|
On November 08 2020 02:04 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2020 01:52 Liquid`Drone wrote:On November 08 2020 01:43 m4ini wrote:On November 08 2020 01:41 Liquid`Drone wrote:On November 08 2020 01:36 Biff The Understudy wrote:On November 08 2020 01:08 Liquid`Drone wrote:On November 07 2020 23:44 Biff The Understudy wrote: Savage comeback a year after by Greta Thunberg. She annoys me most of the time but she is fiercely smart:
Seriously? She annoys you most of the time? Oh, she is awesome in many ways and her achievements are remarkable. I also think she fights the good fight, and most certainly the right way. Her persona really does get on my nerves though. Does that make me a bad person? Honestly, there are few things I find more pathetic than adults who are annoyed by Greta Thunberg. Genuinely very surprised to see you in that group. The fuck? She absolutely is annoying. That's not judging her ideas. In fact, the very idea that adults who're generally easier annoyed at younger people somehow are pathetic because it's Thunberg is absolutely idiotic. Not really sorry you are offended. I genuinely think it speaks very poorly of a person if they look at Greta Thunberg and think 'oh god, she annoys me', and I think people who find themselves thinking like that should reflect around what aspect of her annoys them, and then try to understand how unreasonable that is, and then try to work on how to better themselves so it's no longer the case. You're reading too much into it, the public speaking mannerisms of teenagers tend to be cringe inducing. This isn't a value judgement. True. I do also find her uncomfortable to listen to, but I think that's intentional. I think she's doing good work, as she's clearly trying to make her audience uncomfortable. The thing is that we aren't her target audience : world leaders are. And yes, all of them deserve to squirm on the issue of climate change.
I think China has a better chance of dealing with Climate change successfully than the US does. Their centralized economy means they can go ahead and shut down all coal mining once they have enough renewables, while we're still investing in scrubbing coal fumes because of propaganda about a tiny amount of jobs in one region that are dropping for unrelated reasons.
|
Has everyone seen the America: Endgame clip, based on the final Avengers fight? I don't remember the last time a meme video made me laugh and cry so hard, simultaneously. It's absolutely perfect for this election. I found it on Facebook (couldn't find it on YouTube). It's a must-watch: https://fb.watch/1Czqwj4JhP/
|
On November 08 2020 02:07 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2020 02:06 PhoenixVoid wrote: Biden's walking into possibly one of the most nightmarish scenarios a president could walk into. A raging pandemic, a harsh economic crisis, demands for tangible reform in race relations and policing, environmental crises, reuniting a country more bitterly divided than ever, challenging China's rising presence and many, many more issues. I hope he finds the strength and people to find the light through this. Yeah, it's not the greatest legacy to inherit at the moment.
2008 groundhog day. But people don't learn, what are you gonna do.
|
|
|
On November 08 2020 02:10 Vindicare605 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2020 02:01 Starlightsun wrote:On November 08 2020 01:52 WombaT wrote: Eugh Donald just fuck off already.
One thing I would be curious about is how widespread the kind of sentiment he is articulating there actually is. Of course the QAnon folk of the world will believe this kind of thing but how is it playing with the more moderate Republican voter? I think it's gonna be a significant portion of the country unfortunately. It's probably going to depend on how hard Fox News leans into the narrative. If the rumors that were buzzing around yesterday are true, then Rupert Murdoch has already told Trump to concede. It doesn't look like he's going to be fighting Trump's fight this time.
That's a relief to hear. Makes me worry less about violence and stuff. But now as farva said we'll see how strong our institutions hold with all the legal crap he's going to pull.
|
Thanks to all who posted updates and explained what was happening. This result is such a huge relief.
|
Giuliani claims 600000 ballots are in question because of the observing thing
|
Northern Ireland26790 Posts
On November 08 2020 02:12 Nevuk wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2020 02:04 Dan HH wrote:On November 08 2020 01:52 Liquid`Drone wrote:On November 08 2020 01:43 m4ini wrote:On November 08 2020 01:41 Liquid`Drone wrote:On November 08 2020 01:36 Biff The Understudy wrote:On November 08 2020 01:08 Liquid`Drone wrote:Seriously? She annoys you most of the time? Oh, she is awesome in many ways and her achievements are remarkable. I also think she fights the good fight, and most certainly the right way. Her persona really does get on my nerves though. Does that make me a bad person? Honestly, there are few things I find more pathetic than adults who are annoyed by Greta Thunberg. Genuinely very surprised to see you in that group. The fuck? She absolutely is annoying. That's not judging her ideas. In fact, the very idea that adults who're generally easier annoyed at younger people somehow are pathetic because it's Thunberg is absolutely idiotic. Not really sorry you are offended. I genuinely think it speaks very poorly of a person if they look at Greta Thunberg and think 'oh god, she annoys me', and I think people who find themselves thinking like that should reflect around what aspect of her annoys them, and then try to understand how unreasonable that is, and then try to work on how to better themselves so it's no longer the case. You're reading too much into it, the public speaking mannerisms of teenagers tend to be cringe inducing. This isn't a value judgement. True. I do also find her uncomfortable to listen to, but I think that's intentional. I think she's doing good work, as she's clearly trying to make her audience uncomfortable. The thing is that we aren't her target audience : world leaders are. And yes, all of them deserve to squirm on the issue of climate change. I think China has a better chance of dealing with Climate change successfully than the US does. Their centralized economy means they can go ahead and shut down all coal mining once they have enough renewables, while we're still investing in scrubbing coal fumes because of propaganda about a tiny amount of jobs in one region that are dropping for unrelated reasons. I think you're right there, at least structurally. As to whether the will will ever be there that's another thing entirely, but it would be a lot easier to actually do with China's system.
|
But there are observers there. There always has been.
|
Best part is that trunk is golfing right now lol
|
United States43988 Posts
On November 08 2020 01:11 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: This is our country. I mean expect some cringe moments at least.
Trump: “Get me the Four Seasons”
Trump’s administration: “We couldn’t get the Four Seasons but we got you a Four Seasons”
|
Northern Ireland26790 Posts
This press conference is absolutely shameful.
|
On November 08 2020 02:19 KOFgokuon wrote: Best part is that trunk is golfing right now lol Nothing odd here, that's what he does more often than not.
|
|
|
On November 08 2020 02:20 WombaT wrote: This press conference is absolutely shameful. I like when he just randomly started flaming Philly's crime rate
|
|
|
If you needed any more evidence that Trump and Giuliani don't have much of a grasp of the law, look no further than this observers nonsense.
Even if it were true (it's not) judges will instantly say "well what do you want, to send someone back in time to observe?"
Because it's clear counting the votes again 1) is already happening several places and 2) won't change anything.
|
I'm guessing they are at least going to employ competent lawyers despite being so incompetent themselves?
|
On November 08 2020 01:55 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2020 01:52 Liquid`Drone wrote:On November 08 2020 01:43 m4ini wrote:On November 08 2020 01:41 Liquid`Drone wrote:On November 08 2020 01:36 Biff The Understudy wrote:On November 08 2020 01:08 Liquid`Drone wrote:Seriously? She annoys you most of the time? Oh, she is awesome in many ways and her achievements are remarkable. I also think she fights the good fight, and most certainly the right way. Her persona really does get on my nerves though. Does that make me a bad person? Honestly, there are few things I find more pathetic than adults who are annoyed by Greta Thunberg. Genuinely very surprised to see you in that group. The fuck? She absolutely is annoying. That's not judging her ideas. In fact, the very idea that adults who're generally easier annoyed at younger people somehow are pathetic because it's Thunberg is absolutely idiotic. Not really sorry you are offended. I genuinely think it speaks very poorly of a person if they look at Greta Thunberg and think 'oh god, she annoys me', and I think people who find themselves thinking like that should reflect around what aspect of her annoys them, and then try to understand how unreasonable that is, and then try to work on how to better themselves so it's no longer the case. Why on earth do you think i'm "offended"? I don't give a shit what you think of me lol. But, for fun, you're saying i'm supposed to change so she is less annoying to me? Lets be very real here, i've not even mentioned her ideas, i said she's annoying in the same way GreenHorizon is annoying. She has an annoying personality. Take your white knighting somewhere else. And don't talk about pathetic if you're a guy judging people by whether or not they like whoever you adore. I'm generalising heavily here and ofc it's my impression only. People using terms like white knighting or Snowflake for three matter in any serious way should try to paraphrase it differently because these terms are so vastly different on meaning from person to person that their statement becomes almost useless, at least ambiguous.
Will trump speak or is he really golfing?
|
On November 08 2020 02:24 Starlightsun wrote: I'm guessing they are at least going to employ competent lawyers despite being so incompetent themselves?
Based on their track record this week, I don't think any competent lawyers are going to touch this with a 10 foot pole.
|
|
|
|
|
|