• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:21
CEST 07:21
KST 14:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation12$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 555 users

"You're Better Than You Think" thread from Blizz

Forum Index > Hearthstone General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
MarcoBrei
Profile Joined May 2011
Brazil66 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-20 12:33:55
September 20 2014 12:30 GMT
#1
So Blizzard announced what I suspect to be true, about the ladder distribution. Most players are at the bottom and very few at the top. But the discrepancy is bigger than I thought. An enormous amount of players don't manage to get rank 15 in ladder, as the image below shows.
I actually feel a little better knowing that, I reached rank 11 with less than 100 matches in a month. While I though I was doing "average", I actually let 90% of players behind, playing "few games" compared to many people.

The question I ask is: why Blizzard makes such kind of ranking? When people see a rank from 25 to 1, will naturally think the rank 12 as the "middle", where an average player shoul be. Also, frustration about performance is a major reason for people abandoning a game.
They could have done a rank from 10 to 1, where higher ranks had "subranks", like 4.5 to 4.1, and 1.10 to 1.1. Or used a lot more "stars", I don't know, there must be a better way to display the ranking.
What also worries is: when players get a lot frustrated from not getting higher ranks they may abandon the game, shrinking the player database and bringing to bottom some players which were at the top, doing a snowball effect which may do something like what I think happened to starcraft 2.

[image loading]
Link: http://us.battle.net/hearthstone/en/blog/15955974

EDIT: now I'm a bit more convinced this simulation about arena distribution may be very close to real:
http://www.liquidhearth.com/forum/hearthstone/457079-computer-simulation-to-understand-arena-results
I guess it's possible that Blizzard releases the Arena distribution either, so we may confirm.
Qwicker
Profile Joined January 2014
United Kingdom0 Posts
September 20 2014 12:40 GMT
#2
Not sure how accurate this is. Last season i got like rank 15, but only because i played very few games. Previous seasons i would get to high ranks and legend. Also, i doubt every single of the 2 million player base plays a single game the entire season. When i got to rank 15, i went 11-1, but because i didn't play ranked for the rest of the season, i didn't advance any higher. Still kinda cool though, to know that potentially I am in the top few % in the world, thanks for the information :D
Quotes are only for the inspirational
MrSexington
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1768 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-20 13:01:25
September 20 2014 12:54 GMT
#3
A little misleading.

You have to further break it down to people who actually try to climb the ladder that season and people who have access to all the legendaries. I would like to see the data from that pool of players.

I have all the cards and I can get to rank 5 in any season if I try, but I'm probably a middling player at best -- exactly as good as I think I am.

(The best I've gotten is rank 2. I can't get those last couple wins.)

Nice try, Blizzard.


edit: Almost by definition, if you have a 51%+ win rate, you can get to rank 5 if you play enough games. This is because of win streaks. If you take all the people who play many games a season and have all the cards, my guess is that the true 51st percentile is around rank 5. (I think.)
MarcoBrei
Profile Joined May 2011
Brazil66 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-20 13:03:53
September 20 2014 12:54 GMT
#4
On September 20 2014 21:40 Qwicker wrote:
Not sure how accurate this is. Last season i got like rank 15, but only because i played very few games. Previous seasons i would get to high ranks and legend. Also, i doubt every single of the 2 million player base plays a single game the entire season. When i got to rank 15, i went 11-1, but because i didn't play ranked for the rest of the season, i didn't advance any higher. Still kinda cool though, to know that potentially I am in the top few % in the world, thanks for the information :D


Yes, there are a lot of casual players in the rank, we do not have a separated rank to check your skills among the hardcore players.
But I think I'm more likely to be considered a casual player than a hardcore, so to me, and to many people, this information is pretty relevant.

On September 20 2014 21:40 Qwicker wrote:
i doubt every single of the 2 million player base plays a single game the entire season


I guess this chart counts only people with at least one ranked game in the season.
Solmyr
Profile Joined April 2008
Poland261 Posts
September 20 2014 13:06 GMT
#5
If this is true that hearthstone is extremly casual game where players don't give a fuck about ladder system at all.
BongChambers
Profile Joined September 2012
Canada591 Posts
September 20 2014 13:11 GMT
#6
On September 20 2014 22:06 Solmyr wrote:
If this is true that hearthstone is extremly casual game where players don't give a fuck about ladder system at all.


See I would go with this as I hardly give a shit about the game, liked it for about 1-2 weeks and got to rank 14 before I got bored and just did nothing but Arena with common cards the second my hero turned level 20.

I don't even play the game anymore, just enjoy watching Kirpp stream the game.
420
leather gracket
Profile Joined January 2011
51 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-20 13:28:37
September 20 2014 13:27 GMT
#7
the guys who can build potential legendary decks sit at 20 with their golden shaman and warlock bots..

blizzard: make a graph about the bot distribution please
oh wait, ban and wipe all the bot accounts instead.
Jarmam
Profile Joined June 2010
Denmark140 Posts
September 20 2014 13:34 GMT
#8
How many of those 75% in the bottom are people between 25 and 20, who have to litterally lose 100% of their games not to advance? It would be much more interesting if those accounts were excluded, as these also include people who are de facto inactive, who only bother with arena, who play once every two weeks and so on.

What is the proportion between 20(or 19)-15 and 15-10? That might be interesting.
"Freedom for Colossus" - White-Ra
Schelim
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Austria11528 Posts
September 20 2014 14:25 GMT
#9
completely irrelevant. this basically just shows activity. anybody could get to a high rank if they play enough games and have a healthy brain. i would argue that anybody with a decent card pool could make it to legendary if they play enough, all you need is 51% winrate from rank 5 onwards.
TY <3 Cure <3 Inno <3 Special <3
Cade)Flayer
Profile Joined March 2010
United Kingdom279 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-20 16:04:16
September 20 2014 16:03 GMT
#10
With a 51% win rate you need something like 750 games on average to reach Legend starting at rank 5, so not really feasible. And many people are not capable of keeping a 50%+ win rate at rank 15 let alone even reaching rank 5 and then winning more than half their games for 750 games in a row against much stronger opponents. If you go to more casual websites you'll see plenty of people who struggle in sub-10 ranks and who do have "healthy brains". It's generally the argument of frustrated players who can't reach Legend that the only thing that matters in Hearthstone is amount of games played.
That boys a monster
Smacky7
Profile Joined September 2014
Romania0 Posts
September 20 2014 16:27 GMT
#11
Well, ofc it's even harder now to climb since not all the people are spending money in this game. Before Naxxramas i got to rank 6 with the Dr.Draw basic only priest deck, with the exact same deck, i can't pass rank 16 atm, how's that? The belchers are incredibly annoying and this game is on it's way to become a pay2win game. That's why i did quit playing on ranked. I'd rather play 4-5 games / month in casual, just to relax myself than being salty on the ladder everytime i see belcher and KT.

/spit Blizzard.
Pay 2 Win
Schelim
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Austria11528 Posts
September 20 2014 16:36 GMT
#12
On September 21 2014 01:03 Cade)Flayer wrote:
With a 51% win rate you need something like 750 games on average to reach Legend starting at rank 5, so not really feasible. And many people are not capable of keeping a 50%+ win rate at rank 15 let alone even reaching rank 5 and then winning more than half their games for 750 games in a row against much stronger opponents. If you go to more casual websites you'll see plenty of people who struggle in sub-10 ranks and who do have "healthy brains". It's generally the argument of frustrated players who can't reach Legend that the only thing that matters in Hearthstone is amount of games played.

i was in legend last season and am in rank 2 right now (and was around those ranks in the few seasons before that). i don't mean to brag, just saying that inability to reach legendary is not a motivation for me to say what i said. in fact, i think the very fact that i DID reach legendary supports my point. i consider myself a decent, but not amazing HS player, and while i did invest quite a lot of time into getting legend last season, it's not like i stopped doing anything else. i'd say i played 2-3 hours a day on average. and yeah it's not feasible to play that much for many people; hence why i said in theory anybody could reach it if they played a sufficient amount of games. i also specified that you need to have a decent card pool (or i guess one competitive deck) to be able to do it, which i'm sure many of the more casual players don't have. they also by definition don't invest a lot of time into HS or they wouldn't be casual.
TY <3 Cure <3 Inno <3 Special <3
Eggi
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
478 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-20 17:10:36
September 20 2014 16:58 GMT
#13
This kind of backs up my [semi] crazy theory of of most people dont care about the esport aspect of the game

If we do have ~20 million accounts and only ~50k highest avg we have had outside of last years blizzcon tourny(and its blizzcon so it will always have more viewers)

Im guessing most of that 75% dont care about the competitive aspect of this game, because I feel people who do care about it and watch it are atleast past rank 15 from the general consensus that I have seen.

Just a theory and a trend I noticed, would be nice to see what ranks actually do watch HS
imallin
Profile Joined December 2009
United States17 Posts
September 20 2014 17:22 GMT
#14
This is a perfect example of using statistics in a misleading way to try and prove a point. Not saying the statistics themselves are inaccurate but you are pretty gullible if you bought the tagline, "you're better than you think".

You won't get a good sense of how skilled you really are unless you are able to see the rank distribution of players who have played a comparable number of hours as yourself.
Moriquenti
Profile Joined June 2014
Greece0 Posts
September 20 2014 17:39 GMT
#15
''You are NOT better than you think''
"You are Not your Legendaries''
''You are not your playing second with the coin and descent drops in your hand''
''You are not getting anything better just because you bought decks''
''You are Not your Twitch audience ''
''you are not your Aggro deck when we want Control to win ''
''you are not your Control deck when we want Aggro to win''
''You are not your Pretending you're having fun''


we are blizzard and here's our false statistic pat on back to ''comfort'' your torment !

''YOU Have to give Up ''

''YOU Have to give Up ''


Sk'shgn eqnizz hoq
Solmyr
Profile Joined April 2008
Poland261 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-20 17:46:57
September 20 2014 17:44 GMT
#16
Dude if you are tormented by hearthstone why bothered coming here ?
Moriquenti
Profile Joined June 2014
Greece0 Posts
September 20 2014 17:47 GMT
#17
i bother to come and agree with the people that also wrote before me with a fight club twist whats your problem duderino ?

Sk'shgn eqnizz hoq
Zato-1
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Chile4253 Posts
September 20 2014 19:06 GMT
#18
On September 20 2014 21:54 MrSexington wrote:
edit: Almost by definition, if you have a 51%+ win rate, you can get to rank 5 if you play enough games. This is because of win streaks. If you take all the people who play many games a season and have all the cards, my guess is that the true 51st percentile is around rank 5. (I think.)

With 51% winrate, you'd eventually reach Legend- you can have less than 50% winrate and still hit rank 5. If you have, say, 45% winrate but you manage to get a lot of your wins in a row, the winstreak will make you win stars faster than you lose them, and you could eventually reach rank 5.
Go here http://vina.biobiochile.cl/ and input the Konami Code (up up down down left right left right B A)
jrkirby
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1510 Posts
September 20 2014 20:26 GMT
#19
On September 21 2014 04:06 Zato-1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2014 21:54 MrSexington wrote:
edit: Almost by definition, if you have a 51%+ win rate, you can get to rank 5 if you play enough games. This is because of win streaks. If you take all the people who play many games a season and have all the cards, my guess is that the true 51st percentile is around rank 5. (I think.)

With 51% winrate, you'd eventually reach Legend- you can have less than 50% winrate and still hit rank 5. If you have, say, 45% winrate but you manage to get a lot of your wins in a row, the winstreak will make you win stars faster than you lose them, and you could eventually reach rank 5.


Not all "51% winrates" are equal. 50% wins at rank 20-15 is way easier than 50% wins at rank 5-1.
GoingGoingGone
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
Slovakia529 Posts
September 20 2014 21:56 GMT
#20
Time to break into the top 0,5% this month. *cracks neck as Eye of the Tiger music plays in the background*
In all seriousness, though, if only I had the mental stamina... I can't play my best for more, than 5 games. And one bad beat or something tilts me quite a lot.

Oh, and screw you, Blizzard. I'm not better than I think. I don't give a fuck about the others, I'm as bad as I think if I can't win.
Busy night, but there's always room for another... unless the servers are down.
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 39m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 220
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 211
Noble 181
Bale 19
Dota 2
monkeys_forever680
NeuroSwarm91
ODPixel88
League of Legends
JimRising 894
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K876
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor100
Other Games
summit1g9051
shahzam662
hungrybox388
ViBE172
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick42077
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH357
• Hupsaiya 93
• Light_VIP 53
• practicex 24
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo960
• Stunt496
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
4h 39m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
7h 39m
Replay Cast
18h 39m
RSL Revival
1d 4h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 10h
OSC
1d 14h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.