| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
|
HazMat
United States17077 Posts
On January 19 2013 04:06 Doctorbeat wrote: That pic is Crs vs Gambit, not Crs vs Blaze >< IEM fucking up again? I think it's to show how Gambit advances despite Curse beating them earlier... or something. | ||
|
Doctorbeat
Netherlands13241 Posts
| ||
|
LaNague
Germany9118 Posts
People resposible should finally wake up. "some kind of speedrun" | ||
|
jpak
United States5045 Posts
| ||
|
Zess
Adun Toridas!9144 Posts
On January 19 2013 04:08 LaNague wrote: alexich just explaining how this stupid system forced them into a specific strategy. People resposible should finally wake up. At the same time, this is a pretty awesome interview. Alex so excited yet they are so precise on exactly what they needed to do to win | ||
|
GregMandel
France822 Posts
On January 19 2013 04:09 xes wrote: At the same time, this is a pretty awesome interview. Alex so excited yet they are so precise on exactly what they needed to do to win Wait, they calculated who will advance based on the time needed to finsh the games ? What is this ? :O | ||
|
OutlaW-
Czech Republic5053 Posts
Just what happened? | ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
| ||
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
On January 19 2013 04:10 GregMandel wrote: Wait, they calculated who will advance based on the time needed to finsh the games ? What is this ? :O IEM Tiebreakers are based on how fast you won games and how slow you lost games. It's... unique. | ||
|
Dan HH
Romania9246 Posts
| ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On January 19 2013 04:11 OutlaW- wrote: Wait, what the hell? I stopped watching after MYM stomped Curse and GG was 0-2 so I thought they were out Just what happened? Blaze beat crs, GG beat MYM so crs/gg/MYM went 1-2 thanks to the stupid time rule GG got through. | ||
|
jpak
United States5045 Posts
On January 19 2013 04:11 Lysanias wrote: Meh this gives a bad taste in my mouth i find MYM's play after Azubu best overall. Please IEM change this system it's retarded oh and while you are at it also fix that of the Sc2 section. So it's an IEM problem, not a LoL problem. Good to know. | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
| ||
|
GregMandel
France822 Posts
On January 19 2013 04:11 MoonBear wrote: IEM Tiebreakers are based on how fast you won games and how slow you lost games. It's... bad. FTFY But thank you for the answer :D | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On January 19 2013 04:11 MoonBear wrote: IEM Tiebreakers are based on how fast you won games and how slow you lost games. It's... unique. Is unique a synonym for shit? Cause in this case, they should be. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
On January 19 2013 04:12 jpak wrote: So it's an IEM problem, not a LoL problem. Good to know. happy you finaly got it, why am i not suprised. | ||
|
thenexusp
United States3721 Posts
| ||
|
La1
United Kingdom659 Posts
even though m5 basically threw the first game they deserved it on the 3rd games performance. | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On January 19 2013 04:15 wei2coolman wrote: extended series was dumb, but tie breakers based on time, is even worse... It wasn't smart when they did it years ago for dota and it isn't smart now for league. | ||
| ||
StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Patches Events
BSL Open Qualifier
BSL Open Qualifier
OSC
OSC
WardiTV Weekly
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Online Event
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
