EPT[IEM] New York Discussion - Page 45
| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
|
Ryalnos
United States1946 Posts
| ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On October 14 2011 06:37 Ryalnos wrote: Toin coss, eh? For FP/FB. | ||
|
jtbem
Canada1404 Posts
| ||
|
HazMat
United States17077 Posts
On October 14 2011 06:34 Woony wrote: I think Phreak just confirmed that tiebreakers are solved by win/loss time. Teams shouldn't be allowed to surrender then. | ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
| ||
|
Pooshlmer
United States1001 Posts
On October 14 2011 06:39 HazMat wrote: Teams shouldn't be allowed to surrender then. Surrendering is BAD for you. | ||
|
Bluebush
United States218 Posts
| ||
|
BlueFlames
Germany1756 Posts
On October 14 2011 06:36 Ryuu314 wrote: Well, I kinda disagree cause Yorick's strongest point is the fact that he can completely dominate his lane. By sending him bot, you basically completely give that up. TRM basically spent the first 20-25 minutes of the game playing catch-up, when he should've instead made it the other way around for. TSM tried to have Brand/Ali deny Kass top, but Ali decided to roam and completely defeated the purposed of a 2v1 top lane. Then the huge lane switches put them even more behind. Honestly, if they just sent Yorick top to annoy Kass and had Brand/Ali bot with Ali not roaming they would've been able to teamfight so much better. Altho yes, Fnatic's comp was much much stronger in general than TSM's. You are right, it put them behind, but it did not lose them the game. Yoricks main point is using his ulti right, and farming like a maniac during laning-phase. As i said he really catched up well, so he was not useless lategame. But he got caught off guard too many times. If you cant ulti your carry of ap carry, then your failed your ulti and the damage you do is not worth picking yorick. To be honest i did not undertand the laneswitch at all. It seemed that the laneswitch confused TSM more than it did Fnatic. Which is weird cause they chose to do this. | ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
Derp. Problem is giving the winner a huge time adv. >_> | ||
|
Shiv.
3534 Posts
Opinions? | ||
|
BlueFlames
Germany1756 Posts
| ||
|
Woony
Germany6657 Posts
| ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
Fnatic: Ryze D: Kass Fnatic: Akari D: LS Fn: Zilean D: Talon Fnatic scouted well, huehue. | ||
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
On October 14 2011 06:42 Woony wrote: inb4 Phreak -> Vayne photoshops I would be tempted to do that, except I fear what I would create. I shall not defile my computer with this. | ||
|
LaNague
Germany9118 Posts
1 guy screaming and telling me what i see on the screen with 10 words per second is plenty enough. | ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
Fn: Morg D: Trundle Sona Fn: GP Kog D: Cait Udyr Fn: Janna Swain D: KATARINA | ||
|
Woony
Germany6657 Posts
| ||
|
Pooshlmer
United States1001 Posts
On October 14 2011 06:40 NeoIllusions wrote: Derp. Problem is giving the winner a huge time adv. >_> That would require the losing team to not care while the winning team can only tiebreak. Is there a potential situation like that? | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On October 14 2011 06:39 HazMat wrote: Teams shouldn't be allowed to surrender then. Did anyone surrender? | ||
|
Chrispy
Canada5878 Posts
| ||
| ||
