EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 1603
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States43565 Posts
On June 28 2019 10:42 Danglars wrote: “Want a better life through asylum.” The Asylum Process: Your portal to a better life. It's certainly not the best way of expressing "want to avoid a much worse life of persecution and violence through asylum". Asylum is meant to be people who are forced out of their homes, not encouraged in to ours. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15736 Posts
| ||
|
Introvert
United States4894 Posts
| ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
9025 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Introvert
United States4894 Posts
On June 28 2019 10:47 xDaunt wrote: Like I said, Democrats have a pro-open borders policy problem. did you catch the moderator calling the 3 million "Americans." This "decriminalize the border" thing is the new euphemism. it could have just been a slip up, but the way he's been going... | ||
|
KwarK
United States43565 Posts
On June 28 2019 10:47 xDaunt wrote: Like I said, Democrats have a pro-open borders policy problem. They're not pro-open borders. They're just anti inhumane camps. This isn't an issue with two extreme positions and no middle ground. | ||
|
Nebuchad
Switzerland12387 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15736 Posts
On June 28 2019 10:49 KwarK wrote: They're not pro-open borders. They're just anti inhumane camps. This isn't an issue with two extreme positions and no middle ground. They are saying if you show up and say "my life is really bad back home", they can stay, at least for a while. Then what? Deported later? Depending on what criteria? I am hearing nothing about who gets denied. Does anyone get denied? | ||
|
Introvert
United States4894 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
9025 Posts
| ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On June 28 2019 10:46 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote: Biden is rambling. He's done after 2-3 more "debates". I think his most recent answer was good though. He was off before that. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15736 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States43565 Posts
On June 28 2019 10:52 Mohdoo wrote: They are saying if you show up and say "my life is really bad back home", they can stay, at least for a while. Then what? Deported later? Depending on what criteria? I am hearing nothing about who gets denied. Does anyone get denied? A significant majority denied. Seeking asylum is really hard. The problem is there are very few asylum judges and the system is massively backlogged. If they actually had a working system it would be a case of showing up, making your case at the port of entry, then getting returned back to the other side of the border with your suitcase. Instead we have people showing up and being put on a five year waitlist before kicking them back out. The nationality most commonly approved for asylum is Chinese fleeing religious persecution because they get a lot of help making their claims from churches. The gov doesn't provide any representation for asylum hearings and the judges have almost no time per case. When people think asylum seeker they should be thinking Chinese Christian fleeing religious persecution in PRC, not Mexican, but the biases are pretty entrenched. | ||
|
KlaCkoN
Sweden1661 Posts
On June 28 2019 10:53 xDaunt wrote: Decriminalizing illegal immigration is an open borders policy. There's no way around it. ?? The same way speeding not being criminal means that it's totally ok to drive 85 on a 50 road? | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On June 28 2019 10:59 KlaCkoN wrote: ?? The same way speeding not being criminal means that it's totally ok to drive 85 on a 50 road? Lol, speeding offenses are criminal offenses. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23635 Posts
Also Buttigieg is going to get an anomalous amount of searches related to spelling his name right, not political interest. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
| ||
