|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
On October 27 2024 06:44 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2024 05:06 BlackJack wrote:On October 26 2024 21:17 Magic Powers wrote:On October 26 2024 20:21 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:On October 26 2024 20:07 Magic Powers wrote:On October 26 2024 14:02 Taelshin wrote: @Nettles yeah im aobut 2 hrs in I expected Rogan to go a bit harder. Tbh this is going well for trump though this format suits his long rambly ways they even joked about it. If Kamala was capable of this kind of a discussion she really should have, I doubt she is. I told ya'll Joe Rogan is center right. Why would he go harder on a far-right president? Couldn't say for sure unless Kamala also went on and you could compare the treatment between them, but likely he would also treat Kamala with respect.He did go after Trump a bit harder on the debt/deficit issue and the answer Trump gave was pretty lousy, didn't make much sense. Anyway seems to me the electorate is moving right, what other explanation for Kamala deciding now to build a border wall if she is re-elected.Such a dramatic shift there no? It's good to learn from mistakes i guess. When Trump, before and during his presidency, made the border situation out to be a crisis, there was no crisis. He lied. Feel free to look it up, illegal border crossings were at a low point in and before 2020. The situation got worse only after Biden became president, which means it's not the result of Biden's policies. Migration can't spike so rapidly from US border policies, it spiked due to problems in the origin countries. More likely it was because of the economic fallout from the pandemic. And also, Harris wasn't even in charge of border policy to begin with. Republicans framed it that way because they always do this. They always attribute blame to the wrong person as long as it hurts Democrats. Truth goes out the window. Now that there is actually a large spike of illegal border crossings (which is entirely unrelated to US policy), Kamala obviously supports strengthening the border - not because she flip-flopped, but because now there's actually a problem to talk about. A real problem, not a fake problem made up by lying Trump and his supporters. Now it's actually fair to talk of a sort of border crisis. In truth, before and after Trump became president, illegal border crossings to the US were at a low point. Democrats were completely right and Trump was lying his ass off. I found an article explaining this. Feel free to fact check the claims made in it. The outlet has a strong left-wing bias, but they generally adhere to high factuality. https://www.vox.com/politics/361635/kamala-harris-border-czar-immigration-mexico-guatemala-rnc The idea that the surge in border crossings had nothing to do with Biden and he was just the victim of unfortunate timing is laughable. Obviously you've provided no evidence for this theory other than "migration can't spike so rapidly from US border policies." I've previously mentioned in this thread that migrants at the border celebrated Biden's victory in November 2020. Why were they celebrating? Probably because before he was elected he called for migrants to "surge" the border and bragged that America could take in another 2 million people easily. He also killed "Remain in Mexico" and put in a 100 day moratorium on deportations as soon as he got into office, as well as overturning a bunch of other executive orders Trump put in place to reduce border crossings. It's not exactly some mystery. We saw it happening in real time. Here's an NPR article from January 18 2020, just before Biden was inaugurated, that mentioned a several thousand strong caravan of migrants headed to the United States Another migrant, Miguel Angel, tells AFP he's heading north now because he believes U.S. immigration policy will change once Joe Biden takes office as president.
"I have hope and faith in God, and in the good person that the United States has chosen," he says.
"Biden is a good person and isn't the same as the administration that's just ended." Denying Biden's role in this is just willful ignorance at this point. You're providing evidence that one person expresses the desire to go to the US because of US policy. That is not at all evidence that five times more people than before want to go to the US because of that same policy. The first and foremost reason why people move is money. A more lucrative job for example, or a business opportunity. That's been the number one reason for a very long time. Migration to the US experienced a shift during the pandemic, people didn't just come from the same usual countries as before, they came from more different countries. This is explained in the article. The reason isn't in Biden's policy, the reason is in the origin countries. The sudden spike in migration starting 2019 is absolutely gigantic. The US hasn't seen such a drastic shift in decades. Biden's policy cannot explain that. The pandemic however absolutely can. It crushed many people financially and they wanted to find a better place. Most importantly, I'm describing illegal border crossings, not lawful migration. Illegal border crossings quintupled during the pandemic. Don't conflate these two things.
At U.S.-Mexico border, a new U.S. president spurs hope and a rush to enter CBC
But her eyes light up when asked about whether Joe Biden becoming U.S. president influenced her decision to come to the border: "Yes, after he put out that immigrants could come over, I felt it would be a better future, that they might give us documents to be legal in this country."
‘We have faith Biden will let us cross’: migrants huddle at US-Mexico border Financial Times
"I’ve done nothing wrong for all this to happen to me,” said Carpio, 34. “We have faith in God that Biden will let us cross, that there’s a shelter on the other side for us. That’s the only hope we have.”
Asylum-Seekers Hope Biden's Pledge To Welcome Immigrants Includes Them NPR
"Now that there's a new president, I'll keep praying that God touches his heart and they come up with a strategy to help us here," she says. "Life is really rough here."
Biden’s Promise of Immigration Reform Raises Hopes in Latin America The New York Times
“He’s our only hope,” said Gabriela, 28, a Bolivian asylum seeker who has been stuck in the camp for more than a year. She requested that she be identified by only her first name because she and her 3-year-old son were fleeing death threats.
“With Trump there was no hope,” she continued. “Everything was going backward, backward, backward.”
...
“We only want to work,” Mr. Rodríguez explained. Mr. Trump, he continued, “was a little bit hard on migrants, supposedly. And now this government will help us. That’s what we hope for.”
Honduran migrant caravan heading for US pins hopes on new Biden administration Agence France-Presse
"I have hope and faith in God, and in the good person that the United States has chosen," he said. "Biden is a good person and isn't the same as the administration that's just ended."
Biden brings hope for migrants on Mexican-US border France24
Hopes that Biden will be more welcoming to migrants than Trump spurred thousands of would-be asylum seekers to join a northward march this month from Honduras towards the United States.
Is Migrant Caravan Headed for US Because of Biden's Immigration Policies? Snopes
What's True
A caravan of thousands of Honduran migrants pushed its way into Guatemala in mid-January with hopes of eventually reaching the U.S. border. Some members of that group told journalists they were making the trip because of the Biden administration's approach to immigration.
...
Per the AP's report, an 18-year-old member of the caravan, Eber Sosa, expressed the hope of many that something would change with Biden. "Now that the new president is here we are waiting for the answer, all of us immigrants who are here from Honduras," Sosa said. "We are looking to see what the new president says to move forward.”
Another alleged member of the group told a CNN reporter, "I'm dreaming to get to the U.S. [...] because they have a new president. Biden, he's going to help all of us."
Do you got it from here or should I keep going...?
|
Also an increase in migration can be blamed on both Biden's policies and other factors. Both things can be true. I'm not entirely blaming Biden for every migrant that made it into the country in the last 4 years~. But you're the one trying to absolve him for it having nothing to do with his policies. You're just not doing a very good job at it.
|
@BlackJack The sudden spike happened in 2019, not when Biden became president.
Let me just post a graph so you can see it clearly.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/329256/alien-apprehensions-registered-by-the-us-border-patrol/
Notice the spike in 2019? Followed by a drop in 2020? That's not because Biden invited anyone. In 2021 the biggest spike happened, at the height of the pandemic. The 2019 spike doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason, especially not followed by the decline in 2020, which again doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason.
|
On October 27 2024 07:56 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2024 06:44 Magic Powers wrote:On October 27 2024 05:06 BlackJack wrote:On October 26 2024 21:17 Magic Powers wrote:On October 26 2024 20:21 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:On October 26 2024 20:07 Magic Powers wrote:On October 26 2024 14:02 Taelshin wrote: @Nettles yeah im aobut 2 hrs in I expected Rogan to go a bit harder. Tbh this is going well for trump though this format suits his long rambly ways they even joked about it. If Kamala was capable of this kind of a discussion she really should have, I doubt she is. I told ya'll Joe Rogan is center right. Why would he go harder on a far-right president? Couldn't say for sure unless Kamala also went on and you could compare the treatment between them, but likely he would also treat Kamala with respect.He did go after Trump a bit harder on the debt/deficit issue and the answer Trump gave was pretty lousy, didn't make much sense. Anyway seems to me the electorate is moving right, what other explanation for Kamala deciding now to build a border wall if she is re-elected.Such a dramatic shift there no? It's good to learn from mistakes i guess. When Trump, before and during his presidency, made the border situation out to be a crisis, there was no crisis. He lied. Feel free to look it up, illegal border crossings were at a low point in and before 2020. The situation got worse only after Biden became president, which means it's not the result of Biden's policies. Migration can't spike so rapidly from US border policies, it spiked due to problems in the origin countries. More likely it was because of the economic fallout from the pandemic. And also, Harris wasn't even in charge of border policy to begin with. Republicans framed it that way because they always do this. They always attribute blame to the wrong person as long as it hurts Democrats. Truth goes out the window. Now that there is actually a large spike of illegal border crossings (which is entirely unrelated to US policy), Kamala obviously supports strengthening the border - not because she flip-flopped, but because now there's actually a problem to talk about. A real problem, not a fake problem made up by lying Trump and his supporters. Now it's actually fair to talk of a sort of border crisis. In truth, before and after Trump became president, illegal border crossings to the US were at a low point. Democrats were completely right and Trump was lying his ass off. I found an article explaining this. Feel free to fact check the claims made in it. The outlet has a strong left-wing bias, but they generally adhere to high factuality. https://www.vox.com/politics/361635/kamala-harris-border-czar-immigration-mexico-guatemala-rnc The idea that the surge in border crossings had nothing to do with Biden and he was just the victim of unfortunate timing is laughable. Obviously you've provided no evidence for this theory other than "migration can't spike so rapidly from US border policies." I've previously mentioned in this thread that migrants at the border celebrated Biden's victory in November 2020. Why were they celebrating? Probably because before he was elected he called for migrants to "surge" the border and bragged that America could take in another 2 million people easily. He also killed "Remain in Mexico" and put in a 100 day moratorium on deportations as soon as he got into office, as well as overturning a bunch of other executive orders Trump put in place to reduce border crossings. It's not exactly some mystery. We saw it happening in real time. Here's an NPR article from January 18 2020, just before Biden was inaugurated, that mentioned a several thousand strong caravan of migrants headed to the United States Another migrant, Miguel Angel, tells AFP he's heading north now because he believes U.S. immigration policy will change once Joe Biden takes office as president.
"I have hope and faith in God, and in the good person that the United States has chosen," he says.
"Biden is a good person and isn't the same as the administration that's just ended." Denying Biden's role in this is just willful ignorance at this point. You're providing evidence that one person expresses the desire to go to the US because of US policy. That is not at all evidence that five times more people than before want to go to the US because of that same policy. The first and foremost reason why people move is money. A more lucrative job for example, or a business opportunity. That's been the number one reason for a very long time. Migration to the US experienced a shift during the pandemic, people didn't just come from the same usual countries as before, they came from more different countries. This is explained in the article. The reason isn't in Biden's policy, the reason is in the origin countries. The sudden spike in migration starting 2019 is absolutely gigantic. The US hasn't seen such a drastic shift in decades. Biden's policy cannot explain that. The pandemic however absolutely can. It crushed many people financially and they wanted to find a better place. Most importantly, I'm describing illegal border crossings, not lawful migration. Illegal border crossings quintupled during the pandemic. Don't conflate these two things. At U.S.-Mexico border, a new U.S. president spurs hope and a rush to enter CBCShow nested quote +But her eyes light up when asked about whether Joe Biden becoming U.S. president influenced her decision to come to the border: "Yes, after he put out that immigrants could come over, I felt it would be a better future, that they might give us documents to be legal in this country." ‘We have faith Biden will let us cross’: migrants huddle at US-Mexico border Financial TimesShow nested quote +"I’ve done nothing wrong for all this to happen to me,” said Carpio, 34. “We have faith in God that Biden will let us cross, that there’s a shelter on the other side for us. That’s the only hope we have.”
Asylum-Seekers Hope Biden's Pledge To Welcome Immigrants Includes Them NPRShow nested quote +"Now that there's a new president, I'll keep praying that God touches his heart and they come up with a strategy to help us here," she says. "Life is really rough here." Biden’s Promise of Immigration Reform Raises Hopes in Latin America The New York TimesShow nested quote +“He’s our only hope,” said Gabriela, 28, a Bolivian asylum seeker who has been stuck in the camp for more than a year. She requested that she be identified by only her first name because she and her 3-year-old son were fleeing death threats.
“With Trump there was no hope,” she continued. “Everything was going backward, backward, backward.”
...
“We only want to work,” Mr. Rodríguez explained. Mr. Trump, he continued, “was a little bit hard on migrants, supposedly. And now this government will help us. That’s what we hope for.” Honduran migrant caravan heading for US pins hopes on new Biden administration Agence France-PresseShow nested quote +"I have hope and faith in God, and in the good person that the United States has chosen," he said. "Biden is a good person and isn't the same as the administration that's just ended." Biden brings hope for migrants on Mexican-US border France24Show nested quote +Hopes that Biden will be more welcoming to migrants than Trump spurred thousands of would-be asylum seekers to join a northward march this month from Honduras towards the United States. Is Migrant Caravan Headed for US Because of Biden's Immigration Policies? SnopesShow nested quote +What's True
A caravan of thousands of Honduran migrants pushed its way into Guatemala in mid-January with hopes of eventually reaching the U.S. border. Some members of that group told journalists they were making the trip because of the Biden administration's approach to immigration.
...
Per the AP's report, an 18-year-old member of the caravan, Eber Sosa, expressed the hope of many that something would change with Biden. "Now that the new president is here we are waiting for the answer, all of us immigrants who are here from Honduras," Sosa said. "We are looking to see what the new president says to move forward.”
Another alleged member of the group told a CNN reporter, "I'm dreaming to get to the U.S. [...] because they have a new president. Biden, he's going to help all of us." Do you got it from here or should I keep going...?
Even if someone is so stubborn to refuse to acknowledge how Biden's policies contributed to this, defenders have to explain why he he didn't fix, why it persisted for so long, and why they had to resort to essentially breaking the law in order to "bring the numbers down."
|
On October 25 2024 05:00 Ryzel wrote: Good lord, I was 30 pages behind a few days ago and just binged to catch up hoping I’d find something of substance. Man was I sorely mistaken. DPB and Introvert’s discussion was OK, and I think Uldridge tried his best like 10 pages ago with a particularly good question, but I can’t even remember what it was anymore because it’s been drowned in a quagmire of bullshit and bad faith discussions. Bless your heart DPB but if your intent is substantive discussions with people like the avatar of the outrage machine and a guy cosplaying as a lib normie radicalizer, you’re wasting your time.
ChristianS, farv, how much do you guys charge per 1k+ word insightful post? Is it hourly? PM me rates. I wish there was a conservative IgnE for people to engage with in good faith. Introvert is alright but I understand it’s exhausting for one person. DPB deserves better.
Thank you. We all deserve better.
|
What are the Biden policies that didn't work and what were the Trump ones that did? Because the times look like it could be covid.
Edit: To be clear when I'm saying Covid, I'm not just talking about US policy but the global impact hurting southern economies as well, creating more migrants looking for a better life.
|
Anyone have good polling as to early republican voters and if they intend to vote against Trump? Someone mentioned it may be as high as 10% but that seems insanely high to me
|
On October 27 2024 08:13 Magic Powers wrote:@BlackJack The sudden spike happened in 2019, not when Biden became president. Let me just post a graph so you can see it clearly. https://www.statista.com/statistics/329256/alien-apprehensions-registered-by-the-us-border-patrol/Notice the spike in 2019? Followed by a drop in 2020? That's not because Biden invited anyone. In 2021 the biggest spike happened, at the height of the pandemic. The 2019 spike doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason, especially not followed by the decline in 2020, which again doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason. The spike in 2019 not being Biden doesn't mean the (much larger and more sustained) spike during Biden's presidency wasn't Biden.
And the main issue people have with Biden is not how many people come, but how many get in, are allowed in, and are literally brought in.
|
On October 27 2024 13:40 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2024 08:13 Magic Powers wrote:@BlackJack The sudden spike happened in 2019, not when Biden became president. Let me just post a graph so you can see it clearly. https://www.statista.com/statistics/329256/alien-apprehensions-registered-by-the-us-border-patrol/Notice the spike in 2019? Followed by a drop in 2020? That's not because Biden invited anyone. In 2021 the biggest spike happened, at the height of the pandemic. The 2019 spike doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason, especially not followed by the decline in 2020, which again doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason. The spike in 2019 not being Biden doesn't mean the (much larger and more sustained) spike during Biden's presidency wasn't Biden. And the main issue people have with Biden is not how many people come, but how many get in, are allowed in, and are literally brought in.
Obama had a downtrend, too. The president's policies clearly don't explain the ups and downs.
|
On October 25 2024 05:00 Ryzel wrote: Good lord, I was 30 pages behind a few days ago and just binged to catch up hoping I’d find something of substance. Man was I sorely mistaken. DPB and Introvert’s discussion was OK, and I think Uldridge tried his best like 10 pages ago with a particularly good question, but I can’t even remember what it was anymore because it’s been drowned in a quagmire of bullshit and bad faith discussions. Bless your heart DPB but if your intent is substantive discussions with people like the avatar of the outrage machine and a guy cosplaying as a lib normie radicalizer, you’re wasting your time.
ChristianS, farv, how much do you guys charge per 1k+ word insightful post? Is it hourly? PM me rates. I wish there was a conservative IgnE for people to engage with in good faith. Introvert is alright but I understand it’s exhausting for one person. DPB deserves better. I appreciate the shout-out, somehow I missed this the first time. Not sure whether you’d count my recent back and forth with BJ as “insightful” though. Honestly I’ve had a lot of stuff going on in my personal life the last few months that has somewhat constrained my time (and greatly constrained my motivation) to post in the thread.
I do also think, though, that it’s a tough political moment to say anything particularly useful. Seems like we’re pretty decently likely to elect Donald Trump president again, despite his platform consisting almost entirely of promises to commit crimes and atrocities. I’m not as confident as, say, GH that he’ll win – seems maybe 60-40 or so right now – and it seems a bit premature to start the eulogy or post-mortem.
Supposing Harris wins on Election Day, we can look forward to whatever legal and extralegal maneuvers the Trump folks will try to get into power anyway. They’ve spent a lot of time worming their way into various election administration roles in the last few years, and just generally purging their ranks of anyone who isn’t on-board with stealing the election by any means necessary, so we’ll see if any of that bears fruit. Surely they’ll do a bunch of court cases again, maybe we’ll get a test of the state legislature theory. Maybe there will be another showdown over certifying the election results on January 6th, or even another attempt at forcing a conclusion through mob violence. Maybe all of the above. Republican rhetoric has gotten pretty “Day of the Rope” this cycle, it’s hard to imagine them just standing down with an “aw shucks, better luck next time.”
But hope springs eternal, maybe we get through all that with minimal constitutional crises and a new Harris administration starts. The world is looking, uh, pretty rough. The war in Ukraine, regardless of its conclusion, makes pretty clear that the international order can’t actually stop your powerful neighbors from invading you, and at best can offer money and equipment if your citizens are prepared to pay the high price of fighting off invaders. And even that version of the international order is so much weaker now, with its moral foundation so deeply undermined in Palestine. The immediate consequences are horrific for both Ukraine and Palestine, but the medium-term consequences are maybe even worse if governments all over the world take this as a signal that conquest is back on the menu.
War and desperation create refugees and asylum seekers, which fuel right-wing authoritarian movements, which create more war and desperation, all while climate change destabilizes systems that might otherwise have withstood the war and desperation. We’re not on track for a good 21st century, and I think there’s a real possibility for it to see even worse atrocities than the 20th. But for the moment there’s not a lot to say or do except watch Pennsylvania for who is gonna squeeze out a couple thousand vote margin, because this election still has quite a lot of significance for determining which cliff we’re going to fall off first, and how soon we’ll reach it.
|
On October 28 2024 00:34 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On October 27 2024 13:40 oBlade wrote:On October 27 2024 08:13 Magic Powers wrote:@BlackJack The sudden spike happened in 2019, not when Biden became president. Let me just post a graph so you can see it clearly. https://www.statista.com/statistics/329256/alien-apprehensions-registered-by-the-us-border-patrol/Notice the spike in 2019? Followed by a drop in 2020? That's not because Biden invited anyone. In 2021 the biggest spike happened, at the height of the pandemic. The 2019 spike doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason, especially not followed by the decline in 2020, which again doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason. The spike in 2019 not being Biden doesn't mean the (much larger and more sustained) spike during Biden's presidency wasn't Biden. And the main issue people have with Biden is not how many people come, but how many get in, are allowed in, and are literally brought in. Obama had a downtrend, too. The president's policies clearly don't explain the ups and downs. They are not the sole factor; however, they have demonstrable effects otherwise it doesn't matter who the president is and we can all just go home.
No offense but you may not know enough about the relevant policies to this issue to make a judgment of what affects what, you're looking at a graph in the simplest possible sense and even then drawing incredibly counterintuitive conclusions. Get a modicum of background knowledge.
In 2019 there was unrest in Venezuela, Guatemala, El Salvador, etc. Some of that continues to this day and add Haiti and Nicaragua to the mix. The main thing behind the immediate drawback was Drumpf negotiated with Mexico using the threat of tariffs to increase enforcement by Mexico within Mexico and set up safe third country agreements with other countries, reducing the flow of people who have no right to waltz across the border arriving to it to begin with.
|
On October 28 2024 01:20 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 28 2024 00:34 Magic Powers wrote:On October 27 2024 13:40 oBlade wrote:On October 27 2024 08:13 Magic Powers wrote:@BlackJack The sudden spike happened in 2019, not when Biden became president. Let me just post a graph so you can see it clearly. https://www.statista.com/statistics/329256/alien-apprehensions-registered-by-the-us-border-patrol/Notice the spike in 2019? Followed by a drop in 2020? That's not because Biden invited anyone. In 2021 the biggest spike happened, at the height of the pandemic. The 2019 spike doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason, especially not followed by the decline in 2020, which again doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason. The spike in 2019 not being Biden doesn't mean the (much larger and more sustained) spike during Biden's presidency wasn't Biden. And the main issue people have with Biden is not how many people come, but how many get in, are allowed in, and are literally brought in. Obama had a downtrend, too. The president's policies clearly don't explain the ups and downs. They are not the sole factor; however, they have demonstrable effects otherwise it doesn't matter who the president is and we can all just go home. No offense but you may not know enough about the relevant policies to this issue to make a judgment of what affects what, you're looking at a graph in the simplest possible sense and even then drawing incredibly counterintuitive conclusions. Get a modicum of background knowledge. In 2019 there was unrest in Venezuela, Guatemala, El Salvador, etc. Some of that continues to this day and add Haiti and Nicaragua to the mix. The main thing behind the immediate drawback was Drumpf negotiated with Mexico using the threat of tariffs to increase enforcement by Mexico within Mexico and set up safe third country agreements with other countries, reducing the flow of people who have no right to waltz across the border arriving to it to begin with.
The point is that the pandemic had the biggest effect. It's not about "sole reason", of course Biden's policies also have an effect. Two things can be true at the same time. The argument that Biden's policies caused five times more border hoppings is not well substantiated. The pandemic is by far the best explanation as the major driver, it lines up perfectly time wise and other causes are further down the list.
|
On October 28 2024 02:33 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On October 28 2024 01:20 oBlade wrote:On October 28 2024 00:34 Magic Powers wrote:On October 27 2024 13:40 oBlade wrote:On October 27 2024 08:13 Magic Powers wrote:@BlackJack The sudden spike happened in 2019, not when Biden became president. Let me just post a graph so you can see it clearly. https://www.statista.com/statistics/329256/alien-apprehensions-registered-by-the-us-border-patrol/Notice the spike in 2019? Followed by a drop in 2020? That's not because Biden invited anyone. In 2021 the biggest spike happened, at the height of the pandemic. The 2019 spike doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason, especially not followed by the decline in 2020, which again doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason. The spike in 2019 not being Biden doesn't mean the (much larger and more sustained) spike during Biden's presidency wasn't Biden. And the main issue people have with Biden is not how many people come, but how many get in, are allowed in, and are literally brought in. Obama had a downtrend, too. The president's policies clearly don't explain the ups and downs. They are not the sole factor; however, they have demonstrable effects otherwise it doesn't matter who the president is and we can all just go home. No offense but you may not know enough about the relevant policies to this issue to make a judgment of what affects what, you're looking at a graph in the simplest possible sense and even then drawing incredibly counterintuitive conclusions. Get a modicum of background knowledge. In 2019 there was unrest in Venezuela, Guatemala, El Salvador, etc. Some of that continues to this day and add Haiti and Nicaragua to the mix. The main thing behind the immediate drawback was Drumpf negotiated with Mexico using the threat of tariffs to increase enforcement by Mexico within Mexico and set up safe third country agreements with other countries, reducing the flow of people who have no right to waltz across the border arriving to it to begin with. The point is that the pandemic had the biggest effect. It's not about "sole reason", of course Biden's policies also have an effect. Two things can be true at the same time. The argument that Biden's policies caused five times more border hoppings is not well substantiated. The pandemic is by far the best explanation as the major driver, it lines up perfectly time wise and other causes are further down the list.
How would the pandemic drive immigration/emigration? I'm asking genuinely! On the surface I'd assume that a recent period of time where international travel was most difficult, moving to a country with famously inaccessible health care would not be high on the list of priorities.
I assume it has something to do with economic opportunity? I'm just curious what makes it the best explanation as the major driver.
|
The whole world closed borders including things like travel visa's (which is how many illegals get in) creating a back log. Then Covid did a number on basically every economy creating a greater reason to leave where ever they were,
|
On October 28 2024 02:33 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On October 28 2024 01:20 oBlade wrote:On October 28 2024 00:34 Magic Powers wrote:On October 27 2024 13:40 oBlade wrote:On October 27 2024 08:13 Magic Powers wrote:@BlackJack The sudden spike happened in 2019, not when Biden became president. Let me just post a graph so you can see it clearly. https://www.statista.com/statistics/329256/alien-apprehensions-registered-by-the-us-border-patrol/Notice the spike in 2019? Followed by a drop in 2020? That's not because Biden invited anyone. In 2021 the biggest spike happened, at the height of the pandemic. The 2019 spike doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason, especially not followed by the decline in 2020, which again doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason. The spike in 2019 not being Biden doesn't mean the (much larger and more sustained) spike during Biden's presidency wasn't Biden. And the main issue people have with Biden is not how many people come, but how many get in, are allowed in, and are literally brought in. Obama had a downtrend, too. The president's policies clearly don't explain the ups and downs. They are not the sole factor; however, they have demonstrable effects otherwise it doesn't matter who the president is and we can all just go home. No offense but you may not know enough about the relevant policies to this issue to make a judgment of what affects what, you're looking at a graph in the simplest possible sense and even then drawing incredibly counterintuitive conclusions. Get a modicum of background knowledge. In 2019 there was unrest in Venezuela, Guatemala, El Salvador, etc. Some of that continues to this day and add Haiti and Nicaragua to the mix. The main thing behind the immediate drawback was Drumpf negotiated with Mexico using the threat of tariffs to increase enforcement by Mexico within Mexico and set up safe third country agreements with other countries, reducing the flow of people who have no right to waltz across the border arriving to it to begin with. The point is that the pandemic had the biggest effect. It's not about "sole reason", of course Biden's policies also have an effect. Two things can be true at the same time. The argument that Biden's policies caused five times more border hoppings is not well substantiated. The pandemic is by far the best explanation as the major driver, it lines up perfectly time wise and other causes are further down the list. By your pejorative logic the pandemic making 5 times as many people in the world's life shit holds equally no water. We're talking about a worldwide pandemic here. One that also existed in the US which makes me doubt this whole thesis of escaping a pandemic. What other countries suffered 5x increase border crises at the same time continuing to the current year?
You see FY21 as the "height" of the pandemic to make it line up with a spike, while ignoring all of 2020 which was equally a pandemic and had comparatively no issue. Yet anyone can see 2021 is not the peak, in two ways, first that it's not the highest, and second that it didn't go down again, which is what peaks do - the "peak" was 2023 and in reality the numbers are a shining plateau of Biden incompetence from FY22 to FY24 - which ought to be well past the height of the pandemic you claim. So this is lacking.
You need to look at these stats which include more than CBP, which mostly handles border of stretches, to include encounters at/near ports of entry too:
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics
Notice the huge increase of people getting nabbed under OFO - the reason is because they believe the current administration is welcoming them. And since Title 42 ended in mid-2023 they can't be expelled under that anymore.
|
On October 28 2024 03:08 Fleetfeet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 28 2024 02:33 Magic Powers wrote:On October 28 2024 01:20 oBlade wrote:On October 28 2024 00:34 Magic Powers wrote:On October 27 2024 13:40 oBlade wrote:On October 27 2024 08:13 Magic Powers wrote:@BlackJack The sudden spike happened in 2019, not when Biden became president. Let me just post a graph so you can see it clearly. https://www.statista.com/statistics/329256/alien-apprehensions-registered-by-the-us-border-patrol/Notice the spike in 2019? Followed by a drop in 2020? That's not because Biden invited anyone. In 2021 the biggest spike happened, at the height of the pandemic. The 2019 spike doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason, especially not followed by the decline in 2020, which again doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason. The spike in 2019 not being Biden doesn't mean the (much larger and more sustained) spike during Biden's presidency wasn't Biden. And the main issue people have with Biden is not how many people come, but how many get in, are allowed in, and are literally brought in. Obama had a downtrend, too. The president's policies clearly don't explain the ups and downs. They are not the sole factor; however, they have demonstrable effects otherwise it doesn't matter who the president is and we can all just go home. No offense but you may not know enough about the relevant policies to this issue to make a judgment of what affects what, you're looking at a graph in the simplest possible sense and even then drawing incredibly counterintuitive conclusions. Get a modicum of background knowledge. In 2019 there was unrest in Venezuela, Guatemala, El Salvador, etc. Some of that continues to this day and add Haiti and Nicaragua to the mix. The main thing behind the immediate drawback was Drumpf negotiated with Mexico using the threat of tariffs to increase enforcement by Mexico within Mexico and set up safe third country agreements with other countries, reducing the flow of people who have no right to waltz across the border arriving to it to begin with. The point is that the pandemic had the biggest effect. It's not about "sole reason", of course Biden's policies also have an effect. Two things can be true at the same time. The argument that Biden's policies caused five times more border hoppings is not well substantiated. The pandemic is by far the best explanation as the major driver, it lines up perfectly time wise and other causes are further down the list. How would the pandemic drive immigration/emigration? I'm asking genuinely! On the surface I'd assume that a recent period of time where international travel was most difficult, moving to a country with famously inaccessible health care would not be high on the list of priorities. I assume it has something to do with economic opportunity? I'm just curious what makes it the best explanation as the major driver.
The pandemic drove a lot of people into financial adversity. People who were already in or around the bottom class got hit especially hard. They wanted to escape to a country for job opportunities, and the US was an obvious choice. It's not that the US is known for great healthcare, that's not the issue. It's that - both legal and illegal - work was more accessible there than in the countries of origin where the economy was more dire.
|
On October 27 2024 11:34 Husyelt wrote: Anyone have good polling as to early republican voters and if they intend to vote against Trump? Someone mentioned it may be as high as 10% but that seems insanely high to me
I'm unaware of such data, but that would be pretty cool to find out. We'll probably learn of such things after the election is over.
|
On October 28 2024 04:01 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On October 28 2024 03:08 Fleetfeet wrote:On October 28 2024 02:33 Magic Powers wrote:On October 28 2024 01:20 oBlade wrote:On October 28 2024 00:34 Magic Powers wrote:On October 27 2024 13:40 oBlade wrote:On October 27 2024 08:13 Magic Powers wrote:@BlackJack The sudden spike happened in 2019, not when Biden became president. Let me just post a graph so you can see it clearly. https://www.statista.com/statistics/329256/alien-apprehensions-registered-by-the-us-border-patrol/Notice the spike in 2019? Followed by a drop in 2020? That's not because Biden invited anyone. In 2021 the biggest spike happened, at the height of the pandemic. The 2019 spike doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason, especially not followed by the decline in 2020, which again doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason. The spike in 2019 not being Biden doesn't mean the (much larger and more sustained) spike during Biden's presidency wasn't Biden. And the main issue people have with Biden is not how many people come, but how many get in, are allowed in, and are literally brought in. Obama had a downtrend, too. The president's policies clearly don't explain the ups and downs. They are not the sole factor; however, they have demonstrable effects otherwise it doesn't matter who the president is and we can all just go home. No offense but you may not know enough about the relevant policies to this issue to make a judgment of what affects what, you're looking at a graph in the simplest possible sense and even then drawing incredibly counterintuitive conclusions. Get a modicum of background knowledge. In 2019 there was unrest in Venezuela, Guatemala, El Salvador, etc. Some of that continues to this day and add Haiti and Nicaragua to the mix. The main thing behind the immediate drawback was Drumpf negotiated with Mexico using the threat of tariffs to increase enforcement by Mexico within Mexico and set up safe third country agreements with other countries, reducing the flow of people who have no right to waltz across the border arriving to it to begin with. The point is that the pandemic had the biggest effect. It's not about "sole reason", of course Biden's policies also have an effect. Two things can be true at the same time. The argument that Biden's policies caused five times more border hoppings is not well substantiated. The pandemic is by far the best explanation as the major driver, it lines up perfectly time wise and other causes are further down the list. How would the pandemic drive immigration/emigration? I'm asking genuinely! On the surface I'd assume that a recent period of time where international travel was most difficult, moving to a country with famously inaccessible health care would not be high on the list of priorities. I assume it has something to do with economic opportunity? I'm just curious what makes it the best explanation as the major driver. The pandemic drove a lot of people into financial adversity. People who were already in or around the bottom class got hit especially hard. They wanted to escape to a country for job opportunities, and the US was an obvious choice. It's not that the US is known for great healthcare, that's not the issue. It's that - both legal and illegal - work was more accessible there than in the countries of origin where the economy was more dire. Could work being more accessible to them in the US, or their perception thereof, possibly be a function of the policies of the administration running the US?
|
On October 28 2024 01:10 ChristianS wrote:Show nested quote +On October 25 2024 05:00 Ryzel wrote: Good lord, I was 30 pages behind a few days ago and just binged to catch up hoping I’d find something of substance. Man was I sorely mistaken. DPB and Introvert’s discussion was OK, and I think Uldridge tried his best like 10 pages ago with a particularly good question, but I can’t even remember what it was anymore because it’s been drowned in a quagmire of bullshit and bad faith discussions. Bless your heart DPB but if your intent is substantive discussions with people like the avatar of the outrage machine and a guy cosplaying as a lib normie radicalizer, you’re wasting your time.
ChristianS, farv, how much do you guys charge per 1k+ word insightful post? Is it hourly? PM me rates. I wish there was a conservative IgnE for people to engage with in good faith. Introvert is alright but I understand it’s exhausting for one person. DPB deserves better. + Show Spoiler +I appreciate the shout-out, somehow I missed this the first time. Not sure whether you’d count my recent back and forth with BJ as “insightful” though. Honestly I’ve had a lot of stuff going on in my personal life the last few months that has somewhat constrained my time (and greatly constrained my motivation) to post in the thread.
I do also think, though, that it’s a tough political moment to say anything particularly useful. Seems like we’re pretty decently likely to elect Donald Trump president again, despite his platform consisting almost entirely of promises to commit crimes and atrocities. I’m not as confident as, say, GH that he’ll win – seems maybe 60-40 or so right now – and it seems a bit premature to start the eulogy or post-mortem. + Show Spoiler +Supposing Harris wins on Election Day, we can look forward to whatever legal and extralegal maneuvers the Trump folks will try to get into power anyway. They’ve spent a lot of time worming their way into various election administration roles in the last few years, and just generally purging their ranks of anyone who isn’t on-board with stealing the election by any means necessary, so we’ll see if any of that bears fruit. Surely they’ll do a bunch of court cases again, maybe we’ll get a test of the state legislature theory. Maybe there will be another showdown over certifying the election results on January 6th, or even another attempt at forcing a conclusion through mob violence. Maybe all of the above. Republican rhetoric has gotten pretty “Day of the Rope” this cycle, it’s hard to imagine them just standing down with an “aw shucks, better luck next time.”
But hope springs eternal, maybe we get through all that with minimal constitutional crises and a new Harris administration starts. The world is looking, uh, pretty rough. The war in Ukraine, regardless of its conclusion, makes pretty clear that the international order can’t actually stop your powerful neighbors from invading you, and at best can offer money and equipment if your citizens are prepared to pay the high price of fighting off invaders. And even that version of the international order is so much weaker now, with its moral foundation so deeply undermined in Palestine. The immediate consequences are horrific for both Ukraine and Palestine, but the medium-term consequences are maybe even worse if governments all over the world take this as a signal that conquest is back on the menu.
War and desperation create refugees and asylum seekers, which fuel right-wing authoritarian movements, which create more war and desperation, all while climate change destabilizes systems that might otherwise have withstood the war and desperation. We’re not on track for a good 21st century, and I think there’s a real possibility for it to see even worse atrocities than the 20th. But for the moment there’s not a lot to say or do except watch Pennsylvania for who is gonna squeeze out a couple thousand vote margin, because this election still has quite a lot of significance for determining which cliff we’re going to fall off first, and how soon we’ll reach it. Well, this is what I last said, but I'd agree on roughly 60-40 favoring Trump at this point. It's sort of a silly thing to say though. Just because if the trends hold for the next week or so it could be 90-10 Trump. Then Harris could still inexplicably win and it wouldn't invalidate a theoretical 90-10 prediction for Trump
|
On October 28 2024 04:06 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 28 2024 04:01 Magic Powers wrote:On October 28 2024 03:08 Fleetfeet wrote:On October 28 2024 02:33 Magic Powers wrote:On October 28 2024 01:20 oBlade wrote:On October 28 2024 00:34 Magic Powers wrote:On October 27 2024 13:40 oBlade wrote:On October 27 2024 08:13 Magic Powers wrote:@BlackJack The sudden spike happened in 2019, not when Biden became president. Let me just post a graph so you can see it clearly. https://www.statista.com/statistics/329256/alien-apprehensions-registered-by-the-us-border-patrol/Notice the spike in 2019? Followed by a drop in 2020? That's not because Biden invited anyone. In 2021 the biggest spike happened, at the height of the pandemic. The 2019 spike doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason, especially not followed by the decline in 2020, which again doesn't make sense if Biden was the reason. The spike in 2019 not being Biden doesn't mean the (much larger and more sustained) spike during Biden's presidency wasn't Biden. And the main issue people have with Biden is not how many people come, but how many get in, are allowed in, and are literally brought in. Obama had a downtrend, too. The president's policies clearly don't explain the ups and downs. They are not the sole factor; however, they have demonstrable effects otherwise it doesn't matter who the president is and we can all just go home. No offense but you may not know enough about the relevant policies to this issue to make a judgment of what affects what, you're looking at a graph in the simplest possible sense and even then drawing incredibly counterintuitive conclusions. Get a modicum of background knowledge. In 2019 there was unrest in Venezuela, Guatemala, El Salvador, etc. Some of that continues to this day and add Haiti and Nicaragua to the mix. The main thing behind the immediate drawback was Drumpf negotiated with Mexico using the threat of tariffs to increase enforcement by Mexico within Mexico and set up safe third country agreements with other countries, reducing the flow of people who have no right to waltz across the border arriving to it to begin with. The point is that the pandemic had the biggest effect. It's not about "sole reason", of course Biden's policies also have an effect. Two things can be true at the same time. The argument that Biden's policies caused five times more border hoppings is not well substantiated. The pandemic is by far the best explanation as the major driver, it lines up perfectly time wise and other causes are further down the list. How would the pandemic drive immigration/emigration? I'm asking genuinely! On the surface I'd assume that a recent period of time where international travel was most difficult, moving to a country with famously inaccessible health care would not be high on the list of priorities. I assume it has something to do with economic opportunity? I'm just curious what makes it the best explanation as the major driver. The pandemic drove a lot of people into financial adversity. People who were already in or around the bottom class got hit especially hard. They wanted to escape to a country for job opportunities, and the US was an obvious choice. It's not that the US is known for great healthcare, that's not the issue. It's that - both legal and illegal - work was more accessible there than in the countries of origin where the economy was more dire. Could work being more accessible to them in the US, or their perception thereof, possibly be a function of the policies of the administration running the US?
Like I said, both. It can increase immigration. But it wouldn't result in a five times increase in illegal border crossing. Without a work visa people don't have legal job opportunities. Biden's rhetoric couldn't have this much of an impact. As I said, why else would there have been a similar spike in 2019, and why wouldn't there have been any spikes during both of Obama's terms?
|
|
|
|