EPT"@PeteWilliamsNBC reports on @MSNBC that Rod Rosenstein is on his way to the White House. He has been summoned to the W.H. The W.H. is saying Rosenstein will resign. But it's Pete's understanding that he will not resign and that if the W.H. wants him out, he'll have to be fired."
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 724
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20321 Posts
"@PeteWilliamsNBC reports on @MSNBC that Rod Rosenstein is on his way to the White House. He has been summoned to the W.H. The W.H. is saying Rosenstein will resign. But it's Pete's understanding that he will not resign and that if the W.H. wants him out, he'll have to be fired." | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15725 Posts
On September 25 2018 00:56 ShoCkeyy wrote: So I just read an AP report that Rosenstein was actually heading to the white house knowingly he was going to be fired, so there's news reports that he resigned, but then there's reports that he's going to get fired. Either way, if he did actually resign, doesn't that mean the WH can put a body in his place? Having implications on the investigation now? I will be very surprised of Rosenstein resigns. The only way he would do that is if he needs to serve as a witness and thus recuse himself. | ||
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
I wonder what's actually going on. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Excludos
Norway8165 Posts
On September 24 2018 22:35 Grumbels wrote: This is a collection of headlines from the pro-Trump subreddit, it's just the front page with only a handful of omissions. This is what they're obsessed with right now. Read this and tell me if you think that these people would give any accuser a fair hearing. + Show Spoiler + The Left's weaponization of the #MeToo movement is criminal. The feckless right allowed them to use and win with it against Roy Moore. Now ANY and ALL men they oppose will be attacked under this new method. And the media will push and propagate it. Destruction of a society. + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](https://i.redd.it/8a5ltrc4o2o11.png) Democrats don't care about the truth, only whether the allegations serve to grant them more power over their opposition. The real victims here are not "Dr." Ford or Ms. Ramirez. The real victims are these three.[picture of Kavanaugh's daughters] + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](https://i.redd.it/lvizy7fld4o11.png) Liberals waking up this morning to find out they're *OFFICIALLY* the party of "Politically Timed Rape Accusations" Politically timed rape accusations ignite and pill "war on boys" moms. Keep it up Dems, you'll have no friends left. THIS MOTHERFUCKER CALLED FOR CANCELLATION OF THE THURSDAY HEARING [Feinstein] The face of EVIL. Dianne Feinstein knew Christine Blasey Ford was lying. She also knew that all 4 of the “eye witnesses” denied witnessing ANY of Ford’s claims. Dianne Feinstein knowingly allowed an innocent man be called a RAPIST & his family threatened. A special place in... They over-used this dirty trick. Now, it has lost all power. I don't believe them anymore. I may never believe another accusation for the rest if my life. The best friend of Ramirez tells Ronan Farrow of Ramirez: “this is a woman I was best friends with. We shared intimate details of our lives. And I was never told this story by her, or by anyone else. It never came up. I didn’t see it; I never heard of it happening.” Re-Run: Not a SINGLE person this new "accuser" says was present at this "allegation" 35+ years ago SAYS IT OCCURRED. NOT A ONE! + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](https://imgur.com/MUCJPu6) ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! CONFIRM KAVANAUGH NOW!!!!!!!!!! New liar Deborah Ramirez now says that at Yale in the 1980s Kavanaugh 'exposed himself' and 'slapped her face with his privates'. BREAKING: Third accuser comes forward, claims Brett Kavanaugh and her grew close, exchanged "rings" in "ceremony," even carried two children to term and gave birth! NBC, The New York Times and The Washington Post passed on Ronan Farrow's Kavanaugh accuser story because reporters felt uneasy about the facts. Think about that: NBC, The New York Times and The Washington Post all passed on a story that could've made Trump/Kavanugh look bad As a bonus, here is a particularly idiotic comment exchange. That was a sad exchange, but I think this comment encapsulates the mentality of the forum perfectly: + Show Spoiler + That's because T-D is used as a testing ground for 'new ideas' by the GOP due to its enormous right-leaning user base and popularity. They seemingly think they are the most important people in the world. So important in fact that GOP leadership themselves goes there for advice. They completely fail to recognise that in the grand scheme of things they are just a tiny breeding ground for conspiracy theories, false information, circle jerks, bots and trolls. That said, while perspective is certainly something a large portion of Republicans are lacking these days I don't think these guys represent how the regular everyday republican behaves or thinks of any given situation... but that could just be me being naive I guess. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On September 25 2018 01:14 Plansix wrote: A bunch of people at the White House claimed that they finally got him and he was going to resign. Some outlets picked up that story and reporters who don’t jump the gun did some fact checking. So now we know it’s a meeting. Seems like it was discussed over the weekend but he did not resign, but that caused speculation. Seems like he expects to be fired for not resigning basically. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20321 Posts
https://act.moveon.org/event/mueller-firing-rapid-response/search/ | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
Source: | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18117 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Edit: Apparently we are back on for Thursday. So prepare your best Rod Puns for that day. Spare the Rod is already taken, so be original. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15725 Posts
On September 25 2018 02:03 Plansix wrote: I have also double checked, Deputy AG is a political appointee, which the Senate confirms. Trump would have to appoint a new DAG if he fired Rosenstein, which would likely get a lot of push back from the Senate. I also think there is a lot of wishful thinking by folks in the White House who see Rosenstein as a way to kill the Meuller investigation. Edit: Apparently we are back on for Thursday. So prepare your best Rod Puns for that day. Spare the Rod is already taken, so be original. Wait, what is back on for Thursday? | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
There is a second meeting with Trump, where he will like not fire Rosenstein because he is chicken shit. The meeting itself is pretty inappropriate by DOJ standards. In general the President stays away from the DOJ to avoid tainting any cases they might be working on. But this is Trump and he doesn't respect tje rule of law, so he is going to break that unspoken rule. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On September 25 2018 02:07 On_Slaught wrote: Thursday is also the Kavanaugh hearing. Perhaps Sept 27 can become National Consitutional Crisis Day if things go off the rails as they likely will. You know what a funny tie-in to Watergate is? As part of the Saturday Night Massacre, the AG and DAG both resigned in protest, then it became the job of the Solicitor General, Robert Bork, to fire Special Counsel Archibald Cox. Robert Bork was the original nominee for the seat Anthony Kennedy got, but he got voted down by the Senate for his role in Watergate (allegedly, he'd been promised the nomination in exchange for firing Cox). Then he was salty about it and resigned from his spot on the DC Circuit. Also, this is where the term "to bork" comes from. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20321 Posts
On September 25 2018 02:03 Plansix wrote: I have also double checked, Deputy AG is a political appointee, which the Senate confirms. Trump would have to appoint a new DAG if he fired Rosenstein, which would likely get a lot of push back from the Senate. I also think there is a lot of wishful thinking by folks in the White House who see Rosenstein as a way to kill the Meuller investigation. Edit: Apparently we are back on for Thursday. So prepare your best Rod Puns for that day. Spare the Rod is already taken, so be original. Deputy AG is a political appointee, which the Senate confirms. Trump would have to appoint a new DAG if he fired Rosenstein, which would likely get a lot of push back from the Senate. No need for senate confirmation if Rosenstein was to resign which is why it's particularly concerning that the white house would lie about it | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15725 Posts
| ||
| ||
