• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:05
CEST 17:05
KST 00:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202569RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced9BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
What tournaments are world championships? #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Server Blocker The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 WardiTV Mondays FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Simple editing of Brood War save files? (.mlx) BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 629 users

Some thoughts on the disruptor

Forum Index > Legacy of the Void
Post a Reply
winsonsonho
Profile Joined October 2012
Korea (South)143 Posts
June 28 2015 23:39 GMT
#1
Whether or not this was a design decision, the Disruptor is a very very micro intensive unit. It behaves in a similar fashion to the High Templar and other castor units in that it does absolutely nothing if it is not microed - so the micro floor is already high. With good micro it can be very effective and can be kept alive with a warp prism in much the same way as the Reaver. The difference being that the Disruptor needs to be picked up somewhere in the front lines of the opposing army, hopefully after having killed or at least damaged a good portion of it. It is very much a reincarnation of the Reaver, in that it is basically a controlled, more powerful, costly, reusable Scarab. The issue I find with the 'Scarab' is that it is generally harder to use and keep alive than the Reaver.

To list some of the important differences - the Disruptor differs from the Reaver in that it:
  • can do a lot more damage with a single hit (probably less micro per Disrupter for a pro because of cooldown)
  • is more mobile
  • needs more micro to be useful (higher skill floor - not sure about the skill ceiling)
  • when it 'attacks' it is more vulnerable (needs more micro to keep alive)

Blizzard have said that they are aware of the issues with the Disruptor and are looking at fixes. I feel however that any fixes are only going to make it a more complex unit which is not good for the game for a number of reasons. I feel it will always have the one glaring flaw of being too similar to the High Templar in that it cannot do damage without an ability. The Collosus, in contrast to both the Reaver and Disruptor, was very powerful and was only marginally more powerful with increased skill. This in my opinion is the major reason the Collosus was a horribly designed unit. Protoss needed a powerful and expensive unit but it was so easy to use and abuse that it was given an Achilles heel, it's fragility to air. So a bad design was 'fixed' with a bad design and now has been redesigned superbly by making it essentially useless. I think units generally need to be useful/good in the hands of a less skilled player and much better in the hands of a very skilled player.

The Reaver will always be a superior unit in my opinion. It did good AOE damage and could be useful defensively and offensively without much micro, but when microed well became a lot more useful and powerful. This is definitely in contrast with how the Disrupter operates and I think does the opposite of what Blizzard wants it to do - be useful to noobs and pros and counterable by noobs and pros. But Blizzard like to make things as new as possible and 'cool' as possible even if they have to do more work, waste their own time and make their 'fans' unhappy. This I think is the fatal flaw - if you want to recreate something and do not generally take what is tried and tested and worked well in the past and build on it incrementally you will most likely get a mess. They seem to not want to bring the Reaver back but they bring it's flawed cousin in instead. If blizzard bring the Reaver back or at least it's very similar brother(Dark Reaver perhaps - lol), LOTV will be better for it and I'm sure many in the community will celebrate with wine, beer, and/or delicious juice or even sparkling water.

The silver lining waffle:
+ Show Spoiler +
It's great that Blizzard are communicating way more and more openly, the Lurker is back, Protoss have a strong Gateway unit, and Forcefields are more easily countered, among many other things (you might have noticed that Terran need some love - maybe a Goliath instead of the Cyclone). If the partnership between Blizzard and the community can keep growing in strength, we can iron out a lot more of the flaws in this great game together. Everything has flaws, but you do a good job when you do your best in minimising the flaws.


Replies don't help as much as polls so let's vote on the unit that is taking the place of the Collosus:
Poll: Disruptor, Reaver or something else

The Disruptor is awesome (15)
 
25%

The Disruptor will be awesome with some changes (11)
 
19%

The Reaver is superior (9)
 
15%

Please design a totally new unit Blizzard (24)
 
41%

59 total votes

Your vote: Disruptor, Reaver or something else

(Vote): The Disruptor is awesome
(Vote): The Disruptor will be awesome with some changes
(Vote): The Reaver is superior
(Vote): Please design a totally new unit Blizzard

winsonsonho
Profile Joined October 2012
Korea (South)143 Posts
July 08 2015 17:03 GMT
#2
Well this was a fail in terms of replies . And the title should have maybe been: "Some thoughts on the Disruptor and Poll".

Anyways, seeing as there is some more conversation on the disruptor these days I'd also like to add that I dislike the all or nothing behaviour of the Disruptor. It either leads to the disruptor making up very well for it's high micro requirement and cost or very much wasting it all.

Any comments on my opening post would also be appreciated even if it's to say that I was totally illogical.
DinoMight
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States3725 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-07-08 21:43:48
July 08 2015 21:42 GMT
#3
I think there is an abundance of these threads and people have gotten tired of talking about it.

Blizzard said themselves in a statement that they're looking into the Disruptor. So it's subject to change and there isn't much of a point talking at length about it right now.

In my opinion the Disruptor is a fun unit that interacts well with the Warp prism and encourages both micro by the player using it and counter micro by the opponent. That said, it does feel all or nothing in that if it detonates it annihilates everything and if it doesn't get a good hit it simply just dies VERY cost ineffectively.

Maybe tuning down the damage and the cooldown would be good fixes, but there is still the worry that unless it kills everything near it it just dies instantly before it can be saved.

"Wtf I come back and find myself in camp DinoMight all of a sudden, feels weird man." -Wombat_NI
mantequilla
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
Turkey779 Posts
July 08 2015 22:51 GMT
#4
Once opponent gets to a certain level of skill, distruptor would get obsolete. They are just another gimmicky protoss unit imo. No belief in them.
Age of Mythology forever!
Spect8rCraft
Profile Joined December 2012
649 Posts
July 08 2015 23:08 GMT
#5
The problem I have with disruptors is that it honestly feels like Blizzard is trying to shoehorn baneling micro against Protoss, and naturally scaling up a baneling makes it more all-or-nothing. It's kind of the same feeling I had with the widow mine; they're all big-hitting expendables. And again Blizzard is trying to make a big-hitting expendable not expendable, so it's all just a medley of contradictory design philosophies.
Brutaxilos
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States2629 Posts
July 09 2015 00:12 GMT
#6
I honestly think the Disruptor is an overall great design, but it overlaps with High Templars and Colossus already. Since HTs are pretty iconic to the game, I would be okay if the colossus was removed or changed significantly to another role.
Jangbi favorite player. Forever~ CJ herO the King of IEM. BOMBERRRRRRRR. Sexy Boy Rogue. soO #1! Oliveira China Represent!
cordellb
Profile Joined July 2015
United States19 Posts
July 09 2015 02:22 GMT
#7
give the disruptor Cloak, Feedback, and Vortex (the old mothership spell) and it will be a good unit.
winsonsonho
Profile Joined October 2012
Korea (South)143 Posts
July 09 2015 16:22 GMT
#8
On July 09 2015 08:08 Spect8rCraft wrote:
The problem I have with disruptors is that it honestly feels like Blizzard is trying to shoehorn baneling micro against Protoss, and naturally scaling up a baneling makes it more all-or-nothing. It's kind of the same feeling I had with the widow mine; they're all big-hitting expendables. And again Blizzard is trying to make a big-hitting expendable not expendable, so it's all just a medley of contradictory design philosophies.


And Protoss should not have an expendable unit, it goes against their racial trait and 'history'. But I'm sure blizzard will try make it less expendable, but I do not see how they will find an elegant solution, if they do Kudos to them..

On July 09 2015 09:12 Brutaxilos wrote:
I honestly think the Disruptor is an overall great design, but it overlaps with High Templars and Colossus already. Since HTs are pretty iconic to the game, I would be okay if the colossus was removed or changed significantly to another role.


It is definitely an interesting unit but it has some glaring flaws gameplay-wise imo. I agree that it does overlap more with High Templar than the Reaver would but I will also take the Disruptor over the Collosus any day.
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
July 09 2015 16:33 GMT
#9
I think if the High Templar wasnt in the game the Disruptor would be great. But right now, to me it feels like these two units do pretty much the same thing. A unit you have to babysit and micro in order to deal high AoE damage that can hit your own units if you are not careful.

I think what was good about the Reaver was the auto-attack in combination with a really slow attack speed. The slow attack speed made each individual shot so very important. The difference between good micro and bad micro was to control where the scarab would go and land. Target fire units in the center for maximum splash damage. But do it in a way that the scarab will find its target.

Sometimes slow attack speed can actually be a source for micro potential if each individual attack counts and target firing makes a huge difference.
EddieSC
Profile Joined July 2015
1 Post
July 09 2015 18:42 GMT
#10
What about it generating a shield based on how many units it killed with the blast?

Would reward good micro immensely and fix the vulnerability issue in a fair way.

I just love the unit, but it indeed needs some work, would love to hear some feedback on the shield idea.
DinoMight
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States3725 Posts
July 10 2015 17:36 GMT
#11
On July 10 2015 03:42 EddieSC wrote:
What about it generating a shield based on how many units it killed with the blast?

Would reward good micro immensely and fix the vulnerability issue in a fair way.

I just love the unit, but it indeed needs some work, would love to hear some feedback on the shield idea.


Well the problem is that if it kills everything it doesn't need the shields and if it doesn't, IT DOES because it's at melee range with no attack.

So that idea is backwards from what the Disruptor actually needs.
"Wtf I come back and find myself in camp DinoMight all of a sudden, feels weird man." -Wombat_NI
winsonsonho
Profile Joined October 2012
Korea (South)143 Posts
July 17 2015 13:46 GMT
#12
Great update to the Disruptor Blizzard... Somehow you've actually made this unit a whole lot worse. lol

As I discussed in the OP, this unit is going to be impossible to fix into a non-gimmicky, balanced and enjoyable unit. I would place bets on that. Good luck Blizzard!
FrkFrJss
Profile Joined April 2015
Canada1205 Posts
July 17 2015 14:22 GMT
#13
I'm not sure if it is worse than before, but now it very similar to a High Templar.

Radius for both abilities is 1.5
Disruptor costs 100/200 vs High Templar 50/150 (not counting storm)
Both units benefit greatly from Warp prism use
Both have aoe abilities.
Both are from two different tech paths.

The main differences is that ghosts counter high templars whereas disruptors have....no counters when they attack or immediately after they attack. With a 3-second invulnerability and faster moving speed immediately after the attack, warp prisms will be able to be within range to pick it up without being automatically in the range of vikings.

I would personally like to see something that provided perhaps a more skillful use as described above, but I cannot say that this iteration is inherently bad or worse.

I mean, really, if we look at any of the aoe that is in game, I don't think that many people would describe it as "enjoyable."

I mean, how often have we heard complains about storm, widow mines, fungal growth, blinding cloud. I think tanks and hellions are really the only aoe that people don't really complain about. Or, how often have we heard complaints about ghosts, high templars, vipers, infestors, or the already-mentioned widowmines?

What I am saying is that I doubt any aoe that Blizzard makes for Protoss will truly be "enjoyed" by the community..
"Keep Moving Forward" - Walt Disney
Clear World
Profile Joined April 2015
125 Posts
July 17 2015 18:52 GMT
#14
On July 17 2015 23:22 FrkFrJss wrote:
What I am saying is that I doubt any aoe that Blizzard makes for Protoss will truly be "enjoyed" by the community..


To be prefecty fair. A huge amount of people within the community didn't even WANT another high tier AoE unit. A good amount people wanted Gateway to improve so their relieant on that didn't need to exist. So yeah. They can try as much as they want, but there's going to be a decent size segement that detest the notion of another AoE unit. Though, a very binary concept didn't help the Disruptor to be well loved as a whole.
:p <-- this is my sarcasm face
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
14:00
Bracket Day 1
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .403
BRAT_OK 100
ProTech69
MindelVK 37
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 56250
Bisu 3641
Horang2 2918
Shuttle 2171
Jaedong 1924
Flash 1552
Barracks 1214
BeSt 1063
EffOrt 818
firebathero 451
[ Show more ]
Larva 347
Nal_rA 300
Rush 214
GuemChi 180
Soulkey 174
Soma 159
sorry 95
Dewaltoss 73
Hyun 70
Light 59
Sea.KH 54
Shinee 52
sas.Sziky 44
JYJ37
zelot 36
Aegong 24
sSak 18
scan(afreeca) 17
Terrorterran 14
IntoTheRainbow 9
Stormgate
BeoMulf126
Dota 2
Gorgc6006
qojqva3248
XaKoH 529
420jenkins387
XcaliburYe348
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m3282
sgares329
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor470
Other Games
singsing2035
B2W.Neo1215
Beastyqt953
Fuzer 257
KnowMe86
kaitlyn54
Trikslyr14
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH343
• Adnapsc2 19
• Dystopia_ 4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2990
League of Legends
• Nemesis2728
Upcoming Events
CSO Cup
55m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2h 55m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
17h 55m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
22h 55m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 2h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL Team Wars
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.