|
Unfounded matchfixing accusations are not welcome. Refrain from making off-the-wall accusations without concrete evidence. |
On September 25 2014 23:03 Mikau wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2014 22:59 ManBaker wrote:On September 25 2014 22:58 Mikau wrote:On September 25 2014 22:54 ManBaker wrote:On September 25 2014 22:52 Sleight wrote:On September 25 2014 22:51 Numy wrote:
edit TSM is the 2nd best team NA and they gave SHRC a fight. That is pretty bad news for your region. Edit; 3rd place CN beat out 1st place NA? Say what? OMG is 3rd place CN. And they lost to 3rd place NA And they lost the only game they played against the full roster of EU's 3rd seed That's not worrying? but saying that game was anywhere near representative of TSM's powerlevel is silly. lmao. TSM was the one with the handicap?! SK was already eliminated, had their jungle back with which they didn't scrim for 5 days with their morale under their feet, while also having their coach banned, and they won. Who said anything about a handicap? You're putting words in my mouth. if TSM lost while playing anywhere close to their usual level. Which they didn't.
This is what you said. That TSM didn't play at their best. i.e. they were on a handicap.
Which is irrelevant considering SK was 10 times as much more on a handicap than TSM was.
|
Why did Fnatic not instantly take dragon. Respecting the rumble pick a bit too much methinks.
|
On September 25 2014 23:05 Kupon3ss wrote:
One win is all it takes to judge how superior NA teams are, like LMQ vs OMG did
Of course!
|
On September 25 2014 23:05 Numy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2014 23:02 BrownBear wrote:On September 25 2014 22:57 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 22:55 Lord Tolkien wrote:On September 25 2014 22:54 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 22:52 Sleight wrote:On September 25 2014 22:51 Numy wrote:
edit TSM is the 2nd best team NA and they gave SHRC a fight. That is pretty bad news for your region. Edit; 3rd place CN beat out 1st place NA? Say what? OMG is 3rd place CN. And they lost to 3rd place NA How is TSM the 2nd best team when they beat C9 and lost to SHRC who is 2nd seed. TSM won the last game of regionals because of 1 minion. /half-s Haha well I think if C9 played TSM again in a bo5 C9 may come out on top 3-2 but it's too close to make some hypobole about a regions strength. Feels like Korea has outclassed everyone so hard that other region fanboys are grasping at anything to place themselves above. Actually given C9's performance so far, I think they annhilate TSM if there happens to be a rematch bo5 somehow at worlds. Since that requires TSM > SSW, impossible. But one can dream. C9 has played one game. One game. How can you judge their performance lol.
C9 when they're on their tactical game matches up incredibly well against TSM.
TSM has to win by outskilling their opponents, because tactically they're shit. It worked against SHRC because SHRC plays a very similar style + Uzi and InSec can be baited super hard. It didn't work against full-strength SK because SK played smarter and waited to catch the inevitable throw.
Which type of game do you think C9 plays?
|
Oh when the saints~
go marching in~
Oh when the saints go marching in (one by one) :l
|
welp this is the LMQ that showed up in the playoffs
|
|
|
|
|
On September 25 2014 23:07 BrownBear wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2014 23:05 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 23:02 BrownBear wrote:On September 25 2014 22:57 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 22:55 Lord Tolkien wrote:On September 25 2014 22:54 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 22:52 Sleight wrote:On September 25 2014 22:51 Numy wrote:
edit TSM is the 2nd best team NA and they gave SHRC a fight. That is pretty bad news for your region. Edit; 3rd place CN beat out 1st place NA? Say what? OMG is 3rd place CN. And they lost to 3rd place NA How is TSM the 2nd best team when they beat C9 and lost to SHRC who is 2nd seed. TSM won the last game of regionals because of 1 minion. /half-s Haha well I think if C9 played TSM again in a bo5 C9 may come out on top 3-2 but it's too close to make some hypobole about a regions strength. Feels like Korea has outclassed everyone so hard that other region fanboys are grasping at anything to place themselves above. Actually given C9's performance so far, I think they annhilate TSM if there happens to be a rematch bo5 somehow at worlds. Since that requires TSM > SSW, impossible. But one can dream. C9 has played one game. One game. How can you judge their performance lol. C9 when they're on their tactical game matches up incredibly well against TSM. TSM has to win by outskilling their opponents, because tactically they're shit. It worked against SHRC because SHRC plays a very similar style + Uzi and InSec can be baited super hard. It didn't work against full-strength SK because SK played smarter and waited to catch the inevitable throw. Which type of game do you think C9 plays?
The kind that lost to TSM in a Bo5 apparently
|
On September 25 2014 23:06 ManBaker wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2014 23:03 Mikau wrote:On September 25 2014 22:59 ManBaker wrote:On September 25 2014 22:58 Mikau wrote:On September 25 2014 22:54 ManBaker wrote:On September 25 2014 22:52 Sleight wrote:On September 25 2014 22:51 Numy wrote:
edit TSM is the 2nd best team NA and they gave SHRC a fight. That is pretty bad news for your region. Edit; 3rd place CN beat out 1st place NA? Say what? OMG is 3rd place CN. And they lost to 3rd place NA And they lost the only game they played against the full roster of EU's 3rd seed That's not worrying? but saying that game was anywhere near representative of TSM's powerlevel is silly. lmao. TSM was the one with the handicap?! SK was already eliminated, had their jungle back with which they didn't scrim for 5 days with their morale under their feet, while also having their coach banned, and they won. Who said anything about a handicap? You're putting words in my mouth. if TSM lost while playing anywhere close to their usual level. Which they didn't. This is what you said. That TSM didn't play at their best. i.e. they were on a handicap. Which is irrelevant considering SK was 10 times as much more on a handicap than TSM was.
Saying they didn't play at their best is nowhere near saying they're on a handicap. A handicap is an artificial advantage or disadvantage given to a team from the outside. That's not even close to the same as saying TSM played poorly.
|
On September 25 2014 23:05 Kupon3ss wrote:
One win is all it takes to judge how superior NA teams are, like LMQ vs OMG did
![[image loading]](http://hotmeme.net/media/i/a/c/9uJ-bender-nothing-wrong.jpg)
This CS difference mid. I admit I predicted Fnatic to advance at second, but having LMQ advance over OMG and Fnatic would be hilarious.
On September 25 2014 23:08 Kupon3ss wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2014 23:07 BrownBear wrote:On September 25 2014 23:05 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 23:02 BrownBear wrote:On September 25 2014 22:57 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 22:55 Lord Tolkien wrote:On September 25 2014 22:54 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 22:52 Sleight wrote:On September 25 2014 22:51 Numy wrote:
edit TSM is the 2nd best team NA and they gave SHRC a fight. That is pretty bad news for your region. Edit; 3rd place CN beat out 1st place NA? Say what? OMG is 3rd place CN. And they lost to 3rd place NA How is TSM the 2nd best team when they beat C9 and lost to SHRC who is 2nd seed. TSM won the last game of regionals because of 1 minion. /half-s Haha well I think if C9 played TSM again in a bo5 C9 may come out on top 3-2 but it's too close to make some hypobole about a regions strength. Feels like Korea has outclassed everyone so hard that other region fanboys are grasping at anything to place themselves above. Actually given C9's performance so far, I think they annhilate TSM if there happens to be a rematch bo5 somehow at worlds. Since that requires TSM > SSW, impossible. But one can dream. C9 has played one game. One game. How can you judge their performance lol. C9 when they're on their tactical game matches up incredibly well against TSM. TSM has to win by outskilling their opponents, because tactically they're shit. It worked against SHRC because SHRC plays a very similar style + Uzi and InSec can be baited super hard. It didn't work against full-strength SK because SK played smarter and waited to catch the inevitable throw. Which type of game do you think C9 plays? The kind that lost to TSM in a Bo5 apparently
ONE MINION I SAY!
http://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/2f8dvr/spoiler_cloud_9_vs_tsm_or_how_one_minion_can/
|
YoloStara 1v1ing Yasuo as Nami that's how far ahead EU is. Deal with it NA fanbois.
|
i take j4 over elise any day by the way =) solid champ
|
On September 25 2014 23:08 Kupon3ss wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2014 23:07 BrownBear wrote:On September 25 2014 23:05 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 23:02 BrownBear wrote:On September 25 2014 22:57 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 22:55 Lord Tolkien wrote:On September 25 2014 22:54 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 22:52 Sleight wrote:On September 25 2014 22:51 Numy wrote:
edit TSM is the 2nd best team NA and they gave SHRC a fight. That is pretty bad news for your region. Edit; 3rd place CN beat out 1st place NA? Say what? OMG is 3rd place CN. And they lost to 3rd place NA How is TSM the 2nd best team when they beat C9 and lost to SHRC who is 2nd seed. TSM won the last game of regionals because of 1 minion. /half-s Haha well I think if C9 played TSM again in a bo5 C9 may come out on top 3-2 but it's too close to make some hypobole about a regions strength. Feels like Korea has outclassed everyone so hard that other region fanboys are grasping at anything to place themselves above. Actually given C9's performance so far, I think they annhilate TSM if there happens to be a rematch bo5 somehow at worlds. Since that requires TSM > SSW, impossible. But one can dream. C9 has played one game. One game. How can you judge their performance lol. C9 when they're on their tactical game matches up incredibly well against TSM. TSM has to win by outskilling their opponents, because tactically they're shit. It worked against SHRC because SHRC plays a very similar style + Uzi and InSec can be baited super hard. It didn't work against full-strength SK because SK played smarter and waited to catch the inevitable throw. Which type of game do you think C9 plays? The kind that lost to TSM in a Bo5 apparently
Kupon3ss pls. You missed my point completely.
C9 post bootcamp crushes TSM. C9 pre-bootcamp was slumping hard and lost 2-3.
Not like it matters because we won't see them until next year (when TSM will probably have new players l0l).
|
On September 25 2014 23:07 BrownBear wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2014 23:05 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 23:02 BrownBear wrote:On September 25 2014 22:57 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 22:55 Lord Tolkien wrote:On September 25 2014 22:54 Numy wrote:On September 25 2014 22:52 Sleight wrote:On September 25 2014 22:51 Numy wrote:
edit TSM is the 2nd best team NA and they gave SHRC a fight. That is pretty bad news for your region. Edit; 3rd place CN beat out 1st place NA? Say what? OMG is 3rd place CN. And they lost to 3rd place NA How is TSM the 2nd best team when they beat C9 and lost to SHRC who is 2nd seed. TSM won the last game of regionals because of 1 minion. /half-s Haha well I think if C9 played TSM again in a bo5 C9 may come out on top 3-2 but it's too close to make some hypobole about a regions strength. Feels like Korea has outclassed everyone so hard that other region fanboys are grasping at anything to place themselves above. Actually given C9's performance so far, I think they annhilate TSM if there happens to be a rematch bo5 somehow at worlds. Since that requires TSM > SSW, impossible. But one can dream. C9 has played one game. One game. How can you judge their performance lol. C9 when they're on their tactical game matches up incredibly well against TSM. TSM has to win by outskilling their opponents, because tactically they're shit. It worked against SHRC because SHRC plays a very similar style + Uzi and InSec can be baited super hard. It didn't work against full-strength SK because SK played smarter and waited to catch the inevitable throw. Which type of game do you think C9 plays?
Well I'll judge them by the most recent time C9 played TSM which ended 3-2 to TSM. One game against an A team that does nothing doesn't really change that to C9 annihilating TSM.
|
On September 25 2014 23:06 ManBaker wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2014 23:03 Mikau wrote:On September 25 2014 22:59 ManBaker wrote:On September 25 2014 22:58 Mikau wrote:On September 25 2014 22:54 ManBaker wrote:On September 25 2014 22:52 Sleight wrote:On September 25 2014 22:51 Numy wrote:
edit TSM is the 2nd best team NA and they gave SHRC a fight. That is pretty bad news for your region. Edit; 3rd place CN beat out 1st place NA? Say what? OMG is 3rd place CN. And they lost to 3rd place NA And they lost the only game they played against the full roster of EU's 3rd seed That's not worrying? but saying that game was anywhere near representative of TSM's powerlevel is silly. lmao. TSM was the one with the handicap?! SK was already eliminated, had their jungle back with which they didn't scrim for 5 days with their morale under their feet, while also having their coach banned, and they won. Who said anything about a handicap? You're putting words in my mouth. if TSM lost while playing anywhere close to their usual level. Which they didn't. This is what you said. That TSM didn't play at their best. i.e. they were on a handicap. Which is irrelevant considering SK was 10 times as much more on a handicap than TSM was.
That last sentence was almost English. Also their handicap was self inflicted. The above post is correct in saying TSM played terribly throughout the game, but amazingly it went long enough to come down to that terrible move into SK's base. Either way I like SK and don't care about the EU/NA argument
|
When you argue with ManBaker, everyone loses.
|
Back to the current game going on, Peke Xerath <<<<<< Froggen Xerath.
|
On September 25 2014 23:08 Mikau wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2014 23:06 ManBaker wrote:On September 25 2014 23:03 Mikau wrote:On September 25 2014 22:59 ManBaker wrote:On September 25 2014 22:58 Mikau wrote:On September 25 2014 22:54 ManBaker wrote:On September 25 2014 22:52 Sleight wrote:On September 25 2014 22:51 Numy wrote:
edit TSM is the 2nd best team NA and they gave SHRC a fight. That is pretty bad news for your region. Edit; 3rd place CN beat out 1st place NA? Say what? OMG is 3rd place CN. And they lost to 3rd place NA And they lost the only game they played against the full roster of EU's 3rd seed That's not worrying? but saying that game was anywhere near representative of TSM's powerlevel is silly. lmao. TSM was the one with the handicap?! SK was already eliminated, had their jungle back with which they didn't scrim for 5 days with their morale under their feet, while also having their coach banned, and they won. Who said anything about a handicap? You're putting words in my mouth. if TSM lost while playing anywhere close to their usual level. Which they didn't. This is what you said. That TSM didn't play at their best. i.e. they were on a handicap. Which is irrelevant considering SK was 10 times as much more on a handicap than TSM was. Saying they didn't play at their best is nowhere near saying they're on a handicap. A handicap is an artificial advantage or disadvantage given to a team from the outside. That's not even close to the same as saying TSM played poorly.
Holy shit you really can't admit it can you?
Alright, even if TSM played poorly, it's still irrelevant because 1) it's your own opinion with no basis whatsoever and 2) SK was STILL on a huge handicap which completely invalidates whatever possible "TSM played poorly" point that you can make.
SK, third team in EU with ridiculously huge handicap, already eliminated, beat a TSM in full roster, playing for 1st place.
Those are the facts.
|
On September 25 2014 23:12 BrownBear wrote:
Back to the current game going on, Peke Xerath <<<<<< Froggen Xerath.
He's too damn tanky man!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
