• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 15:34
CET 21:34
KST 05:34
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational12SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)25Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7
StarCraft 2
General
PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey! herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued StarCraft 2 not at the Esports World Cup 2026 [Short Story] The Last GSL
Tourneys
$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Gypsy to Korea Fantasy's Q&A video BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread NASA and the Private Sector
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Esports Advertising Shap…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2323 users

World will end on 2012 - Page 32

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 30 31 32 33 34 42 Next All
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
March 13 2011 18:56 GMT
#621
The planets aren't going to be in a straight line anyways.

Everyone please realize, space is 3 dimensional. The planets might align(or come close) in one dimension but there is still another dimension required for them to align in a straight line.

This absolutely will not happen in 2012 nor will it likely ever happen during the entire span of the existence of this solar system.
LedFarmer
Profile Joined October 2010
United States161 Posts
March 13 2011 19:05 GMT
#622
On March 14 2011 03:45 Aoi SCV wrote:
Why do people think that magic happens when planets/galaxy centres/whatever, are in a straight line?
Seriously? Are you even able to predict the consequences of the simplest everyday events? Do you think that magic happens when the milk lines up with the butter in the fridge also? Or do magic only happen to celestial bodies?

I don't know about you, but when the milk and butter in my fridge lines up, buttermilk pancakes magically appear about 15 minutes later!

(Only happens on Sunday sadly )
I don't read the script. The script reads me.
WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-13 19:10:59
March 13 2011 19:07 GMT
#623
On March 14 2011 03:13 Consolidate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 03:09 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 01:30 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 00:49 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 13 2011 23:09 Kukaracha wrote:
Your post already lacks rigor in it's very base... mysticism was never a very accurate "science".

lol are you referring to my post ? I said it myself that I don't want to bother with rigor in a post on a forum, but yeah studying the myth is a science, anthropology or history depending on how you consider it. People who think that those myth are pure ignorance, blind belief, are wrong: those beliefs have a role in those societies just likes in our modern society we have myth and belief (economy is a serious case in this regard).


Looks like you're neglecting more than rigor in your post.

What is your point exactly? Something something 'economy is a serious case in this regard'.

wtf?

My point was that, in those culture, the end of the world most likely also mean the birth of another world.

Economy is based on so many ridiculous belief / myth on what is the purpose of live and how economic growth will lead us to a better world.


So you're saying that belief in economic theory in general is 'ridiculous'?

Look at Japan's rebuilding after WWII
Look at China's progress resulting from Deng's economic reforms.

You would have them starving in mud huts.

No, I'm not saying economy as a whole is ridiculous, but economy carry some belief about the purpose of life and how money alone will build a better world. And history prove that it's wrong, having more money does not mean the end of poverty, and everybody knows that money will not makes you happy. It's a myth, and if you look at history, those belief are tainted with religious perspectiv (you can make the list, almost all the fathers of economy are religious).
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
rel
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Guam3521 Posts
March 13 2011 19:09 GMT
#624
On March 14 2011 03:56 travis wrote:
The planets aren't going to be in a straight line anyways.

Everyone please realize, space is 3 dimensional. The planets might align(or come close) in one dimension but there is still another dimension required for them to align in a straight line.

This absolutely will not happen in 2012 nor will it likely ever happen during the entire span of the existence of this solar system.


Always loved Travis's posts, and here he throws out another masterpiece of awesome common sense, lost by many.

Travis is the bessst.
I'll tank push my way into her heart. ☮♥&$!
TALegion
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1187 Posts
March 13 2011 19:15 GMT
#625
SO MUCH SHIT is gonna go down the week before 2012. It'll either be a dreadful or HILARIOUS year.
A person willing to die for a cause is a hero. A person willing to kill for a cause is a madman
Aoi SCV
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden10 Posts
March 13 2011 19:18 GMT
#626
On March 14 2011 03:56 travis wrote:
Everyone please realize, space is 3 dimensional. The planets might align(or come close) in one dimension but there is still another dimension required for them to align in a straight line.


I'm not sure I understand you, but it is certainly possible for the planets to align in a straight line. The solar system is reasonably planar, so they are already "aligned" in two dimensions.
nigritude
Profile Joined July 2010
83 Posts
March 13 2011 19:26 GMT
#627
On March 14 2011 04:07 WhiteDog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 03:13 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 03:09 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 01:30 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 00:49 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 13 2011 23:09 Kukaracha wrote:
Your post already lacks rigor in it's very base... mysticism was never a very accurate "science".

lol are you referring to my post ? I said it myself that I don't want to bother with rigor in a post on a forum, but yeah studying the myth is a science, anthropology or history depending on how you consider it. People who think that those myth are pure ignorance, blind belief, are wrong: those beliefs have a role in those societies just likes in our modern society we have myth and belief (economy is a serious case in this regard).


Looks like you're neglecting more than rigor in your post.

What is your point exactly? Something something 'economy is a serious case in this regard'.

wtf?

My point was that, in those culture, the end of the world most likely also mean the birth of another world.

Economy is based on so many ridiculous belief / myth on what is the purpose of live and how economic growth will lead us to a better world.


So you're saying that belief in economic theory in general is 'ridiculous'?

Look at Japan's rebuilding after WWII
Look at China's progress resulting from Deng's economic reforms.

You would have them starving in mud huts.

No, I'm not saying economy as a whole is ridiculous, but economy carry some belief about the purpose of life and how money alone will build a better world. And history prove that it's wrong, having more money does not mean the end of poverty, and everybody knows that money will not makes you happy. It's a myth, and if you look at history, those belief are tainted with religious perspectiv (you can make the list, almost all the fathers of economy are religious).


i think it is so hilarious that i get temp banned for saying stuff like "lolwut" and "r u srs dawg" when the stuff written in this quote is so much worse.

first of all, how exactly are you using the term "money"? do you mean paper money or do you mean what money actually signifies, i.e., production? if paper money, then no shit, having more money does not end poverty. if production, then how does having more production not end poverty? poverty is the lack of material goods and services. if you have more production, i.e., more money, you no longer have poverty.

and look at this blanket statement of, "everybody knows that money will not make you happy." now you are being unclear on, not just one term, but two. what do you mean by happy? and again, by money, do you mean just having a huge wad of paper money under your mattress or are you referring to the things money actually signifies?

and who are you referring to as the "fathers of economy" ...
hifriend
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
China7935 Posts
March 13 2011 19:33 GMT
#628
On March 14 2011 04:09 rel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 03:56 travis wrote:
The planets aren't going to be in a straight line anyways.

Everyone please realize, space is 3 dimensional. The planets might align(or come close) in one dimension but there is still another dimension required for them to align in a straight line.

This absolutely will not happen in 2012 nor will it likely ever happen during the entire span of the existence of this solar system.


Always loved Travis's posts, and here he throws out another masterpiece of awesome common sense, lost by many.

Travis is the bessst.

True, Travis is usually the voice of common sense in threads such as this, just as Chill has been the voice of common sense in every girl blog on tl since at least 2003.
AraMoOse
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada66 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-13 19:40:17
March 13 2011 19:38 GMT
#629
I actually found an ancient Sumerian document which specifically states that the world will NOT end in 2012. The Sumerians of course knew even less than the Mayans, but apparently that makes it more plausible.
Also with respect to the comment from Travis ;

a. It entirely depends on what you mean by a dimension, but i'm fairly certain most physicists would disagree that our universe is limited to 3 dimensions. You might do slightly better by positing three SPATIAL dimensions, but I'm fairly certain this also conflicts with the current model.

b. It remains fairly easy to align three objects in a straight line in a three dimensional universe, I don't see what Travis is on about. I just lined up my mouse, my keyboard and my speaker, yet no matter engulfing vortex has appeared. You can try this at home too!

c. Given the relatively flat 'shape' of our galaxy, and given that the earth rotates around the sun, the 'straight line' should happen essentially once every year (slightly more or less than a year because the sun also moves relative to the center of the galaxy.) So if an alignment means the end of the world, then it should have ended every single year since it's formation.
Raynor for President
WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-13 20:04:58
March 13 2011 19:58 GMT
#630
On March 14 2011 04:26 nigritude wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 04:07 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 03:13 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 03:09 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 01:30 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 00:49 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 13 2011 23:09 Kukaracha wrote:
Your post already lacks rigor in it's very base... mysticism was never a very accurate "science".

lol are you referring to my post ? I said it myself that I don't want to bother with rigor in a post on a forum, but yeah studying the myth is a science, anthropology or history depending on how you consider it. People who think that those myth are pure ignorance, blind belief, are wrong: those beliefs have a role in those societies just likes in our modern society we have myth and belief (economy is a serious case in this regard).


Looks like you're neglecting more than rigor in your post.

What is your point exactly? Something something 'economy is a serious case in this regard'.

wtf?

My point was that, in those culture, the end of the world most likely also mean the birth of another world.

Economy is based on so many ridiculous belief / myth on what is the purpose of live and how economic growth will lead us to a better world.


So you're saying that belief in economic theory in general is 'ridiculous'?

Look at Japan's rebuilding after WWII
Look at China's progress resulting from Deng's economic reforms.

You would have them starving in mud huts.

No, I'm not saying economy as a whole is ridiculous, but economy carry some belief about the purpose of life and how money alone will build a better world. And history prove that it's wrong, having more money does not mean the end of poverty, and everybody knows that money will not makes you happy. It's a myth, and if you look at history, those belief are tainted with religious perspectiv (you can make the list, almost all the fathers of economy are religious).


i think it is so hilarious that i get temp banned for saying stuff like "lolwut" and "r u srs dawg" when the stuff written in this quote is so much worse.

first of all, how exactly are you using the term "money"? do you mean paper money or do you mean what money actually signifies, i.e., production? if paper money, then no shit, having more money does not end poverty. if production, then how does having more production not end poverty? poverty is the lack of material goods and services. if you have more production, i.e., more money, you no longer have poverty.

and look at this blanket statement of, "everybody knows that money will not make you happy." now you are being unclear on, not just one term, but two. what do you mean by happy? and again, by money, do you mean just having a huge wad of paper money under your mattress or are you referring to the things money actually signifies?

and who are you referring to as the "fathers of economy" ...

You're serious ? Money does not mean production, are you a troll ? Money is money man, $$.
Having more does not mean the end of poverty, it's also a question of distribution, I mean come on, that's pretty simple to know that in world where 95% of the wealth is in the hand of what 10% of the people ? (don't know the exact stats)
I'm not gonna argue about happiness, you can read some work about that, you need a certain amount of money to be happy, but having more than a certain amount will not help you achieve happiness faster. And by happyness I mean "a mental state of well-being characterized by positive emotions ranging from contentment to intense joy", but maybe you don't know that since you're such a troll.
And the fathers of economy, well the one that built the damn science ? Montchretien, aristote, thomas more, john hales who cares, they were all philosopher / moralist / religious. Heck Adam Smith, the first fully "economist" was a philosopher in moral philosophy.
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
Heyoka
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Katowice25012 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-13 20:12:54
March 13 2011 20:03 GMT
#631
On March 14 2011 00:59 Penke wrote:
How can the world possibly end in 2012 when i have a youghurt that expires in 2013?


What if 2012 is just the rapture, leaving 2013 to be the year of those left behind and their yoghurt?
@RealHeyoka | ESL / DreamHack StarCraft Lead
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-13 20:06:52
March 13 2011 20:04 GMT
#632
On March 14 2011 04:18 Aoi SCV wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 03:56 travis wrote:
Everyone please realize, space is 3 dimensional. The planets might align(or come close) in one dimension but there is still another dimension required for them to align in a straight line.


I'm not sure I understand you, but it is certainly possible for the planets to align in a straight line. The solar system is reasonably planar, so they are already "aligned" in two dimensions.


the solar system might be "reasonably" planar but it's far from flat...
regardless of what you say the planets aren't going to align in a straight line at all, probably not ever

and even though the solar system is "reasonably" planar as you say, some of the planets are quite a bit on their own planes, with quite a bit different skews to their trajectories

I'd expect you already know this so I don't see why you are arguing with a good point that I made

redFF
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States3910 Posts
March 13 2011 20:07 GMT
#633
On March 14 2011 04:15 TALegion wrote:
SO MUCH SHIT is gonna go down the week before 2012. It'll either be a dreadful or HILARIOUS year.


the shit will go down in december, as the world is scheduled to end just before christmas. Probably nothing will happen, but hey if their is looting and shooting going on i will most definitely be in.
Ryndika
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1489 Posts
March 13 2011 20:09 GMT
#634
Mayas predicted the calendar ending on 2012, what's the bid deal about it? We've done so now for 2011 times too.
as useful as teasalt
HavoK.
Profile Joined March 2010
United States172 Posts
March 13 2011 20:12 GMT
#635
I;m pretty sure that it talks about how a Great change is coming not necessarily a huge destruction.
Aoi SCV
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden10 Posts
March 13 2011 20:18 GMT
#636
On March 14 2011 05:04 travis wrote:
and even though the solar system is "reasonably" planar as you say, some of the planets are quite a bit on their own planes, with quite a bit different skews to their trajectories

I'd expect you already know this so I don't see why you are arguing with a good point that I made

Maybe a "reasonable straight" line is enough to make magic happen? =)

I think the way the term is used is when the planets form a straight line "as seen from above" and the accuracy with which the planets are supposed to be aligned is rather low. That means that there is already an approximation involved, one that is worse (I guess) than assuming that all of the planet lie perfectly in a plane.

I'm not used to post on forums in English, I hope I make sense. =)
ShamTao
Profile Joined September 2010
United States419 Posts
March 13 2011 20:19 GMT
#637
The only reason 2012 might bring the end of the world is that so man f'ing people will believe it and end up CAUSING it. Ugh I hate people sometimes
In the game of drones, you win or you die!
nigritude
Profile Joined July 2010
83 Posts
March 13 2011 20:37 GMT
#638
On March 14 2011 04:58 WhiteDog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 14 2011 04:26 nigritude wrote:
On March 14 2011 04:07 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 03:13 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 03:09 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 14 2011 01:30 Consolidate wrote:
On March 14 2011 00:49 WhiteDog wrote:
On March 13 2011 23:09 Kukaracha wrote:
Your post already lacks rigor in it's very base... mysticism was never a very accurate "science".

lol are you referring to my post ? I said it myself that I don't want to bother with rigor in a post on a forum, but yeah studying the myth is a science, anthropology or history depending on how you consider it. People who think that those myth are pure ignorance, blind belief, are wrong: those beliefs have a role in those societies just likes in our modern society we have myth and belief (economy is a serious case in this regard).


Looks like you're neglecting more than rigor in your post.

What is your point exactly? Something something 'economy is a serious case in this regard'.

wtf?

My point was that, in those culture, the end of the world most likely also mean the birth of another world.

Economy is based on so many ridiculous belief / myth on what is the purpose of live and how economic growth will lead us to a better world.


So you're saying that belief in economic theory in general is 'ridiculous'?

Look at Japan's rebuilding after WWII
Look at China's progress resulting from Deng's economic reforms.

You would have them starving in mud huts.

No, I'm not saying economy as a whole is ridiculous, but economy carry some belief about the purpose of life and how money alone will build a better world. And history prove that it's wrong, having more money does not mean the end of poverty, and everybody knows that money will not makes you happy. It's a myth, and if you look at history, those belief are tainted with religious perspectiv (you can make the list, almost all the fathers of economy are religious).


i think it is so hilarious that i get temp banned for saying stuff like "lolwut" and "r u srs dawg" when the stuff written in this quote is so much worse.

first of all, how exactly are you using the term "money"? do you mean paper money or do you mean what money actually signifies, i.e., production? if paper money, then no shit, having more money does not end poverty. if production, then how does having more production not end poverty? poverty is the lack of material goods and services. if you have more production, i.e., more money, you no longer have poverty.

and look at this blanket statement of, "everybody knows that money will not make you happy." now you are being unclear on, not just one term, but two. what do you mean by happy? and again, by money, do you mean just having a huge wad of paper money under your mattress or are you referring to the things money actually signifies?

and who are you referring to as the "fathers of economy" ...

You're serious ? Money does not mean production, are you a troll ? Money is money man, $$.
Having more does not mean the end of poverty, it's also a question of distribution, I mean come on, that's pretty simple to know that in world where 95% of the wealth is in the hand of what 10% of the people ? (don't know the exact stats)
I'm not gonna argue about happiness, you can read some work about that, you need a certain amount of money to be happy, but having more than a certain amount will not help you achieve happiness faster. And by happyness I mean "a mental state of well-being characterized by positive emotions ranging from contentment to intense joy", but maybe you don't know that since you're such a troll.
And the fathers of economy, well the one that built the damn science ? Montchretien, aristote, thomas more, john hales who cares, they were all philosopher / moralist / religious. Heck Adam Smith, the first fully "economist" was a philosopher in moral philosophy.


is the reason why 95% of the posts on TL about economics deserve a "lolwut"

Grummler
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany743 Posts
March 13 2011 20:55 GMT
#639
We know jesus birth with an accuracy of ~5 years. So this random date the mayas calculated could already past by without anyone recognizing...

Also: I am only 24 years old, but i already survived three of these "the world will end"-dates.
workers, supply, money, workers, supply, money, workers, ...
playa
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States1284 Posts
March 13 2011 21:52 GMT
#640
Could you imagine if our society made a calendar and "randomly" had the last day be thousands of years from now and not even in a year that ended with a 0 or a 5? Plus, it wasn't even the beginning of the month or the end of the month, but a precise day? That's interesting... it's eerie to even be living in a time where there is such a obscure/arcane date mentioned. It makes you think.

If it's merely supposed to be a time of change, you have to assume they felt there would be more "change" in that year/day than all of those previous years? It's as if someone has a time machine and is just trolling current era's. Rambling; simply find it all very interesting.
Prev 1 30 31 32 33 34 42 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 26m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 374
ProTech146
JuggernautJason123
SteadfastSC 123
SpeCial 115
Ketroc 65
elazer 45
UpATreeSC 7
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 215
Dewaltoss 172
Shuttle 125
firebathero 106
EG.Machine 11
Noble 9
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma187
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
byalli709
kRYSTAL_49
minikerr25
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox2008
Mew2King31
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor388
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi2419
Grubby2026
FrodaN1849
fl0m1218
B2W.Neo995
Beastyqt695
mouzStarbuck223
Liquid`Hasu217
XaKoH 100
ArmadaUGS70
summit1g57
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV1713
gamesdonequick1465
BasetradeTV43
StarCraft 2
angryscii 28
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta6
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 41
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos3116
• TFBlade1224
Other Games
• imaqtpie2219
• Shiphtur262
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3h 26m
RongYI Cup
14h 26m
Wardi Open
17h 26m
Monday Night Weeklies
20h 26m
OSC
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 12h
RongYI Cup
1d 14h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 17h
Replay Cast
2 days
RongYI Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
HomeStory Cup
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
HomeStory Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
HomeStory Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-24
OSC Championship Season 13
Tektek Cup #1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Proleague 2026-01-25
Rongyi Cup S3
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W6
Escore Tournament S1: W7
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.