|
United States47024 Posts
On September 28 2013 01:45 wei2coolman wrote:
Does Hydra's AoE crit?
Hydra's Cleave does a fixed % of your AD, so no.
On September 28 2013 01:49 Requizen wrote:
Old Tiamat would, not new one.
Mechanically they're different. Old Tiamat splashed % of physical damage dealt, so it would also splash physical damage modifiers like the base damage on GP's Parley.
New Tiamat splashes % of AD, which means irrespective of other additions to your damage, the splash damage is always determined by your AD.
|
United States47024 Posts
|
|
|
On September 28 2013 01:50 TheYango wrote:Hydra's Cleave does a fixed % of your AD, so no. Mechanically they're different. Old Tiamat splashed % of physical damage dealt, so it would also splash physical damage modifiers like the base damage on GP's Parley. New Tiamat splashes % of AD, which means irrespective of other additions to your damage, the splash damage is always determined by your AD.
Hmm okay, that's what I thought. They should totally let Hydra allow crit, Melee ADC's plz.
|
Baa?21244 Posts
On September 28 2013 01:28 TheYango wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 01:14 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:
"in general people have not considered this when choosing supports" definitely implies that people -should- be considernig it. What, no. That statement doesn't have to carry that implication at all.
Should have a poll.
|
On September 28 2013 02:19 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 01:28 TheYango wrote:On September 28 2013 01:14 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:
"in general people have not considered this when choosing supports" definitely implies that people -should- be considernig it. What, no. That statement doesn't have to carry that implication at all. Should have a poll.
Should have a 1v1 jungle game.
|
On September 28 2013 02:19 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 01:28 TheYango wrote:On September 28 2013 01:14 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:
"in general people have not considered this when choosing supports" definitely implies that people -should- be considernig it. What, no. That statement doesn't have to carry that implication at all. Should have a poll.
I'm actually with Cheep on this. When I originally read it, it definitely had that implication, but I seriously doubt Yango really meant people should look into drafting late game supports, when the average games ends at like 30 minutes.
|
It comes into play a bit more in Dota where when behind a team can be forced to funnel farm imperfectly due to map pressure/safety concerns.
Worrying about your 6item support's farm is silly, but including some means to get your jungler sufficient farm early-ish that they could pick up the off-lane farm later would probably be pretty powerful. Ofc it's so far down the priority list that teams would have to be really good, and really evenly matched for it to hold any real significance in Lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Baa?21244 Posts
On September 28 2013 02:32 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 02:23 wei2coolman wrote:On September 28 2013 02:19 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:On September 28 2013 01:28 TheYango wrote:On September 28 2013 01:14 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:
"in general people have not considered this when choosing supports" definitely implies that people -should- be considernig it. What, no. That statement doesn't have to carry that implication at all. Should have a poll. I'm actually with Cheep on this. When I originally read it, it definitely had that implication, but I seriously doubt Yango really meant people should look into drafting late game supports, when the average games ends at like 30 minutes. I'm the opposite. Saying that people don't do something doesn't imply that they should be doing it. A lot of people make that assumption, but it's not implied in the statement. "in General people have not considered if the Tshirt they wore was manufactured on a Tuesday" That in no way implies you should consider if it was on a Tuesday. If you take it as such you are reading into the statement and making assumtions. The statement it self is just a fact statement on what people consider when making a decision.
taking the statement in isolation is a bit silly and i only did it cause i was too lazy to copypasta his whole post
when taken in context, it definitely had the sense of "maybe people should consider this" for me
|
Baa?21244 Posts
On September 28 2013 02:34 remedium wrote:
The dog did not bark.
The dog did nothing?
|
South Africa35471 Posts
On September 28 2013 02:34 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 02:32 JimmiC wrote:On September 28 2013 02:23 wei2coolman wrote:On September 28 2013 02:19 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:On September 28 2013 01:28 TheYango wrote:On September 28 2013 01:14 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:
"in general people have not considered this when choosing supports" definitely implies that people -should- be considernig it. What, no. That statement doesn't have to carry that implication at all. Should have a poll. I'm actually with Cheep on this. When I originally read it, it definitely had that implication, but I seriously doubt Yango really meant people should look into drafting late game supports, when the average games ends at like 30 minutes. I'm the opposite. Saying that people don't do something doesn't imply that they should be doing it. A lot of people make that assumption, but it's not implied in the statement. "in General people have not considered if the Tshirt they wore was manufactured on a Tuesday" That in no way implies you should consider if it was on a Tuesday. If you take it as such you are reading into the statement and making assumtions. The statement it self is just a fact statement on what people consider when making a decision. taking the statement in isolation is a bit silly and i only did it cause i was too lazy to copypasta his whole post when taken in context, it definitely had the sense of "maybe people should consider this" for me
Are you sure you don't see that implication because if you were the one writing it you would have wanted such implication? Feel that's often the case when reading text from another person.
|
On September 28 2013 02:40 Numy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 02:34 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:On September 28 2013 02:32 JimmiC wrote:On September 28 2013 02:23 wei2coolman wrote:On September 28 2013 02:19 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:On September 28 2013 01:28 TheYango wrote:On September 28 2013 01:14 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:
"in general people have not considered this when choosing supports" definitely implies that people -should- be considernig it. What, no. That statement doesn't have to carry that implication at all. Should have a poll. I'm actually with Cheep on this. When I originally read it, it definitely had that implication, but I seriously doubt Yango really meant people should look into drafting late game supports, when the average games ends at like 30 minutes. I'm the opposite. Saying that people don't do something doesn't imply that they should be doing it. A lot of people make that assumption, but it's not implied in the statement. "in General people have not considered if the Tshirt they wore was manufactured on a Tuesday" That in no way implies you should consider if it was on a Tuesday. If you take it as such you are reading into the statement and making assumtions. The statement it self is just a fact statement on what people consider when making a decision. taking the statement in isolation is a bit silly and i only did it cause i was too lazy to copypasta his whole post when taken in context, it definitely had the sense of "maybe people should consider this" for me Are you sure you don't see that implication because if you were the one writing it you would have wanted such implication? Feel that's often the case when reading text from another person.
I dunno, we often see the question "how come xyz isn't drafted anymore?"
It sort of implies to everyone else that the person still thinks "xyz" is still viable.
|
I don't think it's much different than the romanians(&sarcasm). Some things would be easy to understand when speaking, but without tonal context, it suddenly is much more ambiguous.
|
On September 28 2013 02:43 wei2coolman wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 02:40 Numy wrote:On September 28 2013 02:34 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:On September 28 2013 02:32 JimmiC wrote:On September 28 2013 02:23 wei2coolman wrote:On September 28 2013 02:19 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:On September 28 2013 01:28 TheYango wrote:On September 28 2013 01:14 Carnivorous Sheep wrote:
"in general people have not considered this when choosing supports" definitely implies that people -should- be considernig it. What, no. That statement doesn't have to carry that implication at all. Should have a poll. I'm actually with Cheep on this. When I originally read it, it definitely had that implication, but I seriously doubt Yango really meant people should look into drafting late game supports, when the average games ends at like 30 minutes. I'm the opposite. Saying that people don't do something doesn't imply that they should be doing it. A lot of people make that assumption, but it's not implied in the statement. "in General people have not considered if the Tshirt they wore was manufactured on a Tuesday" That in no way implies you should consider if it was on a Tuesday. If you take it as such you are reading into the statement and making assumtions. The statement it self is just a fact statement on what people consider when making a decision. taking the statement in isolation is a bit silly and i only did it cause i was too lazy to copypasta his whole post when taken in context, it definitely had the sense of "maybe people should consider this" for me Are you sure you don't see that implication because if you were the one writing it you would have wanted such implication? Feel that's often the case when reading text from another person. I dunno, we often see the question "how come xyz isn't drafted anymore?" It sort of implies to everyone else that the person still thinks "xyz" is still viable.
Or it's just Shikyo playing a new champion.
|
|
|
about jinx, they should obviously switch her Q and W right? Q is not the right key to put a toggle on.
|
so ive noticed that the quality of games has definitely decreased as the season has come to an end, so many silvers queing with gold and plat trying to have their friend carry them to an elise skin and the games are just horrible
does this always happen at the end of a season
|
Baa?21244 Posts
On September 28 2013 02:50 FinestHour wrote:
does this always happen at the end of a season
ya
you should start trolling games to crush some dreams
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
