My school is being sued - Page 5

On April 11 2009 15:54 benjammin wrote:
food you are by far the dumbest person on this forum, and that includes superiorwolf + Show Spoiler +

they absolutely have a right to create a GSA club and absolutely have the right to sue for discrimination

if you think the GSA exists to try and lure straight people into turning gay you are a world class moron

On April 11 2009 15:48 keV. wrote:
First of all...

I don't think you people understand what a gay-straight alliance is.

Students create gay-straight alliances for two reasons:

1. If one plans to apply to a liberal college and wants to sweeten their application, they ask to start a gay-straight alliance club that most likely will do nothing because there is no problem of gay abuse or denial of gay rights at their respective schools.

2. Gay students gather to talk about gay rights in life or in school and talk about what can be done to bridge the gap between the straight culture and the gay culture to make for a more pleasurable assimilated relationship. It has NOTHING to do with selling or celebrating gay culture, be it - from gay marriage to we're here we're queer parades.

There is no reason for a school to deny such a club as its intention is to make life better for BOTH parties considered. Stop bickering about something you don't even understand.

On April 11 2009 15:57 food wrote:


im sure promoting gay lifestyle adds up to luring straight people into gay union

On April 11 2009 15:54 food wrote:


and hitler was a jew

On April 11 2009 15:50 food wrote:
you also not taking into account what kind of society we live in. It is very traditional, especially in the US. An accepted set of morals and values has to influence the situation anyhow. It might be different in Cali, but i am pretty sure majority is not open to the idea of gay unions at school, while studying religion is completely socially accepted. Also we do know that "GSA" will never restrict itself to discussing the rights of homosexuals without promoting gay lifestyle to some extent.

On April 11 2009 15:50 food wrote:


you also not taking into account what kind of society we live in. It is very traditional, especially in the US. An accepted set of morals and values has to influence the situation anyhow. It might be different in Cali, but i am pretty sure majority is not open to the idea of gay unions at school, while studying religion is completely socially accepted. Also we do know that "GSA" will never restrict itself to discussing the rights of homosexuals without promoting gay lifestyle to some extent.

On April 11 2009 15:57 keV. wrote:


Quoting because apparently legibility and information is ignored at times.

On April 11 2009 16:07 food wrote:
this barely relates to reality
majority of people attending these alliances are gay people and they have their own interest in going there
also we didnt talk about gay-straight alliance in particular, something called "gay club" or "gay alliance" came up. One form of this would be GSA, but in any case i dont see a point in officially separating gay and straight "communities" by creating specific gay organizations at schools. My point was, if this isnt brought up, peopel would care less. By talking more about the importance of accepting gay people into "heterosexual community" at particular school you drawing a line between them

this barely relates to reality

majority of people attending these alliances are gay people and they have their own interest in going there

also we didnt talk about gay-straight alliance in particular, something called "gay club" or "gay alliance" came up.

One form of this would be GSA, but in any case i dont see a point in officially separating gay and straight "communities" by creating specific gay organizations at schools. My point was, if this isnt brought up, peopel would care less. By talking more about the importance of accepting gay people into "heterosexual community" at particular school you drawing a line between them

On April 11 2009 16:05 Kentor wrote:

yes and evolution should be scrapped and replaced with creationism.

On April 11 2009 16:13 keV. wrote:
I can't even begin to tell you how dumb what you just said is. I'm going to do it anyway because I'm a bit of a masochist.



Yes it relates perfectly. I've attended two high schools one in the RI and one in Florida



No, more often then not teens at a highschool have a very small if any gay population. You should know that.



The OP specifically mentioned a gay-straight alliance. Read.



So any effort to amend the differences between these two cultures will immediately fail. You are a grand idiot.

Thanks for playing. Now stop posting forever.

On April 11 2009 16:16 food wrote:


some said earlier that slavery was socially accepted 150 years ago and i responded that it WAS. This has nothing to do with current state of society, same with your example. Evolution is one of the main concepts of biology nowadays thus socially accepted. Gay unions at schools arent. In 50 years maybe, this does not disprove anything i said.

On April 11 2009 16:08 Trowabarton756 wrote:

Also...w-t-f. You are contradicting yourself all over, you say we shouldn't be accepting because it separates the life styles, then say we have to separate the life styles so people will care less. Make up your mind.

On April 11 2009 16:13 keV. wrote:
I can't even begin to tell you how dumb what you just said is. I'm going to do it anyway because I'm a bit of a masochist.



Yes it relates perfectly. I've attended two high schools one in the RI and one in Florida



No, more often then not teens at a highschool have a very small if any gay population. You should know that.



The OP specifically mentioned a gay-straight alliance. Read.



So any effort to amend the differences between these two cultures will immediately fail. You are a grand idiot.

Thanks for playing. Now stop posting.

On April 11 2009 16:32 food wrote:


i didnt say we have to separate the lifestyles, what are you talking about? I said that bringing this issue up for discussion in court blows it out of proportion thus giving them way more attention then needed. The idea of a gay union will draw a thicker line between gay and straight at schools and not having it would leave people care less. How could you not read this?




guy few posts above you posted that mentioned GSA went to the prom or w/e doing their own thing and no one cares. So they were gay people apparently, he doesnt know if anyone cared or not, it was his subjective idea, but he seen the 'ceremony" or w/e. You can pretend you know all about it, i just dont see a normal person attending meetings of a gay alliance working things out with gay people. Some would, but not majority of the alliance, yes?
i wasnt arguing with the OP specifically, if you havent noticed. This discussion expanded past the OP few pages ago.
also whats with the immediate fail? any effort to amend differences will immediately fail thus im an idiot. We are talkign about the school you dumb shit. I said AT SCHOOLS SPECIFICALLY BRINGING UP GAY ISSUE IS NOT THE BEST THING TO DO, YOU FAIL TO NOTICE THAT? Isnt that what OP said as well, dean denied due to parents/social approval? Where did i go about it beyond schools? You clearly should start reading yourself and i will surely take advice from a shitty poster who cant even follow the argument

On April 11 2009 15:54 food wrote:


and hitler was a jew