• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:06
CEST 16:06
KST 23:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles7[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL81
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Server Blocker RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Small VOD Thread 2.0 Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 691 users

qxc's thoughts: The Adept

Forum Index > Legacy of the Void
41 CommentsPost a Reply
Normal

qxc's thoughts: The Adept

Text byTL.net ESPORTS
Graphics byshiroiusagi
August 13th, 2015 22:42 GMT



Everything in this article is my opinion unless otherwise stated. As a progamer for several years now, I have a wealth of personal experience and observations to draw upon. That said, sometimes I have to speculate.

Overview:

The adept is a gateway unit that only requires a cybernetics core to produce. The adept is a tanky frontline unit that excels vs light units due to its bonus damage. The bonus damage is substantial so the adept is poor against armored units such as marauders, roaches, and stalkers. Also, adepts 2 shots all workers making them an excellent harass unit. The twilight council has an upgrade which increases the adept’s shields by 50 raising its total life from 180 to 230. As shields often stay unupgraded gaining 50 shields with minimal armor is less impactful than a 50 hp increase.

The adept is really interesting because of Psionic Transfer. Psionic Transfer creates an image that moves about the speed of a reaper and can be controlled. This image cannot attack. After 7 seconds the adept then teleports to the image. This image is not affected by any collision from units although it cannot pass through buildings. The adept’s controller may cancel the image to prevent the teleportation. This allows the adept to threaten multiple locations at the same time. The most common use for this is to send the adept to one mineral line and images to the other thus making it very difficult for the defender to accurately split their army. The adept opens up a new range of harassment opportunities for protoss as well as new compositions due to its high hit points.

By the numbers:

Cost: 100/25
Damage: 10 (+13 vs light)
Build time same as a zealot
Health: 90/90
Armor: 1
Movement speed: same as a marine

Psionic Transfer: Projects an invulnerable Psionic Image that can move but cannot attack. After 7 seconds, the Adept teleports to the Image's location. Adept can cancel the shade ability at any time. When you cancel, the shade disappears and you don’t teleport. The image is about as fast as a reaper.

Upgrade:

Shield upgrade, costs 100/100 researches from twilight council, gives adept +50 shields bringing them to 140/90.

PvT:

Adepts rule the early game vs Terran. They 2 shot marines and so do an even better job of maintaining early map control compared to stalkers. In addition, Psionic Transfer gives them opportunities to bypass an early bunker and trade for scvs or force a fight vs marines. Protoss also has a much easier time scouting as the image created gives them vision. Terran must wall off their main and raise depots if any images are attempting to sneak into the main. Adepts are excellent at getting into position while there is other action on the map as the default configuration for Terran will be to have the wall open. Adepts excel in small unit encounters and are able to overcome the healing of medivacs on marines without much trouble due to their high burst damage vs light.

[image loading]
Adepts can close the gap against ranged units instantly using their image and also cut off retreat.

There are a number of strong adept openings, allins and timings early on although their effectiveness in a head on fight falls off greatly as soon as marauders, stim, shields, and medivacs are out. Shields allows marines to survive 2 shots from adepts, although it depends on the upgrades and if they’re able to heal at all after stimming before taking damage.

[image loading]
Nightend uses his adepts to completely surround the terran forces.

Due to adept’s relative low range and lack of anti-air, bio + medivacs are able to kite an adept heavy army and pick up if things get too dicey. Adepts are generally supplemented with blink stalkers to limit medivac movement and immortals to help deal with a heavy marauder based composition. Late game, adepts are used mostly to harass. Warp prisms and image runbys are very common in high level TvP and force Terran to have heavy map control or take huge losses when they move out.

PvP:

Due to adept’s high hitpoints and mobility, both players open 2 gate adept almost every game. As adepts do bonus damage to other adepts, the best unit to counter early adepts are also adepts.

[image loading]
Adepts from both sides scout using their image.

Stalkers, zealots and sentries just don’t do enough damage early game to stop adepts from trading for probes early on. Currently PvP involves a lot of adepts roaming the map and using the image to get into their opponent’s base. As adepts 2 shot probes, 2 adepts are able to do a lot of economic damage unless the defender has a significant number of units already in position.

[image loading]
Adepts use their image to peek inside his opponent’s base.

[image loading]
Adepts see their opponent out of position and transfer into the base where they wreak havoc.

[image loading]
Adepts bounce from one mineral line to another harassing workers while his opponent tries to keep up

[image loading]
Adepts work great in a warp prism as they two shot workers.

Some protoss players have taken to setting up the top of their ramp so they can wall it off with a single pylon to keep adepts out of their base as needed. Stargate has relatively limited usage here due to the threat of being overrun by adepts but can be effective in catching your opponent off guard or out of position.

[image loading]
A typical adept vs adept fight looks a bit like roach vs roach, but there’s far greater opportunities to sneak by and gain position.

The natural transitions once players make it up to 2 base lie in either robotics or twilight. Robotics provides a measure of safety against dark templar while also giving access to Disruptors.

[image loading]
As archons do bonus damage to adepts and do not take extra damage, they can be a potent mid game response.

Immortals and colossus see little play in the matchup currently as immortal’s bonus damage is irrelevant with adepts forming the majority of each player’s army and their shield spell having too long of a cooldown to use them for soaking a lot of damage. As adepts move relatively slowly and are pretty small, disruptors are generally able to catch a significant number of them in the blast.

[image loading]
Disruptors also do excellent damage as adepts tend to clump and are slow.

Players also choose to go into blink and/or the adept shield upgrade for either timings or general pressure. While this leaves them a bit more vulnerable to dts, twilight allows the core army to be significantly stronger.

PvZ:

Adepts largely fill the role of zealots in this matchup. They are strong against zerglings, have high hitpoints and relatively low range. Since they do not do bonus damage vs roaches, they do not perform well and can have trouble actually getting in range to deal damage to the hydralisks. Psionic Transfer helps a lot with positioning but it can be difficult to get the adepts in position without isolating them completely from your army when trying to get on top of the hydralisks. Early game, adept timings largely take the place of zealot timings as adepts are a bit easier to micro and are much more versatile. Psionic Transfer allows them to place additional pressure on the zerg as well as bypass walls while also being an extremely effective scout. As the game goes on, adepts won’t necessarily form a core part of the army as they often do in the other matchups but generally get at least sprinkled in due to their high hitpoints, ability to clear zerglings and scout.

[image loading]
Nightend uses adepts to attack one mineral line while his images allow him to quickly move to another.

[image loading]
Adepts move in to pressure the 3rd and punish the zerg for being out of position when the transfer to their image in the natural.

[image loading]
The adepts stutter step away from zerglings and then cast their image backwards providing an escape if the zerg continues to chase.

Overall impressions:

When fighting against protoss, it’s important to get an idea of how many adepts to expect so that you can prepare in time. Once the harass starts, it becomes very hard to stabilize, but setting up ahead of time makes a huge difference toward defending. Walls are incredibly important for defense. As the protoss player can always cancel the teleport, adepts near your base offer a near endless and risk-free way to scout. Pushing adepts away from your base will be necessary to deny vision of your tech path. In low numbers, adepts will beat most units, especially once they have the shield upgrade from the twilight council. Be wary of leaving your base with minimal map control as you may be inviting a large number of adepts to invade and give you nightmares. The adept succeeds at being useful and creating new ways for protoss to control the map, scout and harass but is a little too similar to the zealot in terms of what units it’s good/bad against. While there are a number of situations that the adept is better than the zealot in, the reverse is less true. The zealot fills few roles that aren’t already filled by the adept. So, while the adept is creating new and interesting interactions in all three matchups, it is largely doing so at the expense of the zealot.

Thanks to NighEnD for providing replays and protoss insight.

Writer: qxc
Editors: Zealously, DarkLordOlli
Facebook Twitter Reddit
TL+ Member
ejozl
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark3366 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-13 23:05:13
August 13 2015 23:02 GMT
#2
Nice. I find that Stalkers do decent against Adepts, if on even economy, since they can kite with longer range. I have done some counter 4 gate aggression with pylon wall off against the 2 gate Adept style, though it's pretty allin.
SC2 Archon needs "Terrible, terrible damage" as one of it's quotes.
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24193 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-13 23:06:34
August 13 2015 23:06 GMT
#3
The adept is a tricky equation. The unit appears far too dominant in early game with its anti light bonus, to the point it poisons PvP openings. On the other hand, once midgame is reached it's actually an interesting unit that solidifies gateway compositions a LOT. I REALLY think adepts should require a twilight council.
Aquila-
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
516 Posts
August 13 2015 23:16 GMT
#4
This post is pretty objective, summing up things that we already know. I would prefer to hear more of qxcs opinion about the state of the unit, should it be changed and if yes how? Does he think it is too strong? Personally I think adepts are too good early game TvP, some allins like warpprism 4 gate or voidray adept seem impossible to stop.
phantomfive
Profile Joined April 2010
Korea (South)404 Posts
August 13 2015 23:18 GMT
#5
It's lousy to push the zealot out like that. Maybe adepts should be zealots, but with an upgrade.
To ease another's heartache is to forget one's own - Lincoln
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2141 Posts
August 13 2015 23:19 GMT
#6
On August 14 2015 08:06 [PkF] Wire wrote:
The adept is a tricky equation. The unit appears far too dominant in early game with its anti light bonus, to the point it poisons PvP openings. On the other hand, once midgame is reached it's actually an interesting unit that solidifies gateway compositions a LOT. I REALLY think adepts should require a twilight council.

this is probably a very good solution
vibeo gane,
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24193 Posts
August 13 2015 23:53 GMT
#7
On August 14 2015 08:19 -NegativeZero- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2015 08:06 [PkF] Wire wrote:
The adept is a tricky equation. The unit appears far too dominant in early game with its anti light bonus, to the point it poisons PvP openings. On the other hand, once midgame is reached it's actually an interesting unit that solidifies gateway compositions a LOT. I REALLY think adepts should require a twilight council.

this is probably a very good solution

Thanks, I hope this is considered at some point. It definitely takes hatch tech drops out of the question, without adepts there is no way you defend speedlings drops, but I don't think this is a bad thing, drops should be lair tech.
Beliskner
Profile Joined August 2015
111 Posts
August 14 2015 00:10 GMT
#8
On August 14 2015 08:06 [PkF] Wire wrote:
The adept is a tricky equation. The unit appears far too dominant in early game with its anti light bonus, to the point it poisons PvP openings. On the other hand, once midgame is reached it's actually an interesting unit that solidifies gateway compositions a LOT. I REALLY think adepts should require a twilight council.


Twilight council could work, but it feels like it's going to pidgin hole Protoss into twilight/blink/HT tech first even more. The adept is/should be essentially Protoss' roach/marauder it NEEDS to be available early game to support, solving the problem of fragile early game army.

I've heard the suggestion of removing 10 or 20 shield and moving it to the upgrade, that feels like a better solution but honestly it feels like the adept isn't THAT crazy good but people are just not fully adapted to playing against it. Let's not nerf it into the ground just because it's viable.
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
August 14 2015 00:14 GMT
#9
On August 14 2015 08:16 Aquila- wrote:
This post is pretty objective, summing up things that we already know. I would prefer to hear more of qxcs opinion about the state of the unit, should it be changed and if yes how? Does he think it is too strong? Personally I think adepts are too good early game TvP, some allins like warpprism 4 gate or voidray adept seem impossible to stop.


Agreed. I was hoping for some discussion of the unit's mechanical floor and ceiling, especially in light of the existing concern that Zealot harass is already too strong in the lategame considering its non-existent micro requirement.

Are Adepts more or less effective harass units in the lategame? Do they require substantially more micromanagement in performing this role? Can Blizzard rest easy knowing that they've solved A+move Protoss once and for all?
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
Loccstana
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
United States833 Posts
August 14 2015 00:25 GMT
#10
It quite obvious that the Adept is way too tanky for its cost, role, and tech level. I would like see an adept more in line with the DT in terms of HP. Its suppose to be a nimble harass unit that is capable of penetrating behind enemy lines, not a super tanky zealot substitute.
[url]http://i.imgur.com/lw2yN.jpg[/url]
TimeSpiral
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1010 Posts
August 14 2015 00:27 GMT
#11
IDEAS:

- Remove the ability to cancel the transfer, so there is some commitment in using the ability.
- Reduce vision radius of shade.
- Two-shotting marines just feels a little too good for a unit that has so much HP and is so fast. But what the hell do I know?
[G] Positioning, Formations, and Tactics: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=187892
Beliskner
Profile Joined August 2015
111 Posts
August 14 2015 00:44 GMT
#12
On August 14 2015 09:25 Loccstana wrote:
It quite obvious that the Adept is way too tanky for its cost, role, and tech level. I would like see an adept more in line with the DT in terms of HP. Its suppose to be a nimble harass unit that is capable of penetrating behind enemy lines, not a super tanky zealot substitute.


Honestly, Protoss doesn't need another light harass unit. They need a tanky unit from the gateway, adepts fill a hole that has been sorely missing.
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-14 00:51:28
August 14 2015 00:49 GMT
#13
On August 14 2015 09:44 Beliskner wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2015 09:25 Loccstana wrote:
It quite obvious that the Adept is way too tanky for its cost, role, and tech level. I would like see an adept more in line with the DT in terms of HP. Its suppose to be a nimble harass unit that is capable of penetrating behind enemy lines, not a super tanky zealot substitute.


Honestly, Protoss doesn't need another light harass unit. They need a tanky unit from the gateway, adepts fill a hole that has been sorely missing.


The Zealot isn't tanky?

Obviously rhetorical question is obviously rhetorical. I just want to find out what you actually meant.
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
TheWinks
Profile Joined July 2011
United States572 Posts
August 14 2015 00:50 GMT
#14
On August 14 2015 09:27 TimeSpiral wrote:
- Remove the ability to cancel the transfer, so there is some commitment in using the ability.

This is how it was at the beginning and how it should be now.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
August 14 2015 01:01 GMT
#15
On August 14 2015 09:44 Beliskner wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2015 09:25 Loccstana wrote:
It quite obvious that the Adept is way too tanky for its cost, role, and tech level. I would like see an adept more in line with the DT in terms of HP. Its suppose to be a nimble harass unit that is capable of penetrating behind enemy lines, not a super tanky zealot substitute.


Honestly, Protoss doesn't need another light harass unit. They need a tanky unit from the gateway, adepts fill a hole that has been sorely missing.


Isn't that exaclty what the zealot is? The cheapest way to accumulate hitpoints in the game!
Even if we talk splash and armor type, the adept is pretty much the exact same thing as the zealot, just more exposed to EMP.

The thing with the adept is that it is superstrong vs light, which means nearly everything early. Then it starts falling off because tanking doesn't stack as well as dps-ing. Then it has an upgrade that is superpowerful on paper - and doesn't help the unit with any of its problems, i.e. low dps against in many scenarios, no antiair, no good movement speed to actually run around.

The gameplay against the adept feels to me like early you just can't really do anything. You just somehow try to get by with whatever you can while building up your setup. Then you get some vital technologies and the adept becomes pretty pointless because you are just not building what it is good against. I guess the way of a well-designed low tier unit is that it fades out and makes room for other units to shine, but I think the drop-off for adepts can be too hard due to the extreme damage discreptancy between vs light and vs armored.
sc2chronic
Profile Joined May 2012
United States777 Posts
August 14 2015 01:02 GMT
#16
I didn't actually read the article, but I 100% agree with what qxc said.
terrible, terrible, damage
Beliskner
Profile Joined August 2015
111 Posts
August 14 2015 01:19 GMT
#17
On August 14 2015 09:49 pure.Wasted wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2015 09:44 Beliskner wrote:
On August 14 2015 09:25 Loccstana wrote:
It quite obvious that the Adept is way too tanky for its cost, role, and tech level. I would like see an adept more in line with the DT in terms of HP. Its suppose to be a nimble harass unit that is capable of penetrating behind enemy lines, not a super tanky zealot substitute.


Honestly, Protoss doesn't need another light harass unit. They need a tanky unit from the gateway, adepts fill a hole that has been sorely missing.


The Zealot isn't tanky?

Obviously rhetorical question is obviously rhetorical. I just want to find out what you actually meant.



Unfortunately because of it's kiteability it's really more of just a meat shield, yes there is overlap between the two but they're not mutually exclusive. The zealot is more like the ling, if they can get up on the army/surround they are good, soaking up the shots and the adept like the roach, ranged tanking unit.

Isn't that exaclty what the zealot is? The cheapest way to accumulate hitpoints in the game!
Even if we talk splash and armor type, the adept is pretty much the exact same thing as the zealot, just more exposed to EMP.


So like above, only if you think about it in meat shield terms, but unlike the zealot the adept cannot be nullified by being kited to death. Which was the problem with early game gateway army vs Terran, your zealots get stim kited to death, you don't have much to fall back on.
Loccstana
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
United States833 Posts
August 14 2015 01:33 GMT
#18
What if they made the phase ability more like stim? Everytime the adept creates a shadow, it would use up 20 shield points? I think that would be a very interesting mechanic.
[url]http://i.imgur.com/lw2yN.jpg[/url]
weikor
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Austria580 Posts
August 14 2015 02:05 GMT
#19
Well, also consider that the next patch will throw out most timings we know are in the game.
Without chronoboost, early game adepts sound much less threatening.

Also the warp prism change with the (pylon power), which im not sure if its coming would fix many all ins.

The adept is allowed to be very strong, people just need to get used to dealing with it more. Its the first unit that doesnt seem like it pays a crazy warpgate tax.

Zerglings beat them cost effectively in lower numbers, they cant shoot air and they are very beatable with many unit compositions.
MoonyD
Profile Joined December 2013
Australia191 Posts
August 14 2015 02:20 GMT
#20
Maybe I'm over-simplying the solution when I say this, but couldn't there be a change added in so that the adept is less effective vs shield unit? This way we won't have to put up with the constant/bland/boring 2 gate adept openings in PvP.

As far as PvT and PvZ is concerned, I do agree the adept is very strong early game. However as the game progresses, it become less and less effective as a core army unit. So I don't think it's a big issue. And doing run-bys/harass with Adepts are still less cost efficient than zealots anyways because they cost gas.
The world wants to be deceived
cordellb
Profile Joined July 2015
United States19 Posts
August 14 2015 02:43 GMT
#21
only blacks would support the Adept

User was warned for this post
Forgottenfrog
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
United States1268 Posts
August 14 2015 03:00 GMT
#22
Hi QXC, thanks for the article. I remember you at the Anaheim convention center back in 2011 I believe. I remember you do an all kill against IM at the GSTL and then seeing you at the convention center. I was so excited getting to meet you. Hope to see you excel in LOTV.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
August 14 2015 03:06 GMT
#23
I think one point that should have been emphasized was that how Adepts are just so much worse vs marauders than zealots. Insanely worse, especially with Medivacs involved.
Loccstana
Profile Blog Joined November 2012
United States833 Posts
August 14 2015 03:25 GMT
#24
On August 14 2015 12:06 FabledIntegral wrote:
I think one point that should have been emphasized was that how Adepts are just so much worse vs marauders than zealots. Insanely worse, especially with Medivacs involved.


And marauders need much more shots to kill an adept than a zealot. Insanely worse, especially with Collosus involved.
[url]http://i.imgur.com/lw2yN.jpg[/url]
YyapSsap
Profile Joined September 2010
New Zealand1511 Posts
August 14 2015 03:37 GMT
#25
I know its abit of a rant but basically P players wanted more usability with zealots since they are slow even with charge and their effectiveness would decrease as the game goes by? Wouldn't it be wonderful if they can be useful throughout the game?

Blizzard heard this and introduced a new unit that completely shadows the zealot with a gimmicky ability and I think will get nerfed alot rendering that unit worthless or with the same balancing issues as most of these gimmicky units. Too many new units which does A when you do B one dimensional abilities that require baby sitting.

Couldn't they just given zealot legs and took away the charge? zealots with a speed upgrade would do wonders for that unit on top of readjusting their shields to hp ratio which someone on TL already analyzed (its beneficial!).

Beliskner
Profile Joined August 2015
111 Posts
August 14 2015 03:48 GMT
#26
On August 14 2015 12:25 Loccstana wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2015 12:06 FabledIntegral wrote:
I think one point that should have been emphasized was that how Adepts are just so much worse vs marauders than zealots. Insanely worse, especially with Medivacs involved.


And marauders need much more shots to kill an adept than a zealot. Insanely worse, especially with Collosus involved.


Yes, but the colossus is nerfed, warp gates are going to be severely nerfed, immortals...which also countered marauders more harshly are nerfed.

The communities main feedback of Protoss has always been to nerf warp gate and buff gateway units. That's what Blizzard has done. The damage output of the Protoss army is severely nerfed and other races have units introduced that makes it even easier to deal with it. The adept doesn't even have good damage, it's just a tank.

It seems that most people are bringing their old sentiments and feelings towards HoTS Protoss into LoTV and not really looking at changes in a holistic way.

Maybe the adept needs a 10 or 20 unit change in it's shield in some way or something, other than that it's a great step forward and a well thought out solution to some of the problems of the protoss army. Terrans seem to be beside themselves that Protoss have a gateway unit that in ways rivals theirs in terms of manoeuvrability and health (hello marauder in medivac).
Does the Adept stand up 1v1 verses marines and marauders? Fuck yeh it does, but is it really that amazing once the Terran get's literally ANY of their other units?... not really.
vikingvolley
Profile Joined August 2015
2 Posts
August 14 2015 04:01 GMT
#27
ded is the gaem

User was banned for this post.
WhaleOFaTale
Profile Joined June 2014
46 Posts
August 14 2015 05:01 GMT
#28
I hate the adept all together in its current role. It is essentially a zealot that can blink. It is not unique, just a hybrid. If protoss needs a tankier unit then so be it, but why does the unit HAVE to have an ability. Why not just take the ability away from the adept and increase its range or something. Abilities are added fun, but blizz might be trying to do too much with a unit who has a main purpose of tanking even better than the zealot
shin_toss
Profile Joined May 2010
Philippines2589 Posts
August 14 2015 05:40 GMT
#29
Didn't know you can cancel the transfer @_@.
AKMU / IU
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2141 Posts
August 14 2015 06:29 GMT
#30
On August 14 2015 09:10 Beliskner wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2015 08:06 [PkF] Wire wrote:
The adept is a tricky equation. The unit appears far too dominant in early game with its anti light bonus, to the point it poisons PvP openings. On the other hand, once midgame is reached it's actually an interesting unit that solidifies gateway compositions a LOT. I REALLY think adepts should require a twilight council.


Twilight council could work, but it feels like it's going to pidgin hole Protoss into twilight/blink/HT tech first even more. The adept is/should be essentially Protoss' roach/marauder it NEEDS to be available early game to support, solving the problem of fragile early game army.

I've heard the suggestion of removing 10 or 20 shield and moving it to the upgrade, that feels like a better solution but honestly it feels like the adept isn't THAT crazy good but people are just not fully adapted to playing against it. Let's not nerf it into the ground just because it's viable.

another option would be to keep it at cyber core tech but make the teleport ability require an upgrade (at twilight council perhaps), that way you keep the strong early game unit but delay the parts that feel the most "bullshitty" until later.
vibeo gane,
Cassalina
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States65 Posts
August 14 2015 08:11 GMT
#31
I'm not sure it fits as a gateway opener...like most people seem to suggest, it's probably worth testing the unit at the twilight council level. Main reason is because this unit is actually pretty effective in the mid game, and it dominates early game, also pushing the zealot away i think :\.

I don't think it's overpowered per se, but i do think it should be tested around a little more and maybe moved around the tech tree a bit before the game goes live. why not, it's beta right?

"advance solidly, fight solidly"
weikor
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Austria580 Posts
August 14 2015 08:43 GMT
#32
Ive found that I win many many games on the back of Adepts and carriers. As long as protoss cant really be contested in the very early and very late game - they are strong.
Beliskner
Profile Joined August 2015
111 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-14 12:10:08
August 14 2015 12:08 GMT
#33
On August 14 2015 17:11 Cassalina wrote:
also pushing the zealot away i think :\.


No that's the thing, it actually has great synergy with almost everything! zealots, High Templar, Archon, Shield Upgrade. It makes a whole other path available for Protoss to be played. . That's the beauty of the adept. If you shade against bio stutter stepping you can attack from the other side and sandwich with zealots and storm. Isn't that the micro you want? Then obviously if you're buffing medic vac de/load pickup micro against it you can have this good dynamic?
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24193 Posts
August 14 2015 12:17 GMT
#34
Add to this that forcefields (and maybe units) should be able to block adepts' shades. An adept shade should at least behave like a mineral walking probe, not go through everything like it does. Oh, and it shouldn't be cancellable.
Beliskner
Profile Joined August 2015
111 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-14 12:36:11
August 14 2015 12:25 GMT
#35
To the contrary, would I get so much hate if I said it should be not only cancellable but also finished early. It would be just so fun to use.

You could still balance it.
Beliskner
Profile Joined August 2015
111 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-14 12:37:27
August 14 2015 12:28 GMT
#36
Perhaps you could combine the stalker Blink and Adept shade into one upgrade at the Twilight.

And yeh you really need the force field change for early pvp.
Lexender
Profile Joined September 2013
Mexico2627 Posts
August 14 2015 12:59 GMT
#37
On August 14 2015 12:48 Beliskner wrote:
Yes, but the colossus is nerfed, warp gates are going to be severely nerfed, immortals...which also countered marauders more harshly are nerfed.



The marauder was nerfed quite a bit vs protoss with the 2 shot thing, so not only base armor units (like zealots) are stronger vs marauders but any protoss army is much stronger against them as long as they have guardian shield.
TheoMikkelsen
Profile Joined June 2013
Denmark196 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-14 13:38:06
August 14 2015 13:23 GMT
#38
I think the adept should be less polarized in damage. Reduce it to maybe 15/20 instead of 10/23 would make it still, perhaps stronger, in lategame while making PVP less... problematic. TVP and ZVP might still be relatively playable with the unit as is, but for early/midgame and especially if terran opens mech, dealing with adepts is extremely difficult.

I think the unit needs to be similar to the stalker, instead of extra damage to armored units, it does extra damage to light units but without the big gap.

I would like to see the ability not being unit-walkable so u can wall off against it as a protoss player. I think it is extremely concerning that phoenix vs phoenix and adepts are the core part of current PvP gameplay, and I do not think it is possible to theorize any alternative openers.
Any sufficiently cheesy build is indistinguishable in skill
andrewlt
Profile Joined August 2009
United States7702 Posts
August 14 2015 19:09 GMT
#39
All I could think of is that the adept's ability and shield upgrade would be really nice on zealots. Not sure we needed a new unit. That psionic transfer thing could even replace charge.
KT_Elwood
Profile Joined July 2015
Germany919 Posts
August 15 2015 10:17 GMT
#40
Nerf Reaper to be scout only, Give 230 HP Reaper to Protoss.

Adept sucks.
"First he eats our dogs, and then he taxes the penguins... Donald Trump truly is the Donald Trump of our generation. " -DPB
NEEDZMOAR
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1277 Posts
August 15 2015 13:04 GMT
#41
Protoss doesnt need 1 insanely strong gateway unit, Protoss needs multiple good gateway units. nerf the adept, buff the zealot and the stalker. remove the 2 second warpin from warp prisms, make it a dropship just like for every other race but maybe increase the capacity to twice as much?
Superbanana
Profile Joined May 2014
2369 Posts
August 15 2015 19:49 GMT
#42
The twilight suggestion is interesting, but how about a cheap cyber core upgrade? Maybe allowing them to swap with image or something like that. The goal is to allow the adepts to stay viable in the early and mid game, but kill the current PvP trend of adept vs adept.
A nerf to light bonus would prevent them from killing workers on 2 shots, and removing the swap with image almost kills early harass, but let them be good scouts and drops.
In PvZ the zerg can make the situation spire out of control but protoss can adept to the situation.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 54m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .191
Vindicta 102
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 11954
EffOrt 1241
firebathero 1206
Larva 635
BeSt 431
Mini 349
Nal_rA 260
Leta 192
ToSsGirL 78
Sharp 69
[ Show more ]
Sea.KH 62
Barracks 52
Shinee 51
Movie 38
GoRush 32
yabsab 28
Terrorterran 25
Hm[arnc] 20
Aegong 18
SilentControl 11
IntoTheRainbow 8
Dota 2
Gorgc9938
qojqva1786
XcaliburYe286
League of Legends
Dendi84
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor568
Liquid`Hasu164
Other Games
tarik_tv38477
gofns20134
FrodaN6800
singsing2308
B2W.Neo2039
DeMusliM730
shahzam551
crisheroes468
KnowMe323
XaKoH 220
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 1
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 73
• Adnapsc2 18
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler115
League of Legends
• Nemesis4701
Upcoming Events
FEL
54m
Elazer vs Spirit
Gerald vs MaNa
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3h 54m
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Wardi Open
20h 54m
Replay Cast
1d 19h
WardiTV European League
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.