| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22678 Posts
On November 01 2026 14:28 Geiko wrote: yesThe drawing is clearly a nude girl. The prepubescent part is implied by the small breasts and the fact that the letter was for infamous child molester Joffrey Epstein. Are you being purposefully obtuse ? | ||
|
oBlade
United States6650 Posts
On November 01 2026 14:28 Geiko wrote: The drawing is clearly a nude girl. The prepubescent part is implied by the small breasts and the fact that the letter was for infamous child molester Joffrey Epstein. Are you being purposefully obtuse ? You see the hourglass curves at the hips or you're just blind? Even CNBC said "woman." Like your whole point goes hard if you don't know what hips are and they happen after puberty, or what MSPaint is (I can leak a letter right now from DJT asking Geiko to beg Macron to drop tariffs, with the exact same signature), and also if you think Joffrey [sic] Epstein's entire life was child molestation (he FAMOUSLY fantasized about a eugenics island of an army of people bearing his children, which cannot involve prepubescent girls if you know how biology works). And you have to believe they would publicize Joffrey's [sic] criminal predilections at his birthday party in 2003, in a collection of materials including a bunch of photos with him and various adult "girlfriends." I mean, other than that, you have a perfectly ironclad belief that this: ![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/qY5BhZL5/lol.png) is pedophilia because small breasts are prepubescent. By ironclad, I mean I am suspicious of the level of indignation two MSPaint strokes creates in you. + Show Spoiler + In reality, prepubescent means no breasts, not small breasts because again, the "pub" in prepubescent means puberty, which is when secondary sexual characteristics develop in both sexes, the "pre" means before, as in "not puberty yet." But thinking small breasts imply prepubescence is its own separate misguided belief you've volunteered. Perhaps skinny women should be banned from the beach, or the government should fine women who don't get implants to match your expectation of what they should look like. | ||
FlaShFTW
United States10598 Posts
| ||
|
LightSpectra
United States3465 Posts
On November 01 2026 13:50 oBlade wrote: This is what I'm talking about, the idea you saw 4 squiggly lines (?) and conclude CNBC published a drawing of a nude prepubescent girl. It's like a Rorschach test that you keep failing. Gee, I wonder why the White House was so panicked to say it was fake then lol | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
Yamato Cup
IPSL
Artosis vs RiceHat
Kyrie vs Sony
Map Test Tournament
WardiTV Weekly
Ultimate Battle
Rush vs BeSt
Replay Cast
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
