EPT
On August 22 2026 13:40 oBlade wrote:
Disgusting behavior.
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2026 10:29 LightSpectra wrote:
So it wouldn't be a bad thing if I said you had an undeveloped brain and whore mother?
On August 22 2026 10:19 ETisME wrote:
Anger isn't always a bad thing.
On August 22 2026 09:59 LightSpectra wrote:
To clarify: when I say "social media ban" I actually just mean social media that's organized by hidden algorithms.
I have nothing against internet forums, or how Facebook used to work before there was a general feed that displayed "suggested content" from people/organizations you didn't explicitly opt to follow. These algorithms are cooked with the explicit intent to spread anger, misinformation, and extremism.
I don't know why there must be some "correction" to "globalism", maybe define both of these terms and I can comment on it.
On August 22 2026 09:45 ETisME wrote:
Economic downfall leads to more crime and more radical policies are a known fact.
You can blame it on social media, but social media like any other media, only spread more information.
We aren't being shut in by mainstream media/state media, because people can directly access all sort of information from people being directly impacted.
Globalist policies has been going on past non stop for a decade, a strong conservative movment was bound to happen sooner or later to so correction.
"People shouldn't be so extreme" or "they are getting wrong information" is not something your mind should go to, because you are begging for having even more gov controlled narrative.
On August 21 2026 22:40 LightSpectra wrote:
There's a lot of discourse about how economic downturns directly leads people to fascism or other extremist ideologies, but that hasn't actually played out in history. There have been 30 or so recessions and depressions in United States history and while it's true that Know Nothings and Teabaggers arose after some of them, there were also plenty of similarly-sized extremist groups that arose during prosperous times, and almost all of them petered out without receiving significant political power the way MAGA did. It can't be a coincidence that everyone owning a smartphone with social media coincided with the meteoric rise of far-right movements across the world and it can't simply be explained by material conditions.
There's a lot of discourse about how economic downturns directly leads people to fascism or other extremist ideologies, but that hasn't actually played out in history. There have been 30 or so recessions and depressions in United States history and while it's true that Know Nothings and Teabaggers arose after some of them, there were also plenty of similarly-sized extremist groups that arose during prosperous times, and almost all of them petered out without receiving significant political power the way MAGA did. It can't be a coincidence that everyone owning a smartphone with social media coincided with the meteoric rise of far-right movements across the world and it can't simply be explained by material conditions.
Economic downfall leads to more crime and more radical policies are a known fact.
You can blame it on social media, but social media like any other media, only spread more information.
We aren't being shut in by mainstream media/state media, because people can directly access all sort of information from people being directly impacted.
Globalist policies has been going on past non stop for a decade, a strong conservative movment was bound to happen sooner or later to so correction.
"People shouldn't be so extreme" or "they are getting wrong information" is not something your mind should go to, because you are begging for having even more gov controlled narrative.
To clarify: when I say "social media ban" I actually just mean social media that's organized by hidden algorithms.
I have nothing against internet forums, or how Facebook used to work before there was a general feed that displayed "suggested content" from people/organizations you didn't explicitly opt to follow. These algorithms are cooked with the explicit intent to spread anger, misinformation, and extremism.
I don't know why there must be some "correction" to "globalism", maybe define both of these terms and I can comment on it.
Anger isn't always a bad thing.
So it wouldn't be a bad thing if I said you had an undeveloped brain and whore mother?
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2026 12:21 KwarK wrote:
It seems like valuable medical information. Why would you not be concerned about this information? Presumably because you already received it from other authoritative sources.
On August 22 2026 11:37 ETisME wrote:
What if I told you I don't care about random internet users comment?
On August 22 2026 10:29 LightSpectra wrote:
So it wouldn't be a bad thing if I said you had an undeveloped brain and whore mother?
On August 22 2026 10:19 ETisME wrote:
Anger isn't always a bad thing.
On August 22 2026 09:59 LightSpectra wrote:
To clarify: when I say "social media ban" I actually just mean social media that's organized by hidden algorithms.
I have nothing against internet forums, or how Facebook used to work before there was a general feed that displayed "suggested content" from people/organizations you didn't explicitly opt to follow. These algorithms are cooked with the explicit intent to spread anger, misinformation, and extremism.
I don't know why there must be some "correction" to "globalism", maybe define both of these terms and I can comment on it.
On August 22 2026 09:45 ETisME wrote:
Economic downfall leads to more crime and more radical policies are a known fact.
You can blame it on social media, but social media like any other media, only spread more information.
We aren't being shut in by mainstream media/state media, because people can directly access all sort of information from people being directly impacted.
Globalist policies has been going on past non stop for a decade, a strong conservative movment was bound to happen sooner or later to so correction.
"People shouldn't be so extreme" or "they are getting wrong information" is not something your mind should go to, because you are begging for having even more gov controlled narrative.
On August 21 2026 22:40 LightSpectra wrote:
There's a lot of discourse about how economic downturns directly leads people to fascism or other extremist ideologies, but that hasn't actually played out in history. There have been 30 or so recessions and depressions in United States history and while it's true that Know Nothings and Teabaggers arose after some of them, there were also plenty of similarly-sized extremist groups that arose during prosperous times, and almost all of them petered out without receiving significant political power the way MAGA did. It can't be a coincidence that everyone owning a smartphone with social media coincided with the meteoric rise of far-right movements across the world and it can't simply be explained by material conditions.
There's a lot of discourse about how economic downturns directly leads people to fascism or other extremist ideologies, but that hasn't actually played out in history. There have been 30 or so recessions and depressions in United States history and while it's true that Know Nothings and Teabaggers arose after some of them, there were also plenty of similarly-sized extremist groups that arose during prosperous times, and almost all of them petered out without receiving significant political power the way MAGA did. It can't be a coincidence that everyone owning a smartphone with social media coincided with the meteoric rise of far-right movements across the world and it can't simply be explained by material conditions.
Economic downfall leads to more crime and more radical policies are a known fact.
You can blame it on social media, but social media like any other media, only spread more information.
We aren't being shut in by mainstream media/state media, because people can directly access all sort of information from people being directly impacted.
Globalist policies has been going on past non stop for a decade, a strong conservative movment was bound to happen sooner or later to so correction.
"People shouldn't be so extreme" or "they are getting wrong information" is not something your mind should go to, because you are begging for having even more gov controlled narrative.
To clarify: when I say "social media ban" I actually just mean social media that's organized by hidden algorithms.
I have nothing against internet forums, or how Facebook used to work before there was a general feed that displayed "suggested content" from people/organizations you didn't explicitly opt to follow. These algorithms are cooked with the explicit intent to spread anger, misinformation, and extremism.
I don't know why there must be some "correction" to "globalism", maybe define both of these terms and I can comment on it.
Anger isn't always a bad thing.
So it wouldn't be a bad thing if I said you had an undeveloped brain and whore mother?
What if I told you I don't care about random internet users comment?
It seems like valuable medical information. Why would you not be concerned about this information? Presumably because you already received it from other authoritative sources.
Disgusting behavior.
It’s only information. This is yet another example of right wing censorship of information.
