EPTOn April 03 2008 03:17 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
obvious april fools joke from god..."pray and i'll save her!!......NOT" *laughs*
obvious april fools joke from god..."pray and i'll save her!!......NOT" *laughs*
The OP was well before April 1st.
God makes people doctors for a reason, right? - Page 9
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
CDRdude
United States5625 Posts
The OP was well before April 1st. | ||
|
MeriaDoKk
Chile1726 Posts
| ||
|
Fumanchu
Canada669 Posts
| ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4653 Posts
On March 27 2008 03:42 baal wrote: Natural selection at its finest ![[image loading]](http://www.doingitwrong.com/wrong/wrong24.jpg) Yeah. She'll mate a lot that's for sure | ||
|
Quesadilla
United States1814 Posts
| ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
|
MyLostTemple
United States2921 Posts
Romanian? | ||
|
toopham
United States551 Posts
On March 27 2008 03:42 baal wrote: Natural selection at its finest i've never shoot from a gun or even hold a gun before... but.. from what I see.. wouldnt that gun just go straight back and poke her eye out? | ||
|
BluzMan
Russian Federation4235 Posts
On April 03 2008 07:24 toopham wrote: i've never shoot from a gun or even hold a gun before... but.. from what I see.. wouldnt that gun just go straight back and poke her eye out? We have a winner, someone give him a medal! | ||
|
Future_sc
United States783 Posts
| ||
|
Funchucks
Canada2113 Posts
On March 27 2008 21:41 Hawk wrote: I still can't believe that the police aren't charging the parents, or at the very least, removing the other kids from the home. Personally, I don't believe in protecting children from their parents. In the first place, a government bureaucracy isn't qualified to decide what is and isn't abuse. The stiff way bureaucracies work, it will always tend to evolve toward zero-tolerance policies on things which might be involved in abuse, but which do not constitute abuse in and of themselves. Right now, for example, we have a whole generation of spoiled brats because people are terrified to spank their kids, or show any sign of depriving them. Parents have become like slaves to their children, and people are reluctant to even have children, because it is now considered normal for third parties to judge and interfere with their decisions. Do I want to have kids someday? Certainly. Do I want to raise children in an environment where I'm under constant scrutiny and suspicion, with an expectation that my life should revolve around their care, and my wife is given the power to take them away and have me pay to raise them however she wants, regardless of my wishes? Hell no. That is no bargain. The way the average parent raised their kid a hundred years ago would today at least get their children taken away, and most likely also land them in jail. In fact, if everything the average parent today did with their kids was made public, they would probably be subject to some kind of government interference. A few cases of serious child abuse are being stopped. Some children's lives are being saved. But what is happening to our overall society? In the second place, what about genetic considerations? In the span of decades, we are a society of individuals, but in the span of centuries we are an ecology of bloodlines. If idiots can't destroy their children, then selection won't act on the relevant genetic factors. This is also a problem with charity and welfare. You don't need much more than a brainstem and a functioning reproductive system to fuck constantly and produce children at an alarming rate. Simple darwinian principles tell you that if society dedicates itself to protecting and raising all of the children, no matter how their parents are behaving, a subpopulation that is genetically programmed to breed at the maximum biologically possible rate without regard for the demands of caring for its own offspring, and genetically incapable of understanding or caring why it should not do so, is going to expand exponentially until it displaces all others. Now, you can say, "But people can be educated!" and so forth, but genetic differences can make education futile. Intelligence can be lowered. Suspicion of authority can be increased. Sex drive can be increased. Direct desire to have children can be increased. Aside from that, there will be other optimizations. Twins. Triplets. Litters. Total male indiscriminacy. Whatever causes people to reduce their rate of reproduction will be bred out, while whatever causes people to increase their rate of reproduction will be bred in. This pressure has always existed, but it has always been counterbalanced by a pressure to ensure children are properly raised, so they can survive in the harsh world to successfully reproduce themselves. With no harsh world, there is no counterpressure. Right now, we're seeing mass extinction of responsibility and ambition in the developed world. If we keep this "every child is precious" mentality, we're going to breed right down to subhumanity before the inability to maintain our automated industry allows the world to become a selective pressure again. | ||
|
xmShake
United States1100 Posts
On April 03 2008 07:24 toopham wrote: i've never shoot from a gun or even hold a gun before... but.. from what I see.. wouldnt that gun just go straight back and poke her eye out? ..haha | ||
|
Meta
United States6228 Posts
On March 27 2008 06:31 WhatisProtoss wrote: Wait, I thought atheism was the unbelief of religion. The anti-religion. Isn't it pretty anti-religion for a government to be anti-religion? Haha. Communism fits the bill. If a government wants to banish religion, doesn't it mean that the government is atheist? It certainly cannot mean that the government holds any religious belief, of course.... china's government does a lot of fucked up things that nobody else would do, however similar they are | ||
|
Danger_Duck
Burkina Faso571 Posts
The family does not attend an organized church or participate in an organized religion, Vergin said. "They have a little Bible study of a few people." | ||
| ||
