EPT[Patch 4.21] Rek'Sai General Discussion - Page 40
| Forum Index > LoL General |
Starting Page 94 spamming will in GD will be warned, please don't post for the sake of post count. Keep it civil. Please take website feedback to http://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/website-feedback/ | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
On December 22 2014 17:15 GolemMadness wrote: Biscuit is better early, runic affinity is better mid/late. It's partially personal preference. If you think you need the extra sustain early, then take biscuit. If not, take runic affinity. As a note, I don't think the biscuit mastery is actually working. | ||
|
JazzVortical
Australia1825 Posts
On December 22 2014 17:12 justiceknight wrote: regarding AP masteries, how do i know which 1 is better to take for my AP hero? the biscuit or the 20% buff? I am trying out the biscuit at the moment for sustain since the 7 mins blue is kinda too long for me. Depends on your champ and preference. I prefer taking the 3 movespeed, 3 mana regen and 3 summoner cooldown over both biscuit and buff duration. I don't like buff duration because on my solo queue voyages I can't rely on getting buffs, so if I had to choose between biscuit and buff duration I'd go biscuit. Biscuit feels a little underwhelming to me, but I can see the appeal if you need more sustain. There's no straight up better choice really. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
Simberto
Germany11960 Posts
On December 22 2014 18:53 zulu_nation8 wrote: i'm convinced the girls can only be good at support thing is only in NA, there's at least two Chinese streams I've seen that has D1/Challenger legit 420 mechanics girls, one gets consistent 20k+ viewers. Also the money Chinese streamers make in general is pretty insane. Does "legit 420 mechanics" mean you play as if you were high? | ||
|
Sponkz
Denmark4564 Posts
On December 22 2014 19:49 Simberto wrote: Does "legit 420 mechanics" mean you play as if you were high? 420 mechanics is when you smoke and get better. The idea is, that weed makes you more relaxed, so if you're a very hyper-active player, you end up doing shit loads of mistakes if you're sober. Then when you smoke weed, you stop flaming, you tryhard and generally just durr around without having no idea what the hell you're doing. I got diamond 1 this way, legit legit legit legit. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
I'm of the opinion that it is a cultural thing more than any actual physical limitation. | ||
|
Vanka
China1336 Posts
On December 22 2014 23:11 Amui wrote: Well I have a female friend who's diamond 1 and much better than I am so there's that. I'm of the opinion that it is a cultural thing more than any actual physical limitation. well technically there'd be also women who could also kick your ass physically, but that's not proof of anything biologically. Girls tend to have more pressure than boys to do things that are less socially acceptable/safe/etc. A girl wouldn't be encouraged to try to start their own company or become a novelist or whatever the same way a boy is. China just has a large population so the number of girls who don't care about that is higher, so there's more likely to be talent that comes out than in NA. Chinese girls can't have boyfriends in high school (nor boys girlfriends) or have to hide them so they tend to spend more time online (this is my own conjecture though), so they ought to be a little more technologically able too. | ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
| ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
| ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On December 22 2014 23:11 Amui wrote: Well I have a female friend who's diamond 1 and much better than I am so there's that. I'm of the opinion that it is a cultural thing more than any actual physical limitation. It's one of those things that are so marred by cultural pressures that it's hard to do any strict scientific studies on. However things like reaction time, and spacial visualization ability have all been shown to favor males by a pretty large margin. | ||
|
Prog
United Kingdom1470 Posts
On December 23 2014 01:22 wei2coolman wrote: It's one of those things that are so marred by cultural pressures that it's hard to do any strict scientific studies on. However things like reaction time, and spacial visualization ability have all been shown to favor males by a pretty large margin. Source(s)? | ||
Chexx
Korea (South)11232 Posts
If he can link any studies to "how it reflects on gaming" I will applaud him otherwise he gets the AMOR award | ||
|
killerdog
Denmark6522 Posts
After looking at 10+ papers, http://www.iosrphr.org/papers/v2i3/R023452454.pdf is the only one which seems to be even vaguely credible, but tbh that difference seems pretty minimal. (And even this one reads like a highschool psych project -.-) Besides, these low count studies don't account for the fact that top level players are likely to be in the top percentile of their gender with regards to reaction times anyway, and I can't find any research into whether the top x% of males are faster then the top x% of females, or if it's just the average curve is slightly lower for females, but they peak around the same place. Basically all these studies are irrelevant for the purposes of judging gender differences in top level athletes. Not to mention it completely ignores potential externalities, fx the possibility that traditional "male" activities (sports, gaming etc) potentially being very good conduits through which to train reaction time, something which can often be improved by 10-20% just through practice, which would more then cover the difference. Spacial visualization as an advantage in gaming just going into buzzword territory at this point though >.> I could just as easily say "women are better at multitasking so they should die to ganks less" and it would have just as much grounding in science. tldr: wei2 pls + Show Spoiler + Also found this amusing ![[image loading]](http://biology.clemson.edu/bpc/bp/Lab/110/Rxn_Review2.gif) New LCS strat of *slightly* arousing your opponents during pre-match interviews? | ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
On December 23 2014 02:58 killerdog wrote: After looking at 10+ papers, http://www.iosrphr.org/papers/v2i3/R023452454.pdf is the only one which seems to be even vaguely credible, but tbh that difference seems pretty minimal. (And even this one reads like a highschool psych project -.-) Besides, these low count studies don't account for the fact that top level players are likely to be in the top percentile of their gender with regards to reaction times anyway, and I can't find any research into whether the top x% of males are faster then the top x% of females, or if it's just the average curve is slightly lower for females, but they peak around the same place. Basically all these studies are irrelevant for the purposes of judging gender differences in top level athletes. Not to mention it completely ignores potential externalities, fx the possibility that traditional "male" activities (sports, gaming etc) potentially being very good conduits through which to train reaction time, something which can often be improved by 10-20% just through practice, which would more then cover the difference. Spacial visualization as an advantage in gaming just going into buzzword territory at this point though >.> I could just as easily say "women are better at multitasking so they should die to ganks less" and it would have just as much grounding in science. tldr: wei2 pls + Show Spoiler + Also found this amusing New LCS strat of *slightly* arousing your opponents during pre-match interviews? No wonder watch's team always seems to not do that well even with good players. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
Spacial visualization comparisons have been shown in DAT testing (there's pretty significant difference between male and female for the spacial visualization section of DAT). This is probably the most well known documented report, but there are plenty of other studies that have shown similar results. There's been ton of reaction time studies showing same thing. Another thing to note is how normal curves tend to work, 1sd difference significantly impacts upperend when comparing two groups. @amui also cultural impact can also impacts genetic selection. Hunter gatherer relations have also been a natural selector in terms of gene pool. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
| ||
