|
On April 14 2014 05:48 ParadeofMadness wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2014 05:40 Swords wrote:On April 14 2014 05:38 ParadeofMadness wrote: if CA or CLB get into the LCS nintendude will have a serious contender for ''worst jungler in lcs'' Watching these games I'm thinking the chances of CA/CLB beating Coast/Dig/Crs are insanely low. yeah i dont think so either. But just puzzled how do they find these shitter junglers??? Is the jungle talent pool in na this bad Hey come on that's not fair, brokenshard is from eu
|
On April 14 2014 05:53 seRapH wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2014 05:48 ParadeofMadness wrote:On April 14 2014 05:40 Swords wrote:On April 14 2014 05:38 ParadeofMadness wrote: if CA or CLB get into the LCS nintendude will have a serious contender for ''worst jungler in lcs'' Watching these games I'm thinking the chances of CA/CLB beating Coast/Dig/Crs are insanely low. yeah i dont think so either. But just puzzled how do they find these shitter junglers??? Is the jungle talent pool in na this bad Hey come on that's not fair, brokenshard is from eu
#freeNKInc
|
On April 14 2014 05:53 seRapH wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2014 05:48 ParadeofMadness wrote:On April 14 2014 05:40 Swords wrote:On April 14 2014 05:38 ParadeofMadness wrote: if CA or CLB get into the LCS nintendude will have a serious contender for ''worst jungler in lcs'' Watching these games I'm thinking the chances of CA/CLB beating Coast/Dig/Crs are insanely low. yeah i dont think so either. But just puzzled how do they find these shitter junglers??? Is the jungle talent pool in na this bad Hey come on that's not fair, brokenshard is from eu
wut he speaks like an american
edit: he's from israel apprarently
|
So many fails in that fight
|
this morgana is missing some not too difficult bindings...
|
lol legit Quadra kill, pity penta kill
|
RobertoXPentakill
Both these teams make mistakes that any LCS team would take advantage of. Even XDG/EG would have good odds vs them.
|
On April 14 2014 05:22 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2014 04:34 QuixoticO wrote:On April 14 2014 01:41 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 13 2014 23:57 TitusVI wrote:On April 13 2014 21:37 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 13 2014 09:11 Leeto wrote: I really wanna see how LMQ does in the LCS. It seems they win all their games by just being mechanically better than their opponents. XWX especially. Top-4 easily, considering level of NA LCS. Not higher, probably a bit lower. Challenger scene and actual LCS are too different from each other to expect same level of utter domination. which means teams like dignitas, curse, maybe even clg get more pressure and have to step up their game. TSM, C9 and CLG are 2 heads above LMQ if not more. There is absolutely no pressure. Even Dignitas and Curse with non-slumping Voyboy are better than LMQ. But EG, XDG and Coast are somewhere near, right. Absolutely no pressure is a bit overstating it don't you think. Even XDG could take of games from every team in the LCS. So how would you be able to say a team that in skrims are getting the respect from the top LCS teams be a non factor in pressure? On April 14 2014 04:27 ketchup wrote: I don't understand why CLB picked up brokenshard. I have to agree. Never was a big fan of brokenshard. If you can end every split 21-7 being 3-1 against every team i don't think you will be pressured a lot. Doublelift was saying openly that LMQ in scrims and LMQ on LAN are two completely different teams and Doublelift and CLG know better than anyone else what is it to be beasts in scrims and then being just mediocre on LAN. Plus there is last season of LPL, where LMQ were almost the worst team and LPL, even if it was better than it is right now, constructed like NA LCS with nice tops and just bad mids/bottoms. About Brokenshard. He has his moments of brilliance but i still think that dropping heavenTime made DTG/TBD/CLB way worse than it was in FXO time.
Well if you're going to bring up Doublelift's comment, you should probably take in context that DL meant LMQ takes LAN more seriously than scrim/NACL ... so umm yeah.
You seem to have a lot against LMQ though, you're consistently the one downplaying them even going so far as to say in some other thread that they were going to struggle against C9T during the finals???
|
is this for 3rd place or final?
|
On April 14 2014 06:30 wei2coolman wrote: is this for 3rd place or final?
Well LMQ is not playing so...
|
On April 14 2014 06:30 Chicane wrote:Well LMQ is not playing so... touche'.
surprised 3rd place is a bo5.
|
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On April 14 2014 06:13 KissBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2014 05:22 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 14 2014 04:34 QuixoticO wrote:On April 14 2014 01:41 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 13 2014 23:57 TitusVI wrote:On April 13 2014 21:37 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 13 2014 09:11 Leeto wrote: I really wanna see how LMQ does in the LCS. It seems they win all their games by just being mechanically better than their opponents. XWX especially. Top-4 easily, considering level of NA LCS. Not higher, probably a bit lower. Challenger scene and actual LCS are too different from each other to expect same level of utter domination. which means teams like dignitas, curse, maybe even clg get more pressure and have to step up their game. TSM, C9 and CLG are 2 heads above LMQ if not more. There is absolutely no pressure. Even Dignitas and Curse with non-slumping Voyboy are better than LMQ. But EG, XDG and Coast are somewhere near, right. Absolutely no pressure is a bit overstating it don't you think. Even XDG could take of games from every team in the LCS. So how would you be able to say a team that in skrims are getting the respect from the top LCS teams be a non factor in pressure? On April 14 2014 04:27 ketchup wrote: I don't understand why CLB picked up brokenshard. I have to agree. Never was a big fan of brokenshard. If you can end every split 21-7 being 3-1 against every team i don't think you will be pressured a lot. Doublelift was saying openly that LMQ in scrims and LMQ on LAN are two completely different teams and Doublelift and CLG know better than anyone else what is it to be beasts in scrims and then being just mediocre on LAN. Plus there is last season of LPL, where LMQ were almost the worst team and LPL, even if it was better than it is right now, constructed like NA LCS with nice tops and just bad mids/bottoms. About Brokenshard. He has his moments of brilliance but i still think that dropping heavenTime made DTG/TBD/CLB way worse than it was in FXO time. Well if you're going to bring up Doublelift's comment, you should probably take in context that DL meant LMQ takes LAN more seriously than scrim/NACL ... so umm yeah. You seem to have a lot against LMQ though, you're consistently the one downplaying them even going so far as to say in some other thread that they were going to struggle against C9T during the finals???
Lol dude, use brains once. First of all, i was hoping that C9T will win because i clearly support C9E and C9T, not cheering a second for C9.Prime. And i have nothing against LoMoQ, they seem funny and humble guys.
LMQ are playing against Challenger teams right now. How many good teams are there? Choking CLB? C9T with Bischu/Yazuki who choke every LAN event he plays? Team 8 were fucked by richierich, other teams don't deserve to be named. Will they go same against NA LCS teams? No. Will they be on level of TSM/CLG/C9 who are clearly WAY better than whole NA LCS? No. Will they be on level of EG/XDG last split? No. So they will be on Dignitas/Curse/Coast level, which is ok if they don't want to be eliminated.
And you just need to ask Cheep about LMQ's chances, even though we were speaking about it 1-2 weeks ago. Middle of the pack - not higher, not lower, if they use this roster. If Uzi comes though, things can change.
|
The land of freedom23126 Posts
God damn it, this doublepost. If CLB loses, i will literally laugh. Curse, pls, choose CA you're 6th.
|
that xp difference on botlane is insane. rofl level 6 vayne vs level 4 lucian.
|
westrice so questionable >.> this is like the millionth time i've seen him blow flash when he's dead no matter what.
|
Going to admit as an 'anti-fan' of Brokenshard this has been a great series to watch.
I miss when Pr0lly was an LCS quality mid though :/
|
On April 14 2014 06:35 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote: God damn it, this doublepost. If CLB loses, i will literally laugh. Curse, pls, choose CA you're 6th.
They should at least swap out Vooby/Cop and try out Mashme/Duocek imo.
|
I don't understand complexity's teamcomp. ._.
|
On April 14 2014 06:34 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2014 06:13 KissBlade wrote:On April 14 2014 05:22 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 14 2014 04:34 QuixoticO wrote:On April 14 2014 01:41 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 13 2014 23:57 TitusVI wrote:On April 13 2014 21:37 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 13 2014 09:11 Leeto wrote: I really wanna see how LMQ does in the LCS. It seems they win all their games by just being mechanically better than their opponents. XWX especially. Top-4 easily, considering level of NA LCS. Not higher, probably a bit lower. Challenger scene and actual LCS are too different from each other to expect same level of utter domination. which means teams like dignitas, curse, maybe even clg get more pressure and have to step up their game. TSM, C9 and CLG are 2 heads above LMQ if not more. There is absolutely no pressure. Even Dignitas and Curse with non-slumping Voyboy are better than LMQ. But EG, XDG and Coast are somewhere near, right. Absolutely no pressure is a bit overstating it don't you think. Even XDG could take of games from every team in the LCS. So how would you be able to say a team that in skrims are getting the respect from the top LCS teams be a non factor in pressure? On April 14 2014 04:27 ketchup wrote: I don't understand why CLB picked up brokenshard. I have to agree. Never was a big fan of brokenshard. If you can end every split 21-7 being 3-1 against every team i don't think you will be pressured a lot. Doublelift was saying openly that LMQ in scrims and LMQ on LAN are two completely different teams and Doublelift and CLG know better than anyone else what is it to be beasts in scrims and then being just mediocre on LAN. Plus there is last season of LPL, where LMQ were almost the worst team and LPL, even if it was better than it is right now, constructed like NA LCS with nice tops and just bad mids/bottoms. About Brokenshard. He has his moments of brilliance but i still think that dropping heavenTime made DTG/TBD/CLB way worse than it was in FXO time. Well if you're going to bring up Doublelift's comment, you should probably take in context that DL meant LMQ takes LAN more seriously than scrim/NACL ... so umm yeah. You seem to have a lot against LMQ though, you're consistently the one downplaying them even going so far as to say in some other thread that they were going to struggle against C9T during the finals??? Lol dude, use brains once. First of all, i was hoping that C9T will win because i clearly support C9E and C9T, not cheering a second for C9.Prime. And i have nothing against LoMoQ, they seem funny and humble guys. LMQ are playing against Challenger teams right now. How many good teams are there? Choking CLB? C9T with Bischu/Yazuki who choke every LAN event he plays? Team 8 were fucked by richierich, other teams don't deserve to be named. Will they go same against NA LCS teams? No. Will they be on level of TSM/CLG/C9 who are clearly WAY better than whole NA LCS? No. Will they be on level of EG/XDG last split? No. So they will be on Dignitas/Curse/Coast level, which is ok if they don't want to be eliminated. And you just need to ask Cheep about LMQ's chances, even though we were speaking about it 1-2 weeks ago. Middle of the pack - not higher, not lower, if they use this roster. If Uzi comes though, things can change.
Awfully defensive are we? You don't have to justify your opinion to me lol. I know where LMQ is likely to place and I'm pretty sure I'm on the same page with Cheep on it so I don't really need to ask him for it.
|
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On April 14 2014 06:41 Doctorbeat wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2014 06:35 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote: God damn it, this doublepost. If CLB loses, i will literally laugh. Curse, pls, choose CA you're 6th. They should at least swap out Vooby/Cop and try out Mashme/Duocek imo.
Lol, Duocek was atrocious whole Challenger Series. I have no idea how did he play yesterday against LoMoQ and how did he play in previous games, but i will pick Voyboy from those 11/10 times. And MashMe had his chances in LCS already, it was bad.
On April 14 2014 06:44 KissBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2014 06:34 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 14 2014 06:13 KissBlade wrote:On April 14 2014 05:22 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 14 2014 04:34 QuixoticO wrote:On April 14 2014 01:41 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 13 2014 23:57 TitusVI wrote:On April 13 2014 21:37 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote:On April 13 2014 09:11 Leeto wrote: I really wanna see how LMQ does in the LCS. It seems they win all their games by just being mechanically better than their opponents. XWX especially. Top-4 easily, considering level of NA LCS. Not higher, probably a bit lower. Challenger scene and actual LCS are too different from each other to expect same level of utter domination. which means teams like dignitas, curse, maybe even clg get more pressure and have to step up their game. TSM, C9 and CLG are 2 heads above LMQ if not more. There is absolutely no pressure. Even Dignitas and Curse with non-slumping Voyboy are better than LMQ. But EG, XDG and Coast are somewhere near, right. Absolutely no pressure is a bit overstating it don't you think. Even XDG could take of games from every team in the LCS. So how would you be able to say a team that in skrims are getting the respect from the top LCS teams be a non factor in pressure? On April 14 2014 04:27 ketchup wrote: I don't understand why CLB picked up brokenshard. I have to agree. Never was a big fan of brokenshard. If you can end every split 21-7 being 3-1 against every team i don't think you will be pressured a lot. Doublelift was saying openly that LMQ in scrims and LMQ on LAN are two completely different teams and Doublelift and CLG know better than anyone else what is it to be beasts in scrims and then being just mediocre on LAN. Plus there is last season of LPL, where LMQ were almost the worst team and LPL, even if it was better than it is right now, constructed like NA LCS with nice tops and just bad mids/bottoms. About Brokenshard. He has his moments of brilliance but i still think that dropping heavenTime made DTG/TBD/CLB way worse than it was in FXO time. Well if you're going to bring up Doublelift's comment, you should probably take in context that DL meant LMQ takes LAN more seriously than scrim/NACL ... so umm yeah. You seem to have a lot against LMQ though, you're consistently the one downplaying them even going so far as to say in some other thread that they were going to struggle against C9T during the finals??? Lol dude, use brains once. First of all, i was hoping that C9T will win because i clearly support C9E and C9T, not cheering a second for C9.Prime. And i have nothing against LoMoQ, they seem funny and humble guys. LMQ are playing against Challenger teams right now. How many good teams are there? Choking CLB? C9T with Bischu/Yazuki who choke every LAN event he plays? Team 8 were fucked by richierich, other teams don't deserve to be named. Will they go same against NA LCS teams? No. Will they be on level of TSM/CLG/C9 who are clearly WAY better than whole NA LCS? No. Will they be on level of EG/XDG last split? No. So they will be on Dignitas/Curse/Coast level, which is ok if they don't want to be eliminated. And you just need to ask Cheep about LMQ's chances, even though we were speaking about it 1-2 weeks ago. Middle of the pack - not higher, not lower, if they use this roster. If Uzi comes though, things can change. Awfully defensive are we? You don't have to justify your opinion to me lol. I know where LMQ is likely to place and I'm pretty sure I'm on the same page with Cheep on it so I don't really need to ask him for it.
Ye, 28-0 LMQ, sadly enough you will be sad. And i hate opinions without justifying, just fyi. They can't be called as opinions if you have no arguments in their defence.
|
|
|
|