he said it was a photoshop DRAWING tho... NOT a MANIPULATION... there is definitely a difference

many people use tablets and draw and do digital paintings in photoshop....

FOR Example:

here is aphotoshop drawing with a tablet... i love it :-D

So much energy and movement in this one. love the color scheme
the scribbling lines aid to the scene being more frantic

uberMatt

Canada659 Posts

May 28 2007 05:19 GMT

#123

hey does anyone have any really good nature paintings? ie natural landscapes painted, i think it was popular from dutch painters in 1800s but i wasn't really paying attention when i went to the art gallery in london because i was 11 and bored :DD, for me this is the best art ;].

zuqbu

Germany797 Posts

May 28 2007 05:52 GMT

#124

If you're looking for dutch landscape paintings you're more likely to find works from the 17th century, in the 19th century this genre was dominated by french artists.
The National Gallery has an excellent website where you can browse the complete collection:
http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/
Since paintings from this era are considered public domain by now you are also likely to find content at WikiCommons:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

This is a 17th century dutch landscape painting, with a typical low horizon to have room for cloud formations and light impressions.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Jan_van_Goyen

This a 19th century impressionist landscape.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cezanne

Perhaps by looking at these you can tell what you're looking for?

fusionsdf

Canada15390 Posts

May 28 2007 05:53 GMT

#125

Really really glad this thread has managed to avoid being infested with modern 'art'

suffeli

Finland772 Posts

May 28 2007 06:15 GMT

#126

HR Giger, Li I, 1974

Discussing what art is "good" or what makes an art piece is better than the other is about personal taste. Personally I wouldn't really care if someone is fond of paintings made of poo which likely many people would find utterly disgusting.

zuqbu

Germany797 Posts

May 28 2007 06:18 GMT

#127

On May 28 2007 14:53 fusionsdf wrote:
Really really glad this thread has managed to avoid being infested with modern 'art'

Oh I would like to, but most modern art is sculpture or plastic and thus pictures don't do it any justice.

I mean I could tell that is a 7 x 2,4 metre steel plate that is standing freely and by itself, but there is no magic to the photograph, or is there? You have to be close enough to smell the rusty metal to get it.

Also one could say that modern art starts at the time abstraction was applied to the image, in which case we had a lot of modern art, Salvadore Dali or Edward Munch for example.

There's is such a beauty to the reduced form of the woman, Picasso's skill is unbelievable.

zuqbu

Germany797 Posts

May 28 2007 06:32 GMT

#128

On May 28 2007 15:15 suffeli wrote:Personally I wouldn't really care if someone is fond of paintings made of poo which likely many people would find utterly disgusting.

Actually there has been an artist in the last century who sold his own shit in cans. They were even labelled "artist's shit", some people really bought it. But I struggle to remember his name.

EDIT: Google is my friend.

In 1961 Piero Manzoni produced 90 cans of 30 grams each.

EDIT: There's even a wikipedia article about it o_o http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artist's_Shit

"He labelled them as '100% pure artist's shit' in Italian, English, French, and German, and sold them for the price of their weight in gold."

"Some of the cans have exploded or leaked as a result of internal pressure or the corrosion of the metallic parts."

Hilarious :D

xM(Z

Romania5298 Posts

May 28 2007 06:39 GMT

#129

KizZBG

u gotta skate8152 Posts

May 28 2007 06:47 GMT

#130

[QUOTE]On May 28 2007 15:15 suffeli wrote:
[IMG]http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/157/lihrgigerok3.jpg[IMG]

HR Giger, Li I, 1974

Discussing what art is "good" or what makes an art piece is better than the other is about personal taste. Personally I wouldn't really care if someone is fond of paintings made of poo which likely many people would find utterly disgusting.[/QUOTE]

<3 Giger

[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/40/Birth_machine.jpg[/img]

ebba

Australia63 Posts

May 28 2007 08:32 GMT

#131

Don't know if this has been posted yet, but www.wwwcomcom.com is awesomeness

zizou21

United States3683 Posts

May 28 2007 15:44 GMT

#132

On May 28 2007 14:53 fusionsdf wrote:
Really really glad this thread has managed to avoid being infested with modern 'art'

yeah, god forbid anything that is modern!

Capt. Moroni

United States533 Posts

May 28 2007 21:51 GMT

#133

Michelangelo's Tondo Doni, loved this painting ever since I first saw it at the Uffizi.

Here you have the sacred and the profane, with the groups of naked people in the background, and Mary, Joseph and Jesus in the foreground. You also see John the Baptist on that border between the two, looking up at the young Jesus, and dressed in his hermit clothing. Their arms form a circle, you can follow Joseph's shoulder to Mary's arm, to Jesus' arm back to Joseph, Godhead symbolism.

And it looks amazing, amazingly difficult when you consider he painted it by hand. Just look at the fold and creases of their clothing, really looks like it was done by a computer when you see it first-hand.

FirstBorn

Romania3955 Posts

May 28 2007 22:39 GMT

#134

+ Show Spoiler +

Hiroshima after nuke.

d4d

Switzerland1066 Posts

May 28 2007 22:43 GMT

#135

Francis Bacon : In Memory of George Dyer
Can be seen at the fondation Beyeler in Basel

Equinox_kr

United States7395 Posts

May 28 2007 22:50 GMT

#136

Pretty self-explanatory, I suppose.

But I really love how da Vinci drew this.

MyLostTemple

United States2921 Posts

May 29 2007 02:00 GMT

#137

lol @ ppl still arguing over that 1st pic i posted

i'm glad i have provoked discussion... but please keep posting pics and not just opinions.

Hans-Titan

Denmark1711 Posts

May 29 2007 02:29 GMT

#138

CharlieMurphy

United States22895 Posts

May 29 2007 05:28 GMT

#139

Dali is one of my favorite artists. I have a very nice book on his works. I also like the Artists that blizzard has, I just recently bought a book called \"art of WOW\" which at first glance was the butt of a joke. Most the work in there by Sons of the Storm is very nice. I love sketches more than paintings, I prefer cartoon, or fantasy art over realism or still drawings.

http://www.sonsofthestorm.com/artists.html#_self

Thammer
Samwise
Twincruiser
Raneman
& Metzen

I'm also into graffiti and I like artists like:

http://www.artcrimes.org/ - general
http://www.imscared.com/ -craola
http://www.daimgallery.com/ -daim
Saber - LA
Craola - LA
Revok - LA
Sever - LA
Daim - GER
Cope - NY
Can2 - NY
Kab - AUS

etc, etc.

Servolisk

United States5241 Posts

May 31 2007 03:07 GMT

#140

I found this on YouTube since it was on the front page, it is "500 years of female portraits". Their faces are morphed into each other, it's great IMO.