• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:30
CEST 07:30
KST 14:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash7[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy12ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple5Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research3Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: SoulKey vs Ample ASL21 General Discussion RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group E [ASL21] Ro24 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group C
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9395 users

World will end on 2012 - Page 32

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 30 31 32 33 34 42 Next All
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
March 13 2011 18:56 GMT
#621
The planets aren't going to be in a straight line anyways.

Everyone please realize, space is 3 dimensional. The planets might align(or come close) in one dimension but there is still another dimension required for them to align in a straight line.

This absolutely will not happen in 2012 nor will it likely ever happen during the entire span of the existence of this solar system.
LedFarmer
Profile Joined October 2010
United States161 Posts
March 13 2011 19:05 GMT
#622
On March 14 2011 03:45 Aoi SCV wrote:
Why do people think that magic happens when planets/galaxy centres/whatever, are in a straight line?
Seriously? Are you even able to predict the consequences of the simplest everyday events? Do you think that magic happens when the milk lines up with the butter in the fridge also? Or do magic only happen to celestial bodies?

I don't know about you, but when the milk and butter in my fridge lines up, buttermilk pancakes magically appear about 15 minutes later!

(Only happens on Sunday sadly )
I don't read the script. The script reads me.
WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-13 19:10:59
March 13 2011 19:07 GMT
#623
On March 14 2011 03:13 Consolidate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 03:09 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 01:30 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 00:49 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 13 2011 23:09 Kukaracha wrote:
Your post already lacks rigor in it's very base... mysticism was never a very accurate "science".

lol are you referring to my post ? I said it myself that I don't want to bother with rigor in a post on a forum, but yeah studying the myth is a science, anthropology or history depending on how you consider it. People who think that those myth are pure ignorance, blind belief, are wrong: those beliefs have a role in those societies just likes in our modern society we have myth and belief (economy is a serious case in this regard).


Looks like you're neglecting more than rigor in your post.

What is your point exactly? Something something 'economy is a serious case in this regard'.

wtf?

My point was that, in those culture, the end of the world most likely also mean the birth of another world.

Economy is based on so many ridiculous belief / myth on what is the purpose of live and how economic growth will lead us to a better world.


So you're saying that belief in economic theory in general is 'ridiculous'?

Look at Japan's rebuilding after WWII
Look at China's progress resulting from Deng's economic reforms.

You would have them starving in mud huts.

No, I'm not saying economy as a whole is ridiculous, but economy carry some belief about the purpose of life and how money alone will build a better world. And history prove that it's wrong, having more money does not mean the end of poverty, and everybody knows that money will not makes you happy. It's a myth, and if you look at history, those belief are tainted with religious perspectiv (you can make the list, almost all the fathers of economy are religious).
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
rel
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Guam3521 Posts
March 13 2011 19:09 GMT
#624
On March 14 2011 03:56 travis wrote:
The planets aren't going to be in a straight line anyways.

Everyone please realize, space is 3 dimensional. The planets might align(or come close) in one dimension but there is still another dimension required for them to align in a straight line.

This absolutely will not happen in 2012 nor will it likely ever happen during the entire span of the existence of this solar system.


Always loved Travis's posts, and here he throws out another masterpiece of awesome common sense, lost by many.

Travis is the bessst.
I'll tank push my way into her heart. ☮♥&$!
TALegion
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1187 Posts
March 13 2011 19:15 GMT
#625
SO MUCH SHIT is gonna go down the week before 2012. It'll either be a dreadful or HILARIOUS year.
A person willing to die for a cause is a hero. A person willing to kill for a cause is a madman
Aoi SCV
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden10 Posts
March 13 2011 19:18 GMT
#626
On March 14 2011 03:56 travis wrote:
Everyone please realize, space is 3 dimensional. The planets might align(or come close) in one dimension but there is still another dimension required for them to align in a straight line.


I'm not sure I understand you, but it is certainly possible for the planets to align in a straight line. The solar system is reasonably planar, so they are already "aligned" in two dimensions.
nigritude
Profile Joined July 2010
83 Posts
March 13 2011 19:26 GMT
#627
On March 14 2011 04:07 WhiteDog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 03:13 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 03:09 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 01:30 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 00:49 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 13 2011 23:09 Kukaracha wrote:
Your post already lacks rigor in it's very base... mysticism was never a very accurate "science".

lol are you referring to my post ? I said it myself that I don't want to bother with rigor in a post on a forum, but yeah studying the myth is a science, anthropology or history depending on how you consider it. People who think that those myth are pure ignorance, blind belief, are wrong: those beliefs have a role in those societies just likes in our modern society we have myth and belief (economy is a serious case in this regard).


Looks like you're neglecting more than rigor in your post.

What is your point exactly? Something something 'economy is a serious case in this regard'.

wtf?

My point was that, in those culture, the end of the world most likely also mean the birth of another world.

Economy is based on so many ridiculous belief / myth on what is the purpose of live and how economic growth will lead us to a better world.


So you're saying that belief in economic theory in general is 'ridiculous'?

Look at Japan's rebuilding after WWII
Look at China's progress resulting from Deng's economic reforms.

You would have them starving in mud huts.

No, I'm not saying economy as a whole is ridiculous, but economy carry some belief about the purpose of life and how money alone will build a better world. And history prove that it's wrong, having more money does not mean the end of poverty, and everybody knows that money will not makes you happy. It's a myth, and if you look at history, those belief are tainted with religious perspectiv (you can make the list, almost all the fathers of economy are religious).


i think it is so hilarious that i get temp banned for saying stuff like "lolwut" and "r u srs dawg" when the stuff written in this quote is so much worse.

first of all, how exactly are you using the term "money"? do you mean paper money or do you mean what money actually signifies, i.e., production? if paper money, then no shit, having more money does not end poverty. if production, then how does having more production not end poverty? poverty is the lack of material goods and services. if you have more production, i.e., more money, you no longer have poverty.

and look at this blanket statement of, "everybody knows that money will not make you happy." now you are being unclear on, not just one term, but two. what do you mean by happy? and again, by money, do you mean just having a huge wad of paper money under your mattress or are you referring to the things money actually signifies?

and who are you referring to as the "fathers of economy" ...
hifriend
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
China7935 Posts
March 13 2011 19:33 GMT
#628
On March 14 2011 04:09 rel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 03:56 travis wrote:
The planets aren't going to be in a straight line anyways.

Everyone please realize, space is 3 dimensional. The planets might align(or come close) in one dimension but there is still another dimension required for them to align in a straight line.

This absolutely will not happen in 2012 nor will it likely ever happen during the entire span of the existence of this solar system.


Always loved Travis's posts, and here he throws out another masterpiece of awesome common sense, lost by many.

Travis is the bessst.

True, Travis is usually the voice of common sense in threads such as this, just as Chill has been the voice of common sense in every girl blog on tl since at least 2003.
AraMoOse
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada66 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-13 19:40:17
March 13 2011 19:38 GMT
#629
I actually found an ancient Sumerian document which specifically states that the world will NOT end in 2012. The Sumerians of course knew even less than the Mayans, but apparently that makes it more plausible.
Also with respect to the comment from Travis ;

a. It entirely depends on what you mean by a dimension, but i'm fairly certain most physicists would disagree that our universe is limited to 3 dimensions. You might do slightly better by positing three SPATIAL dimensions, but I'm fairly certain this also conflicts with the current model.

b. It remains fairly easy to align three objects in a straight line in a three dimensional universe, I don't see what Travis is on about. I just lined up my mouse, my keyboard and my speaker, yet no matter engulfing vortex has appeared. You can try this at home too!

c. Given the relatively flat 'shape' of our galaxy, and given that the earth rotates around the sun, the 'straight line' should happen essentially once every year (slightly more or less than a year because the sun also moves relative to the center of the galaxy.) So if an alignment means the end of the world, then it should have ended every single year since it's formation.
Raynor for President
WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-13 20:04:58
March 13 2011 19:58 GMT
#630
On March 14 2011 04:26 nigritude wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 04:07 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 03:13 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 03:09 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 01:30 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 00:49 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 13 2011 23:09 Kukaracha wrote:
Your post already lacks rigor in it's very base... mysticism was never a very accurate "science".

lol are you referring to my post ? I said it myself that I don't want to bother with rigor in a post on a forum, but yeah studying the myth is a science, anthropology or history depending on how you consider it. People who think that those myth are pure ignorance, blind belief, are wrong: those beliefs have a role in those societies just likes in our modern society we have myth and belief (economy is a serious case in this regard).


Looks like you're neglecting more than rigor in your post.

What is your point exactly? Something something 'economy is a serious case in this regard'.

wtf?

My point was that, in those culture, the end of the world most likely also mean the birth of another world.

Economy is based on so many ridiculous belief / myth on what is the purpose of live and how economic growth will lead us to a better world.


So you're saying that belief in economic theory in general is 'ridiculous'?

Look at Japan's rebuilding after WWII
Look at China's progress resulting from Deng's economic reforms.

You would have them starving in mud huts.

No, I'm not saying economy as a whole is ridiculous, but economy carry some belief about the purpose of life and how money alone will build a better world. And history prove that it's wrong, having more money does not mean the end of poverty, and everybody knows that money will not makes you happy. It's a myth, and if you look at history, those belief are tainted with religious perspectiv (you can make the list, almost all the fathers of economy are religious).


i think it is so hilarious that i get temp banned for saying stuff like "lolwut" and "r u srs dawg" when the stuff written in this quote is so much worse.

first of all, how exactly are you using the term "money"? do you mean paper money or do you mean what money actually signifies, i.e., production? if paper money, then no shit, having more money does not end poverty. if production, then how does having more production not end poverty? poverty is the lack of material goods and services. if you have more production, i.e., more money, you no longer have poverty.

and look at this blanket statement of, "everybody knows that money will not make you happy." now you are being unclear on, not just one term, but two. what do you mean by happy? and again, by money, do you mean just having a huge wad of paper money under your mattress or are you referring to the things money actually signifies?

and who are you referring to as the "fathers of economy" ...

You're serious ? Money does not mean production, are you a troll ? Money is money man, $$.
Having more does not mean the end of poverty, it's also a question of distribution, I mean come on, that's pretty simple to know that in world where 95% of the wealth is in the hand of what 10% of the people ? (don't know the exact stats)
I'm not gonna argue about happiness, you can read some work about that, you need a certain amount of money to be happy, but having more than a certain amount will not help you achieve happiness faster. And by happyness I mean "a mental state of well-being characterized by positive emotions ranging from contentment to intense joy", but maybe you don't know that since you're such a troll.
And the fathers of economy, well the one that built the damn science ? Montchretien, aristote, thomas more, john hales who cares, they were all philosopher / moralist / religious. Heck Adam Smith, the first fully "economist" was a philosopher in moral philosophy.
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
Heyoka
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Katowice25012 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-13 20:12:54
March 13 2011 20:03 GMT
#631
On March 14 2011 00:59 Penke wrote:
How can the world possibly end in 2012 when i have a youghurt that expires in 2013?


What if 2012 is just the rapture, leaving 2013 to be the year of those left behind and their yoghurt?
@RealHeyoka | ESL / DreamHack StarCraft Lead
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-13 20:06:52
March 13 2011 20:04 GMT
#632
On March 14 2011 04:18 Aoi SCV wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 03:56 travis wrote:
Everyone please realize, space is 3 dimensional. The planets might align(or come close) in one dimension but there is still another dimension required for them to align in a straight line.


I'm not sure I understand you, but it is certainly possible for the planets to align in a straight line. The solar system is reasonably planar, so they are already "aligned" in two dimensions.


the solar system might be "reasonably" planar but it's far from flat...
regardless of what you say the planets aren't going to align in a straight line at all, probably not ever

and even though the solar system is "reasonably" planar as you say, some of the planets are quite a bit on their own planes, with quite a bit different skews to their trajectories

I'd expect you already know this so I don't see why you are arguing with a good point that I made

redFF
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States3910 Posts
March 13 2011 20:07 GMT
#633
On March 14 2011 04:15 TALegion wrote:
SO MUCH SHIT is gonna go down the week before 2012. It'll either be a dreadful or HILARIOUS year.


the shit will go down in december, as the world is scheduled to end just before christmas. Probably nothing will happen, but hey if their is looting and shooting going on i will most definitely be in.
Ryndika
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1489 Posts
March 13 2011 20:09 GMT
#634
Mayas predicted the calendar ending on 2012, what's the bid deal about it? We've done so now for 2011 times too.
as useful as teasalt
HavoK.
Profile Joined March 2010
United States172 Posts
March 13 2011 20:12 GMT
#635
I;m pretty sure that it talks about how a Great change is coming not necessarily a huge destruction.
Aoi SCV
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden10 Posts
March 13 2011 20:18 GMT
#636
On March 14 2011 05:04 travis wrote:
and even though the solar system is "reasonably" planar as you say, some of the planets are quite a bit on their own planes, with quite a bit different skews to their trajectories

I'd expect you already know this so I don't see why you are arguing with a good point that I made

Maybe a "reasonable straight" line is enough to make magic happen? =)

I think the way the term is used is when the planets form a straight line "as seen from above" and the accuracy with which the planets are supposed to be aligned is rather low. That means that there is already an approximation involved, one that is worse (I guess) than assuming that all of the planet lie perfectly in a plane.

I'm not used to post on forums in English, I hope I make sense. =)
ShamTao
Profile Joined September 2010
United States419 Posts
March 13 2011 20:19 GMT
#637
The only reason 2012 might bring the end of the world is that so man f'ing people will believe it and end up CAUSING it. Ugh I hate people sometimes
In the game of drones, you win or you die!
nigritude
Profile Joined July 2010
83 Posts
March 13 2011 20:37 GMT
#638
On March 14 2011 04:58 WhiteDog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 04:26 nigritude wrote:
On March 14 2011 04:07 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 03:13 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 03:09 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 01:30 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 00:49 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 13 2011 23:09 Kukaracha wrote:
Your post already lacks rigor in it's very base... mysticism was never a very accurate "science".

lol are you referring to my post ? I said it myself that I don't want to bother with rigor in a post on a forum, but yeah studying the myth is a science, anthropology or history depending on how you consider it. People who think that those myth are pure ignorance, blind belief, are wrong: those beliefs have a role in those societies just likes in our modern society we have myth and belief (economy is a serious case in this regard).


Looks like you're neglecting more than rigor in your post.

What is your point exactly? Something something 'economy is a serious case in this regard'.

wtf?

My point was that, in those culture, the end of the world most likely also mean the birth of another world.

Economy is based on so many ridiculous belief / myth on what is the purpose of live and how economic growth will lead us to a better world.


So you're saying that belief in economic theory in general is 'ridiculous'?

Look at Japan's rebuilding after WWII
Look at China's progress resulting from Deng's economic reforms.

You would have them starving in mud huts.

No, I'm not saying economy as a whole is ridiculous, but economy carry some belief about the purpose of life and how money alone will build a better world. And history prove that it's wrong, having more money does not mean the end of poverty, and everybody knows that money will not makes you happy. It's a myth, and if you look at history, those belief are tainted with religious perspectiv (you can make the list, almost all the fathers of economy are religious).


i think it is so hilarious that i get temp banned for saying stuff like "lolwut" and "r u srs dawg" when the stuff written in this quote is so much worse.

first of all, how exactly are you using the term "money"? do you mean paper money or do you mean what money actually signifies, i.e., production? if paper money, then no shit, having more money does not end poverty. if production, then how does having more production not end poverty? poverty is the lack of material goods and services. if you have more production, i.e., more money, you no longer have poverty.

and look at this blanket statement of, "everybody knows that money will not make you happy." now you are being unclear on, not just one term, but two. what do you mean by happy? and again, by money, do you mean just having a huge wad of paper money under your mattress or are you referring to the things money actually signifies?

and who are you referring to as the "fathers of economy" ...

You're serious ? Money does not mean production, are you a troll ? Money is money man, $$.
Having more does not mean the end of poverty, it's also a question of distribution, I mean come on, that's pretty simple to know that in world where 95% of the wealth is in the hand of what 10% of the people ? (don't know the exact stats)
I'm not gonna argue about happiness, you can read some work about that, you need a certain amount of money to be happy, but having more than a certain amount will not help you achieve happiness faster. And by happyness I mean "a mental state of well-being characterized by positive emotions ranging from contentment to intense joy", but maybe you don't know that since you're such a troll.
And the fathers of economy, well the one that built the damn science ? Montchretien, aristote, thomas more, john hales who cares, they were all philosopher / moralist / religious. Heck Adam Smith, the first fully "economist" was a philosopher in moral philosophy.


is the reason why 95% of the posts on TL about economics deserve a "lolwut"

Grummler
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany743 Posts
March 13 2011 20:55 GMT
#639
We know jesus birth with an accuracy of ~5 years. So this random date the mayas calculated could already past by without anyone recognizing...

Also: I am only 24 years old, but i already survived three of these "the world will end"-dates.
workers, supply, money, workers, supply, money, workers, ...
playa
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States1284 Posts
March 13 2011 21:52 GMT
#640
Could you imagine if our society made a calendar and "randomly" had the last day be thousands of years from now and not even in a year that ended with a 0 or a 5? Plus, it wasn't even the beginning of the month or the end of the month, but a precise day? That's interesting... it's eerie to even be living in a time where there is such a obscure/arcane date mentioned. It makes you think.

If it's merely supposed to be a time of change, you have to assume they felt there would be more "change" in that year/day than all of those previous years? It's as if someone has a time machine and is just trolling current era's. Rambling; simply find it all very interesting.
Prev 1 30 31 32 33 34 42 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
StarCraft Evolution League #19
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 134
-ZergGirl 78
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 5844
sSak 63
Bale 24
Icarus 15
Noble 9
Dota 2
monkeys_forever684
NeuroSwarm157
League of Legends
JimRising 622
Counter-Strike
summit1g9417
Stewie2K654
m0e_tv83
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King93
Other Games
C9.Mang0316
RuFF_SC277
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick829
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1262
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4h 31m
Afreeca Starleague
4h 31m
Rush vs PianO
Flash vs Speed
PiGosaur Cup
18h 31m
Replay Cast
1d 3h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 4h
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Replay Cast
1d 18h
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
BSL
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS6
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.