on blind i like RoL. At least we can autofire at scamp if RoL flips red. -For Judges claim its really not that important its not like he was a primary target for the town to lynch and if he is town alligned he can keep mafia guessing. Its something like claiming Im a cat. - Ls posting seem almost smart so im inclined to tell judge and L are town/side. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 06 2010 10:04 L wrote: What language? I'm positively cordial this game, my good sir. Shhhh chezinu dont unleash daa beast. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 06 2010 10:13 Incognito wrote: Yes, the mafia is allowed to no-kill if they wish. How much time do we have to vote? im going to sleep soon. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 09:31 vx70GTOJudgexv wrote: So far Ace, L, RoL, mikey, Scamp and Zato have put forth discussion and not been putting up fluff. Chez hasn't put up much and I don't like that most recent post, Malongo put in a major bullshit go with the flow post and nemY has had minimal posting. Vivi hasn't really said much and is voting Mikey for some reason which he neglected to elaborate on. HoE has very few posts. Ace reads as mafia to me, and his opposition on malongo sounds like he's trying to sway town away from lynching who he thinks is a townie. Two motivations: 1 - he knows malongo is a townie and is trying to earn town credit by pulling off of that lynch and voicing opposition. 2 - Malongo is his mafia buddy and he doesn't want him dead. L, Zato, Mikey and Scamp read town aligned to me, promoting decent discussion and trying to understand something. Not overly trusting or buddying, but not too paranoid. RoL is odd. He seemed to react very emotionally to the claim, which to me is generally a town-tell. But he hasn't really tried to wrap his head around anything, which to me is generally a scum-tell. Null-read atm. The rest are null-reads as well. Except Malongo. He reads mafia. LOLWHERE? | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 09:36 HeavOnEarth wrote: ^ well zato and some others have made posts, but i was just asking mostly because i wanted his opinion I know. The thing is that i have a lot less time now. I can post from about 8 KST to 12:00 KST and 1 hour near 7:00 KST. Mods cant confirm that im working but they can confirm i have no post record in about 4/5 months. Not really a defence, just clarifying why i cant post that much. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 09:39 vx70GTOJudgexv wrote: I originally voted you to force a no-lynch and save my sorry ass from being idiot-lynched. Now I'm voting you because your one "real" post in the thread reeked of active lurking, a wonderful scum tactic, of coming in and providing nothing but fluff and lack of contribution to the game. You barely put anything new on the table, then disappeared for a lovely 24 hours. You come back and again provide nothing new to the discussion, and get all OMGUS on me for calling you out. Not really. The thing is Zato-1 posted about me trying to "separate" the town (forming a group with you, L and me). If you read my post I dont even defend against you. Im providing a direct reason why zatos argument is beyond stupidity: I say Im inclined to believe 2 guys are not mafia and they insta band against me... you get the point. Im gonna abstain until the end and i could even vote myself in case i see theres gain for the town in this because its me in the spotlight now. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 09:43 L wrote: Well, you had ample time to make an argument for someone other than judge; I already stated why I think malongo is a fairly safe first day lynch; he's obviously not blue otherwise he'd be active and care a bit more about his impending death. I'd rather lynch someone else, but there's not enough time to get people to switch, especially with you trying to kill judge. READ ME BRO READ ME. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 09:56 L wrote: Your first post and this subsequent post set has no real content in it. I really don't see why you wouldn't have posted more during the first round unless you were actively trying to stay under the radar. You might have restricted posting times, but that doesn't explain the lack of volume of content; why a single tiny post? I called you out in my first post, but you actively ignored it. The risk/reward for killing you with your activity is pretty favorable compared to killing judge. If judge is telling the truth, he's going to be an active asset to the town. If he isn't, his influence is going to be checked by me and ace at the minimum. Now this is odd. Where did I say lynch judge over me? where? . So the thing is: you want a volume of post for day1 over nothing? I understand that a veteran like you like to post a lot about some stuff and try to call people out. However you are directly impliying some fake stuff a)I post a lot a the start of the games (this is absolutely fake and checkeable). b) If I try to stay under the radar im not blue (again fake and checkeable). So the thing here is how much are you going to push on your own will against a no contender. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 10:59 vx70GTOJudgexv wrote: There's no alliance that I know of. Zato, do we have an alliance? You're barking up the wrong tree. Malongo has defined active lurking in this game and people refuse to put an end to it. They would rather see a no-lynch and give mafia a freebie than take action. -_- You damn fadsafads how can you possibly say im active lurking? im participating as much as im able to. I dont care about your rocleclaim: its useless in terms of trustability thats obvious. Its gain if your town (decieves mafia) and its gain if you are mafia (keeps you in the spotlight). I said it before: im going with the other blues playing solid. If you want to lynch me go ahead, still i better lynch Rol instead of me or a no lynch. Im not voting RoL for the simple reason that at this point its not in my choice. Now this is basic logic: I say: hey i think judge and L are town side, then zato: hey malongo is mafia because he thinks L and judge are town he is trying to make separate groups..... now zato1, judge and HOV insta-call (chezinu semibluffs) the preflop raise from L that im mafia. Now if you have 1 brain cell you can tell my allignment. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 11:23 vx70GTOJudgexv wrote: Read the bold headline of "Active Lurking" and tell me you aren't doing that. http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Active_lurking I couldn't care less whether you're "splitting" the town into groups. Im inclined to believe L and judge are town. I think theres a gain on lynching RoL because RoL red=> Scamp red (I posted the reasoning clearly). I dont see a bad thing a medic claim because theres gain and no-lose as long as the other blues keep playing smart. Just to add more Milkymoo and Ace can see (or they know) im not really mafia. You can find better candidates to active_lurking boy (and yet again no im not active_lurking i proposed first post to lynch RoL). Given all the post garbage against me im now almost sure all this come from my first post aka lynch RoL. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 11:45 Ace wrote: stop grasping at straws. I haven't even spoken to Chezinu all game. Stop arguing with your alter ego... pfff way to go with the multi-personality disorder. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 12:30 Chezinu wrote: 30 minutes... Do you want me to kill you judge? What are you going to say when i flip town? upss... shit happens? | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 12:44 Chezinu wrote: Malongo you can save yourself... The fact that you are "forcing" me to save my ass is quite strange to say the least for a player that has a very random voting pattern care to explain why now you want to pick me? | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 12:50 Scamp wrote: I just got back and I finished reading the thread. Also: Hi NemY! The only thing I don't want is a no-lynch. I'd prefer Malongo over Judge. I think those are my only options. This is nice. Why exactly? Remember my first post? Quite interesting given the fact that you where ultra-tight up to now. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 12:57 Malongo wrote: This is nice. Why exactly? Remember my first post? Quite interesting given the fact that you | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 13:02 Scamp wrote: I'm very sure my motivations will be questioned a lot. I don't think I've been ultra-tight. I just haven't gotten a strong read on anyone, though my gut says Mikey. Thanks for correcting your own grammar. you just got out of nowhere to change your vote. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 07 2010 13:31 mikeymoo wrote: Okay, I'm sleeping now and have school until 5 local tomorrow. Once I get home I get to witness 3 hours of night phase, so please nobody hop on my ass for being "inactive". I'll try to check in the morning but no promises. Oh well, I guess it's night phase anyway. Also, I don't know why Malongo didn't save himself. What info did we gain from this? Malongo's not mafia, which I suspected. Cool. Am I missing something? Braaaaaaaains!!!! am i allowed to this no? | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 10 2010 15:38 mikeymoo wrote: X_X ^o^ | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
and dont kill me first bitches! | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 11 2010 15:37 Scamp wrote: Screw that Malongo. Killing you led to town cruising for the win. fucker i helped the town a lot by not voting. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 11 2010 15:47 Incognito wrote: L kept saying that the town should keep checking HeavOnEarth's post, someone (Scamp?) compiled a list but it was ignored. nemY kept questioning the mafia's choice to kill HeavOnEarth day 1, but the town didnt' catch on. Too bad since HeavOnEarth picked out Ace + nemY as mafia. I was really sad about that, but I guess it doesnt matter too much ja? Next game no medic self protects. Question for everyone about DT checks: should checks be returned when they are asked for or after the day post comes up? Usually I think this hasn't been much of an issue, but this game DT got two mafia in a row and DID decide to claim so I don't know what you guys think about that. LOL i always thought dts get the info after day post. That way they cant post his findings before the post. Absolutely imba. | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 11 2010 15:55 Incognito wrote: I know Qatol gives the results immediately. Don't know about other hosts though. The problem with giving results before the post is that allows a time window for the dt to hint his findings in case he is dead that day. Never knew about how that works never been dt ~_~ | ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
| ||
Malongo
Chile3466 Posts
On January 13 2010 08:02 Qatol wrote: I don't think you did. From what I could tell, you were lynched because you were inactive in comparison to everyone else. yeah but zato-1, lawl was so sure i was making good/bad sides (in fact: yeah bro i was giving you the "good side"). From an outsider perspective this is what i wrote to Ace in pm *brag*brag*: To: Ace [ Profile | Buddy ] Subject: Re: lolololol Date: 1/9/10 16:14 I had about 2/3 theories about mafia gaming plan. The most solid included a first player going full into my defense once some votes piled on me (i mean not defending me directly but making big notes about how stupid was to lynch me). So i had Ace/MM in that spot. The second guy was one of the flip floppers Chezinu/Scamp with Scamp being the most likely choice (related to a couple of posts on me). Last guy in my carpet was one of the quiet guys (i put nemy on that spot). The other theories involved more inactive mafia but that was not really likely in a small game (but still possible) or a full crazy mafia with a sacrifice on the judge first move (but again too risky in a small game). | ||
| ||