EPTOn December 28 2012 07:42 NeoIllusions wrote:
I don't have Santa Baron either. :<
But I'm using my Beta Rammus anyways. :D
I don't have Santa Baron either. :<
But I'm using my Beta Rammus anyways. :D
OG Show Off.
[Patch 1.0.0.153: Preseason Balance Update 1] GD - Page 173
| Forum Index > LoL General |
AsmodeusXI
United States15536 Posts
OG Show Off. | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On December 28 2012 07:42 NeoIllusions wrote: I don't have Santa Baron either. :< But I'm using my Beta Rammus anyways. :D This BM Neo mods us all when he's a bad person himself. GG. We got fucked by TL. | ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
Take that Roffles! | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
Mondeezy
United States1938 Posts
On December 28 2012 07:44 Requizen wrote: I've been sporting my Santa Baron just for you all, TL. :D Is Santa Baron really that rare? I have it, but I thought it was fairly simple to obtain since most of my close friends have it as well :S | ||
|
LaNague
Germany9118 Posts
oh look, wetdreams team is cheating, what a surprise. | ||
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
| ||
|
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On December 28 2012 08:36 LaNague wrote: oh look, wetdreams team is cheating, what a surprise. lol... to be fair, what aL.na did has nothing to do with wetdream. Kinda amusing coincidence though. haha | ||
|
AsnSensation
Germany24009 Posts
| ||
|
samthesaluki
914 Posts
| ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
On December 28 2012 07:42 NeoIllusions wrote: I don't have Santa Baron either. :< But I'm using my Beta Rammus anyways. :D I'd be more impressed if it was a Master Yi icon. *sunglasses* Wuju think Riot would of put one in by now. | ||
|
UniversalSnip
9871 Posts
On December 28 2012 06:27 Simberto wrote: I don't see how being able to make a statement to the tribunal would be a "horrible idea". Being able to defend oneself is an important part of a just punishment system. At the moment, the accuser could basically lie about anything that would not be seen in the logs. For example, if someone starts flaming in the postgame lobby, or obviously trolls in the pregame lobby, i will state that in the report with a description or quote of what they said. I am pretty sure that the people judging the tribunal do not completely ignore such a statement. I am a honest person, thus i only write stuff in there that is actually true. However, someone could very well just make up random shit, and the accused would be unable to respond in any way to that. I have never been banned or warned by the Tribunal, and i don't fear that it will happen because i know that my behaviour in game does not warrant it. However, i fail to see how transparency and a right to defend yourself could ever be a bad idea. cuz it's a joke. this isn't a just punishment system, as far as I can tell it isn't designed to be, it's intended to get toxic people out of the game, or to shut up, for the benefit of the rest of us. Strictly utilitarian, just making the game better, not satisfying abstract principles like a legal system is supposed to. Just by statistical means like requiring a large number of reports from credible reporters and requiring multiple cases for even a temp ban they seem to have gotten the false positive rate to a level I'm more than comfortable with, once that's the case I'm happy to take a hit to some nebulous measure of fairness in favor of efficiency. Allowing players to defend themselves is literally one of the worst possible methods of dealing with the problem you cite. - It hangs up the tribunal because now every case has to wait a period of time that allows the person under examination to reply before they can be judged. - it doesn't actually solve the problem which is that people who troll pre/postgame AREN'T being judged guilty - it actually has completely the opposite effect and exacerbates the issue. - it means that innocent people can now see when they are in the tribunal (DISASTER) and will feel pressured to defend themselves (nightmare scenario. the way this will read is that you get an email that, to them, effectively says "explain yourself now or be banned"). - not to mention it doesn't work efficiently with people who act properly but have poor english skills. The proper way to handle pre/postgame trolling is to add the pre/post chat logs to the tribunal, which I am certain they will do eventually. Makes no sense to implement some awful system where you try to act as your own lawyer to sway the tribunal voters. The game is recorded, they check the recording and vote on whether you're a jerk, you don't need representation for this process cuz it aint law. | ||
|
Inschato
Canada1349 Posts
| ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
| ||
|
nojitosunrise
United States6188 Posts
http://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/15jebv/my_name_is_nick_allen_and_i_am_the_league_of/c7n0ip6 With Riot's Season 3 plans, IPL6 will look vastly different. With that being said, I am not sure the IPL5 level of competition will be seen again until Season 3 World Champs. IPL5 was easily one of the most enjoyable tournaments of 2012, sucks that we aren't going to see anything like that for a very very long time. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19573 Posts
On December 28 2012 09:18 UniversalSnip wrote: cuz it's a joke. this isn't a just punishment system, as far as I can tell it isn't designed to be, it's intended to get toxic people out of the game, or to shut up, for the benefit of the rest of us. Strictly utilitarian, just making the game better, not satisfying abstract principles like a legal system is supposed to. Just by statistical means like requiring a large number of reports from credible reporters and requiring multiple cases for even a temp ban they seem to have gotten the false positive rate to a level I'm more than comfortable with, once that's the case I'm happy to take a hit to some nebulous measure of fairness in favor of efficiency. Allowing players to defend themselves is literally one of the worst possible methods of dealing with the problem you cite. - It hangs up the tribunal because now every case has to wait a period of time that allows the person under examination to reply before they can be judged. - it doesn't actually solve the problem which is that people who troll pre/postgame AREN'T being judged guilty - it actually has completely the opposite effect and exacerbates the issue. - it means that innocent people can now see when they are in the tribunal (DISASTER) and will feel pressured to defend themselves (nightmare scenario. the way this will read is that you get an email that, to them, effectively says "explain yourself now or be banned"). - not to mention it doesn't work efficiently with people who act properly but have poor english skills. The proper way to handle pre/postgame trolling is to add the pre/post chat logs to the tribunal, which I am certain they will do eventually. Makes no sense to implement some awful system where you try to act as your own lawyer to sway the tribunal voters. The game is recorded, they check the recording and vote on whether you're a jerk, you don't need representation for this process cuz it aint law. Innocent people SHOULD see when they are in the tribunal, even if they need not defend themselves. This can let them counter-report people who reported for nonsense. or let them see what is pissing people off (even if its not punished). | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On December 28 2012 09:44 nojitosunrise wrote: Well...my jimmies are rustled http://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/15jebv/my_name_is_nick_allen_and_i_am_the_league_of/c7n0ip6 IPL5 was easily one of the most enjoyable tournaments of 2012, sucks that we aren't going to see anything like that for a very very long time. I thought everyone knew that was what was going to happen with the Riot Season 3 stuff. All the top teams are Riot teams and they only play in Riot events. | ||
|
Perplex
United States1693 Posts
On December 28 2012 09:53 Numy wrote: I thought everyone knew that was what was going to happen with the Riot Season 3 stuff. All the top teams are Riot teams and they only play in Riot events. doesn't make our jimmies any less rustled :\ | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
 Should have been rustled when this was first known! Can't do much about it now if you wanted I guess. Not saying something needs to be done though. | ||
|
kainzero
United States5211 Posts
On December 28 2012 09:40 Numy wrote: Watching wings play Xerath then read his chat and everyone is saying how cool Xerath is as if they have never seen it before. Kind of sad how fotm our community is :< all communities have their bandwagons in american football, the spread offense became fotm in college and the wildcat offense became fotm at the pro level. not like it matters anyway though, just play whatever you wanna play | ||
| ||
